Can you help me with this assignment, please?

/in /by

Please carefully review the checklist prior to submitting assignment

  1. Did I read all the instructions? Some of the assignments require outside reading, or must be posted to the discussion area. It is essential that you understand what is required and where to submit it.
  2. Did I answer the question asked, and all its parts? Sometimes the question is close to another topic that may be of more interest, but that is not the question asked. Please limit the discussion to the question presented, being sure to address all facets of the question.
  3. Did I read, re-read and edit my assignment to check for and correct spelling errors, grammatical errors and typos? There is a big difference between a lack of vitamin A, and a lake of vitamin A, while both would be quite harmful only one would apply to your discussion topic. Read your essay aloud, it should flow smoothly and make sense to anyone in the room.
  4. Did I meet the minimum word requirement? Most of the assignments have a recommended minimum word requirement to encourage a thorough exploration of the topic. Expand the discussion to include more of the chapter, more of the vocabulary, and wow me with your knowledge, while avoiding filler and repetition.

The checklist will be used in evaluating the assignment so if you wish to earn the best possible grade, carefully review the checklist as it applies to your assignment.

Question week 12:

Discuss the four basic rules of safe food handling. Be sure to provide the relevant temperature ranges as they apply to safe food handling.

The Relationship of Art and Society, writing homework help

/in /by

The Relationship of Art and Society

Resources: Review your Week 5 readings and videos.

Answer the following questions. Cite your sources per APA, and include a reference page for all sources at the end of the assignment. This is not a paperper se. You may list each question, and answer it rather than preparing an intro, body, and conclusion.

  1. Beginning with the Gilded Age and continuing through the 20th century, examine and describe at least three specific examples of art (include the images) from different time periods you have encountered or examined in this course to illustrate how art has been a reflection of society.
  2. How has art challenged and shaped American society in bringing to light social injustice or reform? Provide examples and accompanying images to support your statement(s).
  3. Your opinion on the role of art today; How does it continue to remain relevant to our lives? How could it change or develop to become more relevant to our lives? Provide any relevant support (references) that may support your opinion.

Format your paper according to appropriate APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.

Materials:

this is the quiz i been talking about

/in /by

1.

The credibility of a judgment depends on the criteria used to make the judgment and the evidence or reasons that support the criteria.

(Points : 4)  True
 False

Question 2. 2.

The educator Benjamin Bloom identified seven categories of questions to use in compiling information about personal issues.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 3. 3.

In critically examining the beliefs of others, you should pursue the same goals of accuracy and breadth that you seek when examining beliefs based on your personal experience.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 4. 4.

Research reveals high achieving people are able to envision a detailed picture of their future with goals and aspirations clearly inscribed and low achievers live in the present and the past.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 5. 5.

The Greek philosopher Socrates cautioned, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 6. 6.

You should be aware that even though in theory facts and inferences can be distinguished, in practice it is almost impossible to communicate with others by sticking only to factual observations.  For that reason, the majority of our communication is based on inferences and not fact.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 7. 7.

The quality of your life can be traced in large measure to your competence as a problem solver.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 8. 8.

Once one has rejected the dogmatic, authoritarian limitations of the œGarden of Eden style of thinking, he or she usually becomes highly skeptical of information coming from unknown sources.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 9. 9.

The idea of knowing is the ability to distinguish beliefs supported by strong reasons or evidence from beliefs for which there is less support, as well as from beliefs disproved by evidence to the contrary.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 10. 10.

Solving a problem begins with determining the importance of the problem.  If a situation is of little importance, you can table the problem until such time as you can go back and solve it.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 11. 11. Taking knowledge learned in a previous situation and applying that knowledge to other situations is a reflection of application.  (Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 12. 12.

You know you have thought through your ideas and beliefs when you are able to explain them.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 13. 13.

A critical thinker is one who has developed a knowledgeable understanding of our complex world.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 14. 14.

Active learners expand their knowledge by integrating new information into their existing knowledge.

(Points : 4)

 True
 False

Question 15. 15. For most important problems, one viewpoint is not adequate to provide a full understanding. (Points : 4)

 True
 False

Short outline (roughly 150 words)

/in /by

All that is required is a quick 150 word outline. Come up with some sources (in-text citation and reference page, not included in the word count) and topics for each paragraph with headings and whatnot. Do not write the whole essay.

Here are the instructions:
Topic:what is mythology, what are the native americans’ customs and their relationship.

This first segment answers the question: “What is mythology?” (or a comparable question if you have narrowed your topic). In this segment, you will go well beyond the definition of the word and into what kind of stories these are, their purpose, their symbols, and their logic (or magic!). The segment must be written using either the essay style or the Review of Literature style. It is also the segment that uses the most sources. Research requirements: a minimum of 8 sources must be used, and you must also have at least 2 sources from each archive (book, database, and web). The segment’s length must be between 4-6 double-spaced pages, plus a reference list of sources used in the segment (this reference list does not count toward the page limit).

Convergys Case: economic value (EV) factors and relationship value (RV) factors, homework help

/in /by

Excel and Convergys Case attached.

Assignment Objectives

  • To recognize that not all customers are created equal
  • To determine how to use both quantitative and qualitative data to assess which customers are most valuable to a firm
  • To assess how to handle different customers strategically

Convergys Case:

One of the most important issues associated with customers in
services and business-to-business marketing is determining which
customers are most valuable to a firm. This is critical because
companies providing services have limited resources and cannot offer the
same degree of services to all customers. Convergys is a
business-to-business company that is exploring alternative ways to
identify its best customers for growing the business. In addition to
information in the case, you are given data in spreadsheet form about
economic value (EV) factors and relationship value (RV) factors. Your
task is to develop a composite scoring rule that takes the relevant
factors into consideration in order to prioritize your best customers
for growing the business. Do not use just the rule proposed by Carlson;
instead develop your own rule and then answer the questions that are
itemized below to decide which customers will generate the most growth
for the business. Your paper on this case should be five pages (1.5
spaced) plus an Excel spreadsheet showing your solution.

Questions to Answer

  1. Identify and justify the metrics in the database that you believe
    should be incorporated into an overall composite measure to score
    customers. Describe the scoring rule that you prefer the most and
    compute the scores for each customer in the database according to that
    scoring rule. (When combining different items to develop a
    composite score, it is important to ensure that the scales of
    measurement for different variables do not influence the final score.
    Scale-neutral metrics can be developed by standardizing the variables
    where necessary.)
  2. Lento and his team are exploring alternative ways to identify the
    best customers for growing the business. Here are the alternative
    selection rules under consideration (ignore “A” customers from any
    analysis you do because those customers are managed through a separate
    process involving senior executives of Convergys):

    • Focus on the top 25% of “B” customers and the top 10% of the “C”
      customers according to their computed scores. (This will result in the
      selection of 14 “B” and 28 “C” customers for a total of 42 customers.)
    • Rank order the entire database according to the scoring rule, and select the top 42 customers.
    • Identify distinct segments of customers based on their EV and RV
      scores, and select one or more segments of customers that you think
      Convergys should target. (To maintain comparability with the other
      methods, restrict to 42 customers by selecting only those customers
      within selected segments that have the highest scores.)
    • Select 42 customers who have the highest customer scores and also have higher-than-average scores on both EV and RV.
  3. Which one(s), if any, of the above selection rules would be most
    effective in identifying the appropriate set of customers for growing
    the business? Why? Justify your answer.
  4. Based on your analysis in question 3, identify the top 25% of
    customers that you would recommend for the primary marketing efforts.
    Explain your rationale for selecting these customers. Within this select
    set of top customers, how would you further prioritize these customers
    based on their strategic value to Convergys?
  5. Recommend an action plan for Convergys to help it increase revenue from the customers you identified in questions 3 and 4.

write a 900-1200 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below.

/in /by

You will write a 900-1200 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.

This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade.

DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.

YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.

Learning Objectives:

Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.

Assessment:

Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument.

Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:

The Frivolity of Evil

How and How Not to Love Mankind

What We Have to Lose

Roads to Serfdom

Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 900-1200 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author’s main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers’ insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.

A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.comhandy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.

Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned.

Please use MLA format.

Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:

GRADING RUBRIC:

The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading.

1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student’s independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quotations are used (comprising no more than 10% of the body of the paper), when appropriate, to support the writer’s analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. The use of block quotations will result in a severe point deduction.

95 points

2.Essay has clear and coherent argument: There is a clearly stated thesis, and support for this thesis in the body of the paper. Each paragraph contributes to this argument, and follows logically from the paragraph before it. The argument presented is persuasive. The insights of two other philosophers are incorporated into the analysis.

95 points

3.Essay fulfills assigned task: The essay addresses the entire assigned question or topic, elaborating on important ideas in satisfactory depth, but without bringing in anything extraneous or irrelevant. The introduction of the essay focuses and provides clarity for the paper. Important terms are clearly and accurately defined. Each paragraph conveys a coherent, organized thought. Short (one sentence) quotations are occasionally used, when appropriate, to support the writer’s analysis, and an explanation is offered for each quotation. No more than 10% of paper is made up of direct quotes. No block quotations.

40 points

4.Essay obeys standards for good persuasive writing: the writer shows that he or she is comfortable using philosophical language, and the prose is clear, not awkward. The structure of the sentences reflects the relationships between/among the ideas discussed.

40 points

5.Essay is technically correct: The essay has been carefully and thoughtfully proofread. The argument is written in complete sentences, with punctuation that does not mislead the reader. There are no mistakes in spelling, grammar, word choice, and punctuation.

30 points

Forensic Assessment Cases

/in /by

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 12 in the
textbook and the required articles for this week. For this discussion
you will take on the role of a psychologist assigned a case in which the
client has a legal concern. For your initial post, select one of the
three forensic case scenarios below and follow the instructions.

