Hi there, I have attached the required links for the case study and the structure for the paper.

this case is about,

On 28th July, outside the Seven Corners bar and restaurant district in Minneapolis, smashing the back window, a Dell laptop was stolen from the backseat of a rental car. This incident led to a security breach that will potentially result in exposing the patient’s confidential medical data and information. On January 19, 2012, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson filed a lawsuit against Accretive Health claiming that Accretive failed to comply with the state rules.

please follow this structure when you write the paper.

Structure

Introduction; Facts; Issues Presented; Applicable Legal Framework; Analysis; and Conclusion.

keep the introduction and conclusion short.

Go through this article as the whole case is in these articles

http://www.startribune.com/hospitals-face-investigation-of-patient-data-theft/131925938/?refresh=true

https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2012/01/24/minnesota-ag-sues-debt-collection-agency-for-health-privacy-violations/.

https://www.twincities.com/2011/09/26/fairview-informs-patients-of-security-breach/.

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2012/07/31/health/accretive-settlement.

https://loriswansonlawsuits.com/accretive-health.

Your Analysis should include consideration of the legal issues raised by the specific factual situation. Include a discussion of the applicable legal principles as a background for your analysis of the specific factual situation. Analyze and evaluate the claims and defenses of all parties. For a case that went to trial, evaluate the evidence and claims/defenses on both sides and analyze the reasons for the outcome.

ANALYSIS PARAMETERS

Be sure to include:

1. the applicable legal standard(s)(e.g. a statute, rule taken from a case we have studied, negligence standard etc.);
2. the arguments presented by both sides under those legal standards;
3. how did the court respond to the arguments and reach its decision (if case went to court); or how would a court be likely to respond?
4. your own evaluation of the legal issues and positions of the parties, including public policy, if applicable. Were the arguments strong or weak? What evidence supported the claims made by each side? Do the arguments make sense? Were there reasons other than the obvious ones for the outcome or decision?;
5. policy analysis of the issues and applicable law, and the possible or actual outcome.
6. Analyze the ethics of the situation, using an applicable code of ethics as a point of reference
7. List best practices/ risk management actions that you recommend based on your research.

Select one or more of the cultural competence assessment tools to assess the level of cultural competency of yourself and your teammates.

Prepare a 3-page paper on your Learning Team’s cultural competency.

Include recommendations regarding increasing or ensuring greater cultural competence for your team members.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Describe the various levels of prevention and give an example of an intervention at each level. Choose examples that are different from those already mentioned by your classmates. 

•Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the various levels of prevention in the context of a specific problem or disorder. Identify which level of prevention would be most effective with the issue or problem you have chosen. Again, choose something not already discussed by a classmate. 

•Respond to the question: why is an emphasis on primary prevention crucial in the human services field? 

•In order to be effective as a human service professional, it is important to become familiar with the resources available in our own community. Using the internet and other resources, research prevention programs in your community. Describe several of these programs and discuss the problems or disorders they are attempting to prevent. Do you think they are effective at this task? Why or why not? 

•Discuss any obstacles likely to impact these programs in your community.

A woman in an out-patient clinic is prescribed olanzapine (Zyprexa) 10 mg QHS. At her 3-month follow-up, the client states, “I knew it was a possible side effect, but I can’t believe I am not getting my period anymore.” Which is a priority teaching need? 1. “Sometimes amenorrhea is a temporary side effect of medications and should resolve itself.” 2. “I am sure this was very scary for you. How long have you been without your period?” 3. “Although your periods have stopped, there is still a potential for you to become pregnant.” 4. “Maybe the amenorrhea is not due to your medication. Have your periods been regular in the past?”

Resource: Ch. 3 of Management: Leading & Collaborating in a Competitive World

Identify a time in your life when you had to make a personal or professional decision such as buying a home, changing jobs, enrolling in school, or relocating to another state or region.

Write a 700- 1000 word paper in which you discuss your decision-making process. Support your ideas with academic research. Include the following in your paper:

Describe each step of your process.

How similar was your decision-making process to the one described in the text?

How might your decision be different if you had used the same steps included in the text?

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. A minimum of 3 peer reviewed references and citations should be included.