Personal Negotiation

This assignment requires you carry out and analyze a real-world negotiation, which encourages you to think about the many everyday situations in which you can negotiate, and challenges you to improve your negotiating skills. For this negotiation you should negotiate something of personal value to you. You should report on your plan, your strategy, and the negotiation results. You can negotiate for anything you would like—a good or service from a merchant, a salary from a potential employer, etc. This paper should be approximately 5 double-spaced pages. At the end, please review the most important lessons that you learned in this course (including insights from the readings), your key strengths as a negotiator, and how you hope to improve moving forward. The rules are as follows:

  • Do not reveal the assignment: You are not allowed to resort to a plea of “Please help me out, this is for a class….” You may not disclose this information until the negotiation is completed.
  • No purchase necessary: You do not have to buy anything to complete this assignment. You may choose to be the seller or enter a negotiation that does not involve financial terms or a purchase.
  • Boundaries: You cannot use negotiation tactics that may be considered unethical, illegal, or potentially harmful to yourself or others.
  • Not required to settle: You do not need to succeed in the negotiation in order to complete the assignment. The purpose of this exercise is to facilitate your learning. Often, we learn as much or more from negotiations that fail as from those that succeed. However, if you do fail, please seek feedback from your counterpart on how you could have negotiated more effectively, and write about what you learned from the feedback.

The paper should be no more than 5 pages in length (double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, 1” margins). The final reflection paper is graded upon:

  • Depth of analysis: Have you correctly employed key concepts to analyze the negotiation? How well have you applied your learning from the course to your analysis of this case?
  • Introspection: Have you linked your experiences with your goals for the course and your strengths and weaknesses? What have you learned about your negotiating style and skills from this negotiation experience? What would you do differently in the future?
  • Creativity: How unique was the context? How inventive was your strategy? How did you meet expected and unexpected challenges?
  • Quality of writing: Have you included the relevant details? Is it interesting and well written?

Grading rubric attached

Develop a compare/contrast essay, Literature Assignment Homework Help (750-1000 Words)

Instructions: Develop a compare/contrast essay of 750 to 1000 words minimum/maximum with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Include a works cited page.
Be sure to argue a particular point of view in your essay (your thesis) and cite varied examples from the readings in MLA format in order to support your perspective. Please focus on the reading themselves, and avoid using outside sources (particularly open-web sources such as Wikipedia). Whatever you do, DO NOT give me a biography of the author or retell a story.
Compare and contrast two of the tales in the Canterbury Tales. Possible ideas would be to discuss different areas being satirized, tone, and characters. Do not retell two of the stories in this essay but lay out similarities and differences in topic, form, or something else that strikes you as important or relevant. Do not repeat a discussion we have seen in the forum.

Henry Mancini

If you were to teach a class about Henry Mancini what would you like to include? Based on the knowledge you gained during this class, can you design a lesson plan? You may select one of Mancini’s most popular film scores such as “The Pink Panther,” “Breakfast at Tiffany’s,” “Hatari!,” “Charade,” “A Shot in the Dark” or any other aspect of his life or music and outline the important points. Design hands on activities to accompany your outline such as view a film with a friend or listen to a film soundtrack then how you can discuss their content. Your class plan should answer the question, what would you like people to know about Henry Mancini?

A comparison of US and international disaster response.

A comparison of US and international disaster response. (Are there differences? Similarities? You may want to choose one or two examples from the US and compare with non-US events). paper should be 7-10 pages (not counting cover page and reference list) or about 3500 words.Remember, you are to write as if you are teaching an audience that is invested, but has no prior knowledge of your topic. Give an introduction to the reason the subject is important to our study. Then develop several paragraphs of content: perhaps one for each of three to seven points you think are especially crucial to understanding. (Those three to seven points were probably listed in your introduction!) Develop each paragraph to explain in rich detail the situation and locale/population as appropriate to which the point applies. Recall: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How. Finally, a conclusion that clearly states (reviews) the key aspects of the three to seven points you want the reader /audience to act upon.

essay about Motivation

Check the attachment and write an essay about motivation

First, writing in the first person is completely acceptable and quite appropriate.

