Essay 2: The Characterization of Dee in Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use”( you need find the article Everyday Use on internet)

The process of characterization is that which every author uses to make, build, or create a character. In most cases this process is carried out in three ways: 1) the author has the character say things that tell us what kind of person he or she is, 2) the author has the character do things that reveal what sort of person we are reading about (or hearing, or seeing), and 3) the author also often has other people reveal things about the character (the closer to the person another character is the better—more reliable—is the information).

First, use the following title:

The Characterization of Dee in Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use” (not in bold please)

Your thesis—the final sentence in your first paragraph—must be something like the following:

In “Everyday Use,” Dee is characterized by what she does, what she says, and what others say about her.

or

In Alice Walker’s “Everyday Use” Dee is characterized by what she does, what she says, and what others say about her.

Your next three topic sentences—the first sentence in each of the next three paragraphs must be—(1) Dee is characterized by what she does. (2)Dee is further characterized by what she says. (3)Dee is also characterized by what others say about her. These must be the opening sentences of paragraphs two through four.

Your final paragraph—a conclusion—must begin with (one of the following) In conclusion, Finally, or In summary, or even another equally conspicuous and emphatic transition to a concluding statement/paragraph.

Clearly, what you have to do is fill in your paragraphs with the appropriate materials. In paragraph one you should introduce your topic in a general way, concluding with an explicit thesis. Your body, the three interior paragraphs, must provide adequate “proof” through particular instances—explicitly quoted from the text—that substantiate the assertion of the topic sentence. You must include explicit things the personsays and does, as well as important things others sayabout the person in order to satisfy these requirements. Your conclusion must conclude. In other words, you must give no further support—the province of the interior paragraphs—the body of the essay. You must pull things together, remind the reader what you have attempted to do, and be certain to revisit the key words in your thesis—and title as well—(here at least—your character’s name and the word characterization).

If this essay seems fundamental, of course it is. The assignment is to remind you of the old standard five-paragraph essay format: tell them what you are going to tell them—tell them—then tell them what you told them. The instructor will then grade the essay and return it to you. Then you are to examine all marks and comments, communicate with the instructor if necessary, and rewrite the essay, submitting it for the second time. Both efforts will receive a grade: the second is actually somewhat more important than the first.

If you understand that this essay is on characterization . . . not Dee, then you are on your way to a good paper with adequate focus.

more than 750 words, double spaced, and in 12 point font with one inch margins. Your name, the instructor’s name, the course number, and date need to be in the upper left hand corner of the first page. Your last name and the page number should appear in the upper right hand corner of each page. In other words the full MLA format.

In a 750-1000 word essay, please respond to the following:

Analyze and explain Epicurus’ famous proclamation: “Thanks be to blessed Nature because she has made what is necessary easy to supply, and what is not easy unnecessary…The right understanding of these facts enables us to refer all choice and avoidance to the health of the body and the soul’s freedom from disturbance, since this is the aim of the life of blessedness.” Do you agree or disagree with this assessment of the good life, and why?

In support of your argument, please refer to specific passages from the video (Alain de Botton’s “Epicurus on Happiness—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness,” available on YouTube via the link below) as well as to your own life experiences and observations.

Epicurus on Happiness—Philosophy: A Guide to Happiness

Applied Philosophy Paper Grading Rubric:

The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading.
1.
Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly
grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the
basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used
correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student’s independent thought, and is written
in his or her distinctive voice. Quotations are used, when appropriate, to support the
writer’s analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation.

25 points

2.
Essay has clear and coherent argument: There is a clearly stated thesis, and support
for this thesis in the body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and
follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented is persuasive.

25 points

3.
Essay fulfills assigned task: The essay addresses the entire assigned question or
topic, elaborating on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in
anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and provides
clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and accurately defined. Each paragraph
conveys a coherent, organized thought.

20 points

4.
Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing: the writer shows that he or she
is comfortable using philosophical language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The
structure of the sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed.

15 points

5.
Essay is technically correct: The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully
proofread. The argument is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does
not mislead the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice, and
punctuation.

15 points

Product Development & Operations – Category Manager Analysis

Due Date

Week 3

Note: While representative of possible situations faced by Alikay Naturals, all scenarios in this assignment are fictional.

Real Business

Let’s roll up our sleeves and use what we’ve learned this week in a
real-life business situation. Each week, you’ll encounter a scenario
where you will assume the role of a business person who works with or at
a national discount retail store, like a Walmart or Target. These
companies provide important, everyday staples for millions of people
across the country and have become very successful businesses in the
process.

Discount retail stores have locations in communities across the
country. They often have strong and recognizable brands that are
household names. We will explore how business works throughout this
course by taking on a few of the many different roles at successful
companies like these.

Your Role

This week, you’ll assume the role of a Category Manager for the Beauty Products category at a national discount retail store.

WHAT IS A CATEGORY MANAGER?

Category Managers are responsible for related groups of products (for
example, baseball equipment or laundry detergents) for a retail
business. They use research, information and insights about the category
to change shopper behavior and increase sales of the products in the
category. They also work with the suppliers of the products in their
category to ensure that good products and services are available to
customers.

As a Category Manager, part of your role is to analyze data and
information about how well a product is selling to help the maker of
that product improve the product and consider introducing new products.
Rochelle and her team at Alikay Naturals have asked you, the Beauty
Products Category Manager, to review one of their products and determine
where it lies in the product life cycle. Additionally, they have asked
you to recommend ways to improve the product in order to increase sales.

INSTRUCTIONS

Click DOWNLOAD TEMPLATE and DOWNLOAD RESOURCES at the bottom for all of your assignment materials!

Step 1: Product Life Cycle

Read the Product Report for Alikay Naturals
Moisturizing Black Soap Shampoo. The Product Report contains important
information that will help you to identify where the product stands in
the Product Life Cycle and give you clues about what changes customers
might like to see. Respond to Rochelle and her team at Alikay Naturals
based on the information in the Product Report.

• Identify where Moisturizing Black Soap Shampoo is currently
  positioned in the product life cycle. Write 2-3 sentences describing the
  rationale for your position.

Step 2: Product Changes

Based on what you’ve learned:

• What recommendation(s) do you have for Alikay Naturals to improve or
  replace Moisturizing Black Soap Shampoo? Write 2-5 sentences that
  support your recommendation(s).

Step 3: New Product Development

Read the New Product Proposal, which contains
three examples of possible products that could be developed to replace
Moisturizing Black Soap Shampoo. Based on the information in this
proposal and the customer feedback in the Product Report:

• If you had to recommend one product, which product would you
  recommend they create? Write 2-5 sentences explaining your decision.
  Provide examples of the customer feedback that informed your choice.
• Determine which type of innovation this represents from among the
  four main types discussed this week. Briefly explain why you chose that
  type of innovation.

Note: You should complete Step 4 after reading the material in Week 3

Step 4: Production Methods

Based on the product you chose in Step 3:

• Determine which production method is most appropriate for the
  production of this product. Write 2-5 sentences explaining your
  decision.

Review the SHRM case, “PAC Resources, Inc.”

Prepare a 4–6-page case analysis on the topic of strategic management and why it is critical to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission. In your analysis, respond to the following question: What is strategic management and why is it critical to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission?

Your analysis of this case and your written submission should reflect an understanding of the critical issues of the case, integrating the material covered in the text, and present concise and well-reasoned justifications for the stance that you take.

Case analysis criteria: Your case analysis should consist of:

• A brief analysis of the situation and pending decision problem, as presented in the case, and as relevant to your answer. This should be exceptionally brief and you should assume the person reading the Assignment is familiar with the details of the case.
• Identification of the major issues surrounding the organization or individuals involved with the organization.
• Identification of alternate courses of action to address the issues identified.
• The decision or recommendation for action, with the appropriate supporting arguments.
• The case question is designed to guide the direction of your analysis in the case. Your analysis should address and ultimately answer the question.

You may discuss your case analysis Assignment with the class, but you must submit your own original work.

Case analysis tips: Avoid common errors in case analyses, such as:

• Focusing too heavily on minor issues.
• Lamenting because of insufficient data in the case and ignoring creative alternatives.
• Rehashing of case data — you should assume the reader knows the case.
• Not appropriately evaluating the quality of the case’s data.
• Obscuring the quantitative analysis or making it difficult to understand.

Typical “minus (–)” grades result from submissions that:

• Are late.
• Are not well integrated and lack clarity.
• Do not address timing issues.
• Do not recognize the cost implications or are not practical.
• Get carried away with personal biases and are not pertinent to the key issues.
• Are not thoroughly proofread and corrected.

Make sure your document includes:

• Your name

• Date

• Course name and section number

• Unit number

• Case name

• Page numbers

The case analysis should be a minimum of 4–6 pages long, double spaced. Check for correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage. Citations should be in APA style.

Here is the Assignment grading rubric.

Assignment submission: Before you submit your Assignment, you should save your work on your computer in a location that you will remember. Save the document using the naming convention: Username_Unit1_Assignment.doc. Submit your file by selecting the Unit 1: Assignment Dropbox.

Learning Goals: This reflection paper assignment is directly linked to two of the three student learning outcomes for this course. It will allow you to demonstrate familiarity with research and thought in the field of interpersonal communication and analyze your own relationships using concepts of interpersonal communication. This assignment will allow you to demonstrate what you’ve learned after reading Chapter 4 and it will help you prepare for the first exam and other assignments.

Instructions: Your reflection paper should be 2 pages, typed, double-spaced, size 12 font, with one inch margins all around, and in essay format. Please proofread your work before submitting it.

Answer the following questions in your reflection paper:

Review the “Common Tendencies in Perception” section in Chapter 4 and choose three to discuss. Think of a time when you have experienced each one. Briefly describe each experience. What were the outcomes? Would they have been different if the common tendency hadn’t played a part in your perception?

Please follow the instructions and submit assignment in time,

PLAGISISM WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED