Read the materials and answer each task a question in one paragraph

/in /by

The subject is ethics in national security. Your assignment is to read the material assigned to your group and respond to the tasks below.

Group 2 read Section 3, Code of Conduct, in FBI ethics and integrity program policy directive and policy guide https://vault.fbi.gov/fbi-ethics-and-integrity-program-policy-guide/FBI%20Ethics%20and%20Integrity%20Program%20Policy%20Directive%20and%20Policy%20Guide%200754DPG%20Part%2001%20of%2001/view. Also read Roufa, T. (2018). Ethics in law enforcement and policing. Available at https://www.thebalancecareers.com/ethics-in-law-enforcement-and-policing-974542.

TASK #1: Provide a brief summary of your reading(s). What do your colleagues need to know about the topic(s) covered in your reading(s)? Why did you select these points?

TASK #2: What was the most challenging idea that you encountered in the reading(s)?

TASK #3: In your reading(s) did you find an explicit or implicit definition of ethics? How would you define ethics for national security professionals? What, in your opinion, is the importance of ethics for national security professionals?

Domestic-Violence TI Care Program Essay

/in /by

Imagine that you are working at an agency that serves victims of domestic violence. You have been asked by the agency’s clinical director to create a trauma-informed care therapy program for victims of domestic violence.

Write a 700-1,050-word essay describing the program you would want to create. Address the following in your essay:

  1. Describe how you would do a needs assessment to determine the need for such a program. Would you use quantitative or qualitative tools? Why?
  2. What tool would you use to measure the outcome of the program? Would you use a quantitative or a qualitative tool? Why?
  3. Research one trauma-informed care intervention you would recommend to the clinical director and evaluate its effectiveness. Discuss its validity and reliability as an intervention. Was the research conducted based on quantitative or qualitative measures?

Include a minimum of three scholarly resources in your essay.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

15.0 %Needs Assessment

Essay omits or incompletely describes how you would do a needs assessment to determine the need for the program, including whether you would use quantitative or qualitative tools and why. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Essay inadequately describes how you would do a needs assessment to determine the need for the program, including whether you would use quantitative or qualitative tools and why, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

Essay adequately describes how you would do a needs assessment to determine the need for the program, including whether you would use quantitative or qualitative tools and why, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Essay clearly describes how you would do a needs assessment to determine the need for the program, including whether you would use quantitative or qualitative tools and why, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

Essay expertly describes how you would do a needs assessment to determine the need for the program, including whether you would use quantitative or qualitative tools and why, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

15.0 %Outcome Measurement Tool

Essay omits or incompletely describes what tool you would use to measure the outcome of the program, including whether you would use a quantitative tool or qualitative tool and why. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Essay inadequately describes what tool you would use to measure the outcome of the program, including whether you would use a quantitative tool or qualitative tool and why, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

Essay adequately describes what tool you would use to measure the outcome of the program, including whether you would use a quantitative tool or qualitative tool and why, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Essay clearly describes what tool you would use to measure the outcome of the program, including whether you would use a quantitative tool or qualitative tool and why, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

Essay expertly describes what tool you would use to measure the outcome of the program, including whether you would use a quantitative tool or qualitative tool and why, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

40.0 %Trauma-Informed Care Intervention

Essay omits or incompletely describes one trauma-informed care intervention you would recommend to the clinical director, including the validity and reliability as an intervention and whether the research conducted is based on quantitative or qualitative measures. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

Essay inadequately describes one trauma-informed care intervention you would recommend to the clinical director, including the validity and reliability as an intervention and whether the research conducted is based on quantitative or qualitative measures, but description is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic.

Essay adequately describes one trauma-informed care intervention you would recommend to the clinical director, including the validity and reliability as an intervention and whether the research conducted is based on quantitative or qualitative measures, but description is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.

Essay clearly describes one trauma-informed care intervention you would recommend to the clinical director, including the validity and reliability as an intervention and whether the research conducted is based on quantitative or qualitative measures, and description is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic.

Essay expertly describes one trauma-informed care intervention you would recommend to the clinical director, including the validity and reliability as an intervention and whether the research conducted is based on quantitative or qualitative measures, and description is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Ashford 4: – Week 3 – Assignment Comparing and Contrasting Theories of Learnin

/in /by

No quotations are allowed in your Week 3 assignment.  However, the
assignment requires that you use three scholarly sources.  This might be
confusing for those of you who haven’t used APA formatting much in the
past. 

Prior to beginning this assignment, be sure to review the required
materials for this week, including the Information literacy: The perils
of online research video that you watched in Week One, and review any
relevant Instructor Guidance.

