The essay option requires a minimum of 800 words and no more than 1000 words of content.

Include APA standards for style, citations, references, and format.

Be sure to include a title page with your name and the name of the essay.

You must use at least four (4) sources from professional websites or scholarly journals. Some examples include www.sans.org, www.wired.com, www.cert.org, and www.nsa.gov.

**You may not use Wikipedia, ask.com, or other related dictionary sites.

All sources must be cited within the text or mentioned within the video presentation according to APA guidelines and must appear at the end of your essay on a separate Reference List page.

Option 1: Privacy Issues-

1. What are some states and/or the Federal government doing to ensure privacy of your computerized records? (California is the state with the toughest laws).
2. What are some issues dealing with privacy and who has control of your data (hint: think of issues with data sharing, like grocery stores selling your information to credit card or insurance companies).
3. Pick another country (or area of the world like EU) and analyze how it handles computer privacy factors differently than the US.

Scholarly Paper: Using the PICOT process, analyze a current nursing practice-related issues ( Please use Short Staffing as the topic for this scholarly paper ) . Plagiarism greater than 10% will not be accepted. This is an independent activity which requires submission of a scholarly paper, according to the instructions below. The scholarly paper will be graded based on the Evaluation of Undergraduate Scholarly Paper rubric, which is included in this syllabus. The scholarly paper should be typed, double spaced, 12 point, Times New Roman using APA format, and limited to 6 pages including title and reference pages. The references cannot be older than 2018. EVALUATION OF UNDERGRADUATE SCHOLARLY PAPER RUBRIC WILL BE USED. Support your position with references no older than 2018 from at least two peer reviewed journal reference articles.

Rubric Instructions

1. Create your 750-1250 word essay on the film assigned to your group. Your essay must have a strong argument thesis that asserts the connections between the American Dream theme and the film. The essay must use correct formatting according to MLA in terms of spacing, heading, font, indenting, in-text citation, works cited, etc. For help with how to formulate an argument or correct formatting see Argument in the Unit/General Resources tab at left.
2. Save your file in .doc or .docx format and submit as an attachment using the BLUE link above. Be sure to click the Submit button or I won’t receive your file. When I have finished grading your essay, you may view my comments by re- clicking the link above

For this assignment, you’ll be completing a Motion to Compel.
Again, this is the sort of task you might actually do at a law firm.

Our law firm, Shaliro, LLC, is handling Carrie Madison’s Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission case against her employer, the CIA,
for wrongful termination. Our office previously filed discovery in this
case and the secretary, Saul Beren, did not reply to our discovery
request. The sequence of events is as follows:

• The discovery was time stamped and filed on October 12th. The CIA agency had until November 12th to respond.
• A time stamped copy was delivered via certified mail on October 13th
  to the Agency’s attorney, Brody Johnson. We received a signed green
  card showing receipt for the certified mail on October 21st by Mr.
  Johnson’s office.
• On November 23rd, we emailed Mr. Johnson inquiring to the Agency’s
  responses to discovery. On November 24th, Mr. Johnson emailed our office
  back stating that he had left two messages for Mr. Beren to reply to
  the discovery or else a motion to compel would be filed by our office.
• On December 18th, we sent a certified letter to Mr. Johnson stating
  that we would be filing a motion to compel if we did not receive
  responses by the end of the month. We received the signed proof of
  service signed by Mr. Johnson’s office for that letter on December 27th.
• On the following January 15th, Carrie’s attorney, who is your boss,
  (Robert Shaliro) spoke with Mr. Johnson over the phone. Mr. Johnson did
  not know why the agency has not responded to the discovery requests.

Mr. Shaliro would like you to file a motion to compel for sanctions against the CIA and Mr. Beren.

Using Microsoft Word, prepare the motion to compel based on the facts of the scenario.

• You can use the following site for a sample: http://www.sniderlaw.com/articles/motion-to-compel.pdf (Links to an external site.)
• The EEOC number is 333-23-2220 Agency #W-133-54333-34

Please complete the entire document and pay attention to the details. Your document should be consistent with the Legal Writing Guidelines and should be “Law Office Ready”.

Summary:

The central question at the heart of Natalie Zemon Davis’s The Return of Martin Guerre is focused on identity: what capacity did peasants like Bertrande and Martin have to live life according to their sense of self? Davis suggests that each of the three main figures (Arnaud, Bertrande and Martin) had an idea of the kind of life they’d like to live and then used what was available to make that happen. They sought opportunity, took advantage of chance, and deceived those around them. Robert Finlay suggests, in argument with Davis, that such calculation should not be attributed to Bertrande. That as a woman alive in the late Middle Ages, Bertrande would not have though about questions of identity as Davis suggests.

In a short essay (2-3 pages) compare and contrast the arguments that Davis and Finlay make about Bertrande’s involvement in the deception. What does Davis argue about Betrande’s role? How does Finlay refute that? What’s Davis’s response to the refutation? Finally, using evidence from the book and articles, make an argument about your position.