What is the so-called Nuremberg defense?, homework help

/in /by

Details:

Over time, a society’s perception of human rights changes. These changes have often been the result of negative events that motivated society to adapt its values in an attempt to avoid the occurrence of similar incidents. In this paper, a current ethical issue that resulted from repeated negative events will be explored in terms of how it motivated the adaptation of the APA Ethics Code.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
  • Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required but is not included in the total word count of the paper.
  • Support all statements with appropriate, contemporary research. Cite and reference at least two scholarly sources other than those in the module and assignment readings.

Directions:

Review the following:

  • American Psychological Association. (2009, August 5).APA Council of Representatives directs change in its ethics code to prevent so-called Nuremberg defense. APA News and Events.
  • American Psychological Association. (2010, February 24). American Psychological Association amends ethics code to address potential conflicts among professional ethics, legal authority, and organizational demands. APA News and Events.
  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Standard 1: Resolving ethical issues. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct: 2010 amendments.

Write a paper of 1,000-1,250 words that addresses the clarifications to the APA position regarding human rights protection. Address the following in your paper:

  1. What is the so-called Nuremberg defense? How did this influence the decision to clarify the APA Ethics Code?
  2. How does the new verbiage in the 2010 Ethics Code enhance the APA Council of Representatives’ resolution of 2007 and the referendum-based policy change of 2008 on the topic of human rights protection?
  3. Compare the current (2010) version of the Ethics Code to the 2002 version. Does the current version reflect a socially improving society or a socially declining society? Why?

evaLUATION

/in /by

The topics below are prompts for each column. Please do not repeat the topics, just provide the appropriate data extracted from the studies.

  • Citation – author, year, title
  • Conceptual Framework – theoretical basis for study
  • Design/Method – Indicate design & briefly describe what was done in the study
  • Sample/Setting – number, characteristics, attrition rate & why
  • Major Variables – Independent variables, dependent variables (e.g. IV = ?, DV = ?)
  • Measurement – What scales were used to measure the outcomes variables (e.g. name of scale, author, reliability info [Cronbach alpha])
  • Data analysis – What stats were used to answer the clinical question (i.e., all stats do not need to be put into the table)
  • Findings – Statistical findings or qualitative findings (i.e. for every statistical test you have in the data analysis column, you should have a finding)
  • Appraisal – strengths and limitations of the study, risk or harm if study interventions or findings implemented, feasibility of use in your practice; remember level of evidence + quality of evidence = strength of evidence of confidence to act

FINICAL REPORTING AND ANALYSIS, assignment help

/in /by

Please complete the following assignments from Chapter 2:

Starting on p. 68 do the answer the following questions:

Q 2-1, Q 2-6, Q 2-10, Q 2-14, Q 2-20, Q 2-28, Q 2-34, Q 2-40, Q 2-45, Q 2-50

subject :FINICAL REPORTING AND ANALYSIS

https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/

YOU CAN ACCESS THE BOOK AND WRITE THE ANSWERS.

2-1: Name the type of opinion indicated by each of the following situations:

a. There is a material uncertainty.

b. There was a change in accounting principle.

c. There is no material scope limitation or material departure from GAAP.

d. The financial statements do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the entity in conformity with GAAP.

e. Except for the effects of the matter(s) to which the qualification relates, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, result of operations, and cash flows of the entity, in conformity with GAAP.

2-6: Will the accountant express an opinion on reviewed finical statements ? Describe the accountants report for reviewed financial statements?

2-10: why are notes to statement necessary?

2-14: Briefly describe a summary annual report?

2-20: can cash dividends be paid from retained earnings? Comment.

2-28: a typical accrual recognition for salaries is as follows :

Salaries expense $ 1000 (INCREASE)

Salaries payable 1000 (increase)

Explain the matching concept applies in this situation.

2-34: Considering the EMH, IT IS BEST IF FINANCIAL DISCLOUSURE IS MADE IN THE BODY OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. COMMENT.

2-40: Describe the Treadway commission.

2-45: indicate the two approaches to presenting consolidated statements.

2-50: Comment on the impact on US GAAP if the short term convergence and the major topics are completed.

MBA Assignment Grading Rubric

MBA Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

APA Styles and Formating

Full Marks

5.0 pts

Needs Work

3.0 pts

No Marks

0.0 pts

5.0 pts

APA References and Citations

Full Marks

5.0 pts

Some errors, needs improvement

3.0 pts

No Marks

0.0 pts

5.0 pts

Topic and Content

Full Marks

80.0 pts

Very good, needs some minor improvementss

60.0 pts

Acceptable but needs significant improvement

45.0 pts

Unacceptable

0.0 pts

80.0 pts

Total Points: 90.0

Program Planning and Assessment Proposal: Section 5, Program Evaluation Plan

/in /by

To prepare for this Assignment, review all of the sections created in previous modules to date, especially the Module 2 Discussions and Assignments where you developed an outline of your evaluation plan. Revise your Evaluation Plan based upon new knowledge, Learning Resources, and previous peer and Instructor feedback.

Assignment: Program Evaluation Plan (2–3 pages in addition to the evaluation instruments to be placed in Appendix C)

Develop the following components of the evaluation:

The Program Evaluation Plan section evaluates the extent to which the program is meeting the predetermined program outcomes and objectives. The introduction includes the following:

  • A brief synopsis of the program proposal being evaluated
  • Questions guiding the evaluation
    • Select one informal and two formal methods or strategies for program evaluation data. At least two of the documents should use quantitative measures; requires the input of numbers or a graduated scale. Examples of approaches might include the following: A formal survey or checklist, formal interview, formal observation, formal anecdotal evidence such as test records, informal conversations, informal tally of comments, informal interviews, Question & Answer activity, etc.
    • Design three documents to gather program evaluation data. Each document must include all of the following:
  • Provide the name of the document (e.g., Likert Survey, Semantic Differential Scale, Checklist, Questionnaires, etc.)
  • Explain the type of instrument or activity (e.g., formal or informal)
  • Provide key purpose for the assessment instrument or activity (e.g., identify the top three concerns of stakeholders)
  • List guiding questions of the instrument or activity [Include a minimum of five and maximum of ten questions]
  • Describe how the instrument or activity will be implemented (e.g., Online Survey Monkey handout, email, etc.)
  • Illustrate how the data will be analyzed (e.g., descriptive statistics (frequency, mode, median, mean) or reporting of numbers in a graph, etc.)
  • Articulate how the findings will be reported (e.g., handout at staff meeting, email, etc.)

Conclusion: Summarize what you learned about the planning process and reflect upon what you would do differently next time you develop a program plan to implement. (2–3 paragraphs)

Appendix A: Annotated Bibliography
Appendix B: Needs Assessment Examples
Appendix C: Evaluation Instruments

Note: The contents of your paper should be substantiated by the literature, utilizing reference citations and providing a reference list at the end of the paper. Please refer to the APA manual (6th ed.) for appropriate guidelines to support scholarly discourse.

Refer to the “Program Planning and Assessment Proposal Overview, Introduction, and Guidelines” document in the Module 1 Learning Resources for specific information.

I have attached the following assignment documents for reference so that you see where I’m going with this. Thank you

The Study of Newton’s Law

/in /by

State Newton’s 1st Law

Have two illustrations of the law and explain/describe how the newton’s works.

-Motions
– How does it work
-Its function

State Newton’s 2st Law

Have two illustrations of the law and explain/describe how the newton’s works.
– Acceleration
– How does it work
-Its function

State Newton’s 3rd law

Have two illustrations of the law and explain/describe how the newton’s worlks.

Also, feel free to use examples.

  • -The role of Action and Reaction in the process of law
  • -How does it work
  • -Its main function.

( Please provide or use real life examples; such as moving cars, dropping an item etc)

*** This is an assignment a FINAL project, please also check the Newtons Laws document that i have attached for your review that can help you guide***

References and in-text citation are requeired.

Thanks,

Final Film Critique (Back to the Future 1985)

/in /by

You will be completing this assignment in two stages. For the first stage (1500 to 1800 words), you will analyze an entire movie. In the second stage (300 to 600 words), you will reflect on how you analyzed the movie as well as how your ability to analyze film in general has evolved.

You are encouraged to incorporate writing from your Week Two and Week Three assignments if (a) you have reflected on the instructor’s feedback, (b) you have revised the relevant parts of the essays accordingly, and (c) the essays discuss the same film that you discuss here.

Stage 1: Analysis

For this stage, you will be analyzing a movie selected from the AFI’s 10 Top 10 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. list. The film you choose can be one that you have previously analyzed in this course. While you are allowed to choose a film that does not come from the AFI lists, you are strongly encouraged to email your professor to receive approval before doing so.

The analysis portion of your paper should be 1500 to 1800 words in length. You should analyze the film through the lens of one of the broad theories you have learned about in class (auteur theory, genre theory, formalist theory). Your analysis must address four main areas (contextual information, story/plot, aesthetic choices, and social/personal impact) and how these areas work together to develop the theme of the movie. As you construct your analysis, assume that your reader is not familiar with this film. Use your analysis to explain to your reader why they should watch this film.

In addition to the film you are analyzing, you must use three scholarly sources to support your arguments. Refer to the ENG225 Research Guide in the Ashford University Library for guidance and to locate your sources. Cite your sources (including the feature-length film) within the text of your paper and on the reference page. Cite your sources according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Your analysis must address the following components (noted in bold below):

  • Contextual Information – In this area, you will provide some of the basic identifying information of the film. This includes:
    • Title
    • Director, cinematographer, major actors/actresses. Be sure to describe their roles in the overall design process.
    • Year of release
    • Type of film (blockbuster, indie, documentary, etc.)
    • Genre
  • Story/Plot – In this area, you should offer a brief summary of the film, and then show how it was deployed in the narrative structure of the film. Explain the difference between the film’s story and its plot. This area can be addressed as a separate paragraph, or can be threaded throughout your analysis of the film.
  • Aesthetic Choices – In this area, you will assess the efficacy of specific techniques and design elements employed in the film as they apply to the overarching narrative and theme of the film. These elements include:
    • Mise en scène (e.g., lighting, sound, composition of frame, costuming, etc.)
    • Editing (e.g., cuts and transitions, shots used, angles, etc.)
    • Technology (i.e., analyze the impact of any notable technological effects: film stock, targeted release venue, special effects, etc.)
  • Social/Personal Impact – In this area, you will critically address the following questions:
    • What impact did this film have on society (i.e., politically or culturally, positive or negative)? The impact can be as major as inspiring political or social changes or as minor as inspiring the production of toys or lunchboxes.
    • How did society affect this film (i.e., what currents in society led to the creation of the film)?
    • If you are unable to find any information about the social impact of the film, explain the personal impact it has had on you.

Note: Not every bullet point under the four listed components will necessarily apply to your movie. However, you will still need to discuss each of the four main components thoroughly, which means that you may need to explain a concept even if it can’t be directly applied to your movie.

Your paper should be organized around a thesis statement that clarifies what you will attempt to accomplish in your paper, and how you will proceed. Additionally, you must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph. Review the Final Film Critique sample, which provides an example of a well-developed analysis as well as insight on composition.

Stage 2: Reflection

After completing your movie analysis, you will reflect on the analysis process and how you have learned to more thoroughly analyze film as well as how rigorous study of film enhances your development as a student and thinker. In this 300- to 600-word reflection, review your initial post from the “Post Your Introduction” discussion in Week One, and consider how your ability to analyze movies has changed or grown. Append your reflection to the analysis portion of your paper and submit as one document. Your reflection should be personal and exploratory in nature.

Address the following questions in your reflection:

  • What can be gained through analyzing film?
  • How has this changed the way you view movies?
  • How are you able to use film theory and criticism to find and interpret meaning in movies?
  • In what ways has this course changed your understanding of how movies are related to society?
  • What skills have you developed during this course, and how might those skills be applied to your major, profession, and/or life?

The Final Film Critique

  • Must be one document that is 1800 to 2400 words in length, comprised of a 1500- to 1800-word film analysis and a 300- to 600-word reflection.
  • Must include a separate title and reference page, and be formatted according to APA style as outlined in Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Must include a title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  • Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  • Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  • Must use at least three scholarly sources (reviews, articles, or book chapters) other than the textbook to support your points. Refer to the ENG225 Research Guide (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for guidance.
  • Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

I have attached a sample of what the paper should look like.

