The two emails address the same situation.

Instructions

You have just received two emails, one from your boss or supervisor and one from a coworker. The two emails address the same situation. A minor problem has occurred that you may be responsible for creating. Your boss/supervisor has asked you for a resolution to the problem. Your coworker, who has been affected by this problem, is angry with you and has written an inflammatory email accusing you of creating this problem on purpose.

  1. Using word, write an email as a reply to both of the emails that you have received. You should attempt to resolve the problem as efficiently as possible. Since your email will be received both by a supervisor and a coworker, consider all aspects of your communication including the formality of the language you use, grammar, and all aspects of formal communication. Your goal is to solve the problem and maintain your professionalism at the same time.
  2. On the same document, analyze the conflict that has happened. What was the cause of the conflict? How did you attempt to resolve the conflict? What did you need to address in terms of your supervisor’s concerns, and how were these different from your coworker’s concerns? Do you think your supervisor and coworker handled the conflict well in their emails to you? How effective are these emails?

Choosing a Famous Deviant Person

Project Part 1: Choosing a Famous Deviant Person

The class project challenges you to identify and select a famous person (television, Hollywood, news media) who you believe is an example of deviance. You will consider the question, “Why is this individual deviant?”

You will apply what you will learn during this class to analyze, categorize, and diagnose your famous person’s level of deviance.

Estimated Time
You should spend approximately 5-7 hours on this task.

Instructions
1. Use your knowledge of a television character, Hollywood celebrity or other famous person to select someone who you believe is an example of a deviant individual. You should be interested and excited about this individual as you will need to research and expand upon the deviance of this person throughout this class during each of the modules.

2. Using the knowledge about deviance obtained in this module to describe why you chose this person, and why you believe this person is to be considered deviant, providing specific examples to define their deviance.

3. Justify why you choose this person using specific references from this module. Your justification can come from the activities, your readings, or any materials you explored during this module.

4. Be prepared in future parts of this project assignment to expand on this deviance definition of your person.

5. Write a minimum of a 500 word paper with in-text citations (APA format) and title and works cited page to the Drop Box titled: Project Part 1: Choosing a Famous Deviant Person.

Quality Improvement in the Health Care Organization Accreditation, management help

What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the Comprehensive Project due in Unit 5? How did you leverage feedback from your peers in the Discussion Board for Units 1–4 in completing the project? How will these competencies and knowledge support your career advancement in management? Below is the attached unit 5 assignment to better understand this assignment ONLY; it is NOT part of this assignment



Quality Improvement in the Health Care Organization Accreditation

The mandate for improving the way in which health care is delivered was stimulated by the public outcry over the estimated 98,000 deaths because of medical errors each year, according to the Institute of Medicine in 1999. Since then, health care organizations have sought means by which the public can be reassured that they were meeting quality and safety standards. Accreditation agencies (e.g., The Joint Commission) and quality awards provide a means for the public to evaluate where the agency is meeting minimum standards.

You have been assigned by your manager to determine which accrediting agencies or quality improvement programs your hospital will utilize in its upcoming revenue cycle. Your hospital is a magnet hospital in a large urban area that provides multilayered services. You have previously used The Joint Commission for your accreditation but feel that you might be better served by using another accrediting body. You have three months in which to gather data and present the information to your manager.

Complete the following for this assignment:

  • Choose 3 quality improvement or accreditation-related programs to consider in replacing The Joint Commission for your organization, and briefly describe them. Your agency accepts Medicare and Medicaid payments; therefore, you will need to explore, as background, the conditions of participation for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). This is important information because you will need to compare your list of accrediting agencies and quality improvement programs with the conditions of participation to see if they meet the criteria.
  • Analyze the costs and benefits of each quality improvement or accreditation-related program by stakeholder group (e.g., patient, provider, and third-party payer).
  • Rank your quality improvement or accreditation-related program suggestions with rationale.

Please submit your assignment.

Discussion: Arguments About Plot

Before you begin writing your discussion post, review the Module 1 Writer’s Workshop, “Writing A One-Paragraph Argument About Literature.”

Respond to this discussion activity by constructing a one-paragraph argument about the plot of The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

  1. Make a claim about how one of the concepts covered in the assigned reading about the plot (conflict, exposition, complication, protagonist, suspense, antagonist, climax, resolution, in media res, flashback, foreshadowing) is meaningful in the assigned novella.
  2. Add evidence to support your claim in the form of a quote from the novella to illustrate the point you are making.
  3. Add analysis by explaining how your quote proves or illustrates your claim

Module 1 Writer’s Workshop

The goal of this module’s workshop is for you to learn how to write a one-paragraph argument about literature. This type of paragraph will provide you with a means of effectively communicating your ideas about the literature you read for this class and will be foundational for your ability to be successful with the three essay assignments in this course. You will practice writing one-paragraph arguments each week for your discussion activities, which will allow you to see the usefulness of this form for persuasively sharing your ideas about and interpretations of literature. You will also have the opportunity to read and respond to your classmates’ arguments, which will continue to reinforce the value of this skill as a means of sharing ideas in an intellectual community.