Secondly, on the evaluation form there is section titled research and another titled figure/graphs. Please be aware that these are not required. It is possible to write an excellent paper without additional research and designing figures. So please do not add references simply to show that you used them, when in fact it was just as easy to cite the textbook. Likewise I am not looking for you to incorporate figures from the textbook (or other sources) that do not have a specific link between your experience and the material related to course. Basically those items are simply asking the authors a question, could our paper be enhanced with more sources and could we incorporate an figure/table that is worth a thousand words. So these have the potential to add value, but are not required, and simply adding references and figures does not necessarily improve your evaluation.

Third, the questions you answered today are from the textbook. Each of them is linked to a different tendency (or bias or heuristic) that influences decision making. Look at those in the textbook and see if you can figure out which question is linked to which tendency.

final project

Final Paper/Project
Asian American history is, in many ways, social history – history seen from the perspective
of ordinary people. While economic, social, and religious elites have always wielded great
power historically, the consequences of historical changes and transformations are lived by
all people, powerful or not, and ordinary people, in their own ways, have contributed to
those changes and transformations.
The final paper/project addresses the original question we began the class with: in what
ways have the ideas of “Asia” and “America” emerged and been shaped by global historical
forces – capitalism, industrialism/modernity, labor migration, nationalism – and how have
ordinary people made sense of those forces as they’ve come to shape their lives, culture,
and the societies in which they live.
For your project, you will compare the histories/stories of two Asian Americans from the
early twentieth century. You will choose two people from a list of names I will provide,
research their personal and family histories, and write up your findings, situating how they
might have experienced the broad historical changes we have discussed in the course.
Telling their individual stories allows you to frame and illuminate that broader history, while
comparing and contrasting their stories allows you to explore the difference and diversity of
Asian American experiences. Part of what you’ll have to decide is what “Asian American”
means – how Asia and America are related – in the context of their story and history. In
telling their histories, you may and probably want to consult and incorporate materials from
your previous assignments: a) what are/were the conditions of the region and/or country
they came from as well as where they live now; b) what were the specific historical issues
that shaped their lives? how aware were they (and/or their families) about the full
circumstances and conditions of those issues? c) have they lived under the same
circumstances, or have they changed, particularly if they migrated/immigrated?
You may choose one of several formats to present your final project: a conventional paper
(12-15 pages), a web site), a video documentary, or some other type of mixed-media form
that combines aspects of these forms. In that regard, I will demonstrate and explain in-class
an online platform, StoryMaps, that allows you to put your story and any documents you
find on the web. In your choice, remember that certain formats require production and
post-production processes in addition to the thinking that goes into its original treatment.
You are familiar with writing papers on a computer word-processor where once you’ve
organized your thoughts, production is a relatively simple matter of spellchecking,
proofreading, and printing (and stapling and copying). A video documentary may require
writing a script, significant time shooting footage, editing, and other post-production
processes. Keep in mind also that each format differs in the presentation of argument,
2
evidence, narrative, and style. Regardless of format, you should turn in all materials you
produce, not just the final version. If you put up a web site, also print out pages with their
respective content and a site map showing the relationships between the different pages.
For a documentary, provide a script, etc. I will arrange a place on the web for all the
papers/projects so everyone will be able to see each others’ papers/projects. So remember
as you are writing/working on them that they will be public, not just for my grading
purposes.
Your projects will be original historical research; in almost every case, the stories you write
will be stories that have never been told or presented. Neither you – nor I – will know
where the person’s story goes or how it turns out. That may make the assignment
frustrating initially, but it will also make it interesting, and hopefully exciting. You will have a
choice between one of two types of people on the lists: a) a picture bride or b) a naturalized
World War One military veteran. Which you choose will give you access to different
information:
• For picture brides, you’ll have information collected by the state of California of
women who arrived via Angel Island in 1918. The list of tabulated information
includes their names, the name of the ship on which they arrived (and on what
date), in some cases, their age, the name (or initial) of their husbands, and the
address where they settled. In some cases you’ll also have a date, which indicates
the date they subsequently had their first child (if it was within a year).
• For WWI veterans, you will have a copy of the naturalization petition they filed
during or after the war. The petition asked a number of questions that the veterans
answered as best they could: where they were born, when, where, and how they
arrived in the United States, did they have wives and/or children, who were their
witnesses, etc.
To begin your project, enter the name(s) of the people you’ve chosen using the respective
Google form for picture brides or WWI veterans, then check against the other Google form
responses to see if someone else has chosen the same person. If you chose a picture bride,
return to your Google form and enter the additional information you have about them from
the picture bride document. If you chose a veteran, e-mail me and I will send you a copy of
their naturalization documents. Using those documents, return to your Google form and
enter the additional information you have about them from those documents. You should
enter this information for each person you include in your project.
From there, you’ll be on your own to research the person. There are several genealogical
sites online that can help you find additional information about them. These include Family
Search (http://FamilySearch.org) and Forebears (http://Forebears.io), which offer free
accounts, and Ancestry (http://Ancestry.com), which is a paid service that offers a free trial.
On these sites, you can find information about when someone arrived, where they lived
(and when they lived there), who they married, what children they had, if and when they
died, etc.
3
Most sites will have general guides to finding historical information and you can find other
resources online and in the library for finding historical/genealogical information. You may
have to figure out ways to configure your searches to get this information:
• do you have details about the person, such as their birth date and location, that can
help distinguish them from another person with a similar name?
• might there be an alternative spelling for the person’s name to use in your search?
Once you find information or a historical document about the person, save a copy and
consider what kinds of information it may contain. A marriage license, for instance, often
lists parents and witnesses. A ship manifest may have explanatory notes about relatives,
sponsors, or location. The more information you find about someone, the more clues you
will have to find additional information about them.
Take detailed notes while doing your research. Use them as the basis for a rough draft of
the story you will tell. You may find documents that connect to some of the issues, themes,
and history we’ve discussed in class or in the assigned readings. Feel free to use them as
sources for context in your story.
You do not need to do this research alone. You can ask the reference librarians in Bartle for
their assistance. You are free to help one another, sharing tips about how to find
information, etc. (I have set up a discussion forum on Blackboard for this). You may also ask
questions in class or during my office hours. If it turns out your research isn’t leading to
fruitful results, you may always choose a different person for your project.
Save electronic copies of any documents or photographs you find to include with your
paper or to use in a StoryMaps version of your project.

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II
Synthesizing and Writing
When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.

The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.

In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.
Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.

The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

  • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
  • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
  • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.
  • Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

Grading for this assignment will be based on quality, logic / organization, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 100

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A

1.State your position on the topic.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely stated your position on the topic.

Insufficiently stated your position on the topic.

Partially stated your position on the topic.

Satisfactorily stated your position on the topic.

Thoroughly stated your position on the topic.

2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely identified (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explained why you selected these specific reasons.

Insufficiently identified (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explained why you selected these specific reasons. .

Partially identified (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explained why you selected these specific reasons.

Satisfactorily identified (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explained why you selected these specific reasons.

Thoroughly identified (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explained why you selected these specific reasons.

3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Insufficiently explained your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Partially explained your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Satisfactorily explained your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

Thoroughly explained your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.

4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Insufficiently examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Partially examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Satisfactorily examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

Thoroughly examined at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.

5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Insufficiently discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Partially discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Satisfactorily discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

Thoroughly discussed the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.

6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Insufficiently discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Partially discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

Thoroughly discussed whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue stayed the same.

7. Follow APA Style requirements for format, in-text citation of quotes and paraphrases, and references page.
Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in following APA Style requirements.

Had 8-9 errors in following APA Style requirements.

Had 6-7 different errors in following APA Style requirements.

Had 4-5 different errors in following APA Style requirements.

Had 0-3 different errors in following APA Style requirements.

8. Follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: include an introductory and concluding paragraph; address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely followed guidelines for clear and organized writing.

Insufficiently followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: did not include an introductory and / or concluding paragraph; did not address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

Partially followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included a partially developed introductory and / or concluding paragraph; partially addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

Sufficiently followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included an introductory and concluding paragraph; sufficiently addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.

Thoroughly followed guidelines for clear and organized writing: included an engaging introductory and thoughtful concluding paragraph; thoroughly addressed main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and detailed supporting sentences.

9. Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
Weight: 10%

Did not complete the assignment or had more than 9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 8-9 errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 6-7 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 4-5 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

Had 0-3 different errors in grammar, punctuation, mechanics, spelling.

writing and research part 2

Assignment Purpose and Objectives: An Annotated Bibliography (“Literature Review”) gathers and summarizes information about your research topic into one document. Its purpose is to create a reference sheet reminding you of your various sources (their relevance to your paper, their research methodologies and data, and their specific arguments). It also preserves a record of research about your topic which may be shared with both your immediate readers and the broader audience the topic may influence and attract (others in your specific field, communities impacted by issues within the scope of your research, etc.). A main objective is to demonstrate your ability to combine citations found in a References List or Works Cited page in APA format with useful annotations (summary explanations) about each of the sources you are using.

Assignment Expectations and Requirements: In a series of clearly written entries on a minimum of three (3) sources, make sure to address the following: • Selectively choose the sources you have determined are most relevant to your topic. • Cite the sources in proper APA format. The citations should be organized in alphabetical order by author just as in an APA References page. • Include a brief summary of the source in your own words (approximately 5-6 sentences), so the reader has a clear idea of the purpose, content, and usefulness of the text. Do not simply copy and paste the article’s abstract (if it has one). • Include a short quotation (no more than one paragraph) from within the source that you are considering using in your paper. • After the summary and quotation, offer a one or two-paragraph explanation of how the source is relevant to your research. This evaluation should be specific. Do not simply say “I think this source is good,” but describe why (“… because it highlights key issue “x”). See the “Useful Prompts” section below for examples of questions you could answer.

Useful Prompts: Consider answering some or all of the following questions to help you write a focused annotation: • Content: What is the resource about? Is it relevant to your research? • Purpose: What is it for? Why was the article or book written? • Usefulness: What does it do for your research (i.e. helps evidence your argument)? • Reliability: Is the information accurate? Do other sources support the conclusions? • Authority: Is it written by someone who has the expertise to author the information? • Currency: Is it new? Is it up-to-date for the topic?

Evaluation Criteria: As you prepare the bibliography for submission, keep in mind the following: Make sure the sources reflect the focus you have developed for your topic/line of inquiry. Utilizing the “Useful Prompts” suggestions, offer thoughtful and complete annotations that address the

Assignment Expectations and Requirements” listed above. Citations must adhere to APA format. See also the grading rubric on the next page. Length and Formatting: You need at least three (3) sources of various types (articles found on the databases, reputable websites or blogs, etc.), so a minimum of 3-4 pages is necessary. APA format. Typed double-spaced; default 1-inch margins; Times New Roman, font size 12. Include your name, class, and date on the upper left-hand side of the first page. Include page numbers on the lower right-hand side of all pages.

Critical thinking paper on corporal punishment, psychology homework help

Critical Thinking Exercise

!

You will need to write a 3 – 5

page paper (doubled spaced with a font of 12!) on the topic of corporal punishment (i.e. Spanking) in the United States

Should it remain legal or should it be made illegal as it is in 46 other nations (2015).

Whichever side that you take you must back up your argument with at least 3 references APA style!

Two of these references need to be from Professional Peer Reviewed Journals In addition to the 3–5

page paper you will need to have a title

page stating which side you are taking and a Reference page at the end which will

be titled References!

NOTE: DO NOT COPY AND PASTE FROM REFERENCES!! IT IS TOO EASY TO COMMIT Plagiarism

HUM/105 – WORLD MYTHOLOGY Version 3

Subject: Male Identity
divine_roles_across_cultures_matrix.doc

Consider the way males are portrayed in myths of the Female Divine.  How would someone who disagreedwith the models of male identity included in the myths of the Female Divine challenge them?  Be sure to provide examples of myths found in your textbook.

Complete the matrix and short essay, as described at the conclusion of the matrix (150 – 350 words). Follow Matrix directions carefully.

As always, be sure to choose myths that come from this week’s readings. 

Point deductions will be taken for selections that come from outside resources.

Format your citations and references consistent with APA guidelines.

Your Divine Roles Across Cultures Matrix is attached. Please be sure to read the Matrix Directions in their entirety. Most importantly, note the following:

  • You must first choose one Divine Role, which occurs in myths of many cultures. Some examples are Sun God, Father God, Fertility Goddess, Goddess of Wisdom, etc. Indicate this role in the top, left column of your Matrix.
  • After selecting this role, you must then choose two deities from differing cultures to examine. Indicate these deities in the remaining top columns of the Matrix.