For this written assignment, you will demonstrate your understanding
of theoretical perspectives by creating a compare and contrast essay on a
topic you select from the list below. This assignment will allow you to
examine two or more different approaches to a given problem or
different examples of a specific phenomenon. In this essay, you will
analyze and explain a minimum of two similarities and two differences in
the topics. You will also analyze and explain the essential connection
between the subjects by justifying and making their comparison relevant
and important.  For this essay, you should write for an audience of
novice students of learning psychology. To create a lucid and
well-developed essay in your own words, you should refrain from using
quotations from your sources.

Choose one of the topics from the list below to compare and contrast:

  • Humanism and behaviorism as psychological learning theories/principles
  • Humanism and social constructivism as psychological learning theories/principles
  • The three types of learning domains (Bloom, 1956)

Once you have made your choice, you will apply basic research to your
project by taking some time to research and develop your expertise in
the subject. This will aid you in the successful completion of this
assignment. The research can be accomplished through reading online
material or researching articles and e-books available from the Ashford
University Library. You must utilize at least three scholarly sources,
two of which must be from the Ashford University Library. (For
assistance with finding resources in the Ashford University Library
related to your subject, please see this tutorial.)
Writing the “Comparing and Contrasting Theories of Learning” Paper
The Paper:

  1. Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length and
    formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
    Center.
  2. Must include a title page with the following:

    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct
    thesis statement. Visit the Ashford Writing Center to clarify how to
    create a strong thesis statement and what it helps you to accomplish.
    You may also use the Thesis Generator tool.
  4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. For
    assistance with the critical thinking portion of the written assignment,
    please see the information included on the Critical Thinking Community website.
  5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. The
    conclusion typically has two parts: the summary statement (one or two
    sentences that restate the thesis in a fresh way to reinforce the
    essay’s main idea) and the clincher (a final thought that creates a
    lasting impression for the reader).
  6. Must use at least three scholarly sources, two of which must come from the Ashford University Library.
  7. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  8. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center

Leadership, Power, and Influence in Interagency Relations, law homework help

/in /by

  • What qualities do you personally prefer in a strong leader, and why do you think these are meritorious. Be specific in your description and rationale.
  • One could argue that a poor leader can ruin even a great plan. Consider and discuss examples of this occurring (the examples can be real or hypothetical).
    • How can other responders help compensate if a weak Interagency like FEMA or Homeland Security leader is in charge of the entire crisis response?
    • What actions might you take personally if you witness, or find yourself on the team of, an ineffective or even potentially dangerous leader?
  • If you were a manager in an organization and were required to assigned one of your team to an Interagency group, what type of person would you try to assign, and why? What advice would you give this person for helping him or her succeed as a member of this group? ANSWER NEEDS TO BE 5 PARAGRAPHS no need to be in essay format

PAPER FOR CISS 391 DUE ON 12th

/in /by

Write
3 policies, each geared to a different type of organization. The
primary introduction for this topic is in Chapter 4 of the textbook.
However, you can conduct some additional research to gain a better
understanding of these policies.

The first policy is an Enterprise Information Systems Policy (EISP). Write
this policy from the perspective that you are part of a large medical
organization that stores patient history on your network. Use the components of an EISP as described in Table 4-1 on page 164 of the textbook.

20180610_203302.jpg

The second policy is an Issue-Specific Security Policy (ISSP). You will write an Independent ISSP that is tailored to a specific issue. You may choose any one of the 10 topics listed at the top of page 165 of the textbook as your Issue-Specific topic. Write
this policy from the perspective of the manager of a department within
an organization that works with highly classified material on a regular
basis. Use the components of an ISSP as described in Table 4-2 on page 166 of the textbook.

20180610_203405.jpg

The third policy is also an Issue-Specific Security Policy (ISSP). Select a different topic from the same list on page 165 of your text. In
this case, write the policy from the perspective of a manager that has
no employees located in the main building of the organization. All
employees in this department work from home and are spread throughout
the country. They must access the company’s servers and storage for
information to do their jobs. This information is sensitive to the
company but not highly classified. Use the components of an ISSP as described in Table 4-2 on page 166 of the textbook.

20180610_203537.jpg

20180610_203405.jpg

Social Control and Criminal Deviance: Bullying, assignment help

/in /by

Bullying is a difficult concept to understand and reconcile the consequences. This assignment focuses on the critical thinking skills that are needed to analyze an emotionally charged topic.

Student Success Tip

Write a one to two (1-2) page essay in which you:

  1. Identify the most important step in the student’s guide to research that you would need in order to analyze bullying.
  2. Define the identified critical step of research in your words.
  3. Explain how bullying relates to one (1) of the following topics:
    1. the agents of socialization (i.e., family, teachers and school, peers),
    2. formal organizations (i.e., conformity to groups),
    3. different types of deviance (i.e., everyday deviance, sexual deviance, or criminal deviance).

Provide a rationale for your response.

Current Events

/in /by

The assignment must meet the following requirements:

1. For the first eight calendar weeks of the semester, August 12th to October 6th, including vacation breaks and holidays, beginning with the first week of the Summer session (regardless of when you entered the class), each student will maintain a weekly current events log. Please consult the syllabus for the due date. All logs are submitted on the due date even though you do them every week. Make sure that you have one news article and only one for each of the first 8 calendar weeks of the class. The week starts on Sunday and ends on Saturday.

RE: SOCW6111 – 2 Discussion Questions (WK8)

/in /by

Discussion 1 – Play Therapy

Children who have been abused or traumatized in some way may benefit from working with a therapist. Children often reenact trauma through repetitious play in order to establish mastery over their emotions and integrate experiences into their history on their own terms. Through the use of toys and props, children may naturally share their emotions and past experiences without feeling the pressure they might encounter with traditional talk therapy.

For this Discussion, review the course-specific case study for Claudia and the Chiesa (2012) and Taylor (2009) articles.

Post an explanation of ways play therapy might be beneficial for Claudia. Using the insights gained from the articles, describe ways you might have worked with Claudia to address her fears and anxiety related to the mugging she witnessed.

Please use subheading and be detailed in response. Use APA formatting with 2 peer reviewed references.

Support your posts with specific references to the Learning Resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.

*****************************************************************************************

Discussion 2 – Tranference and Countertransference

Specific skills and knowledge are essential for a social
worker working with children. Understanding transference and
countertransference is crucial to a healthy therapeutic relationship. Both
transference and countertransference can be evident in any client–therapist
relationship, but are especially important in working with children because of
a common instinct among adults to protect and nurture the young. The projection
or relocation of one’s feelings about one person onto another, otherwise known
as transference, is a common response by children (Gil, 1991). Countertransference,
a practitioner’s own emotional response to a child, is also common.

For this Discussion, review the Malawista (2004)
article.

Post your
explanation why transference and countertransference are so common when working
with children. Then, identify some strategies you might use to address both
transference and countertransference in your work with children.

Please use subheading and be detailed in response.
Use APA formatting with 2 peer reviewed references.

Support your posts with specific
references to the Learning Resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for
your references.

Ethical Issues with an aging population discussion post

/in /by

Discussion: Ethical Issues With an Aging Population

According to the CDC, “in the United States, the proportion of the population aged >65 years is projected to increase from 12.4% in 2000 to 19.6% in 2030,” (CDC, 2003, para. 2). Caring for this aging population is going to be one of the greatest challenges facing the health care industry. Not only will the number of individuals requiring care rise, but so will the cost. As poignantly stated by Crippen and Barnato, “unless we change the practice of medicine and reduce future costs, and explicitly address the ethical dilemmas we face, there may come a time when our kids simply cannot afford us” (2011, p. 128).

In this Discussion, you will examine the ethical issues that the United States and other nations must address when faced with the health care challenges of an aging population.

To prepare:

  • Consider the ethical aspects of health care and health policy for an aging population.
  • Review the Hayutin, Dietz, and Mitchell report presented in the Learning Resources. The authors pose the question, “What are the economic consequences, now and for future generations of taxpayers if we fail to adapt our policies to the changing reality of an older population?” (p. 21). Consider how you would respond to this question. In addition, reflect on the ethical decisions that arise when dispersing limited funds.
  • Contemplate the impact of failing to adjust policy in accordance with the changing reality of an older population.
  • Reflect on the ethical dilemmas that arise when determining expenditures on end-of-life health care.

By Day 3

Post an explanation of the ethical standards you believe should be used in determining how resources should be allocated for an aging population and end-of-life care. Then, provide an analysis of the ethical challenges related to the preparation for the provision of such health care.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

Main Posting:
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.—

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Main Posting:
Writing—

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation—

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.—

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

First Response:
Writing—

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

First Response:
Timely and full participation—

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.—

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Second Response:
Writing—

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Second Response:
Timely and full participation—

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

helps with current event article 75-100 words

/in /by



The current event article (published between 2015-present) should relate to one of the themes or topics being discussed in the module; the article can relate directly to the time and place under review or it can relate to the
themes or issues being discussed.

Each current event post must be 75-100 words and include:

1) an active URL link for the article

2) a short description of what the article is about

3) an explanation of how the article relates to the module’s readings and themes.

4) comment on at least two other students’ posts.


module

1. View lecture PowerPoint

Lecture material is the intellectual property of M. Gonzalez-Meeks and is to be used for study purposes only.

2. Read textbook American Horizons Vol. 2, Concise 1st Edition

Read all of Chapter 15

American Horizons, Vol. 2 Concise-1.jpg

3. Participate in the Module 1 Discussion Board

4. Watch the following film clips:

“Battle Cry” (26 min)

“The United States Comes Apart” (3 min)

“The Politics of Emancipation” (6 min)

“The Challenges of Rebuilding Southern Society” (4 min)

“Rebuilding African American Family Structures” (2 min)

“System of Sharecropping” (3 min)

“Obstruction of Voting Rights for Southern Blacks” (4 min)