For Unit IV of your art gallery presentation, you will be adding descriptions of the principles of design you observe in the artworks you placed in your art gallery. The purpose of this unit assignment is to demonstrate that you can apply what you learned

/in /by

Art Gallery: Principles of Design

For Unit IV of your art gallery presentation, you will be adding descriptions of the principles of design you observe in the artworks you placed in your art gallery. The purpose of this unit assignment is to demonstrate that you can apply what you learned about design principles to your gallery artworks.

  • Begin by reviewing your Unit III feedback and making any necessary revisions to the descriptions of the visual elements.
  • Next, research the design elements in Chapter 4 of your textbook.
  • Place the Design Principles slide directly after the Visual Elements slide describing each artwork.
  • Provide a detailed description of the design principles in each artwork, using full and complete sentences. For design principles, make sure you describe how the artist used most or all of the ones in Chapter 4: unity and variety, balance, emphasis, directional forces, contrast, repetition and rhythm, and scale and proportion. Questions to consider are included below:
    • Unity: what elements work together to make a harmonious whole?
    • Variety: What creates diversity?
    • Balance: Is it symmetrical or asymmetrical?
    • Emphasis: What is the focal point?
    • Directional forces: What are the paths for the eye to follow?
    • Contrast: Where do you see contrasting elements in the artwork?
    • Repetition and rhythm: Is an element repeated?
    • Scale and proportion: Are the objects in proportion to each other?
  • ou do not need to cite a source if it is your observation. Only
  • You do not need to cite a source if it is your observation.
    Only cite a source if you are using information that someone
    published. Be sure to use APA formatting for all outside sources.
  • Please
    submit your full presentation thus far, which should include the
    previous updated segments and the segment for this unit.
  • This segment must include a minimum of five PowerPoint slides.
  • cite a source if you are using information that someone published. Be sure to use APA formatting for all outside sources.
  • Please submit your full presentation thus far, which should include the previous updated segments and the segment for this unit.
  • This segment must include a minimum of five PowerPoint slides.

Write a client recommendation letter, law homework help

/in /by

Write a client recommendation letter (2-3)pages. It is important that you format the document as an actual letter and follow the rubric posted in the announcements. The client is trusting you to explain the law and give good advice.

The letter should have the following;

  1. Introduction: This is just a few sentences at the beginning letting the client know why you are writing to them.
  2. Brief Summary: This is a brief summary of the facts. Although the client may already know the facts it is good to send a reminder about what happened, as well as any additional information you may have found out in an investigation. If the client already knows the facts, a good way to start the sections is with the phrase, “As you may recall….”
  3. Critical Analysis: Notice how I have included the law, applied it to the facts and gave little recommendations about how things might go for the client. You don’t need to include every little bit of the facts or analysis of a case, like we would typically put in a case brief or office memo. However, we need to tell enough to the client about why it is relevant. Look at how I discussed the statutes and the case on point in this section. We still will use in-text Bluebook format, not footnotes. By including citations in the client letter, you are giving your recommendations authority and respect.
  4. Recommendation Section: This is the most important part of the letter. You need to give a solid recommendation to the client. Do you recommend pursuing a course of legal action, conducting more research, interviewing people, that the client settle, etc.? Tell the client what you think they should do or what you would like authorization to do.

I will attach the sample letter and the rubric once i select a tutor.

Literature and the world: Indigenous communities in context

/in /by

The first step for the Literary Analysis assignment is an outline. In class, we discussed the elements that will be useful to have for our workshop next Tuesday. The more you include in the outline now, the more helpful it will be when you go to turn it into a full draft. The elements we discussed were the following:

  1. Introduction (summary)
  2. Thesis – the argument/claim
  3. Supports – sub-claims
    1. Quotes
      1. Primary and secondary
      2. 4 total (one from each)
    2. Conclusion
      1. Sway the reader
      2. Synthesize your arguments
      3. Resolve conflicts/clear up confusion/emphasize your interpretation
      4. What’s the life after the paper ends?
    3. If you’re doing a collaborative project, list group members and anticipated medium

The bulk of this outline is dependent on the thesis, so make sure you have one that’s meaningful to you and that you can defend using evidence from our texts.

As far as grading goes, the outline is part of the overall grade for the Literary Analysis. This assignment won’t have points attached to it, but your work will be factored into the final assignment. You can upload a copy or paste the content into the discussion. Because we’ll be workshopping these together, and because I think it’s useful to see what your peers are doing, this is set up as a discussion. Feel free to read over your colleagues’ outlines and provide feedback if you see things that are being done well or that could be improved. This is intended to be a supportive collaboration, so keep that in mind when responding.

For this assignment, students step into the role of “cultural critic.” The tone of blog posts is professional but entertaining.

/in /by

For this assignment, students step into the role of “cultural critic.”
The tone of blog posts is professional but entertaining. Students should
write for a diverse audience who may not be familiar with the text or
texts discussed, the genre the text is part of, or the concepts learned
in class and applied when analyzing the text (or texts).

Students will choose a popular cultural text and create a 500 – 750-word
post describing, analyzing, and evaluating it. Possible subjects
include, but are not limited to: albums, movies, video games, television
shows, songs, musicians, TV/movie stars, policies that affect popular
culture, media technology, etc. Popular cultural text (or texts)
discussed cannot be part of assigned cultural content.

To achieve core area objectives, students will be asked to pay special attention to the following questions:

  • How does what you have learned from class apply to the cultural object? (Critical Thinking)
  • In what way does the production of the cultural object affect the final product? (Critical Thinking)
  • How is the artist/author/musician/actor/director/etc. (artist for
    short) positioned in society (race, class, gender, ethnicity, religion,
    sexuality, disability)? (Social Responsibility)
  • How does the artist’s position in society affect the production,
    consumption, interpretation and reception of the object? (Social
    Responsibility)
  • How does the object represent an ethical position? If an ethical
    position appears to be missing, what could be the reasons that it is
    missing? (Personal Responsibility)

GUIDELINES

After you take notes on the topic of your blog, think about your
paper. Writing is a process, and should not simply answer the above
questions. This is where critical thinking and communication are
important.

Generate a thesis (a claim you will make and support throughout your
blog post). Your thesis should be related to ideas from the course
(think about representation, social construction, power, discourse,
etc.).

After you have a solid claim, identify reasons you have for making your argument and evidence that supports it.

Your blog post should be well structured. Each paragraph should be
coherent and cohesive. They should contain reasons and evidence that
clearly support your claim (thesis). The reasons and evidence explored
in the paragraph should be communicated in a topic sentence.

Always proofread before handing in the final draft. Blogs are dynamic
and multimedia. Be sure to include pictures and hyperlinks to videos
about the topics that you discuss. Also make sure to link to relevant
material.

*A note on citation. Students will be expected to cite everything. Keep
in mind that linking is very important to effective blogging. You should
be linking to everything that you refer to in your blog posts. All
instances of plagiarism will result in failing the assignment and will
be processed under the Honor Code.

Sartre response (2-3 pages), philosophy homework help

/in /by

2-3 page response paper on Chap 22 Sartre

I have provided you with the chapter since it is absolutely necessary for the assignment because I need direct quotes from it and I need to identify the claim from the text. Below are the specific instructions from the professor. 

The Response Paper this week should come from the reading on Sartre (Chapter 22). We will practice identifying the argument from the text on Kierkegaard. Your Writing to Reason text will help you write this paper. There is no need to accomplish everything listed below.Your primary task is to identify the claim from the reading on Sartre and respond with a counter claim of your own. The Writing to Reason text will help you write a counter claim and argument.

  • Identify the claim from the text (use an in-text citation and quote directly from the text, add page numbers.)
  • Explain the claim in your own words
  • “Unpack” the argument that is developed in the text that supports the claim – In other words how does the philosopher support/prove the claim that you quoted?
  • Offer a counter claim – How do you respond to the claim by the philosopher?
  • Develop a counter argument – In other words use a reasoned argument to prove that your counter claim is true. Remember this is not a research paper nor are we interested in opinion (opinions cannot be validated). The task is to offer a reasoned argument that comes to a logical conclusion
  • Provide relevant examples when necessary

 Papers should be no less than 2 full pages and no more than 3 full pages (1 inch margins, double spaced, Times New Roman – only the course name and number and the student name should appear on the first page). APA citation style should be used where appropriate. Papers will be graded according to the following: The paper demonstrates a mastery of the material that includes perspectives from valid secondary sources, the paper presents an original and defensible counter argument in response to the reading along with an appropriate example that supports the argument.

World Cultural Perspective, communications homework help

/in /by

For this assignment, prepare for your
World Cultural Perspective paper by completing the following:

Provide
an update on your research into your selected culture, and share opportunities
you have had to gather information about the culture, including opportunities
to interact with members of the culture. This might include conducting informal
interviews with members of the culture, viewing media presentations and Web
sites, and reading books and articles.

Provide
a list of at least three resources that you have found related to the
following. Your
resources may include interviews, Web sites, scholarly articles, media, and
books that focus on the aspects of the culture you have chosen to study. Cite
all references in APA format.

· 
The
social issues, tendencies, and trends of a chosen culture.

· 
Nonverbal
communication within your selected culture and how it affects personal
interactions across cultures.

· 
Other
cultural differences that affect personal interactions and communication across
cultures.

Prepare an outline of your paper.

Refer
to the World Cultural Perspective Scoring Guide as you develop this assignment.

Assignment
Requirements.

· 
Paper Length: 4–5 double-spaced pages (not including
title and reference pages).

RES 351 need ASAP please

/in /by

How will you have access to the population to
be sampled or interviewed? What are the instruments you will use to collect
data or qualitative information? What is the appropriate sampling method? What
sampling frame will be used? What is the appropriate sampling size? How will
the sample size be determined? Which qualitative methods will be used and why?
Which statistical tests will be used and why? How will the results and insights
be displayed? What conclusions should be made if the hypothesis is found to be
correct or if it is incorrect?” The paper will also “discuss the timing and
resources required to conduct this research effort and how you will use the
insights developed from the study to influence an improvement in the business
process or attempt further research”.

Rhetorical Analysis – (Greta Thunberg, United Nations Press Conference)

/in /by

file:///C:/Users/gwill/Downloads/Rhetorical%20Analysis%20Stuff.pdf

Above is a link to what you will be working with. The first 2 pages is the Greta Thunberg speech that you will be analyzing.

The essay will consist of 7 paragraphs, plus at least 1 example of logos, 1 example of pathos, and one example of ethos.

In the first paragraph, you will need to restate/summarize what the speech is about, and the message behind it.

The next 5 paragraphs, you will need to find 5 separate rhetorical terms (page 11 on the PDF) that Thunberg uses in her speech and go into detail about each of the terms and how they fit in the speech. Again, 5 terms, 5 paragraphs.

Next you will give an example of each – logos, pathos, and ethos within the speech

Finally, you will end with a conclusion in your final paragraph.

Let me know if you have any concerns or questions.

Hypothesis development, political science homework help

/in /by

Develop a rough and ready theory of party identification. Taking the case of Bulgaria, and considering only those who identify with one of the several major parliamentary represented parties, brainstorm to come up with some hypotheses that help to explain why some people think of themselves as Socialists, while others think of themselves as Liberals, supporters of GERB, Nationalists or supporters of the Reform Block. The dependent variable in each hypothesis will be party identification (with the values being “Socialist”, “Liberal”, “Nationalist”, etc.).What are some independent variables?  Keep a few things in mind:

    • Choose variables that could reasonably be measured (though a survey or some other means).
    • Consider carefully issues of both conceptual and operational definition. For example, if you posit religion as an independent variable, do you mean that there will be partisan differences between people of different faiths, or do you mean that people who are more religious (you also need to consider what that means and how you might measure it) will differ from those who are less so.
    • Specify the nature of the relationship. Do not merely say that party identification is related to age. Are older people more likely than younger people to be Liberal, or are they more likely to be Socialists for instance?
    • Provide rationales for your hypotheses. (“Senior citizens are more likely than younger people to be Socialists because they are more worried about social equality”  “Senior citizens are more likely than younger people to be Socialists because they are more worried about Social Security.”)
    • Don’t worry at this point about whether your hypothesis is valid

professional communication

/in /by

professional communication Assig 1.docx 

professional communication Assig 2.docx 

In Assignments 2.1 (Part 1) and 2.2 (Part 2)
of the Justification Report, you built up the major parts of your formal,
researched justification report (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives,
Criteria, Methods, Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and
References). You will begin Part 3 by inserting your revisions of Parts 1 and 2
based on your instructor’s suggestions. Then, you will include a few new
additions:

Write a four (4) page, single-spaced report in which you: 

1. 
Create an introduction
that tells what your report is about.

a.  Include the Problem Statement that you already
created and revised in Part 1.

b.  Include terms that readers will need to know
in order to understand the report.

c.  Briefly summarize the major sections and
findings of the report that you’ve developed in Parts 1 and 2.

d.  Discuss what your report will cover and what
it will not.

2. 
Create the preliminary
parts of the report that precede the Introduction (after reading Chapter 12 in
your Professional Communications textbook), which includes:

a.  Title Page

b.  Transmittal

c.  Table of Contents

d.  Executive Summary
Note: Use small Roman numerals to number the pages of the preliminary parts of
the report.

3. 
Create the
Recommendation section of the Report.

a.  Provide a one to two (1-2) sentence
recommendation based on what your Evaluation of Alternatives and Findings and
Analysis sections have determined is the most feasible alternative (i.e.
solution) to the problem in the Problem Statement.

4. 
Create the References sections,
which go at the end of the Report, by pasting in your revised References page.

Be typed, single
spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all
sides; citations and references must follow APA format. Include a cover page
containing the title of the assignment, your name, the professor name, the
course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not
included in the required assignment page length.