Risk Interview

/in /by

Select a health care organization in your community to conduct an interview with an appropriate risk management employee. The organization can be your current employer, or a different health care facility in your community. Acute care, urgent care, large multi-provider private medical clinics, assisted living facilities, and community/public health clinical facilities are all ideal options to complete the requirements of this assignment. Make sure to select an individual who can provide sufficient information regarding how that organization manages risk within its facility to answer the questions below.

In your interview, address the following:

  1. Identification of the challenges the organization faces in controlling infectious diseases.
  2. Risk management strategies used in the organization’s infection control program, along with specific examples.
  3. How the facility’s educational risk management program addresses key professional issues, such as prevention of negligence, malpractice litigation, and vicarious liability.
  4. Policies the facility has implemented that address managing emergency triage in high-risk areas of health care service delivery.
  5. Strategies the facility utilizes to monitor and maintain its risk management program.

Post-interview, compose a 750-1,000 word summary analysis of the interview to include the questions above as well as the following elements:

  1. A brief assessment of the organization’s risk management program, including what works well and what could work better (the pros and cons).
  2. Action steps you would take to improve the program. Select one area and provide your rationale and possible steps required to implement your suggestion.

Cite appropriate references as needed to support your statements and rationale.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style. An abstract is not required.

Self reflection improves self awareness

/in /by

Writing about one’s personal experience encourages self-reflection and improves self-awareness. In this activitystudents are invited to reflect, in writing, on their experiences related to managing clinical risks for patients. Students to write about an event they observed or were involved in during their nursing profession that they feel might have placed a patient at risk. Alternatively, students may want to write about an event that occurred to them as recipients of healthcare, or as an observer to their friends’ or family members’ experiences. The event may be one that they feel related to any of anticipation, recognition, or management of a patient safety risk. Safe patient care and reducing medical-legal risk requires nurse practitioners to be aware of potential risks and how to avoid them.

The narrative should include:

  • a description of the event
  • an explanation of how this event placed a patient at risk
  • the student’s reflections on the event including:
  • if and how the event was recognized
  • why and how the event occurred, for example, was the event due to
    • action or inaction by an individual healthcare provider
    • system failure(s)
    • a combination of systems failure(s) and individual provider performance issues
  • what changes or improvements they would make, if any
  • how they felt at the time
  • how they currently feel about the even
  • Were you personally involved in the event? Discuss.
  • What, if any, workplace factors contributed to the event? (e.g., Was it during a handover? Did it involve a medication?)
  • How aware was the healthcare provider(s) of what was going on around them? (situational awareness)
  • How did the health care provider(s) recognize the safety problem, and how did they respond?
  • How did this event affect you?
  • What did you take away that you will use in the future?
  • I would do something differently next time because

Current issue summary, amazon, textbook

/in /by

THERE ARE THREE PARTS TO THIS ASSIGNEMENTS TO THIS!!!!

PART ONE

Write a 525- to 700-word summary.

Research a recent article on auditing acquisitions, payments, property plant and equipment (fixed assets), notes payable, or owner’s equity.

Apply what you learn to your future or current job.

********Current Job is Substitute teacher**************

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

PART TWO

Consider and discuss the specific risks and nature of the company you will be auditing and create comprehensive work programs for the Acquisition, Payment, Property Plant, and Equipment (Fixed Assets), Notes Payable and Owner’s Equity accounts and cycles. :

  • Audit steps for tests of controls, balances, transactions, analytical procedures, etc. as well as other considerations such as sample size and sample methodology.

********************AMAZON**************

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

PART THREE

18-26 (Objectives 18-3, 18-4) In testing cash disbursements for the Jay Klein Company, you obtained an understanding of internal control. The controls are reasonably good, and no unusual audit problems arose in previous years.

Although there are not many individuals in the accounting department, there is a reasonable separation of duties in the organization. There is a separate purchasing agent who is responsible for ordering goods and a separate receiving department that counts the goods when they are received and prepares receiving reports. There is a separation of duties between recording acquisitions and cash disbursements, and all information is recorded in the two journals independently. The controller reviews all supporting documents before signing the checks, and he immediately mails the checks to the vendors. Check copies are used for subsequent recording.

All aspects of internal control seem satisfactory to you, and you perform minimum tests of 25 transactions as a means of assessing control risk. In your tests, you discover the following exceptions:

  • 1. One invoice was paid twice. The second payment was supported by a duplicate copy of the invoice. Both copies of the invoice were marked “paid.”
  • 2. Two items in the acquisitions journal were misclassified.
  • 3. Three invoices were not initialed by the controller, but there were no dollar misstatements evident in the transactions.
  • 4. Five receiving reports were recorded in the acquisitions journal at least 2 weeks later than their date on the receiving report.
  • 5. Two receiving reports for vendors’ invoices were missing from the transaction packets. One vendor’s invoice had an extension error, and the invoice was initialed that the amount had been checked.
  • 6. One check amount in the cash disbursements journal was for $100 less than the amount stated on the vendor’s invoice.
  • 7. One voided check was missing.

Required

a. Identify whether each of 1 through 7 is a control test deviation, a monetary misstatement, or both.

b. For each exception, identify which transaction-related audit objective was not met.

c. What is the audit importance of each of these exceptions?

d. What follow-up procedures would you use to determine more about the nature of each exception?

e. How would each of these exceptions affect rest of the your audit? Be specific.

f. Identify internal controls that should have prevented each misstatement.

Preparing a Multiple‐Step Income Statement

/in /by

Purpose of Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to help you become familiar with the parts of the multiple‐step income statement.

Assignment Steps

Resources: Financial Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making

Scenario: An inexperienced accountant prepared this condensed income statement for Simon Company, a retail firm that has been in business for a number of years.

SIMON COMPANY

Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017

Revenues

Net sales

$850,000

Other revenues

22,000

872,000

Cost of goods sold

555,000

Gross profit

317,000

Operating expenses

Selling expenses

109,000

Administrative expenses

103,000

212,000

Net earnings

$105,000

As an experienced, knowledgeable accountant, you review the statement and determine the following facts:

  1. Net sales consist of: sales $911,000, less freight-out on merchandise sold $33,000, and sales returns and allowances $28,000.
  2. Other revenues consist of sales discounts $18,000 and rent revenue $4,000.
  3. Selling expenses consist of salespersons’ salaries $80,000, depreciation on equipment $10,000, advertising $13,000, and sales commissions $6,000. The commissions represent commissions paid. At December 21, $3,000 of commissions have been earned by salespersons but have not been paid. All compensation should be recorded as Salaries and Wages Expense.
  4. Administrative expenses consist of office salaries $47,000, dividends $18,000, utilities $12,000, interest expense $2,000, and rent expense $24,000, which includes prepayments totaling $6,000 for the first quarter of 2018.

Prepare a detailed multi-step income statement with a brief explanation of 700 words. Assume a 25% tax rate. (Word document, APA level, headlines for all questions asked, in-text citations, and peer reviewed references).

Show your work on the Excel® spreadsheet and submit with your explanation. (see attached excel file, its for you to use and submit with the word document).

See attached grade guide document, to make sure you are following all the assignment’s requirements.

Comparing Origins and History of Hinduism and Buddhism in India, history homework help

/in /by

Unit 2 Essay: Comparing the Origins and History of Hinduism and Buddhism in India

A major theme in India’s ancient and early medieval periods is the early origins and historical development of Hinduism and Buddhism. Chapter 3 of World History repeatedly returns to this theme, covering religious ideas as well as social and political dimensions to the history of these traditions.

For your essay, please write a comparative study of the origins and history of these two traditions in ancient and medieval times. As you write it, although you should judge for yourself what to include in this study, you might think about and consider the following elements:

  • The Vedic Age (1700-600 BCE):
    • The Vedic peoples, Rig Veda, Brahmins, and Brahmanism.
    • The Brahmanas and Upanishads.
    • Varna social system.
  • Transition to Empire (600-321):
    • Siddhartha Gautama (c. 563-480)
    • Caste system.
  • Mauryan Empire (321-184 BCE) and King Ashoka.
  • Regional States, Trade, and Devotional Religion (200 BCE-300 CE)
    • The Kushan Kingdom and King Kanishka
    • New developments in Buddhism: Mahayana Buddhism
    • New developments in Hinduism: Dharma Scriptures, Indian Epics, and devotional Hinduism
  • Medieval India (600-1300 CE): Medieval Kingdoms and Hinduism.

Although the timelines may vary somewhat, overviews of the history of these religious traditions at these two websites will provide you with some additional assistance in writing this essay:

Important Note: Please note that this should not be an unhistorical, general study of Hinduism and Buddhism. You will not want to write a comparative study of these traditions’ major religious ideas and practices, except insofar as those relate to their historical development and the essay topic. You could, for example, organize your essay by addressing a set of comparative points in the body paragraphs.