Forensic Scenario One: Mr. W (Attempting to Obtain Legal Guardianship Over an Elderly Parent): Attorney
Mr. X referred Mr. W for an evaluation of his decision-making capacity.
Mr. W’s children do not agree with the findings from a prior evaluation
and have requested a second opinion. Review the PSY640 Week Six Clinical Neuropsychological Report for Mr. W (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.,
and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you
deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional
scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of
additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to
administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing
an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an
analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Forensic Scenario Two, Mr. M (Not Guilty Plea): Your
client, Mr. M., was referred by the court for an evaluation of his
mental condition after his attorney entered a plea of not guilty on his
behalf. Review the Case Description: Mr. M—Forensic, Pre-trial Criminal Score Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.,
and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you
deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional
scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of
additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to
administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing
an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an
analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Forensic Scenario Three, Ms. X (Personal Injury Lawsuit):

Ms. X was referred for a forensic neuropsychological evaluation in

connection with a personal injury lawsuit she had filed. Review the Case

Description: Ms. X—Forensic, Neuropsychological Score Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.,

and begin your post with a one-paragraph summary of the test data you

deem most significant. Utilize assigned readings and any additional

scholarly and/or peer-reviewed sources needed to develop a list of

additional assessment instruments and evaluation procedures to

administer to the client. Justify your assessment choices by providing

an evaluation of the ethical and professional practice standards and an

analysis of the reliability and validity of the instruments.

Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visual

/in /by

Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals

Due Week 10 and worth 250 points

Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Parts 1 and 2, and add Part 3. Plan to include visuals to illustrate the advantages of your proposed solution.

Write an eight to ten (8-10) page paper in which you:

Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages)

1. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Provide Part 2: Revision of Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages)

2. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Develop Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals (1-2 pages, for 7-9 total pages)

3. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

4. State, explain, and support the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one (1) paragraph.

5. State, explain, and support the second (and third if desired) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

6. Include one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

8. Provide a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Repeat or paraphrase your thesis statement.

9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

11. Support disadvantages and answers with at least two (2) additional quality relevant references. Use at least eight (8) total for Parts 1, 2, and 3. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Points: 250

Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages and Answers

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Insufficiently revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Partially revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Satisfactorily revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Thoroughly revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

2. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Insufficiently revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Partially revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Satisfactorily revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Thoroughly revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

3. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

4. State, explain, and support the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one (1) paragraph.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and did not submit or incompleted provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and insufficiently provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Partially stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and partially provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and satisfactorily provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and thoroughly provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

5. State, explain, and support the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one or two (1 or 2) paragraphs.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and did not submit or incompletely provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and insufficiently provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Partially stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and partially provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and satisfactorily provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and thoroughly provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

6. Include one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Insufficiently included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Partially included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Satisfactorily included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Thoroughly included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Insufficiently used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Partially used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Satisfactorily used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Thoroughly used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

8. Provide a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Repeat or paraphrase your thesis statement.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Did not submit or incompletely repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Insufficiently provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Insufficiently repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Partially provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Partially repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Satisfactorily provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Satisfactorily repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Thoroughly provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Thoroughly repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

9. Develop a coherently structured paper with Use effective transitional words, phrases, sentences, and an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Insufficiently developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Partially developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Satisfactorily developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Thoroughly developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Insufficiently used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Partially used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Satisfactorily used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Thoroughly used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

11. Support disadvantages and answers with at least two (2) additional quality relevant references. Use at least eight (8) total for Parts 1, 2, and 3.

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.

Meetsnumber of required references; all references high quality choices.

12. Clarity, writing mechanics, and APA formatting requirements (including in-text citations and reference page)

Weight: 25%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Designing Forms, business and finance homework help

/in /by

Prepare one 5- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that includes the following

Design two forms for a new software application or business web app that will collect data from its user. You may not copy forms from some resource. These two forms must be your original work containing 4 to 6 data elements for each form.

Draw these two forms. You may use free tools, such as Pencil Project, Microsoft® Paint, Mockabilly (and many others) to create the mock-up interfaces; or you may draw the new forms on a piece of paper and then, take a picture of it.

Include the two forms in your Microsoft® PowerPoint®. You must copy/paste or insert the mock ups or pictures of your forms into the presentation.

Explain the purpose of the new forms (e.g. what data are being collected, why, what will it do with this data, etc.). (one explanation for each form)

Describe how these new forms meet usability standards. (one slide)

Incorporate additional research or academic information to support your presentation. References to the required reading or recommended activities are encouraged. At least one resource is required. Do not exceed 3 resources. APA citation format requires both Reference section and In-text citations. You must include a reference slide with at least one APA format citation.

Format your PowerPoint® speaker notes according to APA guidelines.

LAW2221-XTIA-Legal Environment of Business

/in /by

Robin has just graduated with an MS in elementary education. He sends his résumé to a number of school boards, and one writes back offering an interview for a kindergarten position. When Robin arrives at the interview, it is obvious that the interviewers had expected a female. They ask a few general questions and conclude the interview. Two days later he gets a rejection letter. He later finds out that a female applicant with only a bachelor’s degree was hired. He believes that he has been discriminated against due to sex, and he files a complaint with the EEOC. The school district defends by saying that kindergarten teachers are traditionally female and that the parents’ preference is for a female to conduct the class. Is the school board justified in its actions, and will its defense be effective?