Waste management to enhance public sanitation, Research Paper Proposal help

Research Paper Proposal –

Create a proposal for the Research Paper. This proposal will help you develop a comprehensive guideline for your Research Paper.

The framework for the paper should include the following:

  • A clear thesis statement
  • An annotated bibliography for at least 10 scholarly or professional journal articles
  • A summary that expresses the overall plan of the paper, including subtitles and topic sentences for each subtitle provided

Sample Research Paper ideas could include

  • A comparative analysis of several areas of urban planning (for example, transportation planning vs. housing planning) in New York City

The topics should be substantive and expansive.

The proposal should be between four to five pages in length, not including the title and reference pages. Be sure to follow the APA documentation and writing guidelines when completing this assignment.

I hope the information help with (An annotated bibliography for at least 10 scholarly or professional journal articles)

References 

  • Levy, J.M. (2013). Contemporary urban planning (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall Press.

Article

PJM410 MOD3 Portfolio Milestone

I have attached the bellow in a Word DOX as formatting can be lost

Portfolio Milestone (75 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do
not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title
of your submission.

Option #1: Executive Summary of a Risk Management Plan

The Project Management Institute (Project Management Institute, 2017)
defines the Risk Management Plan as containing some or all of the
following elements:

  • Risk strategy
  • Methodology
  • Roles and responsibilities
  • Funding
  • Timing
  • Risk categories

This is outlined in both A guide to the project management body of knowledge and the Practice standard for project risk management.

Instructions:

For the Portfolio Project that is due in Week 8, you will
develop a complete Risk Management Plan and Risk Register for a project.

Select a project within your industry, or within an industry in which
you would choose to work as a project manager. Submit an executive
summary of your selection (high-level project charter) for a grade. You
will also begin to outline a Risk Management Plan for this project and
add to it each week. This will be submitted as part of your Portfolio
Project in Module 8.

Your executive summary should meet the following requirements:

Refer to the Portfolio Project milestone grading rubric below for more information on assignment expectations and grading.

Reference

Project Management, I. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK® guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Institute.

Option #2: Outline of Risk Management Planning Process

The Project Management Institute (Project Management Institute, 2017)
defines the Risk Management Plan as containing some or all of the
following elements:

  • Risk strategy
  • Methodology
  • Roles and responsibilities
  • Funding
  • Timing
  • Risk categories

For your final Portfolio Project, you will write a paper detailing
the entire Risk Management Planning process. You will include discussion
and analysis of terms learned throughout this course. Your paper should
describe each phase of the process; how it is planned; and any inputs,
tools and techniques, and outputs that can be applied. Your Portfolio
Project should demonstrate your critical thinking abilities, your
knowledge of risk management systems, and your ability to apply risk
management practices and tools. This will be submitted in Module 8.

This week, you will submit your paper outline for a grade.

Your outline should meet the following requirements:

Refer to the Portfolio Project milestone grading rubric below for more information on assignment expectations and grading.

Reference

Project Management, I. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: (PMBOK® guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA, USA: Project Management Institute.

Rubric

PJM410 Mod 3 PM

PJM410 Mod 3 PM

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content

25.0
to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates
strong or adequate knowledge of developing a risk management plan or
process, and correctly represents knowledge from the readings and
sources.

20.0
to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some significant, but not major, errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

15.0
to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

10.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Requirements

10.0
to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation

The Portfolio Project includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0
to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio Project includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0
to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation

The Portfolio Project includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

The Portfolio Project includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Decision Making

25.0
to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Demonstrates
strong or adequate decision making skills regarding the tools,
techniques, roles and responsibilities, and strategies needed to create a
risk management plan or detail the risk management process.

20.0
to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Some
significant, but not major, errors or omissions in decision making
skills regarding the tools, techniques, roles and responsibilities, and
strategies needed to create a risk management plan or detail the risk
management process.

15.0
to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major
errors or omissions in decision making skills regarding the tools,
techniques, roles and responsibilities, and strategies needed to create a
risk management plan or detail the risk management process.

10.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Fails
to demonstrate decision making skills regarding the tools, techniques,
roles and responsibilities, and strategies needed to create a risk
management plan or detail the risk management process.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization

5.0
to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Project
is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format,
including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project
requirements.

4.0
to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small
number of significant, but not major, flaws in organization and
writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way, does not conform to
project requirements.

3.0
to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Major
problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper
essay format. In a significant way, does not conform to project
requirements.

2.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar and Style

5.0
to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Strong
sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and
spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise, with no
unsupported comments.

4.0
to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant, but not major, errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing style.

3.0
to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Inconsistent
to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on
grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

2.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Demonstrates Proper Use of APA Style

5.0
to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation

Project
contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing & APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0
to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation

Few
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
& APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0
to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation

Significant
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
& APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0
to >0 pts
Limited Evidence

Numerous
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
& APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Airline Passenger Information Systems

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

Overview:

In this Module 5 activity, you will first review a scholarly

paper on the topic of airline passenger information systems. Next, you

will conduct in-depth research on the topic of a real-life example of a

relatively new (within the last 5 years) airline passenger information

system offered by a vendor that assists airline passengers in their

travel planning, booking, and flight experience or airline marketing,

sales, and customer service departments’ personnel in servicing those

passengers. Once you have gained knowledge relating to the topic and

gathered sufficient information, you will present a case in a scholarly

APA style paper detailing how the technology solution enables the

airline to obtain and retain new customers and to service and provide

the best passenger travel experience possible.

To receive a high-level grade in this assignment, you must put
forth a considerable amount of time and effort. You will be graded on
the scholastic quality of your paper and the fulfillment of the
requirements stated in the Requirements section.

Requirements:

  • Review the Writing Style Guide.
  • Review the rubric below the assignment data for detailed grading criteria before beginning your work.
  • Use your own words to demonstrate a clear understanding and comprehension of the subject matter.
  • Copying and pasting one direct quote after another without
    presenting a majority of the data in your own words will result in a low
    assignment grade.
  • Support your personal opinions, feelings, and observations with meaningful scholarly data obtained from primary sources.

Submission:

Submit a scholarly paper that addresses the following:

  • Utilize Microsoft Word.
  • Title Page (Page #1).
  • Body of the text (4-5 pages) to include:
    • Centered title of the paper.
    • Introductory paragraph.
    • Conclusion
    • In-text citations for direct quotes or paraphrased data from primary sources.
  • Reference List Page (Page #6 or #7).
  • Times New Roman 12-point font
  • Double-spaced lines.
  • APA Style 7th Edition
  • Utilize the APA_Style_7th_Edition Template.docx. Edit the template to remove the informational notes and add your data. Select Enable Editing immediately below the Microsoft Word toolbar to be able to edit the document.

MGMT 494 Assignment 5.3 Case Study & Research Paper Rubric

MGMT 494 Assignment 5.3 Case Study & Research Paper Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis & Content

55.0
pts
Excellent
– A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of FOUR
FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

45.0
pts
Very
Good – A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of
THREE FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the
text.

40.0
pts
Satisfactory
– A THOROUGH analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of TWO
FULL pages of double-spaced text was submitted in the body of the text.

35.0
pts
Near
Failing – A BASIC analysis of the topic was provided AND a minimum of
TWO FULL pages of double-spaced text were submitted in the body of the
text.

0.0
pts
Failing – A minimum of TWO FULL pages of double-spaced text was NOT submitted in the body of the text.

55.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion & Recommendations

15.0
pts
Excellent – The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were ENTIRELY appropriate.

13.0
pts
Very Good – The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were MOSTLY appropriate.

11.0
pts
Satisfactory – The conclusion was sound AND the recommendations were SOMEWHAT appropriate.

9.0
pts
Near Failing – The conclusion was NOT sound OR the recommendations were NOT SOMEWHAT appropriate.

0.0
pts
Failing – A conclusion with recommendations was NOT presented.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Style & Mechanics

10.0
pts
Excellent – ALL sentences were properly structured AND the data was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

9.0
pts
Very Good – ALL sentences were properly structured BUT there were SOME spelling, grammar, OR punctuation errors.

8.0
pts
Satisfactory – SOME sentences were NOT properly structured AND there were SOME spelling, grammar, OR punctuation errors.

7.0
pts
Near Failing – SOME sentences were NOT properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, OR punctuation errors.

0.0
pts
Failing – MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Scholarly Research

10.0
pts
Excellent
– Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO outside
primary sources (excluding the textbook) AND terminology from the source
materials was presented.

9.0
pts
Very
Good – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of TWO
outside primary sources (excluding the textbook) BUT terminology from
the source materials was NOT presented.

8.0
pts
Satisfactory
– Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside
primary source (excluding the textbook) AND terminology from the source
materials was presented.

7.0
pts
Near
Failing – Scholarly research was conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE
outside primary source (excluding the textbook) BUT terminology from the
source materials WAS NOT presented.

0.0
pts
Failing – Scholarly research was NOT conducted utilizing a minimum of ONE outside primary source (excluding the textbook).

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA Style

10.0
pts
Excellent
– ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND there
were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,
Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of the Text,
Reference List Page.

9.0
pts
Very
Good – ALL of the following APA style components were provided AND there
were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,
Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of the Text,
Reference List Page.

8.0
pts
Satisfactory
– SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND
there were NO format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page Numbers,
Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of the Text,
Reference List Page.

7.0
pts
Near
Failing – SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided
AND there were SOME format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page
Numbers, Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of
the Text, Reference List Page.

0.0
pts
Failing
– SOME of the following APA style components were NOT provided AND
there were MANY format errors: Title Page, Page Header with Page
Numbers, Introductory Paragraph AND Conclusion Section in the Body of
the Text, Reference List Page.

10.0 pts

Total Points:
100.0

Seminar Dropbox, health and medical homework

Option 2: If you are unable to attend the live Seminar, complete the
Option 2 written Assignment. Your responses to the questions on the previous
page should be composed in complete sentences and paragraphs and be 200 – 300
words in length. APA style is required.

  1. Stage 1 of the ABC Model talks about the need for the counselor to have
    certain skills to develop good rapport with the client. The Seminar will be
    discussing the following skills: attending behavior, questioning,
    paraphrasing, reflections, and summarizations. What is the definition of
    each of these skills? Explain how each skill helps the counselor and the
    client. What happens when a counselor does not use these skills in the
    initial part of the session?
  2. Stage 2 of the ABC Model is about identifying the problem. Why is it
    important to ask about precipitating events that led to the client making
    the call to come in for an appointment? How does the counselor begin to
    understand the distress and functioning level of the client during this
    interview? What ethical considerations need to be taken into consideration
    during the second stage of the interview, and why? How does the counselor
    help the client improve his, or her, coping abilities during this
    stage?
  3. Stage 3 of the ABC Model is coping. What is the role of the crisis worker in
    this stage? What tools are useful to the counselor in empowering the client
    and helping him or her see his/her problems in a new light?

You should create your Seminar responses in MS Word. Your paper should be in APA
format and cite all references used. Save your answers and submit them to the
Unit 5: Seminar Dropbox. The Dropbox is located at the top of this
class on the blue toolbar. Be sure to complete all questions to earn your
Seminar points.

Demand, Cost, and Price Discussion help

“Demand, Cost and
Price” 

  • Referring to the
    same novel health care product or service you came up with last week
    (Discussion 2, Part 2), determine how you would assess demand for and the cost
    to produce your product or deliver your service. Provide specific examples to
    support your response.

  • Referring to the
    same product or service, set a price for your product or service. Explain your
    rationale.

********This is a Discussion, not a paper. Need a strong
paragraph with references.*********

(****LAST WEEKS DISCUSSION****)

“Developing and Branding New
Offerings” 

The developments of methods of production in the modern
current market set up as been improved by the increase of speed of output,
quality and also the efficiency of production. The products must also be
directed to the right channels of output and distribution. The companies also
should use wisely the available resources and be eco-friendly when applying the
technology. The best example is when the production of Beef meat is not well
preserved before going to the primary market (Ambler & Styles, 1997). This
may lead to the high loss in the company. The brand manager is the person who
manages the product and is always aware of the market trades well. The manager
will run on all sides looking for the best markets to improve on the selling of
its products. The management should also check more on its sources of raw
materials and the channels of demand and supply. The best example of brand
management is Coca-Cola Company. They have been able to sell their products in
most of the countries in the world.