1. Compare and contrast how each tradition began.

2. Compare and contrast how each tradition developed over time.

3. Compare and contrast the social role each tradition played.

4. Compare and contrast the political roles each tradition played.

Eassy food waste

/in /by

Essay Assignment #2: Casual Analysis

Overview:Ie nadeen

For this assignment, you have looked into multiple sources, from our Ted Talk, John Oliver’s segment, a few journalist articles and an academic journal. By now, you should be quite knowledge about the issue of food waste. Therefore, I now ask you to develop a casual analysis, answering the two questions below:

  1. What are some of the causes leading to the amount of food waste the United States experiences?
  2. What are socio-economic effects of such waste?

In order to answer the question, you will select support from a minimum of three of the sources we have discussed. You may find additional sources, if you would like, but you will need to cite those as well. You will need to choose and Ie nadeen a minimum of three different cause and/or effects. In each paragraph, you will provide at least two pieces of expert support from your sources and research (if you choose to find more).

In your introduction, you will present the issue and discuss what is happening and why we, as a society, should be aware/worried. You can use personal examples here only. Your thesis will state the issue and provide a plan of development (the three causes or effects you plan to discuss).

You will need: 1) an introduction with a hook, background information about the issue, and thesis with a plan of development; 2) 3 body paragraphs each with a topic sentence in your own words and 1 or 2 examples from the sources and explanations/analysis; 3) a conclusion that restates the thesis, reviews your body paragraph, and comes to a conclusion; and 4) to use MLA format and cite your illustrations correctly.

Guidelines

This essay should be 1000-1200 words in length, double-spaced, typed in a 12pt font (Times New Roman). Make sure to introduce all of your sources, use in-text citations and create a Works Cited page. If you need help with those, please review information under MLA Resources on our site.

Final Tips

  • Transitions: Between new ideas and paragraphs, you should always use transitional phrases and words.
  • Please proofread for run-ons, fragments, or any other grammatical errors.
  • Make sure you have a Works Cited page (not included in page
  • https://www.ted.com/talks/tristram_stuart_the_glob…
  • https://gcccd.instructure.com/courses/11727/files/…
  • Source: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/10/141013-food-waste-national-
    1. Rhetorical Context (Who wrote it or created? Why was it written? What is it trying to do to or for its readers? What is it? Where does it appear? When was it published? )

    Who wrote it: Elizabeth Royte
    Why was it written: To raise the point that one third of food is wasted
    What is it doing for its readers: Making them aware of how and where food wastage occurs in its many forms. The article also asks readers to combat this wastage issueWhat is it: An online news post
    Where does it appear: National Geographic News (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/10/141013-food-waste-national-security-environment-science-ngfood/) When was it published: October 13, 2014

    1. Summary (What does the text say? What are its main points? What did you find most interesting?)

    The text speaks about food wastage and that 30% of food grown does not get used in any sense.
    The main points are the ways in which food is wasted or lost (and the difference: waste occurs at the end of the food chain with consumer levels and loss is at the front of the food chain i.e. the farmers during and after production), the impact that food wastage and loss has on labor costs, land and water as well as the greenhouse effect due to higher greenhouse gas emissions.
    What I found most interesting was people found it easy to throw something away just because it was cosmetically imperfect or past its use-by date even when it has not gone off in an obvious way and has been refrigerated well. Another point I found interesting was that due to lack of storage, so much food goes to waste.

    1. What are THREE golden lines from the text (quotes that stood out to you most)
    1. “We forget to eat our leftovers, we leave our doggy bags in restaurants, and we suffer little or no consequence for scraping edible food into a bin.”
    2. “If global food waste were a country, it would be the third largest generator of greenhouse gases in the world behind China and the United States.”
    3. “ Feeding livestock on the food we currently waste, according to the United Nations Environment Programme, would globally liberate enough cereals to feed three billion people.”

Medical Errors Paper, writing homework help

/in /by

Medical Errors

Part 1

Review the requirements for the Portfolio Project. Prepare and submit a bibliography of research sources that you plan to use for the Portfolio Project. The bibliography should include at least six credible reference sources, including at least one peer-reviewed article from the CSU-Global Library. The bibliography entries must be formatted per the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA.

**please write part 2 on separate document **

Part 2

Submit a paper that identifies and examines two distinct types of sentinel events that frequently occur in healthcare organizations. The error types that you select must be significantly different; for example, patient suicide and wrong-site surgery.

In writing this paper, you should consider and address (as necessary) the following:

  • Identify, compare, and contrast the system factors that influence organizational performance.
  • Identify, compare, and contrast the processes and techniques that can be used to investigate, prevent, and control these types of events now and in the future.
  • Identify, compare, and contrast the measures that can be used to assess the performance of the organization and the risk management plan in this area as it relates to patient safety.

Your paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:

  • Eight to 10 pages in length.
  • Include at least six references from the peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles.

Part 4 of Applied Final Project: Understanding Role Reversal, writing homework help

/in /by

Part 4 of Applied Final Project: Understanding Role Reversal

Discussion 1. Gendered violence is a persistent problem all over the world.

You can see statistics concerning violence against women around the world here: UN Women: Facts and Figures: Ending Violence Against Women. Statistics concerning domestic violence in the United States can be found here (scroll down for information on men as victims of domestic violence as well): National Coalition Against Domestic Violence: Statistics.

The readings this week outline the wide variety of presentations of gendered violence. We frequently focus on one type of violence at a time: domestic or intimate partner violence, sexual assault at colleges or in the military, honor killings, or rape as an instrument of war, for example. It is more instructive, however, to think of all of these types of violence as connected.

Recently, there has also been a greater focus on the rate of violence (and self-harm) among transgender people, particularly young people, and also on the extent of under-reported gendered violence against men, much of it also perpetrated by men.

Based on your reading for this week, respond to the following:

  • First, define what we mean by “gendered violence.” Why not just “violence?”
  • Why have we focused primarily on violence against women? Do you agree with adding violence against men and transgender people, or do you see these as separate phenomena? What (if anything) connects all of these types of violence?
  • What purposes does gendered violence serve in a society? Give at least two specific examples.
  • After everything you read for this week, define the one or two most important societal factors that you believe lead to gendered violence. How can we address these factors? Are boys and men predisposed to commit gendered violence? What needs to happen to make a significant dent in the rates of gendered violence?
Question 2.

Part Four of Applied Final Project, Role Reversals: Understanding Our Gendered Selves:

“Understanding My Role-Reversal Act” (20% of course grade; due end of Week 7)

Five (5) pages (1200-1500 words)

All parts of this project should be formatted in APA style (follow for both essay and citation styles): APA Style Guide: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

Purpose: Act Performance and Analysis

At this point, you will have completed your act. In this final part of the assignment, you will describe and analyze it. Write a five page (1200-1500 words) paper detailing your experiences. The first section one-third to one half of your paper should describe your act and your responses to it, and the second one-half to two-thirds of your paper should analyze your act in terms of the scholarship on gender:

Section One (minimum 500 words):

    1. Describe your act:
      1. What did you do?
      2. Where did you do it?
      3. How did you prepare for it?
    2. What responses did you get while performing your act?
    3. How did you feel while performing your act?
    4. What would you do differently if you had to perform this same act again? Would you perform the act in the same location and at same time? Would you change your appearance during the act? Would you do anything else differently? Please refer to the required reading on Participant Observation for this assignment (Mack et al., 2005) [link provided in general description of assignment above].

Section Two: (minimum 700 words):

Using at least three of the sources you identified and discussed in your Annotated Bibliography for Part 3, and/or the readings for this class for support (provide direct quotes for full credit), consider the potential impact of your act. Here are some questions to consider (you do not have to answer all of these questions; they are provided to help you to think about ways your act may have impact on society):

    • Can you explain the range of reactions to your act? Did those reactions reflect any of the sociological scholarship found in the course readings or in your research? Did any of the reactions challenge that research?
    • How do you think class, race, age, and sexuality came into play during the conception and performance of the act?
    • Was performing this act an act of feminism? Why? and, if so, what type(s) of feminism?
    • Was your act an act of activism? That is, could it help to create social change? If so, how?

Rubric for Part Four
Criteria Excellent: Points Possible
20 points		 Good: Points Possible
17 points		 Satisfactory: Points Possible
15 points		 Barely Satisfactory: Points Possible
13 points		 Unsatisfactory: Points Possible
10 points
Section One Completeness

Paper responds to all Section One questions clearly and with vivid, detailed examples and explanations. Length and references to sources are as requested.

Paper responds to all Section One questions, though some answers may not be clear or provide detailed examples. Length and references to sources are as requested.

OR, no references to sources, though all else is as requested.

Paper responds to all but one or two Section One questions in sufficient detail.

OR,

Section One is less than 75% of minimum length.

Several questions from Section One are neglected or underdeveloped.

OR,

Section One is less than 50% of minimum length.

Section One is missing, or only briefly addressed.
Section Two Completeness

Paper responds to all Section One questions clearly and with vivid, detailed examples and explanations. Length and references to sources are as requested.

Paper responds to all Section One questions, though some answers may not be clear or provide detailed examples. Length and references to sources are as requested.

OR, no references to sources, though all else is as requested.

Paper responds to all but one or two Section One questions in sufficient detail.

OR,

Section One is less than 75% of minimum length.

Several questions from Section One are neglected or underdeveloped.

OR,

Section One is less than 50% of minimum length.

Section One is missing, or only briefly addressed.
Use of Sources

Paper refers to at least three sources from class materials and student research in Section Two. Sources are quoted directly, cited in the text, and well-integrated into the discussion. Evidence and support from sources is analyzed (how or why does it support your point).

Paper refers to two sources from class materials and student research in Section Two. Sources are quoted directly, cited in the text, and well-integrated into the discussion. Evidence and support from sources is analyzed (how or why does it support your point).

OR,

Paper refers to at least three sources, but they are not quoted directly, OR are not well-integrated into the text, OR are not analyzed.

Paper refers to only one source from class materials and student research in Section Two. Source is quoted directly, cited in the text, and well-integrated into the discussion. Evidence and support from the source is analyzed (how or why does it support your point).

OR,

Paper refers to at least two sources, but they are not quoted directly, OR are not well-integrated into the text, OR are not analyzed.

Paper refers to any number of sources from class materials and student research that are not quoted directly, and are not well-integrated into the text, are not analyzed.

No sources from class materials and student research are cited.
Depth and Analysis

Writer presents sufficient, convincing examples and evidence to support his/her analysis.

Writer is able to integrate the analysis of the act and sources from the class materials or research into a single discussion of their relationship to the Sociology of Gender, rather than discussing each in turn; synthesizes these ideas into something new (not just a summary of the ideas from each topic).

Writer presents some convincing examples and evidence to support his/her analysis, but a few points may lack direct support.

Writer gives equal attention to the analysis of the act and sources from the class materials or research, but does not integrate them into a single discussion of their relationship to the Sociology of Gender, instead discussing each topic separately; conclusions are based on a synthesis of all of the presented ideas.

Writer presents examples and evidence, but these may not be convincing or fully explained.

Writer does not integrate the analysis of the act and sources from the class materials or research into a single discussion of their relationship to the Sociology of Gender, instead discussing each idea separately, and is unable to form strong connections among them.

Contains few examples or evidence from the act and class materials or research; these examples are largely not discussed or analyzed in terms of the Sociology of Gender.

Examples or evidence from the act and class materials or research are barely mentioned

OR

essay is a discussion of the Sociology of Gender unrelated to any role-reversal act

OR

examples and evidence are listed without discussion or analysis
Writing Mechanics

Student provides a well-written and grammatically correct paper with little to no spelling, citation, or grammatical errors. Student follows formatting guidelines.

Student provides a well-written paper with fewer than 4 spelling, citation, and grammatical errors. Student attempts to follow APA Style, though there may be minor errors.

Student provides a paper with many spelling, citation, and grammatical mistakes, though paper is still comprehensible.

There are major APA Style errors.

Student provides paper that is not proofread and that contains multiple spelling, citation, and grammatical errors, some making the paper difficult to follow in places. Student does not attempt to follow APA Style.

Student provides paper that is difficult to read throughout and is formatted as a list rather than as an essay.
Overall Score A
90 or more		 B
80 or more		 C
70 or more		 D
60 or more		 F
0 or more

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Part Four: Understanding My Role Reversal

Criteria

Paper responds to all Section One questions clearly and with vivid, detailed examples and explanations. Length and references to sources are as requested.

Paper responds to all Section One questions, though some answers may not be clear or provide detailed examples. Length and references to sources are as requested.

OR, no references to sources, though all else is as requested.

Paper responds to all but one or two Section One questions in sufficient detail.

OR,

Section One is less than 75% of minimum length.

Several questions from Section One are neglected or underdeveloped.

OR,

Section One is less than 50% of minimum length.

Section One is missing, or only briefly addressed.

Paper responds to all Section One questions clearly and with vivid, detailed examples and explanations. Length and references to sources are as requested.

Paper responds to all Section One questions, though some answers may not be clear or provide detailed examples. Length and references to sources are as requested.

OR, no references to sources, though all else is as requested.

Paper responds to all but one or two Section One questions in sufficient detail.

OR,

Section One is less than 75% of minimum length.

Several questions from Section One are neglected or underdeveloped.

OR,

Section One is less than 50% of minimum length.

Section One is missing, or only briefly addressed.

Paper refers to at least three sources from class materials and student research in Section Two. Sources are quoted directly, cited in the text, and well-integrated into the discussion. Evidence and support from sources is analyzed (how or why does it support your point).

Paper refers to two sources from class materials and student research in Section Two. Sources are quoted directly, cited in the text, and well-integrated into the discussion. Evidence and support from sources is analyzed (how or why does it support your point).

OR,

Paper refers to at least three sources, but they are not quoted directly, OR are not well-integrated into the text, OR are not analyzed.

Paper refers to only one source from class materials and student research in Section Two. Source is quoted directly, cited in the text, and well-integrated into the discussion. Evidence and support from the source is analyzed (how or why does it support your point).

OR,

Paper refers to at least two sources, but they are not quoted directly, OR are not well-integrated into the text, OR are not analyzed.

Paper refers to any number of sources from class materials and student research that are not quoted directly, and are not well-integrated into the text, are not analyzed.

No sources from class materials and student research are cited.

Writer presents sufficient, convincing examples and evidence to support his/her analysis.

Writer is able to integrate the analysis of the act and sources from the class materials or research into a single discussion of their relationship to the Sociology of Gender, rather than discussing each in turn; synthesizes these ideas into something new (not just a summary of the ideas from each topic).

Writer presents some convincing examples and evidence to support his/her analysis, but a few points may lack direct support.

Writer gives equal attention to the analysis of the act and sources from the class materials or research, but does not integrate them into a single discussion of their relationship to the Sociology of Gender, instead discussing each topic separately; conclusions are based on a synthesis of all of the presented ideas.

Writer presents examples and evidence, but these may not be convincing or fully explained.

Writer does not integrate the analysis of the act and sources from the class materials or research into a single discussion of their relationship to the Sociology of Gender, instead discussing each idea separately, and is unable to form strong connections among them.

Contains few examples or evidence from the act and class materials or research; these examples are largely not discussed or analyzed in terms of the Sociology of Gender.

Examples or evidence from the act and class materials or research are barely mentioned

OR

essay is a discussion of the Sociology of Gender unrelated to any role-reversal act

OR

examples and evidence are listed without discussion or analysis

Student provides a well-written and grammatically correct paper with little to no spelling, citation, or grammatical errors. Student follows formatting guidelines.

Student provides a well-written paper with fewer than 4 spelling, citation, and grammatical errors. Student attempts to follow APA Style, though there may be minor errors.

Student provides a paper with many spelling, citation, and grammatical mistakes, though paper is still comprehensible.

There are major APA Style errors.

Student provides paper that is not proofread and that contains multiple spelling, citation, and grammatical errors, some making the paper difficult to follow in places. Student does not attempt to follow APA Style.

Student provides paper that is difficult to read throughout and is formatted as a list rather than as an essay.
Overall Score

250 words PSY discussion

/in /by

Read the “Research Areas of Emphasis in Professional Psychology” article and select a topic of psychological research discussed in the article (e.g., evidence-based treatments, veterans/active military, multicultural issues, ethical issues, suicide, chronic pain, interpersonal violence). This topic will be used as the focus of the literature review you will be creating as part of your Final Project, as well as for aspects of other assignments within this course, so select a topic that is of personal interest to you.

In your post, discuss some of the methodological issues unique to this psychological research.

  • State the topic you selected and then write two potential research questions that could be explored on the topic you selected.
  • Identify at least one potential research design to answer each of the research questions you wrote (you will identify a total of two designs).
  • Each question will require a different research design to be selected to investigate the topic.

Understanding the Court System

/in /by

The U.S. Court System is a complex system that includes both federal
and state-level courts. The federal system includes the judicial branch
of the government. This system is designed to help society interpret the
U.S. Constitution and provide guidelines for society. Court cases may
concern many different topics and have an unlimited number of outcomes.

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research a civil or criminal court case in which you are interested.

Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you:

  1. Summarize the seminal facts of the case that you chose.
  2. Explain the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.
  3. Describe the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.
  4. Explain
    whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court
    system, and include any related jurisdictional requirements. Explain the
    fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in
    that particular court system.
  5. Summarize the outcome of the case, and indicate whether the judge or jury made the decision.
  6. Discuss whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Provide a rationale for the response.
  7. Use at least (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.