For your Week 4 assignment you will develop a year-long (52 week) training program for the athlete you began training for the Week 2 Athlete Analysis Assignment. For Week 4 you will be developing the overall periodization plan by determining what phases and cycles will be followed working back from the competitive season or the last competition (or signature event) or event your athlete competes in. The length of each phase and cycle as well as the specific workouts within them will vary depending on the sport/event.

For Assignments 3 and 4 you will be developing the details within them in regards to the specific training variables, workouts, and competitions.

Your year-long program will be based on the athlete analysis you completed for

Assignment 1.

Create the off-season, pre-season and in-season phases/cycles for the athlete using the principles of periodization.

These should include the duration of each part of the yearly plan in number of weeks that each part is followed with an overview of the relative volume, intensity, and energy systems emphasized.

The rationale must explained in at least one paragraph for each phase and/or cycle. Furthermore, any assessments planned during or following each phase should be explained with a detailed rationale (and supporting references).

You can also provide a chart for each “season” of the schedule as way of organizing it of which the “details” will be filled in from Assignments 3 and 4.

Please use at least 5 appropriate outside sources to help you develop this program and the paper will be submitted as one combined single WORD document in APA format.

Be creative and have fun with this project.

Please be sure to include all rules of APA formatting and appropriate scholarly, peer-reviewed references. Your paper should contain at the least:

1. Title page
2. APA references/citations
3. Headers
4. Pg. #s
5. A scholarly tone
6. 2-4 pages (not including title page)
7. Minimum 5 appropriate peer-reviewed references
8. Charts/Graphs

Please provide atleast 150 words for each question

1. Discuss the difference between a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP), a Business Continuity Plan (BCP), and a Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP). You might want to start with the definitions from the NIST SP 800-34, located at http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-34r1.pdf. Section 3.5 discusses the different types of Plan Testing, Training, and Exercises.

2. Complete the discussion:

I)Identify and discuss three concepts you learned from this course? do you see these concepts as beneficial to your day-to-day risk management functions?

II)What did you find most value (assignments, labs, discussion and projects) in this course and why?

3.Your lesson discussed several compliance laws, standards, and best practices (see the Lesson 2 activities, under the Rationale tab). The Department of Health and Human Services (the agency responsible for managing HIPAA compliance among healthcare providers) lists recent breaches at https://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report… – think of it as their “Wall of Shame.” Find an article online that discusses a breach or violation of a regulation, such as HIPAA, or of a standard such as PCI-DSS, GLBA, or FERPA. You can also look at Federal Agencies and discuss those that have not had sufficient controls in place (think of the breach that the Office of Personnel Management had). Summarize the article in your own words and address the controls that the organization should have had in place, but didn’t, that facilitated the breach. What were the ramifications to the organization and the individuals involved?

BUS102 Discussion

What are the limitations of the payback period?

Take a fictional project for illustration

Discussion WK4 NURS 8210

HIT Projects and Decision Makers

A nurse leader sought to implement greater security in the children’s wing of the hospital by installing a new alarm and monitoring system. Due to budget constraints, the CNO rejected the proposal, stating that current security methods were sufficient. Shortly after this failed proposal, an individual did in fact breach the children’s wing security and abducted a young child. Thankfully, the child was found and returned to her parents; and the CNO quickly found the money to install the new security system.

Not all HIT projects have such high-profile stakes. The main takeaway from this example is the importance of getting key stakeholders and decision makers on board when planning a new HIT project.

To prepare:

• Bring to mind a HIT project implemented in your organization. Which leaders identified the project? Which stakeholders and decision makers helped moved the project forward?
• Consider methods that were used to garner the support of stakeholders and decision makers to move the project forward.

By Day 3 post a cohesive response that addresses the following:

• Describe an example of a HIT project implemented at your organization and analyze how that project was identified and moved forward.
• Evaluate the impact of key decision makers on moving the HIT project forward