Final Draft

/in /by

The final draft of the essay should be 1,000-1,200-words and include a thesis, all major points, evidence to support these points (including in-text citations), counterclaims, and a Works Cited page. The final draft will reflect significant revisions based upon instructor and peer feedback.

You will generate an arguable claim and write a 1,000-1,200 word academic essay to support that claim, based on the following requirements:

  1. present your arguable claim in your thesis
  2. provide background on the topic
  3. use evidence to support your claim
  4. explain counterarguments and refute them to support your claim
  5. offer a conclusion that underscores why your argument matters within a larger context

This essay prepares you to compose the type of research-based academic writing that you will be asked to do throughout your academic career.

” I already did the outline so based on the outline you write the final draft , And please see the instructor feedback and try to make it your goal ”

there is 2 files. the first is the outline and the second is the feed back.

Human Rights

/in /by

Will provide agency information.

  1. Become more familiar with the long history of the international human rights movement by examining the Human Rights timeline: http://www.stockton.edu/~falkd/timeline.htm.
  2. Become familiar with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other human rights instruments and covenants relevant to your practice setting by visiting the following United Nations website: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/. Be sure to find at least one specific (not just the Universal Declaration) human rights instrument that addresses the client population your agency serves.
  3. Discover whether your agency’s mission, policies and practices, formal or informal, reflect an awareness of human rights, as enumerated in the human rights instruments you have reviewed. To do this, talk with your field instructor and workers, review the agency mission statement and policy manual, and observe the areas where clients wait for services.
  4. Identify any social work ethical standards that mandate social workers to be human rights advocates. Refer to the IFSW website for a view of an international social work ethical code: http://www.ifsw.org and NASW’s website for the NASW Code of Ethics: http://www.naswdc.org.
  5. Write 3-4 page paper summarizing (1) what you discovered about your agency’s consciousness of human rights and degree to which agency mission, policy and practice respect and protect human rights, (2) what specific ethical standards mandate social workers to be human rights advocates, and (3) ways in which your agency might change to become even more supportive of human rights.

One page paper about Terrorism!

/in /by

Look up some 2018 news about Terrorism and then write one page double spaced reflection MLA citation. In the writing you have to follow these steps. First, quick synopsis of the news article. Second, analysis in light of course content assigned (attached articles). You have to read the article I am attaching and then when you write the paper you reflect based on the News article you found, and the article I attached. Plus your opinion. All that in one paper. Preferably pick some News Article about terrorism in Libya.

Please don’t forget to cite and provide the link for the news article you found. Thank you.

major paper about film, writing homework help

/in /by

Context:

Now you are asked to write a critical essay that falls between the theoretical essay and the movie review for both the critical community of cinephiles and film scholars in the academia. The writer of this kind of essay presumes that his or her reader has seen or is at least familiar with the film under discussion. The writer might therefore remind the reader of key themes and elements of the plot, but a lengthy retelling of the story of the film is neither needed nor acceptable. The focus of the essay is far more specific than that of a review because the writer hopes to reveal subtleties or complexities that may have escaped viewers on the first or even the second viewing. The essay may focus on a short sequence at the beginning of the film in relation to other films or on a particular camera angle that becomes associated with a specific character who either fits into a category of cultural analysis or helps define a film genre. Basically, what you write takes a comparative approach to a critical analysis of the film(s) that integrates the formal analysis and cultural analysis (please refer to your handbook Writing about Movies).

The Assignment:

Please write a critical essay either based on the question you raised in your SA1.2 or about one or multiple kind(s) of love in and beyond the films. Pick just one (1) of these two options and explore it in depth through two (2) of the following films: Farewell My Concubine 1993 by Chen Kaige (PRC), Love Letter 1995 by Shunji Iwai (Japan), In the Mood for Love 2000 by Wong Kar-wai (Hong Kong),The Handmaiden 2016 by Chan-wook Park (South Korea), and The Fourth Portrait 2010 by Chung Mong-hong (Taiwan), and a body of optional films listed by me (should be on Canvas). You can also mention any other film that you watched before except the selected two if any need.

Here is a brief outline that I would like you to follow when it comes to paragraphing: (1) Identify the specific question/problem to be explored and briefly suggest what makes it a question/problem. Define your terms to prepare the discussion of specific examples. (2) Analyze selected examples from one film. (3) Analyze selected examples from another film. (4) Explore both connections and differences among the selected films; situate those in a larger context. In other words, complicate the discussion and engage with sort of the social/cultural concerns of our times. And then, (5) draw a conclusion from it, however provisional that conclusion may be. Remember: the goal of exploratory writing is to open up discussion, rather than shut it down. Ideally, your essay would also integrate at least some discussion of one or more of the assigned readings, and do so strategically, in order to develop a point of your own, a complex claim. Note: Every essay needs a title.

Format

  • 4-6 pages in total
  • Double-spaced, with standard margins
  • 12 pt Times New Roma

i will upload the past short essay about those film that i already submitted so you can read it !

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

/in /by

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

View Rubric

Max Points: 300

Details:

In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Students will develop a 1,500 – 1,750 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Problem statement
  3. Purpose of the change proposal
  4. PICOT
  5. Literature search strategy employed
  6. Evaluation of the literature
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
  9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
  10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

RubricRR

Rubrics

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal

1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%

2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%

3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%

4
Good 80-89%
89.00%

5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%

60.0 %Content

5.0 %Background

Background section is not present.

Background section is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Background section is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Background section is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Problem Statement

Problem statement is not present.

Problem statement is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Problem statement is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Problem statement is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Change Proposal Purpose

Purpose of change proposal is not present.

Purpose of change proposal is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Purpose of change proposal is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Purpose of change proposal is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %PICOT

PICOT is not present.

PICOT is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

PICOT is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

PICOT is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Literature Search Strategy

Literature search strategy is not present.

Literature search strategy is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Literature search strategy is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Literature search strategy is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Literature Evaluation

Literature evaluation is not present.

Literature evaluation is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Literature evaluation is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Literature evaluation is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2)

Theory utilization is not present.

Theory utilization content is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Theory utilization content is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Theory utilization content is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2)

Implementation plan is not present.

Implementation plan is present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Implementation plan is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Implementation plan is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3)

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation and /or discussion component is not present.

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, but is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present. Some minor details or elements are missing but the omission(s) do not impede understanding.

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

5.0 %Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2)

Appendices are not present.

Appendices are present, but incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.

Appendices are present with minor elements missing that do not impede understanding.

Appendices are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.

Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

10.0 %Evidence of Revision

Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback or evidence of revision on research critiques.

Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of revision is incomplete.

Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of revision are present.

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is clearly provided.

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

30.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

10.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %

Movieflix Competition

/in /by

Hello,

The topic I’ve chosen was competion.

I’ve enclosed previous assignments just in cause you need them for reference.

Thank you!

Now that you have your strategic plan in place, it’s time to assemble your team to help you to execute your plan.

For your project this week you will need to do the following:

  • In a minimum of 2 pages, prepare an essay explaining the types of teams that Rasmussen Consulting will need in order to carry out the steps that you mapped out in your strategic plan.
  • What will be the role of the team members?
  • Why are these particular teams important for Rasmussen Consulting to properly execute the solution to MovieFlix’s problem?
  • Make sure to include an APA formatted title page and reference page for sources that you may have used for your research. Remember to follow APA guidelines when paraphrasing or quoting information. Don’t forget to cite your sources and include in-text citations as necessary.

Submit your completed assignment to the drop box below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Assignment #1: (PPQH₀ & S) aka-Problem, Purpose, Questions, Hypotheses, Significance

/in /by

Assignment #1: (PPQH₀ & S) aka-Problem, Purpose, Questions, Hypotheses,
Significance

The foundation of proposing a research proposal depends upon clarity in thinking and
specific, focused writing. Please identify and describe your research problem, the
purpose of your study and your over-arching research question along with its
corresponding hypothesis. You will also need to describe the significance of the study
you are proposing. This means, you need to compose a sentence or two describing why
this type of research would be interesting, necessary, and important. Careful
consideration should be paid to how the problem is identified, the context of the problem,
and its rationale. Make sure the research problem is significantly narrow in focus but
yields opportunities for further analysis. Follow the format included in the appendix
section of this syllabus and outlined in your textbook.
The purpose of this assignment is to help you demonstrate applied learning specific to the
discipline of political science. It will demonstrate your ability to read and understand the
literature, identify and integrate ideas, understand applications, analyze problems, demonstrate
knowledge and intellectual comprehension and build your skills communicating clearly and
effectively. (Typically this assignment will be 1-2 pages long)

The topic is: what made the war in Yemen?

Research
Hypothesis

H1:
prime-rely about regional political power

H2:
prime-rely about religion (Sunni group and Shiite group)

Share Your Peer Reviewed Study

/in /by

Week 4 – Discussion

Action research is a form of inquiry in which a problem is identified and a series of actions are planned as a way of gaining deeper understanding of the range of possible solutions. The purpose of this discussion is to promote reciprocal sharing of the study you reviewed with others in your community of practice (your peers in this course) who would value the knowledge you have gained through the peer review process of the study.

There are two parts to this discussion.

Part 1: Share the process and results of the action research study you peer reviewed in EDU 694 or ECE 660. At a minimum:

  • Describe the purpose of the study by writing a statement that completes the following sentence, “The purpose of this study was to…” (two to three sentences).
  • Post the research question(s) – Include definitions of key technical terms, if necessary (one to three sentences).
  • Outcomes/Results or the “so what?” of the study – Answers to the research questions. (three to four sentences)
  • Assuming you would conduct another cycle of this study, what specific modifications or adjustments would you make, and why? (three to four sentences)
  • Explain why this study is important for teachers and other educational practitioners to read about. (two to three sentences)

Part 2:

  • Attach a link to your Folio.
  • In one paragraph, reflect on your experience with the redesign of the Week Three Assignment in terms of challenges you encountered and how you overcame those challenges. Also include how your assessment promotes learning and innovation skills and how it could be used as a tool for ongoing evaluation of student progress.

Discussion Forum:Using the Internet

/in /by

Discussion Forum: Using the Internet: Making the Most of the Web’s Resources

Net neutrality (also known as open Internet) is a concept to provide an equal and a level playing field to create and provide new content and services. The intent of net neutrality is to enable innovation on the Internet without seeking the permission from gatekeepers of broadband providers such as Comcast and Verizon. Recently, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) approved net neutrality new rules designed to make sure Internet service providers treat all legal content equally. What is your position on net neutrality? What is the implication of government involvement and regulation of the Internet that no one owns? How do you understand the concept of broadband and what is the future implication of the Internet usage? Comment on two of your classmates’ post.

Response to Classmate, health and medicine homework help

/in /by

In responding to your classmates’ posts, consider a compare and contrast approach, recommend alternative views, and/or share additional research you have done that supports your classmates’ posts. My classmate response is pertaining to their experience identifying the dynamism of people in their workplace whether it is current or past. This answer has to have a minimum of 150 words with one critical thinking question in the response. Support your response with scholarly sources and citations cited in APA style. My classmate response is listed below.

After graduating from college with a Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering degree, I started my career as an engineer with McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing) in Long Beach, California. From there I moved to Atlanta, Georgia to work for Delta Air Lines where I had the opportunity to progress through various technical and supervisory positions. Seeking to relocate closer to my extended family, I moved to Savannah, Georgia and my current position with Gulfstream Aerospace as an Engineering Manager within the Product Support organization. My direct reports at Gulfstream are technical group heads with engineers reporting to them. There are two other managers in the organization who are my peers whose groups handle planning and certification to complement my group’s responsibility for design. These three groups make up engineering for product support. As engineering, we support multiple internal customers who are the interface with our external customers.

Throughout my career, I’ve observed that certain diverse personality types between individuals can have a positive effect on team results when strategically applied. For example, an extrovert may be more effective at collaborating on solution concepts with a cross-functional team whereas an introvert may excel at executing the details to implement a decided solution. My experience is that the dynamism created through matching personality and task for an individual is a valuable part of team success. In their work, Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type (1995), Isabel and Peter Meyers state something similar:

“Extraverts deal with more situations, faster and somewhat more casually, and with less time out for reflection. They are faster, in part because they already know more about the circumstances. Information has a pleasant, useful way of rubbing off on them as they go about their daily business. Introverts can broaden the base for their analysis by finding out what extroverts can tell them about any situation”(p. 117).

In my organization, I have project engineers who are gifted at seeing the big picture and working with a variety of different disciplines, while my design engineers use their ability to see details in order to solve complex problems. Each has a personality type which contributes to effectiveness in their specific role within the organization. Along with this, I have observed that the relationship between these individuals strengthens when each recognizes the contribution that the other makes on their behalf toward overall success of the team.