Peer Presentation:

Participants must choose from another academic or peer-reviewed journal source a pre-incident stress management program and include in your presentation the background/research, applications of the model/program, and implications for law enforcement agencies if considering this model/program/intervention (i.e. cost, training time, buy-in, etc.).

All participants are expected to present on the program using APA publication manual standards. In addition to furthering your knowledge of course learning objectives the Peer Presentation is also designed at providing the opportunity for presentation (a key skill set in the field of criminal justice) as well as a chance for robust, professional peer discussion. Peer Presentations will be minimum of 5 minutes and maximum of 8 minutes per participant.

Presenting participants will post any handouts, references or presentation materials therefore I need you send those to me.

Second, I am required to both (a) submit a presentation (using APA formatting, you will find they outline standards even for presentations/slides – online) and (b) present the information in the peer presentation. Such as,

Most participants use PowerPoint, which is fine I need also and then I will need a note for each slide to discuss a speech of the PowerPoint on live-video myself will presenting.

Using Camus’ “Create Dangerously” as a model for style and tone and a guideline for

structure, make an attempt to address the question “what does it matter who is

speaking?.

Camus’ talk/essay centers around the questions of what sort of art an artist should

produce, the role of the artist in society, and the role of art in society. He looks at the

position of the artist and reasons why artists might find themselves being criticized

for having produced particular works and then examines some assumptions that lie

beneath these criticism to see if those assumptions are correct. Based upon his

conclusions in those sections he then goes on to put together his own overall

conclusions.

I’m asking you to do the same sort of work in your essay, but rather than

considering the piece of art (the text) as the central part, we are thinking about how

the public’s view of the artist might shape the public’s opinion about the text.

Just as Camus ends up looking at the artist and society in his attempt to understand

what sort of art an artist should produce, I expect that you may need to think about

message, purpose, context, and audience when thinking about the way in which we

need to create our own ethos in communication.

Length wise, I expect that most writers would need to write for at least six pages

(double spaced, in MLA format) to attempt a satisfying, thoughtful and productive

response, and that a focused response would not go much longer than eight pages.

Your readers will all be familiar with the readings from our course, so those

readings would be useful for discussing examples of what you mean. You may also

use outside examples if you are trying to make a point not covered by one of our

class readings, but keep in mind that an outside text might require more explanation

and might push your paper longer that you prefer.

All examples that you refer to in your paper or that you use to help shape your own

explanations in the paper need to be identified in the paper and included in the

works cited.

You’ve had seven weeks to consider this question. Let’s see what you have come up

with. I’m looking forward to your input.

And professor’s comments are: Good work on the writing and imitation side of things, but this essay is a bit off-topic for the prompt itself. Too much about art (not our subject) and not enough about ethos. I’ll grade this on quality of writing and polish if you choose to complete what you have, but it will not qualify as superior work if you are aiming for that in the portfolio. That would require a topic shift and deeper revision.

**NO PLAGIARISM, MUST BE ORIGINAL WORK**

BE VERY SPECIFIC TO THE INSTRUCTIONS AND PLEASE DON’T PLAGIARIZE

Assignment Content

The purpose of this assignment is for you to apply what you learned through the activities and chapter readings. You can reflect on the results from the reading and activities this week to inform your answers.

Review the Sociology Matters prompt at the end of Ch. 6 (pg.185).

Write a 700-word response to one bullet at the end of the chapter.

Announcements: For the Wk3 assignment, make sure that you answer one of the bullet points at the end of Chapter 6 (pg.185). You don’t need to answer all of the bullet point questions. You only need to answer one. Also, make sure that you include insights in your answer that you gained from the readings and the discussion.

I will included Chapters 6, 7 and 8 once accepted.

Note: Paper must be in APA format, with an “Introduction”. Please provide references to the citations (NO Websites that require sign-in and NO Blogs as references) and please provide web links for the references.

Then, develop your PowerPoint Presentation. Consider following this pattern for your slides:

• Slide 1 – Title slide (Does not count toward the slide count)
• Slide 2 – Introduction slide (Introduces and discusses the two selected course concepts)
• Slide 3 & 4 – Identify and appraise the first selected concept (Consider the exemplars evaluated during the course)
• Slide 5 & 6 – Identify and appraise the second selected concept (Consider the exemplars evaluated during the course)
• Slide 7 – Describe how the two concepts impact the nurses’ need to use high level clinical judgement (Consider how nurses advance clinical practice because of the identified concept)
• Slide 8 & 9 – Analyze the emerging health initiatives surrounding the two selected concepts (Discuss what initiatives have developed because of the identified exemplars discussed throughout the course)
• Slide 10 – Discuss how to advance workplace communication (Identify how to advance communication within the healthcare metaparadigm)
• Slide 11 – Conclude the presentation (Provide an overview of what was discussed in the presentation)
• Slide 12– Reference slide (References must be in APA Style and citations must be included in the presentation and speaker notes; does not count toward the slide count)

Assignment 3: Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues

Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

Before writing your position statement on Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues, you should read Chapters 1 through11 in your textbook. Then, research at least three (3) peer-reviewed articles about individual rights, morality, ethics, individual rights, duty, or codes of conduct for criminal justice professionals.

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

1. Create a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will balance the two issues in your own career in law enforcement.

2. Determine a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Provide one to two (1-2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

3. Select a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Provide one to two (1-2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

4. Explain what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

5. Support your position statement with three (3) relevant and credible references, documented according to latest edition of APA. (Note: Do not use open source sites such as Ask.com, eHow.com, Answers.com, and Wikipedia.)

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format (latest edition). Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page developed in accordance with the latest edition of APA, including a running head, page number, the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page, revision of the previous assignment, and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Analyze the issues pertinent to codes of conduct and / or the ethics of duty.
• Recommend ways to use ethics to improve decision making in the criminal justice system.
• Analyze various philosophical approaches for ethical decision making, and the effectiveness and limits of each approach for making ethical choices.
• Analyze the ethical issues involved with balancing means and ends in the criminal justice field.
• Examine the key elements of virtue and character.
• Examine reasons for and effective ways to apply critical ethical thinking to criminal justice issues.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in ethics and leadership in criminal justice.
• Write clearly and concisely about ethics and leadership in criminal justice using proper writing mechanics.