|
Evaluation Objectives
|
The report demonstrates a thorough appraisal of the researched information. The essay is presented as a congruous and thoughtful exposition of ideas.
9 – 10 pts
|
The report demonstrates a satisfactory appraisal of the researched information. The report is presented as a thoughtful exposition of ideas.
7 – 8 pts
|
The report demonstrates a minimal appraisal of the researched information. The report is presented as a disparate exposition of ideas.
5 – 6 pts
|
The report demonstrates no appraisal of the researched information. The report is presented as an incongruous exposition of ideas.
0 – 4 pts
|
10
|
|
Analysis Objectives
|
Report completely examines the major theory, thesis or conclusions discussed in the article.
9 – 10 pts
|
Report generally examines some of the theory, thesis or conclusions discussed in the article.
7 – 8 pts
|
Report fails to satisfactorily examine the major theory, thesis or conclusions discussed in the article.
5 – 6 pts
|
Report does not examine the major theory, thesis or conclusions discussed in the article.
0 – 4 pts
|
10
|
|
Application Objectives
|
The report shows multiple instances and exceptional understanding of terminology and concepts specific to the course core learning outcomes throughout.
9 – 10 pts
|
The report shows sufficient and satisfactory use of terminology and concepts specific to the course core learning outcomes throughout.
7 – 8 pts
|
The report shows minimal use of terminology and concepts specific to the course core learning outcomes throughout.
5 – 6 pts
|
The report fails to demonstrate an understanding of terminology and concepts specific to the course core learning outcomes.
0 – 4 pts
|
10
|
| Findings and Conclusions |
Report conveys complete and exceptional understanding as to the author’s findings and conclusions.
9 – 10 pts
|
Report conveys sufficient understanding as to the author’s findings and conclusions.
7 – 8 pts
|
Report conveys minimal information regarding the author’s findings or conclusions.
5 – 6 pts
|
Report conveys no indication as to the author’s findings or conclusions.
0 – 4 pts
|
10 |
| Structure, Grammar, Spelling, adheres to APA |
Report contains all required technical components: 1,000 – 1,500 word length (excluding required cover and reference pages), typed, double-spaced. Demonstrates proficiently written in APA Style. Contains five or fewer formatting, grammar, or spelling errors.
9 – 10 pts
|
Report contains most of the required technical components: 1,000 – 1,500 word length (excluding required cover and reference pages), typed, double-spaced. Demonstrates functional literacy in in APA writing style. Contains ten or fewer formatting, grammar, or spelling errors.
7 – 8 pts
|
Report does not contain all required technical components: less than 1,000 word length (excluding required cover and reference pages), typed, double-spaced. Demonstrates a lack of proficiently with APA writing style. Contains ten or more formatting, grammar, or spelling errors.
5 – 6 pts
|
Report missing required technical components: less than 1,000 word length (excluding required cover and reference pages), typed, double-spaced. No evidence of proficiently with APA writing style. Contains ten or more formatting, grammar, or spelling errors
0 – 4 pts
|
10 |