how did political power and religious ideas affect one another? ● Narrow the broad question to an issue that you find significant in the specific texts/time/place which you are analyzing

/in /by

THESIS SHOULD BE A QUESTION YOU COME UP WITH THAT IS AN ISSUE YOU FIND SIGNIFICANT THAT CAN BE RELATED TO THE PROMT… VIEW GUIDELINES BELOW TO SEE

below I will attach primary source, secondary source, paper guidelines. DONT FORGET THAT YOUR THESIS SHOULD BE A QUESTION THAT HAS REASON 1,2, AND 3. MAKE SURE THE PRIMARY SOURCE IS USED TO BACK UP THESIS. PRIMARY SOURCE IS THE METAMORPHOSES

  • Narrow the broad question to an issue that you find significantin the specific texts/time/place which you are analyzing
  • Write a thesis that takes a stand on the issue you’ve identified, including all the parts of the thesis, as specified in the Writing Assignment Overview (opposition, subject, assertion, reasons)
  • Support the assertion with at least 3 reasonsyou draw from analyzing the text(s)
  • Support your reasons with evidence from the text(s): quote, paraphrase, and summarize the text(s) as needed to demonstrate your points
  • Consider and address an alternative view of the issue, the counterargument (opposition)
  • Cite your sourcesfor all ideas and words you use from any source
  • Use primary source to support thesis (Metamorphosis) and secondary source can be used
  • Thesis format: Although X (counterargument), this paper will argue Y (thesis) because Reason 1, 2,3
  • Thesis should be a question you come up with that is related to the initial prompt: In the first few weeks of the quarter, MMW 12 explores socio-political transitions from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire along with major cultural changes, including the rise to dominance of Christianity over other religious beliefs in the Mediterranean world. Reflecting on such transitions, how did political power and religious ideas affect one another?

    Choose 1-2 texts from the assigned course readings in Weeks 1-3 for your MMW 12 lecture track to address this question, tailoring the question to the text(s) you choose. You will need to ground your analysis in one or two specific text(s), and focus your argument on those text(s).
    include counter argument and rebuttal make sure to paraphrase many quoted from the primary source that can be used to support your thesis
    USE QUOTES AS EVIDENCE, PARAPHRASE!!

Discussion 1: Damage Apportionment, law homework help

/in /by

Discussion 1: Damage Apportionment”

  • Part A: What is the individual liability of defendants under the theory of joint and several liability? Under this theory, how might a plaintiff choose to collect damages where there are two defendants, one who is relatively poor and one who is relatively wealthy? Review p. 374 for reference.
  • Part B: What is the individual liability of defendants under the theory of several liability? What type of rules do some states use to enable the plaintiff to collect an insolvent defendant’s “orphan share?” Review p. 380 for reference.

  • “Discussion 2: Scope of Employment”

    • Part A: Determine whether or not an employer will be held vicariously liable for an employee’ s tortious acts if the act was determined to be “incidental” to employer’s employment? What if the tortious act was determined to be “during the scope of employment”?

      Please read for a reference Trahan-Laroche v. Lockheed Sanders, Inc. at 657 A. 2d 417 (NH. 1995) and at p. 404 of your textbook.

    • Part B: Consider these circumstances, “special errands,” and “complete abandonment of special errands,” and determine in which circumstances the employer may be potentially vicariously liable. Provide a rationale for your response. Please read for a reference, O’Connor v. McDonald’s Restaurants of California at 269 Cal. Reptr. 101 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) and at p. 406 of your text.

    • Proposed Methods, Literature Review, and Methods Section, psychology homework help

    /in /by

    Assignment 2: Final Project: Introduction, Literature Review, and Methods Section

    Turn in the proposed methods section for your research paper as well as your introduction and literature review.

    The introduction and literature review should address your research question: why it is important, and how prior research does or does not support your hypothesis, as well as providing a background on what we know about this topic.

    Please refer to the material on the components of a research paper provided in Module 1 as you work on this document.

    Your methods section, in addition to covering the subheadings of participants, instruments, and procedure, must include a fourth subheading called ethical issues and note any ethical issues that need to be considered, as well as how they would be handled.

    Be sure to include a title/cover page and a reference page formatted in APA style.

    Knowledge Worker

    /in /by

    Are you a knowledge worker? Is your current job or a job you have worked at before considered to be a knowledge worker position? If you have not worked, please think of a job that you know about. Think about the tasks that you do at this job and decide if they are considered knowledge work, describe why or why not.

    Now, think of your dream job, perhaps the one you will have after finishing this program. Will it be a knowledge job? Explain why or why not.

    Entire response should be a minimum of 250 words (approximately one page, double spaced using Times New Roman font).

    Medical vs Behavioral Models of Corrections, law assignment help

    /in /by

    There are 2 general models to consider when discussing treatment of offenders. First is the medical model, which focuses on psychological evaluation and creating a treatment plan that corresponds with the evaluation.

    The second model is known as the psycho/social/behavioral model. This model uses several methods, including a risk assessment and a thorough treatment prescription process. The psycho/social/behavioral model looks at all aspects of the offender’s life.

    Compare and contrast the medical and psychological/sociological/behavioral models.

    Assignment Guidelines:

    • Using the library, course materials, textbook, and Web resources, research the 2 models of correctional treatment.
      • What are the advantages and disadvantages of the medical model? Explain.
      • What are the advantages and disadvantages of the psycho/social/behavioral model? Explain.
      • How are these 2 models similar?
      • Based on what you have found, which model do you believe is the most appropriate for assessing special-needs offenders?
    • Compile your responses into a PowerPoint presentation of 7–10 slides.
      • Be sure to include speaker notes for each slide.

    4 scholarly reference minimum / Do Not Write in first person even when writing opinion

    ​The Female Advantage, sociology homework help

    /in /by

    The Female Advantage

    As the textbook notes, women are still underrepresented as managers of businesses, yet some people, such as Sally Helgesen see women as the business leaders of the future. Why? Because their style of management is more democratic and flexible, and therefore able to adjust more easily to the fast-changing, dynamic business environment, or thrive in a company where educated young professionals expect to be treated as individuals.

    In a recent article summing up their book, Megatrends for Women, Patricia Aburdene and John Naisbitt describe women leaders as having these strengths relative to men:

    · women encourage more participation

    · women share more power and information

    · women more effectively enhance other people’s self-worth

    · women get workers more excited about their work

    While these qualities all sound “nice,” the authors warn that this would be an oversimplification. “Caring about people and supporting them always must be balanced with objectivity. . . . Anyone who thinks ‘supporting people’ and being ‘nice’ alone cut it in the business world is in need of a serious reality check.” (p. 46)

    One thing that helps women, according to Judith Hall, a psychology professor at Northeastern University, is that women traditionally are better at interpreting body language and other non-verbal cues. They also are able to tolerate ambiguity and to juggle many things at once.

    Men, however, who see job performance “as a series of transactions–rewards for services rendered or punishment for inadequate performance,” (Ibid) might misinterpret women’s management style. A female manager’s willingness to empower employees by asking them for help, might, for example, look like ignorance, and as though she truly doesn’t know what she is doing. Also, other employees might feel freer to criticize a woman, or to challenge her authority.

    Source:

    Aburdene, Patricia and John Naisbitt. Megatrends for Women. New York: Villard Books, 1992.

    Discussion Questions

    1. Characterize women’s management style according to the two leadership roles and three leadership styles discussed in the text. Do you agree with the claim that the two sexes have distinct leadership styles?

    2. How do more creative jobs differ from more routine jobs in terms of the type of leadership that works best?

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————short answer 4-7 lines

    Business information systems discussion

    /in /by

    Requirements:

    For this activity will you use the process diagrams and data table from module 1- MIS Project 1a: Identifying Processes. Using the data table that identified the actor, the major steps, the detailed steps, the type of data, and the way the data is used complete another table in this discussion along with the personal narrative.

    What do I post? Explain how and why the data collected is important to both the customer and the organization (Amazon). Provide citations and references for any direct/indirect citations.

    • In your post of the 300-500-word narrative submit your table after making any necessary changes.
      • Identify in more detail based upon the module readings what type of data you have in the data type field and explain how the data is used- i.e. written, updated, etc.
    • Next, identify how data is stored in the logical structure of a relational database (i.e. data dictionary).
    • Finally, explain how and why the data collected is important to both the customer and the organization (Amazon).

    Remember:

    • Provide citations and references for any direct/indirect citations. Use APA style.

    “Ode to a Toad”, writing homework help

    /in /by

    Think of an object that you use a lot – your cell phone or your MP3 player or your computer.  Now create a humorous verse about this item.  It should contain at least six lines and it should reflect how you CANNOT live without this item.  Be sure to give it a title;  it does not need to rhyme (although this adds to the humor of such a poem). 

    The following poem was written by a high school student, Anne-Marie Wulfsberg.  Read this poem and try to figure out its tone.

    “Ode to a Toad”Toad on the grass

    I was out one day for my usual jog

    (I go kinda easy, rarely full-hog)

    When I happened to see right there on the road

    The squishy remains of a little green toad.

    I thought to myself, where is his home?

    Down yonder green valley, how far did he roam?

    From out on the pond I heard sorrowful croaks,

    Could that be the wailing of some of his folks?

    I felt for the toad and his pitiful state,

    But the day was now fading, and such was his fate.

    In the grand scheme of things, now I confess,

    What’s one little froggie more or less?

    The tone of this short poem is obviously humorous.  Many authors develop their own tone and so many of their poems are written in a serious tone or a self-mocking tone or an impersonal tone.

    MGT312 – Decision Making & Problem Solving

    /in /by

    Course Learning Outcomes-Covered

    • Explain critical thinking and cognitive psychology as it pertains to analyze and synthesize information for problem solving and decision making. (2.7)
    • Employ and analyze aspects of creativity as they pertain to problem solving and decision making in all manners and circumstances. (2.3)
    • Demonstrate effective leadership skills and teamwork capacity for efficient decision making as either team member or a team leader. (3.4 & 3.5)
    • Title: “3 Simple habits to improve your critical thinking”

    Author: Helen Lee Bouygues

    Date of Publication:May 6, 2019 

    Published: Harvard Business Review

    Assignment Questions:(Marks 10)

    • Read the attached article titled as “3 Simple habits to improve your critical thinking” by Helen Lee Bouygues, published in Harvard Business Review, and answer the following Questions:
    1. Summarize the article and explain the main issues discussed in the article. (In 600-700 words)
    • What do you think about the article in relations to what you have learned in the course about how to improve your critical thinking? Use additional reference to support you argument. (In 200-400 words)
    • What do you understand by groupthink? According to the article how we can prevent people from engaging in groupthink. Use additional reference to support you argument. (In 150-300 words)
    • “Critical thinking is the opposite of creative thinking.” Do you agree? Provide examples of why you agree or disagree. (In 200-300 words)

    Documentary Critique on ‘The Persuaders’, communications assignment help

    /in /by

    Book
    Review

    Assignment: Review an approved book related to public relations.
    Remember that a review is not merely a summary report but includes an
    evaluation. Follow the guidelines listed below and posted here: http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/book-review

    Also, refer to the book report rubric in the assignment area.

    What’s due: A 4-6 page (800-1200 word) written review in APA style. The
    paper should address the guidelines below.

    1. What
      is the specific topic of the book or article? What overall purpose does it
      seem to have? For what readership is it written? (The preface,
      acknowledgements, bibliography and index can be helpful in answering these
      questions. Don’t overlook facts about the author’s background and the
      circumstances of the book’s creation and publication.)
    2. Does
      the author state an explicit thesis? Does he or she noticeably have an axe
      to grind? What are the theoretical assumptions? Are they discussed
      explicitly? (Again, look for statements in the preface, etc. and follow
      them up in the rest of the work.)
    3. What
      exactly does the work contribute to the overall topic of your course? What
      general problems and concepts in your discipline and course does it engage
      with?
    4. What
      kinds of material does the work present (e.g. primary documents or
      secondary material, literary analysis, personal observation, quantitative
      data, biographical or historical accounts)?
    5. How
      is this material used to demonstrate and argue the thesis? (As well as
      indicating the overall structure of the work, your review could quote or
      summarize specific passages to show the characteristics of the author’s
      presentation, including writing style and tone.)
    6. Are
      there alternative ways of arguing from the same material? Does the author
      show awareness of them? In what respects does the author agree or
      disagree?
    7. What
      theoretical issues and topics for further discussion does the work raise?
    8. What
      are your own reactions and considered opinions regarding the work?

    By Margaret Procter

    http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/book-review

    Or the other option:

    Writing a
    Documentary Critique

    What’s
    due: A 4-6 page (800-1200 word) written review in APA style. The paper should
    address the guidelines below. The critique should be written as a paper – do
    not merely list bullet points to answer these questions. These questions are
    intended as a guide and represent a minimum benchmark for the critique. Note:
    Use APA style for general format and citation. 

    Give details of the documentary

    • Title of the documentary

    • Intended audience

    Explain the purpose of the documentary

    • What is the purpose of the
    documentary?

    • What is the main message the
    director wants to get across to the audience?

    State your prior knowledge of the subject

    • Did you know anything about the
    subject before you watched the documentary?

    • What did you expect to see?

    • What questions did you have
    about the subject?

    Summarize the documentary

    • Who / What is the subject of
    the documentary?

    • What is the documentary about?
    What are the main events (if any)?

    • Where was it filmed?

    What other details are relevant?

    Talk about the sound effects, camera work, interviews and special
    effects

    • Do you like the sound effects?

    • Are the images sharp?

    • How is the filming? What camera
    angles were used?

    • Do you like the interviews?
    What have you learned from the interviews?

    • Are there any special effects?

    Analyze the information presented in the documentary

     

    ·  What are
    the main sources of information?

    ·  Is it
    credible? Ethical?

    ·  How does
    the information presented compare to other information you have learned about
    the topic in your studies?

    Evaluate the contributions and lasting impact of the documentary

    o  To what
    extend did the documentary impact society?

    o  Describe
    any temporary or lasting contributions or changes to culture in a given
    setting.

    o  How was
    the documentary received by its intended audience? Critics? (You likely will
    need to reference some outside sources for this section.)

    Provide personal comments and recommendation

    • Which part of the documentary
    do you like most?

    • What have you learned from it?

    • Was there anything that
    surprised you?

    • What are the drawbacks of the
    documentary?

    • Would you recommend this
    documentary to your peers/colleagues/family?

    ·  What will
    be your lasting “take away” from watching the documentary? (What will you
    remember five years from now?)