I need help writing a paper with an approximately 1200 word paper on Vitiligo.

This paper should include:

-Introduction

-Definition

-Symptoms

-Treatments

-Prevention

-Conclusion

AND

At least THREE references at the bottom.

Reflect: The discussion we had about how to measure and describe variables was redundant in some parts (levels of measurement) but also new information in other parts. In particular, the ability to discuss and analyze how precise variables are, their central tendencies, and how dispersed they are is invaluable in our efforts to reduce measurement error and select the correct measures of the variables we are studying. The skills and knowledge learned today will be applied and re-applied multiple times in every political science research project you conduct.

Write: In your initial post of at least 550 words, review Exercise 5 on pages 45-46 and complete the following:

• State whether the statements below are true or false. Please explain each of your responses carefully.
  • The Barack Obama feeling thermometer has a positive skew.
  • The mean of the Hilary Clinton thermometer provides an accurate measure of central tendency.
  • Hilary Clinton’s ratings have a greater amount of variation than Barack Obama’s ratings.

See attached assignment and Rubric. Need 4-5 references less than 5 years old, APA format 4 pages not including title or refrence page

1. For this assignment, research two of the experts listed below who are in the Discovery Channel program to determine his/her credibility in his/her field, and post your findings here BEFORE you view the programs. The main purpose of the assignment is to discover and document your steps in determining how websites are or are not credible. Check at least 5 websites for each person when doing your research. Please prepare a Works Consulted page in proper MLA 8 format. Please see the attached for more detailed instructions. If you quote from any of your sources in your report, please prepare a Works Cited page and use proper intext citations.

More detailed directions:

Discovery Channel Program Exercise in Support and Credibility of Experts by Googling — minimum 7 pages of writing (approx. 1250 words) half for each person you choose (625).

How can you tell which online information comes from reliable authorities? Anytime you use someone else’s words or ideas in your writing or formal speaking you should be aware who that person is; you can start now investigating the reliability of any sources you are thinking of quoting or paraphrasing.

We like to think that if information is in print, it is reliable. Unfortunately, that is not always the case. People with unjust biases and even those who want to sow hatred find their way into print. In general, works that appear in print go through a much more extensive vetting process than what appears online, but there are so-called vanity presses that will publish pretty much anything if the author will pay the cost. There are also all sorts of periodicals that express slanted—and often conflicting—points of view, some of them offensive to many of us. That’s what comes of freedom of the press.

When you go online, how can you start to weed through a list of results to find reliable authorities? For one thing, you can learn to “read” the list of results you get from Google or other search engines.

Please document the following by taking screen shots and explaining in prose as you work through your research in order to discover the possible credibility of two of the experts from the list. Please number each part of your assignment.

1. Choose two:

Dr. Robert Folk, a geologist

Dr. Monica Grady, a meteorite specialist

Dr. Michael Persinger, neurologist and geologist

Dr. Joe Nickell, a paranormal investigator

Dr. David M. Jacobs, an historian

Dr. Jack Cohen, a reproductive biologist

Garry Wood, an ambulance driver in Edinburgh, Scotland

1. Take a screen shot of the list of links that appear. Be sure to post this and all other screen shots in your paper. Before you click on a link, examine the first ten to fifteen entries in the resulting list. Yes, you may use Wikipedia as one source for this assignment. Look at each URL and see what you can learn from it. Also notice any other information that might affect your opinion of the source’s reliability or objectivity.

• Are there sources that you immediately trust as reliable? Which ones, and why?
• Are there any that you immediately assume will present a biased perspective? Which ones, and why?
• Are there any that are completely unfamiliar to you? If so, choose two or three and speculate what type of source each might be.

1. Now click on a couple of the sources that you trusted as being reliable. Identify exactly who wrote the document that you have accessed. If you cannot find an author, what does that suggest? If there is an author, search that person’s name and see if you find convincing credentials that support the assumption that he or she is qualified to write on the subject at hand.
2. Do the same with at least two sources that you predicted would be biased. Does further investigation support your assumption?
3. Go to at least one of the sources that were unfamiliar to you. Once you look more closely at the source, do you find any evidence of its reliability or lack thereof? Explain.
4. Based on your research, do you think the expert is credible in his/her field? Give at least two examples why.

** IMPORTANT** A sample of this assignment is attached!