I need someone to write me an essay for my English class .. The subject is ( The American Nazi party )

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

Here are a few Information Security Policies (Educause) (Links to an external site.) from higher education institutions. Choose two of these policies or other policies of your choice that you may find publicly available. Here are a few security policies from airlines:

https://www.china-airlines.com/us/en/terms-and-conditions/information-security (Links to an external site.)

https://www.airfrance.us/US/en/common/transverse/footer/edito_psc.htm (Links to an external site.)

https://www.singaporeair.com/en_UK/privacy-policy/ (Links to an external site.)

After evaluating these two different Information Security Policies, write a 1-2 page paper comparing and contrasting these policies. What are some of the similarities and differences? Would you have any recommendations to add to each of these policies?

Here is the grading rubric:

MGMT 394 3.4 Hands-On Rubric

MGMT 394 3.4 Hands-On Rubric

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development	30.0 pts (Excellent – A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated. 26.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated 23.0 pts (Average – C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. 20.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated. 17.0 pts (Failing – F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.	30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure	30.0 pts (Excellent – A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product. 26.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented. 23.0 pts (Average – C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity. 20.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought. 17.0 pts (Failing – F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.	30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis	25.0 pts (Excellent – A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions. 22.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed. 19.0 pts (Average – C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear. 17.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized. 14.0 pts (Failing – F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.	25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat	15.0 pts (Excellent – A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product. 13.0 pts (Above-Average – B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product. 11.0 pts (Average – C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product. 9.0 pts (Near-Failing – D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting. 7.0 pts (Failing – F) Activity is not formatted at all.	15.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

Next

Answer three questions below. You must do your own work and use Turnitin. Not accept any paper that has 25% or more “similarity. Also not accept papers that fail to properly cite to sources.

5 full Pages. Like all papers you’ll submit, formatting is: 1” margins all around, double-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font. No headers, extra spaces between paragraphs – none of the little tricks that take up space.

Question 1: There are a few categories of persons who may be considered to be “disabled” and protected by the ADA. First, in your own words, identify those categories. Also, tell me which persons are not protected by the ADA. Then, find a case where an employer disputed that an applicant or employee was actually “disabled” under the law and describe the dispute (what were the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s basic arguments?) as well as the court’s decision and reasoning.

Question 2: A person is not entitled to protection under the ADA unless they are 1) “disabled” and as long as they are 2) “qualified.” Do some research and describe, in your own words, what it means to be “qualified.” What are “essential functions” of a job and who decides what is or is not “essential?” Then, find a case involving the ADA where the central dispute was whether the applicant or employee was “qualified.” Tell me what each side argued and how the court resolved the dispute.

Question 3: An important part of the ADA is an employer’s obligation to engage in the “interactive process.” Do some research into that term and, in your own words, tell me what it means. Then, find a case where the central dispute was whether or not a plaintiff or defendant properly engaged in the “interactive process.” Tell me the major arguments made by each side and tell me how the court ruled…and why.

Poem # 4- Filling Station – Gas Station – Workspace

Submit Assignment

• Due Sunday by 11:59pm
• Points 0
• Submitting a text entry box
• Available until May 22 at 11:59pm

Filling Station by Elizabeth Bishop

—this little filling station,

oil-soaked, oil-permeated

to a disturbing, over-all

black translucency.

Be careful with that match!

Father wears a dirty,

oil-soaked monkey suit

that cuts him under the arms,

and several quick and saucy

and greasy sons assist him

(it’s a family filling station),

all quite thoroughly dirty.

Do they live in the station?

It has a cement porch

behind the pumps, and on it

a set of crushed and grease-

impregnated wickerwork;

on the wicker sofa

a dirty dog, quite comfy.

Some comic books provide

the only note of color—

of certain color. They lie

upon a big dim doily

draping a taboret

(part of the set), beside

a big hirsute begonia.

Why the extraneous plant?

Why the taboret?

Why, oh why, the doily?

(Embroidered in daisy stitch

with marguerites, I think,

and heavy with gray crochet.)

Somebody embroidered the doily.

Somebody waters the plant,

or oils it, maybe. Somebody

arranges the rows of cans

so that they softly say:

esso—so—so—so

to high-strung automobiles.

Somebody loves us all.

POETRY PROMPT – for this poem I want you to write about being at a gas station (or the gas station shop) or in a 7/1 . I want the poem to describe what the gas station, gas shop or 7/11 is like. What is on the shelving, who is in the store or pumping gas, why are they there, how is the light, what time of day is it? I want your poem to full absorb the surrounding of the location you pick, so the reader feels like they are there with you.

Your poem must have a title. Your poem must between 15 to 20 lines in length, but your line length must be a short – four to six words per line only (like it the example above).

Next

  

Ashford 6: – Week 5 – Discussion 1

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

     

Long-term   Decision Making

 List a few of the issues and considerations businesses should have when it comes to the selection of long-term investments and how those issues impact the various financial statements.
 

Guided Response:
Review your peer’s posts. Respond to at least two of your peers describing how these issues can be overcome by the tools discussed in this chapter and why (i.e., looking at IRR, NPV, cash flow).