The Components of an Argument Paragraph

When writing any argument paragraph (for literature, science, history or any other discipline), you should include three key components:

  1. A claim (also known as a thesis).
  2. Evidence (in order to support that claim).
  3. Analysis (which is when you explain how your evidence supports your claim and, possibly, why your claim is important).

What is Different About a Literary Argument?

How might a literary argument paragraph be different than any other argument paragraph? For this class, your literary argument paragraphs should meet these criteria:

  • Your claim should involve one of the formal literary elements we are studying that week (plot, character, setting, symbol, etc). You should be discussing how that particular element creates meaning or is significant to one of this module’s assigned literary texts or how it works in conjunction with another literary element. For example, your claim might answer one of these questions: Why is the setting significant in this story? How does the point of view in which this story is told help the reader to better understand one of the characters?
  • Your evidence should take the form of references to specific examples from the assigned literary texts. Optimally, this evidence will take the form of a quote that illustrates the point you are making. Occasionally, it may be more effective to reference several different examples from the text with page numbers but without using a quotation.
  • Your analysis should explain how the evidence (quote or reference) you provide shows your claim to be true. It is also useful to have a sentence that explains why your argument/claim is important. In other words, why should your reader care about your idea?

Your one-paragraph arguments for this class should be very brief — no more than 5-7 sentences in length. Conciseness means communicating your idea using only words that add value — in other words, after you draft your paragraph, re-read it and eliminate any unnecessary words and sentences. Keep it short and simple.

Let’s look at an example one-paragraph argument about the literary element point of view that is related to this week’s assigned reading:

The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is written mostly in the third-person by a narrator who is not a participant in the story but who narrates the story from the limited perspective of a supporting character, a lawyer, Mr. Utterson. In other words, the reader knows only what Mr. Utterson knows. However, in the final chapter of the novella, the first-person point of view of the protagonist emerges through the literary device of a letter addressed from the protagonist to Utterson. This use of the first-person point of view in the final chapter is crucial to the understanding the full meaning of the novella’s events and ending the suspense that has been building up during the course of the plot. In the letter, the protagonist tells his life’s story from its beginning until the time of the novella’s conclusion: “I was born in the year 18 — to a large fortune, endowed besides with excellent parts, inclined by nature to industry, fond of the respect of the wise and good among my fellowmen, and thus, as might have been supposed, with every guarantee of an honorable and distinguished future.” In this way, the protagonist solves the mysteries of the novel as he tells his story using the first-person point of view (“I”) for his confession.

Now, let’s break that paragraph down into its respective components: Introduction (optional), Claim, Evidence, and Analysis.

Introduction (optional)

The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is written mostly in the third-person by a narrator who is not a participant in the story but who narrates the story from the limited perspective of a supporting character, a lawyer, Mr. Utterson. In other words, the reader knows only what Mr. Utterson knows. However, in the final chapter of the novella, the first-person point of view of the protagonist emerges through the literary device of a letter addressed from the protagonist to Utterson.

Claim

This is what I am claiming to be true about the importance of a particular literary element in the assigned reading.

This use of the first-person point of view in the final chapter is crucial to the reader understanding the full meaning of the novella’s events and ending the suspense that has been building up during the course of the plot.

Evidence

In the letter, the protagonist tells his life’s story from its beginning until the time of the novella’s conclusion:

“I was born in the year 18 — to a large fortune, endowed besides with excellent parts, inclined by nature to industry, fond of the respect of the wise and good among my fellowmen, and thus, as might have been supposed, with every guarantee of an honorable and distinguished future.”

This quote supports my claim about point of view, demonstrating the use of the first-person (“I”) point of view and relating it to the protagonist’s confession.

Analysis

Here I explain how my evidence (quote) “proves” my claim about the importance of point of view in the final chapter of the novella.

In this way, the protagonist solves the mysteries of the novel as he tells his story using the first-person point of view (“I”) for his confession.

What is the Difference Between Plot Summary and an Argument About Literature?

Plot summary is simply retelling what happened in a story in your own words. With plot summary, you are not adding your own ideas, you are just restating (perhaps for someone who did not read the story) a short version of what happened in the story. Plot summaries do not meet the requirements for the discussion boards or essays in this course. An argument requires you to put forth your own ideas about and/or interpretations of literature. For this class, we will use formal literary elements (plot, setting, symbol, etc) to give your arguments focus. You can ensure that you have an argument by making sure to include claim, evidence, and analysis in your argument paragraphs.

In Conclusion

Building an argument paragraph is a rigorous intellectual exercise that requires critical reading, thinking and writing. If writing argument paragraphs seems difficult at first, your comfort level should increase with weekly practice in the Discussions area (very low risk in terms of your overall grade) and the support of your instructor as a writing coach who is available to answer questions and give feedback. Once you’ve mastered this skill of writing literary argument paragraphs, you should feel much more confident in your ability to complete the three required essays for the course.

May I get HELP on a class post question. No essay

“Your Role in Peer Review” Please respond to the following:

  • Think about a time when someone gave you good advice that you did not take. For this discussion post, provide the situation and explain why the “good” advice was not taken.
  • Next, discuss whether or not it makes sense to ignore “good” advice. When is it appropriate to do so? When is it not? From a writing perspective, think about how you can separate someone’s good intentions from good advice in writing. Explain what this process looks like.
  • Finally, determine what you believe is the best strength you offer your classmates in a peer review? Justify your response.

Litigation Against Law Enforcement Officials, assignment help

Litigation
Against Law Enforcement Officials                                                                              c10

.

In your main post, respond to the
following from a criminal justice practitioner’s perspective, supported by
legal reasoning:

Describe
the capital crime or crimes in your jurisdiction.

Articulate
your position as to whether capital punishment is an appropriate punishment for
offenses other than murder.

Explain
your perspective as to whether the manner in which capital punishment is
imposed is a question of legality, morality, or emotion, considering public
opinion.

Explore how the implementation and
enforcement of capital punishment could affect the mindset, philosophy, and/or
actions of a criminal justice practitioner in carrying out their duties.

Psychology, assignment help

This assignment is Due on 5/18/16

Write a 1,250-1,500-word essay that describes
abnormal behavior based on the five perspectives of abnormal psychology.

Choose a film or television show that depicts
elements of abnormal psychology and treatment methods. Examples of suitable
subjects include films such as American Psycho, Fatal Attraction,
and Obsession, or television shows such as HBO’s In Treatment and
The Sopranos.

Use the resources listed in this Topic to
assist you in completing this assignment.

Select a character or characters in the film
or television show that depict abnormal behavior and treatment methods or the
lack thereof.

To frame the context, consider the five
perspectives of abnormal psychology and their treatment methods. Which of the
five abnormal psychological perspectives (biological, psychodynamic,
humanistic, cognitive behavioral, and sociocultural) best addresses the type of
abnormal behavior exhibited by the character(s)? In addition, address the
following:

  1. Describe
    how the character(s) exhibit abnormal behavior.
  2. Explain
    how therapists in each of the five perspectives would treat the
    character(s).
  3. Describe
    which perspective you feel is the best. Justify your choice based on
    scholarly research.

Question 1 AND Question 2

EVERYTHING MUST BE IN MLA AND EACH QUESTION MUST ANSWER SPEAREATLY

Question 1

Conflict is essential to drama: it develops and holds the audience’s attention. In Shakespeare’s famous play Hamlet, conflict helps to develop the plot in both outward ways (the action of the storyline) and inward ways (what occurs in the characters’ minds).

Argue in a micro-essay of at least 250 words how the playwright creatively uses both outward and inward conflict to affect the actions of the plot and the inward thoughts and motivations of its characters.

In-text cite lines of dialog in the play which you believe supports your response. (See Purdue OWL online for examples of in-text citing lines from a play).

QUESTION 2

ACT V, SCENE I

In the churchyard, two gravediggers dig a grave for Ophelia. They argue whether Ophelia should be buried in the churchyard, since her death looks like a suicide. According to religious doctrine (Catholic), suicides may not receive Christian burial. The first gravedigger, who shows through his words a clever and mischievous wit, asks the second gravedigger a riddle: “What is he that builds stronger than either the mason, the shipwright, or the carpenter?” (V.i.46–47). The second gravedigger answers that it must be the gallows-maker, for his frame outlasts a thousand tenants. The first gravedigger challenges his answer, saying that it is the gravedigger, for his “houses” will last until Doomsday. Hamlet and Horatio enter at a distance and watch the gravediggers work. Hamlet looks with wonder at the skulls they excavate to make room for the fresh grave and speculates darkly about what occupations the owners of these skulls served in life: “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer? Where be his quiddities now . . . ?” After this dialog, the king and queen and others come to the gravesite that was prepared for Ophelia’s burial. Overcome by grief, Ophelia’s brother Laertes jumps into his sister’s grave where Hamlet joins him in a brief fight. Wow! There is a lot of things happening dramatically in this famous scene!

Argue in a micro-essay of at least 250 words what you believe is the importance of this scene in terms of revealing Hamlet’s mindset and also foreshadowing the actions that occur subsequently at the conclusion of Act V.

In-text cite lines of dialog from this scene where you believe they will enhance the credibility of your answer.

In the Field Discussion

Assignment 1: In the Field Discussion

This assignment is concerned with how to avoid indirectly influencing the memories of individuals during interviews or interrogations.

Tasks:

Find any online video of Loftus reporting on how to create false memories. You can use the following key words to locate an appropriate video:

  • Creating false memories
  • Elizabeth Loftus

Provide a link to the video you watched and report what you learned.

In addition, refer to the title Strategies to Avoid Interview Contamination in the October 2003 issue of the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.

In a minimum of 300 words, discuss what you believe are the two most important practices recommended for avoiding interview contamination and what you believe is the least important practice recommended.

Submission Details:

  • By the due date assigned, post your responses to this Discussion Area.
  • