1 page needed in 4 hours

Review Visitor Flow/Sales Funnel for shopping on both Xchair.com and competitors. (see list of competing products and competing advertisers below)

EVERY ONE COME UP WITH AT LEAST TWO POINTS

MAIN POINTS TO GO OVER DURING CALL: (Make sure every point is unique and substantive)

SEE The example below and how 1 of my team did it and make one for because every member should make a list and answer the question I also attached the list

  • Competitive products
    • (PAOLA) Herman Miller Aeron Chair
      • Similarities
        • Details on specs
        • Information on design
        • Customization feature
      • Differences
        • Facebook and twitter pages seem a higher frequency of frequent posts than XChair
        • Content marketing
        • More video
        • Embody seems to boast and provide a good amount of information on its history and design
        • Embody caters to different industries
  • Competitive advertisers

a.(PAOLA) Dollar Shave Club

i.What these companies do that we don’t?

    • Videos requires someone to create content

ii.What works for them?

    • Use of comedy to attract its clients
    • Variety of products at a discount cost

iii.What looks interesting about their strategy?

iv.What could we do to mirror their success?

    • create video content; however, tailor it to a more sophisticated demographic

Bed in a box concept

  1. (PAOLA) Nectar

i.What these companies do that we don’t?

    • Home trial for a year
    • Lifetime warranty
    • Floating chat function
    • What works for them?
      • Home trial for a year
      • Lifetime warranty
    • What looks interesting about their strategy?
      • Floating zzzz and sheep announcing the latest purchase
    • What could we do to mirror their success?

discipline investigation assignment 2

This is a interview essay about anyone who has worked as a programer or any other jobs related to computer science which is my major.

Some example interview question:

  • How did you get started in your profession? Particularly, What did you do to put yourself in the position?
  • What’s your daily routine/ habits?
  • What’s the growth in the particular field? (Growth = Vertical movement/ advancement).
  • What other skills would benefit in this field? (Communication/ Technical/ Critical Thinking).
  • What are some of the obstacles you’ve faced with in regards to…

Achieving your goals

Conducting business

  • Are you satisfied with your current profession? If not, what would you have done differently?

General format

Introduction

Discourse community (part of the Outside Research***).

Preface and Preview Statement.

Interview Report

Background and Career Path

Roles and Responsibilities

Communication Skills

Conclusions

Works Cited (Minimum of 2 sources).

Appendix: (List of interview questions).

*** Outside Research: Find minimum of 2 outside sources (See Course Reader “Writing Steps” in Discipline Investigation assignment) that give you additional information about your future discourse community:

For Example: What types of work or jobs someone in that field would have?

What the requirements will be for those jobs in the future?

more details are showed in the attached file.

the same required in pic

the same required in the pic with simple words…………………………………………..

jess takes board 50 inches long and cuts it two pieces one which 26

Jess takes a board that is 50 inches long and cuts it into two pieces, one of which is 26 inches long. How long is the second piece? Express your answer in feet.

signals systems and transforms fourth edition

Please do the questions in the doc file. Additional pages from the book have been attached for the rest of the problems. Thanks

peer review 108

Unit 4 Peer Review of Course Project: Reading and Reviewing Drafts

1111 unread replies.1111 replies.

For this discussion you will need to post your draft of your course paper and respond to at least one of your peers’ drafts using the questions below.

Due Dates

  • Your draft must be posted by midnight Thursday.
  • Your reviews of your classmates’ drafts should be posted by midnight Saturday.

NOTE: Please make sure to post your draft on time Thursday to ensure that your classmates have an adequate amount of time to complete their review of your paper.

Please answer the following questions for each draft you review. You are welcome to add additional commentary for your peers. You can copy and paste the form into a word document to fill it in and then copy and paste it into the discussion forum.

Note: you are not required to revise the paragraphs for your peers – your job is to provide the feedback your peers need to revise their own work.

Depending on the number of individuals in your class, your instructor may assign an additional paper for you to review. Please check for announcements.

OPEN-ENDED FORM

Author____________ Reviewer_____________

The goals of peer review are:

  1. to help improve your classmate’s paper by pointing out strengths and weaknesses that may not be apparent to the author, and
  2. to help improve editing skills.

INSTRUCTIONS

Read the paper(s) assigned to you twice, once to get an overview of the paper, and a second time to provide constructive criticism for the author to use when revising his/her paper. Answer the questions below.

ORGANIZATION (10%)

  1. Were the basic sections (Introduction, Conclusion, Literature Cited, etc.) adequate? If not, what is missing?
  2. Did the writer use subheadings well to clarify the sections of the text? Explain.
  3. Was the material ordered in a way that was logical, clear and easy to follow? Explain.CITATIONS (20%)
  4. Did the writer cite sources adequately and appropriately? Note any incorrect formatting.
  5. Were all the citations in the text listed in the References section? Note any discrepancies.GRAMMAR AND STYLE (20%)
  6. Were there any grammatical or spelling problems?
  7. Was the writer’s writing style clear? Were the paragraphs and sentences cohesive? Did paragraphs have an opening topic sentence, several supporting sentences, a concluding sentence, and a transition sentence to the next paragraph (where appropriate).CONTENT (50%)
  8. Did the writer adequately summarize and discuss the topic? Explain.
  9. Did the writer comprehensively cover appropriate materials available from the standard sources (e.g., ECPI library)? If no, what’s missing?
  10. Did the writer make some contribution of thought to the paper, or merely summarize data or publications? Explain.

There are two primary areas that you should be focusing on when you engage in this kind of peer response: the macro issues and the micro issues.

The macro issues deal with the large issues (content, fulfillment of purpose, organization, etc.). Usually, when a reader makes recommendations about macro issues, it means you will probably need to add content to your paragraph, delete content from your paragraph, move major chunks of your paragraph around, etc.

The micro issues deal with the smaller scale issues (spelling, grammar, word choice, punctuation, etc.). Usually, these micro issues are identified in the proofreading/editing stages of the writing process, and it is easier to identify them when you have several sets of eyes going over your draft. If you notice any micro issues as you go through your peers’ drafts, please do note them. You might even want to offer suggestions for how to improve them.

NOTE: You will be evaluated on the content and depth of your responses, so remember the following when completing them:

  • Be considerate
  • Be thorough
  • Write clearly and use complete sentences
  • Make constructive comments
  • Avoid rude remarks
  • Make helpful suggestions
  • Praise the positive

Your purpose for each response is to assist the writer in any way possible with improving her or his paper. Now is the time for sound advice and cyber-support.

Giving and Receiving Constructive Criticism

I know some of you will feel awkward about posting your draft to the discussion board for others to read, but there are many reasons why making your draft public like this can benefit you. Here are a few of those reasons:

  • For one thing, it’s always helpful to have someone else read over your work because readers will find mistakes writers cannot see. Writers tend to read over their writing so much that, after a while, they can no longer see the mistakes they are making. A reader can help with this problem.
  • Also, writers write so that readers can understand what they are writing about. What better way to see if a reader understands what you have written than to have a reader actually read your writing?

Additionally, I know some of you will feel awkward about making comments about drafts you have read.

You might feel that you are not qualified to give feedback, but I’m asking you to put aside your doubts and give it your best shot. More than anything else, your classmates need real readers who can let the writers know if they are “making sense” or fulfilling the assignment. You can serve as a genuine reader for your classmates, and that’s a valuable service to them. Don’t worry about “not being sure” of an answer to a required question. You are the READER-and your interpretation of what you read matters. Just answer the questions from a reader’s perspective, and don’t worry about being “right” or “wrong.” As long as you read the draft carefully and answer the required questions thoughtfully, you are doing your job.

Your reviews should be thoughtful and detailed. Saying things like “this is a great job” or “well done” throughout the entire paper, does not help the writer improve. No one is able to write a perfect paper the first time. Even those with extensive writing experience need to revise their first drafts. What does this mean… please provide constructive criticism. Some things you should be looking for:

  • Missing internal citations
  • First person writing
  • Grammar errors
  • Two or three sentence paragraphs
  • Misuse of quotation marks
  • Direct quotes without proper citation

response paper 2 pages

RESPONSE PAPER 3 (2 pages),

 

The class has viewed several examples of memorials, including Most Serene Republic

by Internationally acclaimed Native American artist Hock E Aye Vi Edgar Heap of Birds who was chosen to participate in the 2007 Venice Biennial. Heap of Birds is a Professor at the University of Oklahoma where he teaches Native American Studies and Fine Arts. Heap of Birds, who is Cheyenne/Arapaho, has been creating site-specific installations, sculpture, drawings and prints in order to draw attention to the social and political injustices that the many native tribes of America

have endured and which the white culture has conveniently forgotten. He considered four components to his project to be placed in different locations at the Venice Biennale. One focuses on Venice’s role in the Fourth Crusade. Two others center on the warrior chiefs who traveled with William “Buffalo Bill” Cody‘s Wild West Show to Venice. The phrase ‘Most Serene Republics’ fosters a link to an ironic assessment of very hostile policies carried out by the church and republic during the ‘Fourth Crusade,’ years 1201-1204, in European history. Heap of Birds states, “These deeds of war were based primarily on religious, xenophobic and business interests that, when re-examined, reveal similar tactics relating to the current tragic war in Iraq.” Thus, as is his

usual practice of using the past to illuminate the present, he refers to President

George W. Bush who had used the word “crusade” in the initial stages of the war on terrorism. 

 

 

Born in 1959 in Athens, Ohio, Maya Lin catapulted into the public eye when, as a senior at

Yale University, she submitted the winning design to a national competition for the Vietnam

Veterans Memorial to be built in Washington, D.C. Writing about the memorial, a black granite

wedge that emerges from and disappears into the ground, she says it “does not force or dictate

how you should think. In that sense it’s very Eastern. . .. It reflects me and my parents.” Her father was the Dean of Fine Arts at Ohio University, and her mother, Julia Chang Lin, is a professor of literature at Ohio University. “As the child of immigrants you have that sense of ‘Where are you? Where’s home?’” notes Lin, “and of trying to make a home.” Trained as an artist and architect, Lin’s

sculptures, parks, monuments and architectural projects are linked by a common ideal of making a place for individuals within the landscape.

 

Krzysztof Wodiczko, artist, professor and director of art, design and the public domain at Harvard Graduate School of Design is renowned for his large-scale slide and video projections on architectural facades and monuments around the world. He uses images and voices of the homeless, immigrants, survivors of domestic violence, war veterans and other marginalized people in his work. His interrogative design practice, begun in Poland and continued at MIT, creates nomadic instruments for homeless and immigrant survival, communication, empowerment, and healing. His current projects concern the Ablution of War (also the title of his recent book) or the Unwar Memorial. Wodiczko’s socially engaged art practice entails forging trusting relationships with veterans, and giving voice to the voiceless so that they can speak about the unspeakable.

 

Wodiczko’s artistic practice focuses on those people who live in their monuments shadow, who are monuments to their own memories.  Our monuments to historical events and heroes are metaphors or momento mori (from Latin ‘remember that you will die’).  Wodiczko says,  “We must create a site of rupture between the monument as symbol or sign of authority and the reality of the invisible public who have suffered unspeakable acts  – those who have Hannah Arendt’s ‘right to have rights.’.”

 

Compare one of Wodiczko’s war veteran’s memorial projects with Maya Lin’s Vietnam Veteran’s Memorial.  Discuss their physical differences, interpretive challenges and differences in public reactions.

 

 

 

Following your discussion of Wodiczko and Lin’s memorials, answer the questions below:

 

What is a memorial?

 

 

 

 

 

What should a memorial achieve?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What must an artist consider in designing a monument?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maya Lin said that the Memorial was meant to help people confront their pain. What kinds of changes occur when emotional wounds begin to heal? Discuss and compare Veteran’s Flame project to Maya Lin’s Vietnam Memorial. How do these two Memorials aid in the healing process?

 

 

You might want to visit the following links for your research:

 

http://www.mayalin.com/

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mlZzCAbmDyE

Veteran Flame Project

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xnxf_WNQN_4

Human Rights: A Global Challenge, University of Dayton

Krzysztof Wodiczko

Art and the Culture of War: Toward the Un-War Memorial

 

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

old dimionion case study

Morning -Please see attached case study with questions

acc561 week 4 assignment

3 questions with multiple segments 

see attached

ashford bus 640 week 3 dq 2

Contribution Analysis

Explain what is meant by “contribution analysis”. Carefully define the term and provide examples to illustrate it.

Guided Response:
Can you think of a recent example where you had to evaluate the incremental costs and benefits of different options in order to make a decision? In 300 words or more, please, provide your response to the above discussion question. Respond substantively to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Substantive responses use theory, research, and experience or examples to support ideas and further the class knowledge on the discussion topic.

Reference

Douglas, E. (2012). Managerial Economics (1st ed.). San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education