Critical Thinking, management homework help

This Module 1 Critical Thinking Assignment addresses two elements that are fundamental to this class: organizational development and business strategy. This Assignment also includes an abbreviated analysis of the Skoda case study that was developed by university students. As a first step, complete the following activities:

  • Review definitions of Organizational Development from the reading and other sources of your choosing. Describe the concept of Organizational Development in your own words.
  • Read the Sǩoda case study, focusing especially on the SWOT analysis as a tool in strategic planning.

Write a paper that includes the following:

  • Your personal definition of Organizational Development
  • An abbreviated assessment of Sǩoda’s strengths: Choose a Sǩoda strength that was identified through the SWOT analysis. Example: Clear Vision. Discuss how Sǩoda could benefit from understanding this strength.
  • An analysis on the value of a SWOT analysis and strategic planning, explaining why Organizational Development might be important to Sǩoda
  • Citations and references to reading material and experiences to support your positions

Your paper should be 3-4 pages long (not including the title page and references in the page count) and adhere to the writing and citation guidelines as outlined in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements.

Religion 212 essay.

SUBMIT ASSIGNMENT 10

Click the link above to submit your assignment.

Students, please review the how to Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment video in Course Info for more information.

FINAL PAPER: World View Chart Writing Assignment

Due Week 10 and worth 235 points

This assignment uses the information you have gathered for your weekly World View Chart Assignments.

Choose ONE (1) category (origin of all things, nature of god, view of human nature, view of good and evil, etc.) from the chart to focus on for this assignment. Consider how the selected category relates to all of the religions covered and to your own social or work experiences.

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

1. Select ONE (1) category from the completed World View Chart. Provide a rationale for choosing this category. What is compelling about this category? Why is it important in the study of religion?

2. Describe the selected content and explain the significance of the selected category across all of the religions studied. Show in what ways the category is significant for each religion.

3. Give an example of how you have noticed this category in your life, town or country. What impact does this category have in the everyday lives of people who practice religion in your area? (You do not have to give examples of all the religions in your area, just one you have noticed besides any you practice). For example, in Cincinnati, Ohio we have Hindu, Greek Orthodox, Catholic festivals in the summer. So if my category were “Festivals and Celebrations” I could use those events as my example.

4. Use at least three (3) quality resources as references for the assignment and document your sources using APA Style for in-text citations and references. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

5. Write clearly and coherently using correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and mechanics.

Your assignment must:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Analyze what is meant by religion.

Analyze the similarities and differences in the primary beliefs held by major religious traditions and the cultures in which these religions evolved.

Describe the varieties of religious experience and practice in a wide range of cultures.

Recognize how daily life within various religions and current affairs are influenced by religion.

Develop written pieces that demonstrate an analysis of a topic relevant to the course.

Use technology and information resources to research issues in religion.

Write clearly and concisely about world religions using proper writing mechanics.

Basically….you are choosing ONE OF THE 8 SECTIONS OF THE CHARTS WE HAVE WORKED ON ALL QUARTER……EX: AFTERLIFE. THEN YOU ARE GOING TO ADDRESS HOW EACH OF THE 12 RELIGIONS WE COVERED VIEWS THE SECTION YOU CHOSE. IN OUR EXAMPLE….AFTERLIFE.

-DO NOT CHOOSE CHRISTIANITY OR ANY OTHER SINGLE RELIGION TO ADDRESS: 0 GRADE

-DO NOT BE SELECTIVE IN ADDRESSING 2 OR 3 OR EVEN JUST 1 RELIGION….IT IS 12 AND HERE THEY ARE:

HINDUISM, JAINISM, BUDDHISM, DAOISM, CONFUCIANISM, SHINTO, ZOROASTRIANISM, JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY, ISLAM, SIKHISM, FINALLY CHOOSE ONE OF THE NEW RELIGIONS SUCH AS MORMONISM, JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES, AND COMPLETE THE CHART FOR WEEK 10 ON ONE OF THESE AND USE IT FOR THE 12TH AND FINAL RELIGION OF YOUR FINAL PAPER.

Compare and Contrast, English homework help

Write a Research Paper of 9-10 pages.

With introduction and conclusion. Keeping with our four episode studies of the television series Scandal, House of Cards, Blackish and Damages, choose a television series that ideally is in its third season, is available on DVD/Blu-Ray, and has generated critical interest. Identify four episodes for study from the same season, but not necessarily sequential or episodes 1 through 4. For example, a student might study season three, episodes 3, 4, 12, and 20 of the X-Files (why you ask, because 4, 12, and 20 were written by Darin Morgan and 3 pivots the series from a larger story arc to episodic storytelling). Gather at minimum three college-level sources in support of your project. To find articles use Rotella Library electronic resources like Academic Search Premier, Gale Virtual Reference Library, and the various newspaper databases. Find books in the reference room and the stacks. Consider visiting Tomas. Developing an argument takes time and arguments tend only to take shape as a result of drafting— writing to discover. Don’t get stuck on this step. Instead jump ahead and get started on your paper’s components (see below).

The best method for developing an argument for your research paper is to zero in on one of the analytical strategies explored this semester. These include genre study, narrative analysis, and production analysis, as well as rhetorical and cultural analysis. As we took notice in class, there is a characteristic shot in Scandal, something is seen through another, often dirty or smeared glass. A study of Scandal might analyze how at the level of the shot Scandal reinforces the idea of being spied upon unaware. As we also took notice in class, Blackish employs a narrator in the form of lead character, Dre. An analysis of Blackish might debate to what end Dre as narrator creates identification with the viewer. from one to the next. Your paper should have a thoughtful title, and it should be formatted in MLA style (1A style). It should provide a works cited list (an MLA formatted bibliographic list of all items referenced within the paper) and a bibliography (an MLA formatted bibliographic list of all items of research.

The final components are your introduction and conclusion. Abandon the idea that a lengthy paper needs to be written from beginning to end. Instead, take a page from television and film production— where shooting is completed out of sequence and in an order that facilitates efficient production.The final components are your introduction and conclusion. Abandon the idea that a lengthy paper needs to be written from beginning to end. Instead, take a page from television and film production— where shooting is completed out of sequence and in an order that facilitates efficient production.

-Analysis-of-Healthcare-Consumer-experience

Conduct website searches of the following organizations:

Reflect on your learning experiences as a consumer of healthcare; then assess how the information on the above agency websites can impact a healthcare consumers’ role in making healthcare decisions by completing the following:

  • Compare and contrast the information provided to the healthcare consumer from a minimum of two websites.
  • Evaluate how the information provided is (or is not) beneficial to you as a healthcare consumer.
  • Identify two additional websites that you have used (or could use) in search of patient information.
  • Assess the value of these additional resources.

Requirements:

  • Your paper should be 4 double-spaced pages including introduction and conclusion.
  • A minimum of four (4) scholarly articles in addition to other course resources.

peer-reviewed articles.

  • Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references.
  • In-text citation used throughout the assignment and APA-formatted reference list.
  • Please no plagiarism and sources should be 5 years or less.
  • Include headings organize the content in your work.

Summary-for-Soil-not-Oil

Need to write 2 pages ( double space) of summary after reading book which “soil not oil ( just need to read part of it then write the summary) “, Shiva, Vanadana, in which you will be asked to identify the author’s thesis and main supporting points. First two paragrah need to be the summary for this book, and the left paragraph need to be the conclution and discuss for this book.

Assessing Self

Purpose:

The purpose of this assignment is for you to develop a Relationship Building Action Plan.

Outcome Met by Completing This Assignment

  • use leadership theories, assessment tools, and an understanding of the role of ethics, values, and attitudes to evaluate and enhance personal leadership skills
  • develop and implement methods for establishing a constructive organizational structure and culture that fosters positive employee and employer relationships
  • assess the interactions between the external environment and the organization to foster responsible and effective leadership and organizational practices

Background:

After a relaxing weekend, you come to work, sit down at your desk and open your email. The following is an email to you from Andrew Rockfish:

I am sending this email to you because of the personal nature of the material contained within your next assignment. It is incumbent upon all good leaders to assess continuously their personal leadership skills, style, and approach.

You will be developing a personal relationship building assessment plan. Much like an annual doctor’s check-up, the goal of the assessment plan is to develop a procedure for evaluating the status of your personal skills, style, and attitude in your work with others. Included in the assessment plan is a review of your leadership strengths, weaknesses, results of leadership assessments, feedback methodology, attitude, and leadership style.

Relationship building is a dynamic process just as situations change so too can the people skills needed to address the situation. Periodic review of those skills will benefit you by noting weaknesses and areas of change or improvement needed in your behavior.

So, what exactly am I asking you to do that needs confidentiality? Well, your plan is going to be the result of the following hypothetical evaluation you received after your first year with GDD. Although the hypothetical evaluation could be much better, we have found that the results provide trainees the opportunity to reflect upon one’s actual results and to prepare for personal growth moving forward.

The hypothetical scenario is one in which you were promoted a year ago into a leadership position. However, the past year has proved to show several issues and the results are not at all what we were hoping for when we promoted you. Still, experience has taught us that help starts with an employee taking stock of their personal skills. Since we believe that you have the potential for being an excellent department head, we would like to take measures toward your development. Please follow the instructions below:

Instructions:

Step 1: Preparation for the Assignment

Before you begin writing the report, you will read the following requirements that will help you meet the writing and APA requirements. Not reading this information will lead to a lower grade:

  • Review “How to Analyze a Case Study” under Week 6 Content. You are expected to use the facts from the case scenario focusing on using this information to determine opportunities and solve problems.
  • Read the grading rubric for the assignment. Use the grading rubric while writing the report to ensure all requirements are met that will lead to the highest possible grade.

In writing this assignment, you will read and following these tasks:

  • Contractions are not used in business writing, so you are NOT to use contraction in writing this assignment.
  • You are responsible for APA only for in-text citations and a reference list. Cite the page or paragraph number.
  • You are expected to use the facts from the case scenario paired with the weekly courses readings to develop the analysis and support the reasoning. No more than three (3) external resources can be used in completing the assignment. The expectation is that you provide a robust use of the course readings. If any material is used from a source document, it must be cited and referenced with a page or paragraph number. No books can be used as resource documents. A reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.

Step 2: How to Set Up the Plan

Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document that is double-spaced, 12-point font. The final product will be between 6-8 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page and appendix. Write clearly and concisely.

Follow a Report Format.

  • Create a title page with title, your name, the course, the instructor’s name and date;
  • Introduction
  • Leadership Table (make sure the tables are formatted to fit within the report and are easy to read and interpret)
  • Leadership Assessment
  • Relationship Building Action Plan


Step 3: Leadership Table

In this hypothetical scenario, your review has been completed and the results of the evaluation as well as feedback from your peers and direct reports are in your hands. The key to success in this project is to accept that the content in the “GDD Evaluation Form” as a real assessment of your performance at GDD for the first year’s work in this position. Although the information within the form is obviously hypothetical, you must place yourself in the position and address the situation as if it were truly you.

  • Examine the comments and information from the two documents: Evaluation Form and Peer/Direct Report Comments. Identify those statements/comments that relate to the following concepts: your strengths as a leader, your weaknesses as a leader, communication skills, personality, emotional IQ, with respect to others – trust, leadership attitude, leadership style, and vision/strategic goal implementation.
  • Complete the Leadership Table with the statements/comments you have identified.

Topic

Comment Phrase (s)

Strengths as a Leader

Weaknesses as a Leader

Communication Skills

Personality

Emotional IQ

Trust

Leadership Approach

Demonstrated Leadership Style

Vision/Strategic Goal Implementation

  • Using the main topics listed in the table above, write one paragraph for each topic, relating the identified statements/comments to conclusions that you draw about your effectiveness as a relationship builder over the past year. Use the course readings (weeks 1 – 6) to support your conclusions/reasoning. Be brutally honest with the conclusions that you draw. This is personal and means your future with GDD is on the line.

Step 4: Leadership Assessment

To ensure you have a complete picture of your leadership skills, you will need to take the leadership assessments listed below. If you took any of these assessments back in week 5, you may use the results but you must complete all assessments. Copy the actual results in the appendix of the plan. Note: your results are confidential.

Then, write a short summary of the results of each quiz or test. The summary is your explanation of the results and not a copy/paste of the results.

Step 5: Relationship Building Action Plan

Now that you have completed the Leadership Assessments, it is time to develop a plan of action for improvement. Think of the leadership action plan as a way to improve the relationship-building skills with others and influence the people within the department to accomplish the work in an efficient manner that meets organizational standards and satisfies customers. In completing the Action Plan, you will identify the gaps between the statements/comments from the table and the leadership assessment results. Focus on the process of how to bring about improvement rather than what you should do. Consider the steps you will take to resolve the weaknesses you have?

To accomplish the action plan, you will complete the tasks listed below. Be thoughtful in your responses reflecting upon the input documents (Evaluation Form and Peer/Direct Report Comments and Leadership Table).

In completing each task, you will formulate a thesis statement and support the reasoning with rigorous, focused thinking that demonstrates the analytical skills GDD is looking from you. Read all of the reports and information closely.

  • Provide a paragraph that explains why people skills are important for a leader to possess.
  • Identify and discuss the people skills that are lacking in your relationship with others as demonstrated in the assessments and feedback received in Step 3.
  • Explain how the missing or weak people skills are hindering your success at building relationships with followers.
  • Explain the significance of the leader-follower relationship to fulfilling the strategic plan of the leader.
  • Identify the one critical factor from the facts provided (aside from the weaknesses in personal skills), that will specifically affect your leader-follower relationship more than any other factor. Explain how and why this fact will affect your future if not corrected now.
  • Provide at least three practical recommendations as to how you can improve the weak skills that you identified.

Step 6: Appendix – comes after the Reference List

  • Use the appendix to provide the results of each of the leadership assessments.
  • Make sure to label each leadership assessment.

Step 7: Review the Paper

  • Read the paper to ensure all required elements are present. Use the grading rubric to ensure that you gain the most points possible for this assignment.
  • Proofread the paper for spelling and grammatical issues, and third person writing.
  • Read the paper aloud as a first measure;
  • Use the spell and grammar check in Word as a second measure;
  • Have someone who has excellent English skills to proof the paper;
  • Consider submitting the paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC). The EWC will provide 4-6 areas that may need improvement.

Ethical and spiritual discussion 5

Read the lecture and respond to the discussion questions with reference

Intervention and Ethical Decision Making

The application of bioethical principles in the context of different worldviews and religions will be the goal of this topic. Different models of ethical decision making suggest different steps and priorities, but the important thing to note is that all models are attempting to organize all of the relevant information in a case so that nothing is left out of consideration. Still, the way in which all of the relevant details in a case are considered will always take place within the context of a worldview. As such, the most important determinant of a bioethical decision is not a methodology but the worldview context in which the the methodology is functioning. Consider then how the Christian biblical narrative determines the values that are deemed relevant or important in a case and how different worldviews would impact the decision making in different cases.

Consider the following analysis from a Christian perspecive of the case study “End of Life and Sanctity of Life” in the American Medical Associations Journal of Ethics (Available in Loud Cloud readings). That case is analyzed from a Jewish and Buddhist perspective by different commentators. This case will be analyzed by addressing the four principles in the principalist approach, and then consider that data in light of the Christian worldview in order to recommend a course of action in accordance to Christian values and biblical principles.

Recall that the four principles of principalism include (1) autonomy, (2) beneficence, (3) nonmaleficence, and (4) justice. Depending on the case, different principles will come to have greater prominence in deciding an ethical course of action. At times there may be conflicts among the principles themselves, in which it will have to be determined which principle will have the greater priority. For example, a common conflict is that between a patients autonomy and what a physician considers to be beneficent, or in the best interests of the patient. A physician might see that a particular course of treatment will be beneficial for a patient (beneficence), and yet the patient refuses the treatment (autonomy). Should the physician simpy allow the patient to choose for themselves a course of action that will knowingly bring them harm? Is it right for the physician to coerce or force a patient to undergo a treatment against his or her will, and violate their autonomy, even if it will bring about some medical benefit?

How do the four principles apply to the case of 82 year old Mrs. Jones?

Autonomy: In this case, Mrs. Jones is incapacitated; she has been unconscious for two days and has no ability to communicate her desires for or against treatment. This is further complicated by the fact that she left no advance directive (a legal document that details her wishes for or against certain kinds of medical treatment should she ever become incapacitated such as a living will or a healthcare power of attorney). While Mrs. Jones’ family and the physian disagree about the appropriate treatment for her, it seems that determining what Mrs. Jones would have wanted is not possible. Thus, while her autonomy is certainly to be respected, in this case it is not something that is able to be obtained, given her condition (she would technically be considered incompetent and unable to exercise autonomy in her current condition).

Beneficence: Dr. Rosenberg believes that it will be in Mrs. Jones best interest medically to be put on temporary dialysis. He believes it to be the beneficent course of action; that which will bring about her good. Mrs. Jones’ family believes that dialysis will be a cause of undue suffering for her, and thus do not consider it to be the beneficent course of action. The fundamental disagreement lies here. Two parties, who are not Mrs. Jones’ herself, and who presumably do not have information about how she would have decided for herself, disagree about whether or not an action is truly beneficent for her. The principle of non-maleficence is closely related.

Nonmaleficence: Not only does Dr. Rosenberg have a moral duty to promote Mrs. Jones’ good, but he has a corresponding negative duty to not inflict evil or harm upon her. Mrs. Jones’ family believes that to place her on dialysis would inflict harm and suffering on her. Dr. Rosenberg believes it to be his duty to place her on dialysis, and that to not do so would be harmful to her. Dr. Rosenberg’s dilemma involves the belief that withholding treatment that has a good chance of restoring Mrs. Jones back to health with little risk is immoral.

Justice: Questions of justice usually come to the forefront in terms of the equal and fair distribution/allocation of medical goods and services (i.e., organ donation, health insurance, etc). In this case this principles does not play a major role. It might be said that it is unjust or unfair for Mrs. Jones to not decide for herself. But in the terms of this class, that concern would more appropriately be a question of autonomy, beneficence and nonmaleficence.

The above discussion sketches out how each principle would be relevant to or apply to Mrs. Jones’ case. But notice that you do not automatically have an answer to this dilemma. What should be done ethically? To answer this question, it is necessary to consider the four principles in light of an overarching worldview. Thus, how ought a Christian think about this dilemma?

To begin with, it is important to note that the Bible holds that all life is sacred (Gen. 2:7, Ps. 139:13-16, Exod. 20:13). Thus, whether a life is at its begging or end, it is valuable and sacred.

The dilemma in Mrs. Jones’ case is directly related to her perceived quality of life. Her family (presumably if they are being honest) does not desire that she remain alive and suffer. They perceive it better for her to stop living, than for her to continue living in a poor quality of life in which she would suffer. Dr. Rosenberg believes that her life is sacred, and that her quality of life is not so bad as to warrant ending her life early, if it can be saved with reasonable effort and low risk. For the Christian, while quality of life certainly matters, it does not determine the value of a life, or the worthiness of living for a person.

You might ask why exactly Mrs. Jones’ family is so ready to give up on a treatment modality (temporary dialysis) that will likely succeed? Meilander notes the importance of taking care of those in need and accepting their dependence upon those who love them and vice versa, accepting your own dependence when you are incapacitated, upon those who love you (2013, pp. 85-88). The reticence on the part of Mrs. Jones’ family seems to communicate a lack of willingness to deal with her care. It seems as if they want it to be over with, instead of fulfilling their duty to care for her and be active partners with Dr. Rosenberg in decididng what is in her best interest.

From the Christian perspective, it would be true that if Mrs. Jones had a personal relationship with Christ, her quality of life or existence would be improved dramatically were she to enter into God’s presence directly by way of her earthly passing. However, it would be radically mistaken to believe that it is up to some one other than God when that time would be. Does a refusal of dialysis constitute a reasonable decision? Or does it constitute a decision that functionally denies the opportunity for healing and thus denies God’s prerogative? It seems more likely that it is the latter.

In brief, it seems that Dr. Rosenberg is justified in his refusal to refuse reasonable and low risk treatment for Mrs. Jones. Ultimately, it seems that Mrs. Jones’ family does not want to take responsibility for her care, and is instead opting to determine her worth or value based upon a perceived quality of life.

In your own case study, consider how each of the four principles apply, and analyze those facts in terms of a wider worldview or religion. All ethical decision making takes palced within a worldview. The content of a worldview will determine what is valuable and what is not, as well as how a person would engage in decision making given those values.

Reference

Meilaender, G. (2013). Bioethics: A primer for Christians. (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Discussion 1

What is your definition of “spiritual care?” How does it differ or accord with the description given in the topic readings? Explain.

Discussion 2

When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from your own, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation?

bibliography and annotation

read the document before bidding

annoteded Bibliography
contains the sources you used in the ELP-Paper. It is important that you start
your ELP research immediately. Each entry contains the citation of the source
in correct MLA Format and an annotation on the source following the citation.

Two entries are
required in this assignment.

  • Book.
  • Database – an article from a
    professional journal.

DIRECTIONS:

Each entry must
contains a complete citation in the latest MLA Format and an accompanying
annotation. Use the following site for MLA citation information.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/05/

DO NOT USE A CITATION
MACHINE. LEARN HOW TO WRITE A CITATION.

CITATION/ANNOTATION
CHECK LIST:

1. All citations must
be in MLA format.

2. Use Times New Roman
type at 12 pts. for all ELP work.

3. Double space all
lines in the Annotated Bibliography.

4. Indent all lines of
the citation and annotation entries EXCEPT the first line of each citation.

5. Use one-inch
margins on all sides of the document.

6. Write in the third
person. Do not use I, you, me, we, etc.

7. Do not refer to
your ELP research.

8. Each annotation
must contain the following:

  • One sentence stating the
    purpose or findings of the author. (What the book/article was about).
  • One sentence stating if there
    were any photographs, illustrations, or charts.
  • One sentence stating if there
    were any limitations to the source. (In other words, was there something
    missing the author could have included).
  • One sentence stating who would
    find the source useful.

SAMPLE
CITATION/ANNOTATION ENTRIES:

1. One entry for this
assignment must be a book.

Sample #1.- Book: With
permission of David Gallagher, Sp. 2013.

Buechner, Thomas S.
Norman Rockwell A Sixty Year Retrospective
. New York: Harry N.

Abrams, Incorporated,
1972. Print.

The book illustrates
Rockwell’s work in chronological order in twenty-year increments. It includes a
brief autobiography related to his artistic career, including his schooling and
how he became an artist. Over 150 of his paintings are illustrated in the book,
including an overview on how he developed his work and the story behind selected
paintings. The book is valuable to someone looking to research Rockwell’s
career, as it is a well-organized overview in a chronological timeline. A
limitation includes the fact that not all of Rockwell’s work is explained and
is limited to what the author chooses.

2. One entry must be
an article from a professional journal that was obtained from a database (See
Neumann library). – Notice that the URL is not required for a database entry.
However, a URL for an approved Web site is required in the Annotated Bibliography.

Sample #2.- Database
With permission of David Gallagher, Sp. 2013.

Greenhill, Jennifer A.
“The View from Outside: Rockwell and Race in 1950.” American Art 21.2

(Summer 2007): 70-95. Ebsco
Host
. Web. 28 Feb. 2013.

The article provides a
background of the paintings that Norman Rockwell created focusing on the
epidemic America had with the color of race. Nearly two-dozen examples of his
artwork are provided in the article. It describes how racism existed in America
and how Rockwell depicted it in his work throughout his career. It chronicles
racism in America and when, or how, Rockwell’s work connected to it. A fan of
Norman Rockwell and one who has an interest in racism would find this source
valuable. This is true since the author provides specific examples how Rockwell
blended art with the controversial topic of racism in America. A limitation of
the article is that it does not analyze all of the work that Rockwell created
based on the Civil Rights Movement.

Lorber-s-Night-to-His-Day-English-homework-help

Write a 300-word response to question #4 at the end of Lorber’s “Night to His Day…”

3-4-page-essay

3-4 page essay comparing james cone, Fredrick Douglass, and James Baldwin backgrounds on race and religion and how they compare to each other