The film for discussing will be Back to the Future (1985)

Political Science Discussion, homework help

/in /by

•  Explain the causes of the turmoil in Egypt in early 2011.

•  Why do you think Muslim Bortherhood’s democratically elected
government was overruled by military?

•  Appraise the prospects for the brotherhood in Egypt and the
future of military.

•  What could be the repercussions when a dictatorship is forced
out allowing other strong elements to shape the fate of the people – where does
this take Egypt in the wake of other threats such as ISIL?

 
Or Alternative questions:

•  What do you think of democracy in Iraq?

•  How is democracy working in Afghanistan?

How Iran is scoring in
implementing a democratic election process?

Quiz-Cultural Approach to Organizations

/in /by

Question 1 – simply NAME your theory and explain what it is and what the goal of the theory is.

theory name is Cultural Approach to Organizations. explain what it is and what the goal of the theory is.

Question 2 – to which of the 7 tradition does your theory belong?

Question 3 – to which context does your chosen theory belong? Interpersonal? Mass media? Organizational? This should be VERY clear.

Question 4 – deals with axiology, epistemology, and ontology.

Question 5 – name some strengths and weaknesses of your theory. You should have at least 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses.

Questions 6 & 7 – these 2 are worth 25 points each. All of the previous questions are only worth 10 points each. It only makes sense that the questions worth 25 points should have a much more lengthy and detailed response. Two or three paragraphs (or more) are required.

2 Assignments – Week 2

/in /by

————————————————————————————————————————————

Writing Journal 2 – “ASSIGNMENT 1”

————————————————————————————————————————————

(PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FROM THE PROFESSOR.)

Please reflect, in writing, on the following two-part prompt.

Make sure that your finished reflection is at least 300 words long to ensure that you receive full credit:

What is the purpose, in your opinion, of personal writing? Why would a Remembered Event or personal narrative essay be assigned as part of a college writing course? These are questions I was asked by students the very first college course I ever taught. I was teaching a set curriculum (I was required to teach a personal essay), and the students were all pre-engineering majors, and they were trying to stage a mutiny. They argued that they would never have to do this kind of writing in their majors or in their professional lives. (The engineers in my family later told me they were wrong on both counts.) Some people view personal writing as less rigorous than other kinds of writing. Do you agree? Why or why not? Why do you think personal writing is so often assigned in college writing classes?

Part 2. Please read the excerpt of Exit West in Moodle Readings Folder 1.

Although the novel is a work of fiction, what tools has the author used that might translate to personal narrative writing?

(PLEASE SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FROM THE PROFESSOR.)

————————————————————————————————————————————

Discussion 2 – “ASSIGNMENT 2” – Your discussion should be at least 300 words

————————————————————————————————————————————

One of the most important facets of writing a good Remembered Event Essay is choosing a topic. In the past, I’ve used a textbook that has some excellent guidelines for choosing an event, and I scanned the relevant page and put it in this week’s Reading Folder (remember that you also have a reading in Writing Commons linked through the syllabus).

Using the bullet-ed prompts on the bottom of page 34, please write for five to ten minutes each on three different events you might choose to write your essay about. Do this even if you have already determined, for sure, what you’d like to write about. Try to write in as much detail as you can, but don’t write for more than ten minutes about any one event. Then, go ahead and post each of the three free-writes as one post to this Discussion Forum.

After you’ve posted your own free-writes, review the free-writes of at least three of your peers.

Which idea/event do you think would make the best essay and why?

Which event might best fulfill the requirements of the assignment as you understand them?

What do you find interesting or thought-provoking about these events? How do you relate to them?

Complete Technical Writing Discussion Post

/in /by

Looking at Design

Please respond to EACH of the following discussion topics and submit them to the discussion forum as a single post. Your initial post should be 75-150 words in length.

Search the web for a business’ or organization’s website that you find effective (it would be even better if you can find a website of a potential competitor to your portfolio project subject). Share the link to this website, and answer the following questions:

  • What are some particular things about this website that you admire?
  • What could have been done better or more concisely?
  • Could any of the information you see be better represented visually?
  • Are there areas in the website that could be enhanced by adding a chart or table?
  • Discuss the aesthetic properties of the website in terms of white space, font style and color, layout, ease of navigation, etc.