Training Evaluation

Introduction

The purpose of unit assignments is to broaden your comprehension of the unit material. The unit assignments provide an opportunity for you to explore areas that might benefit your own organization or studies and also help you broaden your exposure to the different elements of training and development.

Unit Learning Outcomes

This assignment will address the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

  • ULO 6.1 Assess the different types of training evaluation and discuss the barriers to evaluation.
  • ULO 6.2 Explain how training evaluation can be quantifiable.
  • UL0 6.5 Evaluate relevant scholarly research and synthesize research to complete required assignments.

Directions

Conducting evaluation studies using full experimental designs and sophisticated data collection is almost impossible in real organizations. Some managers argue that training evaluations can provide meaningful conclusions only when conducted using these techniques. They therefore conclude that in most cases training evaluations are a waste of time and money. Debate this conclusion: Is it the case that training evaluations should be conducted only when it is possible to use the more sophisticated procedure? Why do organizational leaders need to see quantifiable results and how can these results be presented in a reliable format? Conduct scholarly research to compose a 2-3 page APA formatted paper that addresses these issues. Review the grading rubric for expectations.

One independent article report (5 pages)

Independent Article Reports (IAR):

Each student will submit two, 5-page independent article reports. (You are only doing one for now) For each of the two IARs, students will select one current

article to review (not more than 6 months old) from traditional, editor-reviewed media sources (i.e. the Wall Street Journal, the

New York Times, Time Magazine, the Star-Ledger, Sports Illustrated, CNN.com, FOXNews.com, NBCNews.com, USA

Today, the Asbury Park Press, etc.). If a student is unsure whether their article fits this requirement, then they should consult

with the Instructor. The article must be about ethics, social responsibility, or stakeholder management. Any topic covered in

class by or before the IAR’s submission date is acceptable. Remember, this is a business course and is part of a business

school curriculum. As such, students should not choose articles that focus on politics or the political climate either locally,

nationally, or globally.

IARs will normally be graded and returned within two weeks. As this is a writing intensive course, in addition to each report’s

content students will be graded based on their writing style, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

The due dates for the IAR papers are listed in the course timeline at the end of this Syllabus. Additional guidance on the IAR

papers is provided in Addendum A to this syllabus. In addition, Addendum C provides the Business School’s Written

Communication Rubric by which all papers will be evaluated.

Please see the syllabus and pictures below for context and ideas for possible topics

Remember, only 1, 5 page article report is necessary

Heart of Darkness Essay, writing homework help

Write a response to the following question of approximately 5 double-spaced pages. 

Papers should be in-depth, specific, thorough and clear.  Papers should respond to the questions by analyzing specific quotations from each of the three texts, all the while explaining how those quotations or features support the answer. Integrate quotations into your writing effectively.

Your paper should rely entirely on the student’s own analysis of the text without the use of outside sources (except those indicated in the questions).

Your writing should be grammatically clear and use specific words.

Paper Question:

How would Edward Said critique Heart of Darkness? Use the excerpt from Orientalism to determine how he would agree and/or disagree with Achebe’s criticism of Conrad’s novella. Use specific examples and/or passages from all three works.

**Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad**  https://www.gutenberg.org/files/219/219-h/219-h.htm

**Edward Said’s critique is attached as an uploaded file**

** Sparknotes for the book Heart of Darkness** http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/heart/ 

Compare the various motivations for establishing the colonies

Just need a couple of paragraphs for a discussion forum

Module 2: Discussion Forum

3131 unread replies.3333 replies.

Compare the various motivations for establishing the colonies. How well did the colonies achieve their original purpose or have to adapt to unexpected situations in the New World? Give specific examples from a few of the different colonies.

  • For example, what motivated colonists to settle in Jamestown, Plymouth, Rhode Island or Philadelphia?
  • How did the colonies interact differently with the American Indians?
  • What impact did settlement patterns have on colonial growth and cohesion?
  • Do you see any connection between the settlement patterns and later when the colonies rebelled against Britain?

Post and Reply

  1. Select 1 passage from M. Butterfly. (The words passage and quotation are used interchangeably and mean the same thing.)
  • Your passage may include an image since the images are part of the author’s writing. You may also piece together multiple passages using ellipses (…) in between.
  • Be sure to include the page number(s) after the passage, like this (17-18).
  • Write a short summary of the passage (1-2 sentences).
  • this is just to get the summary out of your system and to be able to focus on an analysis
  • Analyze the passage you have chosen (3-4 sentences).
  • What does is show you as a reader?
  • Can you apply the theoretical lenses to the passage? What does that reveal about the passage?
  • What is your interpretation of the passage?
  • remember to avoid summarizing the passage
  • remember to avoid making overgeneralizations based on the text.
  • See sample below.
  • **Your post must be original and dissimilar to other students. This will be factored into earning points.
  • Then, reply to two other students, commenting on their analysis and offering additional feedback.
  • You should read through the discussion thread and create an original post. If your ideas are similar to another student that has posted before you, you should mention him/her and build on their comment in your post.**Evidence of reading though the discussion thread is factored into earning points.

Click on “Reply” to type your post.

Your post should look something like this: (Note: See the link “passage analysis” under the heading “Guidelines for Writing about Literature” in the “Course Resources” section of the course site.)

Passage: “Nan said to Tess, but projecting for the benefit of the front, ‘Truly, are we so superior as we think? I wonder little. When we first moved in at the mine, we did something at the house so stupid am still in pain. There were two pawpaw trees growing side by side by the house, one thriving with nice big pawpaws on it and the other sick-looking and leaf-less – dead looking. Well, we thought it was plain what we should do: take down the dead tree. So we hauled and pushed on the trunk of the poor tree and strained and pulled it over – uprooted it, Gareth and myself. It was his idea: we must just straight off do this, get it over. Then, with the crash, the servants come out. They had funny looks on. Dineo said, so quietly, ‘Oh, Mma, you have killed the male.’ We didn’t understand. It seems the pawpaw grow in pairs, couples, male and female. The male tree looks like a phallus – no foliage to it, really. The female needs the male in order to bear. They take years to reach the heights ours had. Then the female died. The staff had been eating pawpaws from our tree for years. It was a humiliation” ( Rush 21).

Summary: Nan is explaining to Tess how she and Gareth dug up a tree that looked like it was dead, but that they learned from the natives that they were all wrong about their interpretation of the tree. It looked dead but the other tree needed it for its survival.

Analysis: The pawpaw trees function as a symbol within the text. They symbolize the hierarchic relationship between the men and the women in the text as well as the hierarchic relationship between the whites and the blacks in the text. When Rush writes that they “uprooted” the tree, it brings to mind the appropriation of colonies and cultural upheaval.

Two students that I want you to replay:

1)Passage: Gallimard: Its heroine, Cio-Cio-San, also known as Butterfly, is a feminine ideal, beautiful and brave. And its hero, the man for who she gives up everything, is – not very good looking, not too bright, and pretty much a wimp: Benjamin Franklin Pinkerton of the U. S. Navy. As the curtain rises, he’s just closed on two great bargains: one on a house, the other on a woman-call it a package deal. (5)

Summary: Gallimard describes the Opera for the audience initially in case they are unaware of the story. The Opera is the story of a foreign masculine power overtaking the feminine power from the West.

Analysis: In this passage, Gallimard mentioned that part: Butterfly is a feminine ideal. From that, We could know he has a yearning for a woman who likes a butterfly. Also, he does not know what his future of marriage or life is. He described his marriage as not love. This is the two important factors that he fell in love with Song.

2)Passage: MAN 1 AND WOMAN 3: . . . it was dark . . .

MAN 1 AND WOMAN 1: . . . and she was very modest!

MAN 2: So—what? He never touched her with his hands?

WOMAN 1: Perhaps he did, and simply misidentified the equipment.

WOMAN 2: A compelling case for sex education in the schools.

WOMAN 3: To protect the national security!

MAN 1: Church can’t argue with that.

MAN 2: That’s impossible!

ALL: How could he not know?

MAN 1: Simple ignorance.

MAN 2: For twenty years?

WOMAN 2: Time flies when you’re being stupid.

WOMAN 3: Well, I thought the French were ladies’ men.

WOMAN 1: It seems Monsieur Gallimard was overly anxious to live up to his national reputation.

MAN 2: Instead, he’s become a national embarrassment.

WOMAN 2: A laughingstock.

MAN 1 AND MAN 2 : A fool.

WOMAN 3: Actually, I feel sorry for him.

WOMAN 1: A toast! To Monsieur Gallimard!

WOMAN 2 AND WOMAN 3: Yes! To Gallimard!

ALL: To Gallimard!

MAN 1: Vive la différence!

They toast, laughing. Lights down on them.

Gallimard’s cell.

GALLIMARD: You see? They toast me. I’ve become patron saint of the socially inept. Can they really be so foolish? Men like that—they should be scratching at my door, begging to learn my secrets! For I, Rene Gallimard, you see, I have known, and been loved by . . . the Perfect Woman.

(Pause)

Alone in this cell, I sit night after night, watching our story play through my head, always searching for a new ending, one that redeems my honor, where she returns at last to my arms. And I imagine you—my ideal audience—who come to understand and even, perhaps just a little, to envy me. (16-18)

Summary: After observing from the cell a group of well-dressed men and women making conversations about and making fun of him, Gallimard expressed his feeling inside.

Analysis: Those well-dressed men and women behaved unseemly at an upper party making fun of someone else, which forms a strong contrast here to satirize the hypocrisy of some people from the upper class. In addition, the self-reflection of Gallimard himself to some extent reflects the bad ending of this character.

Comparing the experiences of past black men and women to present day black men and women

Black history is often a series of “great men,” and occasionally of “great women.” Does this do justice to the Black identity? Who was left out, and what effect does that have on Black America? Compare the experiences of Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. DuBois, Marcus Garvey and Ida B. Wells-Barnett with that of average Black men and women. Evaluate whether the life experiences of the “great” fairly represent the African-American experience of the beginning of the 20th Century.

5 paragraphs, Thesis, 3 body paragraphs, conclusion/summary, 2-3 pages, AT LEAST 5 sources, must have works cited/bibliography.

Sources must be cited through the essay

• Type the topical question at the top of your response essay. Remember to stick to the question.

• Then, you will complete a five paragraph (two to three paged) typed logical, focused essay on the question. Be clear and precise.

• Your answer must be completely developed, and have factual support represented by specific examples from the texts, and be in the STANDARD ESSAY FORM (single-spaced or double-spaced).

Quantitative study

Quantitative Study Evaluation

Locate an article from the peer-reviewed, scholarly journals in your field using one of the databases available in the Capella Library. This article should be no more than five years old and report on an empirical quantitative study. The article may be related to the topic you have selected for your final course paper. Use the study activities and the annotated Quantitative Study Evaluation Template to evaluate the study in your journal article. In your paper, demonstrate that you understand the important elements of the article:

  • The research problem.
  • Literature review.
  • Purpose statement.
  • Research design.
  • Research questions.
  • Data collection plan.
  • Data analysis and interpretation plan.

Include a statement about how you might use this study to inform your current or future work as a counselor. Describe at least one ethical and one culturally relevant concern to the study.

Written Requirements

  • Length of paper: 4–6 pages
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Sociological Inquiry Journal writing (300 words)

You are welcomed to write on a topic of your own choosing. Your writing
can be freeform and exploratory, but your work must discuss at least one specific
concept covered in a section of the course that pertains to the prompt or topic
you’ve chosen.
Each entry must be at least 300 words. The following criteria will factor into your grade:

– Relevance of topic you’ve chosen

– Demonstrated understanding of at least one specific course concept

-Depth of critical engagement and original thought
– Style and clarity of writing

please check the file attached for class concepts and all other details.

psy 2012 module, psychology homework help

1.0If human hunger was entirely regulated by biological factors, what would happen to your weight?

A.

B.

C.

D.

2. Carl works hard to get As on his report card because his mother pays him 25 dollars. Carl’s behavior is being influenced by:

A.

B.

C.

D.

3. Greg has five young daughters. One time when he went shopping with his five girls, a stranger came up to Greg and said, “Wow, five girls! What’s the matter? Didn’t your wife want sons?” In regard to the determination of sex, what was incorrect with the assumption of the stranger’s question?

A.

B.

C.

D.

4.

A race car driver wants to win the prize money and feels as if the money is pulling him to win. Which of the following would explain this behavior?

A.

B.

C.

D.

Question 5

 

The concept of instinct has been redefined with the idea of:

A.

B.

C.

D.

7. “I have lots of motivation to do something. I want to do something with my life, but I’m not sure what.” This person shows ____ but lacks ____.

A.

B.

C.

D.

Question 8

 

What are the two main causes of sexual dysfunction?

A.

B.

C.

D.

Question 9

 

A person’s metabolic rate refers to the:

A.

B.

C.

D.

9. Poor students come from homes where parents speak less than the parents of middle-class students.

A.

B.

Ethics Audit

Ethics Audit

This assignment focuses on code of ethics. For the assignment, you are asked to access and analyze a code of ethics from a public or non-profit organization. Most are listed online or on the organization’s website.

Evaluate and perform an “Ethics Audit” using the following expectations:

1. Identify the organization, and include a “copy” of the code of ethics in your report. The code of ethics content does not count for the 500-word evaluation.

2. The outline of the assessment will be in a (paragraph) narrative format.

3. Review and identify all general themes that involve conduct and behavior application to all employees.

4. What types of evidence or impressions exist (or do not exist) that high moral standards are included in the code of ethics?

5. Provide reflection and examples if the document is clearly or vaguely written.

6. Cite four examples if the tone of the document is generic in nature or more customized according to the organization’s mission.

7. Provide evidence of infractions or sanctions if certain behaviors are not followed.

8. Present examples (of codes) that outside stakeholders will be provided the same consistent moral standards as employee expectations in the organization.

9. Provide a comprehensive summary that includes the focus and scope of codes:

  • Are they narrowly written or extremely focused?
  • Are the coverage of topics too detailed, too broad, or balanced?
  • Do the codes include the depth and breadth of social responsibility, or are they focused only on the organization’s mission?
  • Is the clarity of the language used easy to follow and understand by all levels of employees?

Your response should be at least 500 words in length in APA style. All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.

Include a cover page containing the tile of the assignment (Ethics Case Study-Public Leadership), your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The title page and the references pages are not included in the required assignment page length.