References:

Ambler, T., & Styles, C. (1997).
Brand development versus new product development: toward a process model of
extension decisions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(4),
222-234.

Sprott, D., Czellar, S., &
Spangenberg, E. (2009). The importance of a general measure of brand engagement
on market behavior: Development and validation of a scale. Journal of
Marketing Research
, 46(1), 92-104.

Criminal Justice Discusion legalize recreational marijuana alcoholic beverages

Google 2016 Report: Fatal Accidents Involving Drivers High on Marijuana Soar. Hosted by Lester Holt

Google 2015 Report: D.C. Legalizes marijuana Despite from Congress

After reading/viewing the above reports. Please answer the following questions below:

  1. Should the United States legalize the consumption of recreational marijuana and treat it similarly to the consumption of alcoholic beverages?
  2. What issues or problems may arise from that policy choice?
  3. Underage drinking is a serious issue for many reasons, including the potential for drunk driving accidents that may result in injury or even death. Who do you think should be held criminally responsible for underage drinking at events such as fraternity parties?

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan.
Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.
Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic.
NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice.
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 11
Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life.

an overview of the Nursing Process Project and the project resources can be found in Module 3: Nursing Process Project: Overview.

Overview

Now that you have assessed your client, it is time to determine the priority problems. As you complete the Diagnosis/Analyze Cues section of the template, prioritize the nursing diagnoses/cues in the correct order. The purpose is to familiarize yourself with the process by analyzing your assessment cues.

As a reminder, an overview of the Nursing Process Project and the project resources can be found in Module 3: Nursing Process Project: Overview.

Instructions

The second part of the Nursing Process Project requires you to complete the diagnosis/Analyze Cues section on the Nursing Process Project Download Nursing Process Project template. Follow these steps to complete this part of the project.

Step 1: Complete the Diagnosis section of the Nursing Process Project Download Nursing Process Project template Download template.

Step 2: Include a minimum of three priority problems along with signs and symptoms that are related to the client problem.

Step 3: Submit your Nursing Process Project completed through the Diagnosis/Analyze Cues section.

Due

Sunday, by 11:59 p.m.

Submission and Assessment Guidelines

This assignment will receive a completion grade. It is expected that all questions are given complete answers. If the assignment is not complete, then your instructor will deduct points from this assignment per their discretion.

Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. For help on how to submit your assignment, see How Do I Upload a File as an Assignment Submission in Canvas? Links to an external site.

This activity is worth 10 points toward your final grade.

. What is the relationship between levels of CD4 lymphocytes and the likelihood of clinical complications from AIDS?

Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Pagana: Mosby’s Manual of Diagnostic and Laboratory Tests, 6th Edition AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) Case Studies The patient, a 30-year-old homosexual man, complained of unexplained weight loss, chronic diarrhea, and respiratory congestion during the past 6 months. Physical examination revealed right-sided pneumonitis. The following studies were performed: Studies Results Complete blood cell count (CBC), p. 156

Hemoglobin (Hgb), p. 251 12 g/dL (normal: 14–18 g/dL) Hematocrit (Hct), p. 248 36% (normal: 42%–52%)

Chest x-ray, p. 956 Right-sided consolidation affecting the posterior lower lung

Bronchoscopy, p. 526 No tumor seen Lung biopsy, p. 688 Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) Stool culture, p. 797 Cryptosporidium muris Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) serology, p. 265

p24 antigen Positive Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Positive

Western blot Positive Lymphocyte immunophenotyping, p. 274

Total CD4 280 (normal: 600–1500 cells/L) CD4% 18% (normal: 60%–75%) CD4/CD8 ratio 0.58 (normal: >1.0)

Human immune deficiency virus (HIV) viral load, p. 265

75,000 copies/mL

Diagnostic Analysis The detection of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) supports the diagnosis of AIDS. PCP is an opportunistic infection occurring only in immunocompromised patients and is the most common infection in persons with AIDS. The patient’s diarrhea was caused by Cryptosporidium muris, an enteric pathogen, which occurs frequently with AIDS and can be identified on a stool culture. The AIDS serology tests made the diagnoses. His viral load is significant, and his prognosis is poor. The patient was hospitalized for a short time for treatment of PCP. Several months after he was discharged, he developed Kaposi sarcoma. He developed psychoneurologic problems eventually and died 18 months after the AIDS diagnosis.

Case Studies

Copyright © 2018 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

2

Critical Thinking Questions

1. What is the relationship between levels of CD4 lymphocytes and the likelihood of clinical complications from AIDS?

2. Why does the United States Public Health Service recommend monitoring CD4 counts every 3–6 months in patients infected with HIV?

3. This is patient seems to be unaware of his diagnosis of HIV/AIDS. How would you

approach to your patient to inform about his diagnosis? 4. Is this a reportable disease in Florida? If yes. What is your responsibility as a

provider? .

Mr. J.R. is a 73-year-old man, who was admitted to the hospital with clinical manifestations of gastroenteritis and possible renal injury.

Mr. J.R. is a 73-year-old man, who was admitted to the hospital with clinical manifestations of gastroenteritis and possible renal injury. The patient’s chief complaints are fever, nausea with vomiting and diarrhea for 48 hours, weakness, dizziness, and a bothersome metallic taste in the mouth. The patient is pale and sweaty. He had been well until two days ago when he began to experience severe nausea several hours after eating two burritos for supper. The burritos had been ordered from a local fast-food restaurant. Nausea persisted and he vomited twice with some relief. As the evening progressed, he continued to feel “very bad” and took some Pepto-Bismol to help settle his stomach. Soon thereafter, he began to feel achy and warm. His temperature at the time was 100. 5°F. He has continued to experience nausea, vomiting, and a fever. He has not been able to tolerate any solid foods or liquids. Since yesterday, he has had 5–6 watery bowel movements. He has not noticed any blood in the stools. His wife brought him to the ER because he was becoming weak and dizzy when he tried to stand up. His wife denies any recent travel, use of antibiotics, laxatives, or excessive caffeine, or that her husband has an eating disorder.
Case Study 1 Questions:

The attending physician is thinking that Mr. J.R. has developed an Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Analyzing the case presented, name the possible types of Acute Kidney Injury.
Link the clinical manifestations described to the different types of Acute Kidney injury.
Create a list of risk factors the patient might have and explain why.
Unfortunately, the damage to J.R.’s kidney became irreversible and he is now diagnosed with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Please describe the complications that the patient might have on his Hematologic system (Coagulopathy and Anemia) and the pathophysiologic mechanisms involved.
Reproductive Function:
Ms. P.C. is a 19-year-old white female who reports a 2-day history of lower abdominal pain, nausea, emesis, and a heavy, malodorous vaginal discharge. She states that she is single, heterosexual and that she has been sexually active with only one partner for the past eight months. She has no previous history of genitourinary infections or sexually transmitted diseases. She denies IV drug use. Her LMP ended three days ago. Her last intercourse (vaginal) was eight days ago and she states that they did not use a condom. She admits to unprotected sex “every once in a while.” She noted an abnormal vaginal discharge yesterday and she describes it as “thick, greenish-yellow in color, and very smelly.” She denies both oral and rectal intercourse. She does not know if her partner has had a recent genitourinary tract infection, “because he has been away on business for five days.
Microscopic Examination of Vaginal Discharge
(-) yeast or hyphae
(-) flagellated microbes
(+) white blood cells
(+) gram-negative intracellular diplococci
Case Study 2 Questions:

According to the case presented, including the clinical manifestations and microscopic examination of the vaginal discharge, what is the most probable diagnosis for Ms. P.C.? Support your answer and explain why you get to that diagnosis.
Based on the vaginal discharge described and the microscopic examination of the sample, could you suggest which would be the microorganism involved?
Name the criteria you would use to recommend hospitalization for this patient.
Submission Instructions:

This assignment has 2 case studies. You must work and include both case studies in your initial post.
Your initial post should be at least 500 words for each case study, formatted and cited in the current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources