Relating Course Work & Skills Sets to Internship

/in /by

1. Name and describe three or more specific courses that you feel have made an impact in preparing you for internship. For each course mentioned, share a specific example of what you learned and how it has helped you. Be very detailed in describing how you are using this learning while on internship.

2. Identify at least three “gaps” or knowledge/skill sets that you did not come prepared with to internship. How could these have assisted you on internship? Describe the strategies you are using to compensate for and overcome these gaps. Provide illustrative examples to support your statements.


Before beginning, review: file and pictures which i have uploaded

be sure to use full sentences, paragraphs, appropriate language and formatting.

Public Relations Inc., Balance sheet assignment help

/in /by

Public Relations Inc.
managed a grand opening party on behalf of a new restaurant on April​ 15, 2009. Public Relations charged the restaurant​ $2,100.

The restaurant paid
for​ $1,800 of the bill from Public Relations Inc.
on April​ 20, 2009.

The remaining balance
was paid on May​ 5, 2009. How did these transactions affect
Public​ Relations’ income statement for the month of
April and for the balance sheet at April​ 30, 2009?

 
Transaction

How did effect net income?

Multiple choice:

(Decreased, Increased,

Net effect of $0.00 or No effect)

how did it effect balance sheet?

Multiple choice:

(Decreased, Increased,

Net effect of $0.00 or No effect)

April 15, 2009
Managed a party and billed the restaurant
?????
?????
 

April 20, 2009
Restaurant partially paid the invoice owed to Public Relations

  How did it effect Net income?

Multiple choice?

(Decreased, Increased,

Net effect of $0.00 or No effect)

????

  how did it effect on balance sheet

Multiple choice?

(Decreased, Increased,

Net effect of $0.00 or No effect)

?????

Public Opinion Discussion Board

/in /by

The purpose of this discussion board is to examine the bases of ideological perspectives. This assignment has three parts but the essence of the assignment is part 2, this is where the bulk of the points will be scored.

Assignment:

  1. Your ideology
    1. Take the PEW typology quiz http://www.people-press.org/quiz/political-typology/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
    2. How were you categorized?
    3. Are you at all surprised by your results?
  2. Examine the bases of your ideological perspective in terms of:
    1. Chapter 6, “Public Opinion” of your Open to Debate e-text
    2. Jonathan Haidt and George Lakoff who look at differences in ideology as manifestations of deep-seated moral values. I will be expecting references to Haidt and Lakoff in your essay and you should find the following resources to be of help.
      1. Haidt, “What Makes People Vote Republican” Ch. 6 Reader
      2. Jonathan Haidt TED Talk: https://embed.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_can_a_divided_america_heal (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
      3. Lakoff, “Don’t Underestimate Trump” Ch. 5 Reader
  3. Please relate your understanding of the cognitive bases of ideological reasoning, above, to the narratives employed in the 2016 presidential election such as depicted in this podcast: https://businessofstory.com/podcast/brander-chief-dr-randy-olson-explains-power-trumps-narrative-intuition/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. What about facts: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/donald-trump-lies-liar-effect-brain-214658 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.?

Chapter 6 Open to Debate e text Text: Braunwarth and Langenbach. Open to Debate

http://www.nsspress.com/braunwarth_otd_2nd/pdf/PPr…

Chapter 5 Reader Reader: American Government Examined: A Reader. Joseph Braunwarth, editor

http://www.nsspress.com/braunwarth_reader/pdf/PSRe…

Chapter 6 Reader Reader: American Government Examined: A Reader. Joseph Braunwarth, editor

http://www.nsspress.com/braunwarth_reader/pdf/PSRe…

Bacteria: MRSA infection protocol

/in /by

Consider you are in the role of a hospital administrator. Review the clinical protocol for seeing a patient with a potential MRSA infection.

  • Is the clinical protocol effective toward preventing the spread of MRSA? Why?
  • Is the clinical protocol cost effective and a reasonable method for clinical practice? Why?
  • Is the clinical protocol respectful towards the patient? How?

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

“Once the patient checks in and notifies the desk staff they may have MRSA, the staff member should explain to the patient they will be isolated to a single patient room, and protocol for contact precautions should be activated immediately. The patient should be asked to remain in the room to avoid the spread of infection. If there are any wounds they should be cleaned and covered with dressings. There should be a caddy or station set up outside the door with protective gear and a sign stating the room is being used under precaution or isolation, to prevent someone accidentally wandering in. Staff should use universal precautions, wash hands before and after contact, disinfect any surfaces the patient may have contaminated upon arrival, dawning PPE/Use of protective gowns, gloves, masks, and footwear. Protection should be used to prevent spreading infection. Biohazard bags should be readily available for disposal of any and all disposable wear or linen used in the care of this patient. Vitals are taken normally and equipment used is to be discarded if disposable, or cleaned with alcohol or bleach if non-disposable. The room and its contents must be disinfected after use for a patient with potential MRSA or contact precautions. Again Staff must thoroughly wash hands before and aftercare. Housekeeping should be notified of the need per facility policy. Laundry is aware based on the color bag that linen is placed into.”

What is environmental toxins?

/in /by

Assessment 2

  • PRINT

  • Environmental Toxins

  • Toggle Drawer

    Overview

    Write a 3–4-page analysis on the impact of a selected toxin on human health.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Toggle Drawer

    Context

    Toxins are substances that can harm a living organism. When air, water, or soil is contaminated by toxins, it can lead to serious health problems. The Assessment 2 Context document provides a brief overview of topics related to toxicity. You may wish to review this document for key concepts and ideas related to this assessment.

  • Toggle Drawer

    Questions to Consider

    To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.

    • What is the role of an environmental health professional?
    • How do professionals define risks associated with environmental toxins?
    • What is an example of one technique people use to detoxify the body? Have you, or would you, use such a technique?
    • How has the federal government made recommendations to protect human health?
    • What is the role of the Consumer Product Safety Commission regarding product safety?
    • What is the role of OSHA regarding workplace safety?
    • Is your own workplace proactive when it comes to hazards?
    • In what ways are you, or could you, become proactive in reducing your own occupational hazards?
    • What are some ways occupational physical, biological, or chemical hazards could be decreased?
    • What are the perceived risks of nanotechnology?
    • How do the views of upstream scientists differ from downstream scientists, with respect to new technology like nanotechnology?
    • What are the differences in scientific approaches to risk assessment?
  • Toggle Drawer

    Resources

    Required Resources

    The following resources are required to complete the assessment.

    Capella Resources

    Click the links provided to view the following resources:

    Suggested Resources

    The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.

  • Assessment Instructions

    The purpose of this assessment is for you to learn how to summarize and critically evaluate a scientific paper on environmental toxins.To begin, choose a toxin to research. Note: The CDC Web site and other materials listed in the Resources should provide you with a starting point in selecting a toxin.Then, select at least two peer-reviewed articles about your chosen toxin to read carefully. Craft a 3–4-page analysis of the toxin’s impact on human health based on what you have learned. Address the following in your analysis:

    • Highlight the main points presented in the articles you read. What message are the authors trying to convey about that toxin?
    • Describe the possible sources of human exposure to this toxin, and analyze their risk.
    • Analyze what happens when this toxin enters the environment.
    • Analyze the persistency of this toxin.
    • Analyze the federal government’s recommendations for protecting human health from this toxin.
    • Describe what other sources of information say about these toxins.
      • Identify any discrepancies you found in your research.
      • If the authors have different perspectives, how might these differing views affect environmental health?

    Your analysis should follow a logical structure and be evidence based. Use the MEAL Plan to help guide the organization of your analysis:

    • Main Idea: Present the main point or idea that you are making about the environmental toxin you studied.
    • Evidence: What does the research say? Support your statements with evidence from your research and personal experience.
    • Analysis: Summarize main ideas from articles related to the points outlined for this assessment. Compare and contrast the ideas of the authors of the two articles. Identify those ideas and facts that relate directly or indirectly to your main point. Make explicit links between source articles, your personal experience, and your current analysis.
    • Link: Integrate and combine information from the source articles and your personal experience to your main point or idea.

    Additional Requirements

    Use the APA Paper Template (linked in the Resources under the Required Resources heading) to format your analysis.

    • Written Communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • Length: This analysis should be 3–4 pages in content length. Include a separate title page and a separate references page.
    • Font and Font Size: Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced. Use Microsoft Word.
    • APA Formatting: Resources and in-text citations should be formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.
    • Number of Resources: You are required to cite a minimum of 2 scholarly resources. You may conduct independent research for resources and references to support your analysis. Provide a reference list and in-text citations for all of your resources, using APA format. You may cite texts and authors from the Resources.

chart about the effectiveness/ineffectiveness

/in /by

Create a chart about the effectiveness/ineffectiveness of the argument the author is making by assessing the piece using criteria from your book, our discussions, and the sample doubting and believing chart below. The chart is not comprehensive, but should provide ideas:

Believing

Doubting

Impressive use of logic

Problematic use of logic and/or several fallacies.

Several of the author’s strategies (such as use of emotional appeal or compare-contrast) are persuasive and compelling.

Some aspects of the approach are problematic (its use of pathos, for example, feels manipulative). Flaws in the writing style work against the argument.

The design of the essay complements the argument and/or the style of the writing does.

The design/writing style could be improved. For example, it uses too much sarcasm or too casual of language for its audience.

The ethos helps the author make his/her case. (For example, the author has impressive credentials/the site/journal is reliable, the research is up to date, etc.)

Some aspects of its credibility are problematic, such as bias.

The statistics or studies are representative, come from reliable sources, and can be verified elsewhere (i.e., in the other sources in the casebook, in credible online sources, etc.).

The statistics/studies used aren’t representative/seem flawed. They don’t match the information on credible sites.

All points are well supported with evidence, and quotes are from reliable authorities.

There isn’t enough backing for some of the points in the argument.

The author takes the other side’s arguments and values into consideration, and even admits that they have points.

There is not enough consideration for the other side’s points/they are unfairly represented.

Reliable sources/quotes are used.

Biased sources/quotes are used.

It reaches out to its audience.

It risks alienating rather than persuading its audience.

Analogies, anecdotes, and comparisons are used effectively to reach the audience.

Analogies, anecdotes, and/or comparisons don’t quite work.

It seems to include all the content it should.

It is missing content (issues, concerns, points) it should include.

Your own chart should include specific details from the article/video you are analyzing. These may be quotes, summaries, and specific details, including your own opinions.

Your chart can be loosely based off this one. For instance, maybe your columns are simply labelled as good/bad.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/opinion/sunday/end-legacy-college-admissions.html

This is reading material.

Corporate Valuation and Financial Planning

/in /by

1.Identify four ways in which managers use projected financial statements.

2.Define the following:

Operating plan –

Financial plan –

3.Briefly describe the key elements of an operating plan.

4.How can the financial plan be used to help management provide guidance to security analysts?

5.Identify the five uses of free cash flow and how these uses are related to a financial plan.

6.What is the forecasted financial statements (FSS) method and what are its two major applications?

7.Which items comprise operating current assets?

8.Why is it reasonable to assume that current assets grow proportionally to sales?

9.What are some reasons that net PP&E might grow proportionally to sales, and what are some reasons that it might not?

10.What are spontaneous liabilities?

11.What is the three-step process used to project financial statements?

12.Preliminary additional financing generally comes from three sources. What are they?

13.What is the financial surplus or deficit?

14.Write out the AFN equation and briefly explain its use.

15.Discuss the five key factors on which external financing depends as indicated in the AFN equation.

16.Define the following:

Self-supporting growth rate –

Excess capacity adjustments –

Lumpy assets –

Economies of scale –

17.Define the following:

Full capacity sales –

Target fixed assets to sales ratio –

Required level of sale –

18.Is it possible for the AFN to be negative? If so, what would this indicate?

19.What advantages does the forecasted financial statement method have over the AFN equation for forecasting financial requirements?

no word count use same document uploaded

/in /by

NO WORD OR PAGE COUNT BUT ANSWER EACH PROMPT BELOW IN THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT ONLY NO NEW DOCUMENT IS TO BE CREATED

part c uses the questions from ppt (2 questions on last slide) attached all questions below are in the document

Experience with Conflict

  • Briefly describe a conflict that you were engaged in in the past
  • Choose a conflict that was not resolved. Provide enough detail to give the conflict context i.e. situation, relationship
  • What were you thinking and feeling at the time?
  • Describe what was good and bad about the situation.
  • What conflict style did you choose to use? and why?
  • What conflict style did the other person choose to use? Can you identify why?
  • Choose
    an alternate style that moves the exchange in a positive direction and
    explain why you believe that this approach would have been a more
    effective choice.
  • What challenges might you have to overcome if you had used a different approach? Be specific.
  • How do you think the person you were engaged in conflict with might have responded to this different approach?
  • What sense can you make of the situation?
  • Provide three specific strategies that you could apply to future conflicts that would produce a more positive outcome.

2-1 Milestone One – Final Project Research Proposal

/in /by

Instructions

In this module, you will submit a description of the topic that you will focus on for the final project as well as a preliminary research question that will guide your paper. It is understood that your research question will likely change and evolve as you read the literature on your topic, but it is important to have a research question to guide your reading. You will also submit a list of search terms that you will use to find peer-reviewed articles on your topic in the Shapiro Library electronic databases.

For additional details, please refer to the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document (attached).

Please see the attached documents and follow the directions exactly! This will be an ongoing major project so the research topic needs to be psychology related, preferably specializing with child development (that is my major) and it needs to be a research topic that will be easy to continue working with and researching.

Stakeholder Roles and Strategic Goals, social science homework help

/in /by

Write a 6- to 8-page paper (not including title page and reference page) that addresses the following:

  • Describe an existing non-profit or public organization of interest to you. Include the organization’s mission, stakeholders, short-term goals (1–4 years), mid-terms goals (5–14 years), and long-term goals (15–20 years).
  • Select and explain your role as a stakeholder, including why this organization is important to you both personally and professionally.
  • Explain how you, in your role, will help to evaluate and revise the organization’s strategic planning process. Include any potential legal implications of revising the organization’s current strategic plan.
  • Explain at least 3 strategic goals that you would recommend for the organization, which will directly contribute to and effect positive social change.

Use proper APA formatting and include the following:

  • A title page and running head
  • An introduction that states the purpose of the paper
  • Level 1 headings to define each part of the paper
  • A conclusion to synthesize the entire paper
  • A minimum of six scholarly sources to support your paper
  • In-text citations as appropriate
  • A reference list

Also, the work should not be highly plagiarised.