Media Writing

/in /by

What we want you to do is to choose one (or maybe two) specific

production aspects of the film that we have talked about in

class–which can include the cinematography, the lighting, the editing,

and the audio production–and analyze the effectiveness of that aspect

within the film.

Talk about some of the technical as well as creative choices that the

filmmakers made, and why you think they made the decisions that they

did, at the exclusion of everything else that you know was possible.

You may use the IMDB website (Internet Movie Data Base) to provide you

with specific technical information and the names of all of the crew

members. Please use the appropriate technical terminology that we have

utilized in class, as well as the terminology that was in the text.

This paper is NOT a review or critique, although your writing may

include some subjective observations.

Two pages

Please answer the following questions below in two complete, yet concise essays. in 5 pages

/in /by

Please answer TWO of the following three questions below in two complete, yet concise essays.Be sure to answer all parts of the question.Double space and use an appropriate font and margins.Use quotes from and citations to the documents we have read in class when appropriate.Write in formal academic English.You will be graded on both your content and your prose and each answer is worth 200 points.

  • “Perikles’ Funeral Oration,” The Lysistrata, and Plato’s Apology must all be seen in the context of the Peloponnesian War and its aftermath.How is each document a reaction to the war? How might they relate to or be different from one another?What might explain any differences?
  • You have read secondary articles on Alexander the Great by Blunt, Heckel, and Badian.Describe and assess their arguments?Be sure to take into account the primary sources by Arrian, Plutarch, and those in Dillon and Garland, chapter 15 that you have read and how each of the modern authors uses them.
  • you should use the documents that i attached and also you can use resources from outside.

you can use for qustion 1

Apology,lysistrata,

and you can use for qustion 2

Alexander the Great,Heckel,brunt,badian,

This link has some helping:

https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/ancient/pericles-funeralspeech.asp

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory

/in /by

Create a PowerPoint presentation of 16-18 slides for the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2-RF).

Address and include the following in your PowerPoint:

  1. A title, introduction, and conclusion slide.
  2. What is the MMPI-2-RF and what does it measure?
  3. What are the legal and ethical requirements for a professional to administer, interpret, and/or report the results of an MMPI-2-RF?
  4. How would information gathered from the MMPI-2-RF assist in the intake and treatment planning process?
  5. Describe potential treatment strategies that would likely be incorporated into a treatment plan based on results from an MMPI-2-RF.
  6. Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included in the slide and do not simply restate it. Please ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50 words.
  7. A reference slide with a minimum of four scholarly references in addition to the textbook.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

RUBRIC

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

100.0 %Content

10.0 %MMPI-2-RF and What it Measures

Does not identify what the MMPI-2-RF is or what it measures.

The MMPI-2-RF was identified, but a less than appropriate description of what it measures is included. The description is unclear or inappropriate for the MMPI-II. Demonstrates poor understanding of the MMPI-2-RF and what it measures.

The MMPI-2-RF was identified, and an appropriate description of what it measures is included. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the MMPI-2-RF and what it measures.

The MMPI-2-RF is identified and the description of what it measures is very appropriate. Description of measurement is clearly articulated, with some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a good understanding of the MMPI-2-RF and what it measures.

The MMPI-2-RF is identified and the description of what it measures is completely appropriate. Description of measurement is comprehensively articulated, with strong evidence to support claims; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the MMPI-2-RF and what it measures.

20.0 %Legal and Ethical Requirements (administration, interpretation, and reporting)

Does not include legal and ethical requirements.

Gives details of the legal and ethical requirements in a less than satisfactory manner; unclear or inappropriate requirements related to administration, interpretation, and/or reporting are listed. Demonstrates poor understanding of the requirements of the MMPI-2-RF.

Minimally details the legal and ethical requirements. A limited grasp of the requirements for administration, interpretation, and/or reporting is shown. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the requirements of the MMPI-2-RF.

Adequately details the legal and ethical requirements. Requirements for administration, interpretation, and reporting are appropriate and the description shows why they are necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding of the requirements of the MMPI-2-RF.

Comprehensively details the legal and ethical requirements. Requirements for administration, interpretation, and reporting are comprehensive and completely appropriate. Description clearly details why all are necessary; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the requirements of the MMPI-2-RF.

20.0 %Intake and Treatment Planning Process

Does not discuss how gathered information assists the intake and treatment planning processes.

Describes how gathered information assists the intake and treatment planning processes in a less than satisfactory manner. The description is unclear or inappropriate for the content. Demonstrates poor understanding of how gathered information can assist in processes.

Minimally describes how gathered information assists the intake and treatment planning processes. A limited grasp of the information and processes is shown. Demonstrates a basic understanding of how gathered information can assist in processes.

Adequately details how gathered information assists the intake and treatment planning processes. Information and processes are appropriate and show why they are necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding of how gathered information can assist in processes.

Comprehensively details how gathered information assists the intake and treatment planning processes. Information and processes are comprehensive and completely appropriate. Description clearly details the interrelation of each; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of how gathered information can assist in processes.

20.0 %Potential Treatment Strategies

Does not include potential treatment strategies.

Gives details of treatment strategies in a less than satisfactory manner; unclear or inappropriate strategies are listed. Demonstrates poor understanding of potential treatment strategies to incorporate.

Minimally details treatment strategies. A limited grasp of potential strategies is shown. Demonstrates a basic understanding of potential treatment strategies to incorporate.

Adequately details treatment strategies. Potential strategies are appropriate and the description shows why strategies are relevant and necessary. Demonstrates a good understanding of potential treatment strategies to incorporate.

Comprehensively details treatment strategies. Potential strategies are comprehensive and completely appropriate. Description clearly details why all strategies are relevant and necessary; rationale is virtually flawless. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of potential strategies to incorporate.

5.0 %Detailed Speaker Notes

The presentation does not contain speaker notes.

The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes.

The presentation?s speaker notes are present and are generally competent.

The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in person.

The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that give a complete picture of what would be said if the presentation were given in person.

5.0 %Presentation of Content

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

5.0 %Layout

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

integrate information from multiple sources regarding an ethical topic, psychology homework help

/in /by

In a 3-5 page scholarly paper, integrate information from multiple sources regarding an ethical topic of your choice. You will also explore how personal beliefs, values, and biases can impact ethical decision making and how you will apply the Ethics Code in your future career. The majority of the paper will focus on the synthesis of information from your sources. The exploration of personal beliefs, values, and biases should be no more than 1 page.

Use the readings from Units 1, 2, and 3 to guide your topic selection using the APA Ethics Code. Once you select a topic, find and incorporate at least three articles from the Kaplan Library pertaining to your topic.

In this paper, you will synthesize the readings from the textbook along with the articles you chose. Consider the following:

  • What is the main issue the author is addressing?
  • What is the author’s central point?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article?
  • What makes the article interesting and important?
  • How will this synthesis of what the author has to say help you apply what you are learning to your own work in the profession?

After synthesizing the ideas from the readings (articles and textbook), reflect on your personal background (biases, beliefs, values, etc.) and discuss how this could influence your ethical decision making. How will you balance your personal influences with the guidelines you find in the Ethics Code? How will you apply the Ethics Code in your career?

The paper should:

  • Follow Assignment directions (review grading rubric for best results).
  • Use correct APA formatting per the APA Publication Manual, 6th Edition.
  • Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English.
  • Be written in Standard American English and be clear, specific, and error-free. If needed, be sure to use the Kaplan University Writing Center for help.

Your paper should include:

  • Title Page
  • Abstract
  • Main Body of the paper (3- to 5-pages)
  • Reference Page

Reaction Paper—Nonfiction, English homework help

/in /by

Read the following nonfiction selections

“Salvation,” Langston Hughes

“How I Became a Socialist,” Helen Keller

“About Men,” Gretel Ehrlich

“Waterloo” Andrew Lam

“Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King, Jr.

Select two of the nonfiction texts you have read this week.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper detailing your reaction to each selection. Include the following in your paper:

  • A summary of the strategies you think the writer used to convey a particular idea.
  • Describe how you personally relate to the theme and explain the intended purpose of each story and its theme.
  • Use quotes from each selection to support your paper. At the end of the paper, consider how you analyzed the stories and answer the following questions:
  • What makes each of the chosen selections nonfiction?
  • Is imagination required for writing and reading nonfiction? Why or why not?

Posc,,,,,,,,,

/in /by

Two page summary on two reading assignment one page on each

You must turn in a journal entry for each reading that indicates at the top of the page which
reading it is (with the author, chapter number, and chapter title). A journal entry should be a
one-page, single-spaced (it can be double-spaced if you have room), typed, summary and review
of the reading in question. It should have two sections. In the first section, you should provide a
brief synopsis of the reading that identifies the key themes, thesis, and key points. The second
section should contain your evaluation of the readings. How does the reading connect with the
discussion in the class or with other topics we cover? How does it connect with current events or
actions of recent presidents? How does it relate to other things you know, have learned in this
class or others?

Child or adult? Determining if a child should be tried in the juvenile or the criminal justice system

/in /by

Child or Adult?

Determining whether to try a child in the juvenile or the criminal justice system will have an impact on every step of his or her experience. Although the exact laws and practices of the systems vary from state to state, broad underlying beliefs differentiate the two systems. While the juvenile system is often thought to be more lenient in its punishments, there are often stricter regulations throughout the process. In the juvenile system a child may not have a right to a jury trial or bail. Juvenile records are not open to public access like adult criminal records and parole is very different between the two systems. When the child in question is treated by the justice system as a child, the courts act as more of a parent attempting to punish but also protect.

Differences between juvenile and adult criminal justice systems exist at every step of the way. In the website Four Kids, Four Crimes (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., follows four cases and examines how and why two defendants were tried as juveniles and two were tried as adults. After reading all four case stories, choose one of the cases and answer the following questions:

  • Which case did you choose? Was he tried as an adult or a juvenile?
  • Discuss whether you agree with the decision made to try the juvenile as an adult or as a juvenile. What factors did you rely on to arrive at this decision?
  • What scholarly evidence did you use in making your decision? Why is this resource credible and compelling?
  • Compare your chosen case to that of Christian Fernandez (covered in your text at the beginning of Chapter 5). What similarities and differences are there? Would you have tried Christian as an adult if you were the prosecutor? Why or why not?
  • Are girls (women) treated the same as boys (men) in the criminal justice system? Be sure to discuss both juvenile and adult offenders of each gender.

Your initial post should be at least 350 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and at least one other scholarly resource. Please properly cite in the body of your work and at the end of your work your required references. Be sure to support any opinions you have with credible, scientific evidence. APA Style please

The book for the class is Crime & Society by Kimberly Collica and Jennifer Furs

Every Little Hurricane” by Sherman Alexie, essay help

/in /by

Subject: “Every Little Hurricane” by Sherman Alexie

Prompt: Analyze a particular element (character, symbol, leitmotif) in a shortstory and argue its significance to the story’s meaning.This essay is for a general academic audience

Formatting:4-5 pages (1000 – 1250 words); MLA formatting(see http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/ for help.)

Reminders:●Although you are not required to use sources, any sources used should be documented.●In an essay of this nature, it’s best to use specific passages to back up your discussion since doing so offers more opportunity for close analysis.

………………………every little hurricane

Here is my outline/info for the argumentative/fiction essay that needs to be covered:

Hook: No matter what the destiny is, and no matter what has happened in the past, it’s the best solution to be patient and strong in any stage.

Thesis: It is definitely possible to successfully survive and win over a tragedy with two powerful weapons called patience and strength.

First body paragraph: definition of patience, an evidence from “Every Little Hurricane” which is about Victor’s nightmares and how he survived, an example of patient people who succeeded.

Second body: definition of strength and how it looks like to be strong enough to deal with conflicts, an evidence (quote or paraphrase) from “Every Little Hurricane” about strength, and example to support the idea of strength and its power.

Third body: claims about those people who suffered but have chosen to peacefully deal with their traumatic experiences and most importantly chosen to be patient and strong. Lastly, the benefits of being patient and strong which is way better than giving up, being exhausted and impatient.

Conclusion: it’s always the best to choose the spiritual way which is being patient and strong. Call to action: everyone needs to be able to learn to be patient to let bad memories go away and be strong enough to continue positively.

……………..

Ultimately, the paper should cover the following questions:

What does the text say? Provide paraphrased ideas or direct quotations to use in your essay(be sure to distinguish between what you paraphrase and directquotations. Include page numbers for all material):

What does the text mean? How do I interpret this? (Read between the lines):

Why does it matter? How does it relate to your thesis?:

……………….

I need a NON-PLAGIARIZED essay and it is the most important point about it.

Thanks,

Sincerely,

Shaki

From Secular Monarchy to Islamic Republic

/in /by

Required Readings

  • Mark Gasiorowski, “Islamic Republic of Iran,” in Mark Gasiorowski and Sean L. Yom (eds.), The Government and Politics of the Middle East and North Africa (Boulder, Co: Westview, 2017: pp. 271-306.
  • powerpoint week 8

Recommended Reading

Write a one-page paper summarizing the readings, articles or report. Students should analyze by answering one or more of the following questions:

  • How significant is the question?
  • How convincing or persuasive is the argument?
  • Is there a different methodology the author could have used?
  • How logical are the causes and outcomes behind the argument?
  • Is the empirical evidence and methodology sound, why or why not? Are there alternative explanations the author could have considered?
  • What solutions does the reading propose to solve a specific issue and do you agree with them and have others to propose?

Intercultural Communication Paper, writing homework help

/in /by

Intercultural Communication Paper

This assignment demonstrates your professional writing skills as well as your intercultural communication competency.

It consists of two parts:

Part 1:

Complete the INCA Survey and develop a 1 to 2 page reflection summarizing your ideas. The survey and scoring key are located at CONTENT> COURSE RESOURCES> ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES> Intercultural Communication Paper.

Directions: Complete all of the INCA Survey questions. When you are done, use the INCA survey student manual to help you analyze your results. Read about the different dimensions of intercultural competency and what they mean. All supporting docs can be found at CONTENT> COURSE RESOURCES> ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES> Intercultural Communication Paper.

Note that a total score for the INCA survey is not important for the purpose of this assignment. (You will not get a total score).

Part 2:

Select 3 (THREE) critical incidents from document Critical Incidents (see ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES)- Student Directions and analyze them. Frame your analyses of each incident using the dimensions from the INCA survey. Your analysis should contain at least three scholarly references that pertain directly to the incident. Your analysis should be complete and supported by the literature not an opinion.

Complete both parts in a SINGLE formal written paper using APA format. Use headings to mark each part: Part 1 and Part 2. Use subheadings to indicate the discussion of each critical incident. Please review the requirements for all written assignments on page 3 of the syllabus.

Optional: include a chart or graph to support your written analysis. Just be sure to explain the information presented in the chart or graph.

About INCA:
INCA is an acronym for Intercultural Competency Assessment. The purpose of the INCA survey is for you to examine your intercultural awareness and assess your cultural sensitivity. This activity is designed to help you become aware of your own attitude towards cultural diversity. The dimensions of cultural competence measured by the INCA survey are:1) Tolerance of ambiguity, 2) Behavioral flexibility, 3) Communicative awareness, 4) Knowledge discovery, 5) Respect for Otherness, and 6) Empathy.

Note: This project and the instrument created was funded by the Council of Europe and the Leonardo da Vinci II Program. You can read more about this project, if you are interested, here:http://ec.europa.eu/ewsi/en/resources/detail.cfm?ID_ITEMS=9372