Task 2
Kindly read the research paper titled “Environmental impact of e-commerce and other sustainability Implications of the information economy” and answer the following:
a) Debate on the role of information economy for Sustainable development of the society.
b) Debates on how E-Commerce provides a Sustained Competitive Advantage in the Digital Era.
Task 3:
Carefully read the provided research papers
• Role of financial institutions in boosting e-banking in Pakistan.
• The Adoption of e-Banking: The Case of Omani Banks and answer the following:
a. Discuss the barriers faced in adoption of e-banking in view point of Omani banks and global banking.
You can choose any local bank to discuss.
b. Propose recommendations to eliminating the barriers in adapting to e-banking. Recommendations should comprise of Social, Legal and Ethical barriers and their solution.
TASK4: Format & Referencing (10 Marks) Requirement:
1 Words limit = 3000 approximately (excluding table of content and reference list)
2 References (Harvard Style) = At least 15 references are required from books, journal articles, newspaper articles, electronic books, electronic journals etc. Students are advised to take at least 03 references from each of the above mentioned sources.
i. The words limit for the assignment is 3000 (approximately). For each question, you are expected to write at least 700 words for each question.
ii. The document should be well presented and neatly done.

In addition to being a decorated law enforcement officer with 15 years of experience in investigations, you are also a member of a regional professional membership organization for law enforcement officers.

At next year’s annual conference, you will be conducting a training for which members can receive continuing education credits. The topic of your training is “Probable Cause v. Reasonable Suspicion: How Do We Train Our Officers?” This is a “train the trainer” event, in that the bulk of the attendees at your workshop will be training officers who will take these techniques back to their agencies to use as they train their new officers on these constitutional issues.

Your job is to put together a PowerPoint presentation that will utilize contemporary case law and other resources to provide a training presentation to the attendees. The objective of your training is to help attendees learn how to differentiate between probable cause and reasonable suspicion. Essentially, your job is to provide these trainers with the tools to return to their agencies and make these concepts and issues clear to their officers. Effectively presenting this information can be the difference between a case being dismissed for lack of probable cause, and a deserving criminal defendant being prosecuted effectively.

Your training should address, but is not necessarily limited to, the following:

• A definition of search and seizure
• A discussion of who the Fourth Amendment regulates
• A discussion of the reasonableness clause and the warrant clause of the Fourth Amendment
• A definition of probable cause and of reasonable suspicion, and a discussion of the current state of the law on probable cause and reasonable suspicion
• At least 2 different fact scenarios to illustrate the steps in the decision-making process for an officer in determining whether probable cause or reasonable suspicion exist
• A discussion of the current state of the law in stop-and-frisk
• A discussion of the consequences to law enforcement for violating the Fourth Amendment (such as the exclusionary rule or civil or criminal liability)
• Any other information you believe important to convey in training on this topic

You must support your presentation with a minimum of 5 legitimate sources.

Be sure to reference all sources using APA style

****90% of Project is already completed****

Research Project

Focus of the Research Project
The final version of your Research Project should be 10 to 12 double-spaced pages (not including the title page, reference page, tables, appendices, etc.). The paper will be an original business research project that tests a hypothesis of your choice. The research can relate to your place of current/previous employment or other contexts of interest. Sample topics could include, but are not limited to:

• Manufacturing quality/cost improvement
• Service quality improvement
• Systems design
• Accounts receivable/billing/accounts receivable aging
• Marketing/advertising Issues
• Sales of goods
• Investments
• Product safety
• Workplace safety
• Labor pools
• Human resources matters of broad concern
• Population studies

For your Research Project, you will be combining all parts that you have worked on from Weeks One through Five. Your paper should be formatted as follows:

• Part 1: Introduction
  • Background information about your research project (Week One)
  • Describe the management dilemma (Week One)
  • Ethical Concerns (Week Two)
  • Develop and explain your hypothesis (Week One)
• Part 2: Literature review
  • Background research on at least three scholarly sources (Week One)
• Part 3: Data
  • Secondary data (Week Three)
  • Measurement benchmark and scales (Week Three)
  • Plans for using observations, focus groups, interviews, or surveys (Week Four)
  • Plans for analyzing data (Week Five)
  • Plans for how to analyze results (Week Five)
• Part 4: Results
  • Summarize and display the results of your research. Provide charts, graphs, tables, and so forth, as they might apply to your research.
  • State whether you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis based on your study; explain.
• Part 5: Conclusion
  • Summarize the entire study and reflect on it
    • Consider the “take-home” message that management and other decision makers can use from this research to make informed business decisions.
    • Include the strengths and weaknesses of the study and suggestions for future research.
• Part 6: References
  • Include a separate references page and cite all references within the text of the paper.
• Part 7: Appendix
  • If applicable

Writing the Research Project
The Research Project

• Must be 10 to 12 double-spaced pages in length (not including the title page, reference page, tables, appendices, etc.) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
• Must include a separate title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
• Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
• Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
• Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
• Must use at least three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library, in addition to the text.
• Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
• Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

There are many examples in the news, and it is important to delve into this deeper from a professional perspective. For instance, one non-replicated study is publicized and spread across the media, prompting the urge for change or outrage, but some significant and relevant details are omitted and the study can be misused. Also, studies that focus on replicating other studies to develop comprehensive knowledge may be more difficult for researchers to accomplish or get funding for, thereby diminishing the appeal for this level of responsible research.

To prepare for this Discussion, review the resources from Bartholet (2014), O’Connor (2013), and Fedina (2015), and reflect on the growing use of reporting on research studies in different avenues of popular media (television, social media, radio, etc.). Also, consider what major aspects of a research study may or may not be discussed when shared in the media, and how these choices may impact a study’s relevance in the field of study and greater community. Further, consider how the concept of research quality can be applied to widely publicized studies, and how the different criteria (credibility, validity, etc.) can be an opportunity for promoting positive social change.

By Day 4

Post an analysis of the use and misuse of research studies for promoting positive social change. Your analysis should include the following:

• How does misuse occur when publicizing emerging research studies? Explain with supportive examples.
• What is the responsibility of a researcher when promoting positive social change? Explain.
• How can researchers utilize research studies to promote change within their given field?

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly source.

In a cogent answer discuss the events that led to the American Revolution. Was the battle cry of “liberty” based On economic, political, intellectual opposed to taxation and virtual representation by parliament? Was it the reaction of an energy mob (“ordinary” colonists”) that put pressure On elite class reluctant to wage war? Was it rooted in a deeper cause and linked to notions of English liberties, anlightenment ideas, and the great awakening? Was it an organized revolt or simply a misguided, unorganized protest movement that went too far by a handful of colonists overreacting to a few unfortunate events? and finally, was it a worthy cause considering that only one-third of the colonists( patriots) supported it and that it marginalized certain groups of Americans ( salves, women, and native Americans)? USE THE OUTLINE GIVEN PLEASE NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ! Times new roman pt 12