4 Page History Paper

Term Paper

  Much instruction on history deals with dates and events.  We rarely discuss the emotions or internal drives that led  men and women to  create the history that we study.  Yet,  one purpose of studying our past is to learn how and why people acted or reacted the way they did.  The objective of the term paper I have assigned for this course this semester seeks to rectify that.

There are several characteristics Americans, including Europeans, and Native Americans have displayed during our history, such as

Courage,

Risk taking

Greed

Generosity

Loyalty

Perseverance

Genius/ingenuity

Stupidity

Emotional reactions

Hate

Anger

Love

Sacrifice

What I want you to do is pick three of these words above and then:

1. Provide a definition of the word you chose. 

2.  Give three one or two sentence examples of historical events that occurred before 1877 that demonstrate that characteristic

3.  Write a narrative (1-2 pages) of the event which best describes that characteristic.

4.  Explain why that event best describes that characteristic.

Your notes,  the powerpoints, and the text are sufficient sources to use in crafting your responses.

For risk taking I wanted to talk about the mayflower compact and how the colonists set up a government different from what they experience back in england, sacrifice I wanted to talk about the native americans and how they had to give up their land and also hariett tubman and how she escaped and sacrificed her freedom to help others escape and for perseverance you can do whatever.

 now i have already started, I just cant finis. Here is what I have

Janay Aikens

Professor David A. Davis

AMH 2010 Term Paper

12 June 2014

The Character Traits of History

  Many people look at history solely as a factually based subject that lacks true meaning and importance. History is more than just memorizing dates and the foundations of colonies. History teaches many lessons, much wisdom can be learned. Throughout the study of history, values and morals can be obtained. In just this semester alone, I have seen risk taking, sacrifice, and perseverance demonstrated multiple times in stories that I once brushed aside.

  Risk taking is defined as adventurous, courageous, brave; exposure to the chance of injury or loss. The act of taking a risk occurred well before the revolutionary war. The real revolution was the colonists even having the courage to venture off across the seas, not knowing the danger that they could be facing. From the time Jamestown was founded, the colonists endured death from foreign diseases and starvation.

 

ARTS 130 Narrative Essay Assignment

Make sure you follow the instructions keenly i need a high quality work

as you have seen in the instruction doc you have to relate the essay to one of the themes that were presented. also you do not need to have sources this assignment is based on opinion and yourself.

Note

The essay should have proper sentences with no plagiarism or grammar errors

follow instructions and make sure you go through the rubric document because i need a high mark on this paper.

Follow keenly everything in the rubric and ensure everything is in the essay

i have also attached a sample narrative pdf that you can look at and see what i expect in the essay.

Thank you

Portfolio Project: Improving Patient Flow

Drawing from the concepts learned during this course, write a paper that explores and applies the relevant tools and techniques to address one of the two common operating issues presented below (do not address more than one).

It will be critical to identify the key contributing factors, which are often numerous and intertwined. In developing solutions, you must give due consideration to possible second- and third-order effects. Where possible, you are encouraged to examine a local healthcare organization; this may include interviewing organizational leaders and managers, examining issues and challenges, and analyzing data, for example.

Issue 2: The ER staff feel like they are “pushing” admissions to the intensive care and medical-surgical units, and that nursing staff in these units is reluctant to accept new patients. The ICU and MS nurses counter that they “pull” admissions in when they can, except during times when census is high and staffing is tight.

Your paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:

HCM410 Mod 8 PP

HCM410 Mod 8 PP

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Content

60.0 to >48.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of relevant course concepts and appropriately applies the concepts to the identified operational issues.

48.0 to >36.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

36.0 to >24.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

60.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Requirements

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Critical Analysis

50.0 to >40.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second and third-order effects.

40.0 to >30.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second and third-order effects.

30.0 to >20.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second and third-order effects.

20.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second- and third-order effects.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

50.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Sources

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least six credible sources.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates three to five credible sources.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one or two credible source.

12.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Application of Source Material

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.

12.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Organization

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized and well written for a presentation format. Conforms to project requirements.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper presentation format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow presentation format. Does not conform to project requirements in a significant way.

12.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper presentation format. Does not conform to project requirements.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Grammar and Style

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

10.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

10.0 to >0.0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

0.0 pts

No Description

No Submission

25.0 pts

Total Points: 300.0

Previous

Recovery/Support Group Meeting, psychology assignment help

Attend an open Recovery or Support Group meeting in your local community. It can be for any addiction and does not have to be a 12-step meeting.

 It must be a support group to help with the recovery from any addictive disorder.

Ensure that the meeting is considered “open” prior to attending it.

Write a two-part paper of 750-1,000 words summarizing the meeting and discussing important concepts presented in the meeting. Include the following in your paper:

Part One: Summarize the Meeting

  1. Include the address, date, start time, and end time of meeting.
  2. Describe the format of the meeting that you attended.
  3. Describe the contents of the meeting.
  4. List key speakers.

Part Two: Discuss Concepts and methods

  1. Identify the major concepts/methods utilized in the group.  (are their books utilized, prayers utilized, principles or guidelines or any rituals utilized)
  2. Explain the purpose of each concept/method.
  3. Describe each of the following: a) Closed meeting; b) Open meeting; c) Steps; d) Sponsor; and e) Home-group.

Include at least three scholarly resources in addition to the textbook in your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

YOU DON’T NECESSARILY HAVE TO ATTEND A MEETING, JUST MAKE IT UP.

LP9.1 Assignment: Integrate Graphics

LP9.1 Assignment: Integrate Graphics

This assignment will assess the following competency: 9. Integrate graphics into technical writing documents.

Directions: For this week’s assignment, you will create a graphic visual of the data you collected from the questionnaires you disbursed in Week 6. You need to take the data you collected and transfer it into an appropriate visual for your reader (e.g., bar chart, pie chart, table, graph, etc.). The visual should clarify your data and make it easy for the reader to understand your findings. All parts should be labeled clearly. Include a brief paragraph accompanying your graphic image that discusses the data and explains why you chose the visual design to convey your data.

Please use the Purdue OWL APA source to guide you as you develop your graphics.

Tip: Remember that you need to integrate your primary data/results into your final paper proposal. Develop a graphic visual that you will be able to easily include in your final paper and professional oral presentation.

Analyze a Management Case homework help

1. Read Case 1 and Note 6 I uploaded first and answer those questions under the Case 1

2. Then Answer the question below:

Read Case 1. Think of a servant leader you know (similar to Mrs. Noble). What servant leader behaviors would you say this person demonstrates? Based on the model of servant leadership (Figure 10.1), what outcomes have your selected servant leader attained? In other words, what did this person how has it affected you and your organization?

( Please share a practice example of the theory from the workplace or other organization. )

No overview of Servant Leadership. 

(Typically three or more fully developed paragraphs with appropriate citations)

1-2 pages required. 

You need to read the Case 1 and Note 6 I uploaded. You can use quote and list reference. Reference should not be used above 30% of whole paper. 

Only use the note 6 for reference. No outside sources

NO Plagiarism. It must be upload to the Turnitin website. 

 

If you don’t follow the rules, I will withdraw it. 

case_1_.docx
note_6.docx
note_6.docx

How do you detect deception in people who are collecting intelligence?

I AM GOI G TO POST TWO DIFFERENT FORUM QUESTIONS. THIS IS EASIER THEN SEPERATING AND MAKING ANOTHER POST. Do both post the same way initial post followed by responding to classmates.

INTL304 BOO1

Denial & Deception – GradedEach week, forum discussions should include: substantive 250+ word initial answer; initial answer posted by Thursday at 11:55pm ET; follow-ups to classmates posted by Sunday at 11:55pm ET.

View Full Description

Denial and deception are attempts by those you are collecting intelligence against to either prevent collection or to provide signals that are are misleading and deceptive.

This topic is worthy of a full course, but we must introduce this topic here in Intelligence collection. Read Deception.pdf for this discussion forum.

The question for this week is two-fold for collectors:

1) How can you tell whether your collection is being targeted for disinformation or deception? Research and include real-life examples!

–AND–

2) What measures as a collector can you take to reduce the effects of that disinformation/deception?

BEFORE POSTING: please be sure to COMPLETE AND USE the readings in this week’s lessons. It is imperative to review these, study them, before posting so that you can learn the material and engage thoughtfully.

To get a better understanding of the impact of denial and deception operations, I have placed 5 videos here that will help you understand denial and deception, and if you think about what is happening and how it affects the collection of intelligence you can begin to form ideas and approaches for addressing this very severe problem facing all collectors of intelligence:

Forum #2

IRLS200

While it is extremely important to be comfortable using the library and that should be your starting point for research, there are many important resources available on the web as well. It’s important that you be able to find the reliable ones. For this week’s forum, watch the screencast on finding information from research institutes or think tanks, then do a search for information on fragile or failed states using think tanks like Brookings Institute or Chatham House.. What do you think are most important things to know about fragile or failed states?”

Respond to at least three colleagues, providing feedback on their search strategies and the quality/relevance of the texts they located.

Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 350 words. Please respond to at least 3 other students. Responses should be a minimum of 150 words and include direct questions.

Exemplary

50 points

Meets Standards

40 points

Below Standards

30 points

Unsatisfactory

0 points

Initial Discussion Posting

The initial post is worth a maximum total of 50 points.

Contribution is posted by due date and demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the concepts presented by providing evidence from the material andreferences (with citations) to the readings and associated resources.

Contribution contains no spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors. If audio post, contains no grammar or speaking errors.

Posting is made on time.

Contribution demonstrates an understanding of the concepts presented by providing evidence from the material or references (with citations) to the readings and associated resources.

Contribution contains no more than 3 unique spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

Posting is made on time.

Contribution demonstrates an understanding of the concepts presented, however no reference to the readings or associated resources is made to support the ideas shared.

Contribution contains 4 or more unique spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

Posting is made after the due date.

Does not contribute or answer the question posed.

Contribution contains so many spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors that the meaning is unclear.

Posting is made after the due date.

Exemplary

50 points

Meets Standards

40 points

Below Standards

25 points

Unsatisfactory

0 points

Responses to Discussion Posts of Other Classmates

The responses to other classmates are worth a maximum total of 50 points.

There are more than 2 responses to others by the due date and each advances the learning by includingat least two of the following components:

  • Validates post with additional evidence from the literature.
  • Poses a thoughtful question which generates further discussion.
  • Provides an alternative point-of-view, and evidence is provided.
  • Offers additional insight into how the concept might be understood, with evidence provided.

and addresses questions and comments by the instructor.

Responses containno spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

Responses to others advance the learning by including at least one of the following components:

  • Validates post with additional evidence from the literature.
  • Poses a thoughtful question which generates further discussion.
  • Provides an alternative point-of-view, and evidence is provided.
  • Offers additional insight into how the concept might be understood, with evidence provided.

Responses contain no more than 3 unique spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

Only 1 response is posted, or responses to others do not advance the learning, or include any of the following components:

  • Validates post with additional evidence from the literature.
  • Poses a thoughtful question which generates further discussion.
  • Provides an alternative point-of-view, and evidence is provided.
  • Offers additional insight into how the concept might be understood, with evidence provided.

Responses contain more than 4 unique spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.

Responses to others are made after the due date.

Does not respond to others.

Additional points may be awarded at the discretion of the course instructor if the stude

suicide Final paper draft, psychology homework help

Draft, Final Paper

For the draft, submit the following:

  • Title page
  • Detailed outline (including introduction/thesis, and
    conclusion)
  • Reference page that includes an annotated listing of
    all of your sources. 

Select your topic and include the
major points that are relevant to the topic.  (See topic options and full
instructions in Week Five.) See Below

Final Paper

For this assignment, students will select one of the following topics or issues
related to Death & Dying to research:

  • Suicide

The following are examples of some
points you can include as they relate to your topic:

  • Description of topic: Briefly describe your
    specific topic and why it is of particular interest for the course.
  • Dying process: Describe the death and dying process.
  • Support: Describe how you would be able to support the
    grieving individual.
  • Community support: What resources are available in your
    community?  Describe how you would help someone dealing with issue of
    death in your community.
  • Legal or ethical issues: Examine and discuss any
    specific, relevant legal or ethical issues.
  • Personal perspectives/examples: Share any insights you
    may have on this topic that best explain personal thoughts, beliefs, and
    values. Use pertinent examples to illustrate your points.

Writing the Final PaperThe Final Paper:

  1. Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length, and
    formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing
    Center.
  2. Must include a title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted
  • Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a
    succinct thesis statement.
  • Must address the topic of the paper with critical
    thought.
  • Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  • Must use at least five scholarly sources, including a
    minimum of two from the Ashford University Library.
  • Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in
    the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page, formatted
    according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be
    used to evaluate your assignment.

    Curriculum and Theory

    Curriculum and Theory

    Along the margins of your textbook in this week’s readings are quotes from the
    following prominent early childhood theorists: Froebel, Dewey, Montessori,
    Erikson, Piaget, Vygotsky, Gardner, Rogers, Pikler, Gonzalez-Mena, and Bowman
    and Moore.  Choose one of these quotes or one you find on your own from
    one of these theorists.  Use it as the starting point for an analysis of
    your chosen theorist and his or her relationship to curriculum programs such as
    High Scope or Creative Curriculum.  In a two- to three-page paper (plus
    title and reference pages) include the following:

    1. Your chosen quote and a summary of the philosophy of
      your chosen theorist.
    2. A well-researched summary of High Scope, Creative
      Curriculum, or another comprehensive early childhood curriculum about
      which you are familiar.
    3. An analysis of how your curriculum does or does not
      exemplify the tenets of your chosen theorist’s philosophy

    Ethics Project Healthcare, assignment help (1-2 pages)

    Review the scenario below. Throughout the course, you will be referring to this scenario, coming up with an appropriate solution, and reflecting on your thinking process. 

    Your 82-year-old patient is in kidney failure and requires hemodialysis but this sort of medical intervention goes against her religious beliefs. Without this treatment she will certainly die. With the treatment she can expect to live a relatively normal life for years to come. She has no other diseases or conditions. 

    Part 1: 

    In such serious situations it is important to have a good foundation for your perspective. Consider the patient’s decision to refuse the treatment and respond to the following: 

    1.Define the problem using your own words.

    2.What do you think someone following Kant’s moral perspective would say about the patient’s decision?

    3.How do you feel about this patient’s decision? Should patients have the right to refuse reasonable treatment?

    Your assignment should be 1-2 pages and in APA format.