Utilize the PDP Template as a guide for what to include in your Professional Development Plan.

File labeled PDF Template. Follow that chart.

. What makes newspaper journalism different from the journalism of other mass media?

Please read Zenko’s Between Threats and War and answer the following:

1. How might we critique Zenko’s coding of success for DMOs?

2. Propose a different rubric (i.e. analytical framework!) for defining and assessing the success of military intervention.

THIS IS AN EXAMPLE FOR THE ANSWER ( DOES NOT HAVE TO BE A WHOLE PAGE) SHORT, CLEAR AND STRAIGHT TO THE POINT. PLEASE DON’T COPY IT.

How might we critique Zenko’s coding of success for DMOs?

I thought that DMOs meant carrying out top-secret military operatives but its more than that, he defines it as “a single or serial physical use of kinetic military force to achieve a defined military and political goal by inflicting casualties or causing destruction, without seeking to conquer an opposing army or to capture or control territory.” (2) In my opinion, it seems that each DMO has its own different results depending on its surroundings. With different factors (human coordination, intel nature, weapon maintenance, geographical location, etc.) that can result in different outcomes, it is hard to determine when the event will result in success.

2. Propose a different rubric (i.e. analytical framework!) for defining and assessing the success of military intervention.

The factors that can consist of different analytical framework for success could be the motives for using deterrence, coercion, and punishment and how much force should be used. Also, analyzing the benefits of achieving these types of goals for political and military motives beforehand could improvise a strategy for a successful military intervention rather than just counting corpses.

I need 250 words for this topic “Should Texas allow incarcerated felons to vote?”

and 100 words a replay to one of my classmates.

this is the topic that I need a replay for:

This is a very tough question that I’ve never thought of before. Many incarcerated felons have been wrongfully convicted so those specific individuals I think should be allowed to vote, but of course, there’s no right way to do that. Felonies at common law were defined to only cover these 9 crimes: homicide, arson, robbery, rape, maiming, wounding, burglary, larceny, mayhem, prison escape, and sodomy. These are mostly violent crimes that are also all malum in these crimes. So it makes sense that these crimes carry a harsh penalty and that people who can’t be expected to follow the moral mandates of living in a society shouldn’t have a say in defining the laws. And traditionally, these crimes carried a mandatory penalty of death. But with the rise of crimes that aren’t inherently morally wrong, but just made illegal for policy/regulatory reasons, and the idea that someone convicted of a felony could someday reenter society, it no longer makes as much policy sense. So, you could say I’m torn. However, when someone is incarcerated, they are incredibly easy to manipulate, which gives wardens inappropriate political power which creates serious issues of corruption and abuse. Removing the right of incarcerated people to vote makes sense, but keeping it removed after incarceration has ended is wrong. But, a person that has already demonstrated incredibly poor judgement, I believe is deemed unfit to choose what is best for other people. Thus, if I had to decide, I would go with not allowing them to vote.

Here is Participation Topic #2: Should Texas allow incarcerated felons to vote?

Two states (Maine and Vermont) allow incarcerated felons to vote while in prison. Should Texas join them?

Take care to answer all elements of the question.

You must post at least two (2) times for full credit. You must post: 1) a substantial (250-word minimum) original answer to the question; and, 2) a substantial (100-word minimum) reply to a colleague.

Take care to formulate reasoned arguments, not simple declarative statements. An argument is a well-developed, clearly stated line of reasoning aimed at convincing others of the truth or fallacy of a statement.

“Reasoned” means you’ve thought about the question and present your ideas in a coherent fashion. It does not mean that I or your classmates agree with you.

You will encounter a variety of viewpoints on volatile topics over the course of the semester. You may disagree, perhaps strongly, with opinions expressed by your classmates (and almost certainly, me).

As long as we treat each other with respect, these differences enhance class discussion and create an atmosphere where we learn from each other. Rest assured that your grades will not be influenced by beliefs or ideas expressed on the discussion boards.

And though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously, by licensing and prohibiting, to misdoubt her strength. Let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse, in a free and open encounter?

–Milton, Aeropagitica, 1643

Participation is graded on whether your comments are thoughtful and coherent, respond directly to the question (or another post in the board), contribute something new to the discussion, reflect an effort to move the discussion along, bring some evidence to your argument, and reflect an understanding of the course materials.

NOTE: I take spelling, grammar, and composition into account when grading your work. Your work must be well-written to receive full credit.

doing research online about Sony Pictures Hack, 2014 Sony Hacks. then answer the following questions, write two paragraphs for each question.

What did we learn from this hack/incident/vulnerability? How do we prevent/avoid it? (4pts)

How does this hack/event affect you and how does it make you feel about cyber security? (4pts)

here are some links that might help you with this case:

https://www.vox.com/2015/1/20/18089084/sony-hack-north-korea

https://www.computerworld.com/article/2879480/2014-cyberattack-to-cost-sony-35m-in-it-repairs.html

https://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/casestudies/paper/36022

https://www.businessinsider.com/sony-cyber-hack-timeline-2014-12

https://www.riskbasedsecurity.com/2014/12/05/a-breakdown-and-analysis-of-the-december-2014-sony-hack/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2014/12/18/the-sony-pictures-hack-explained/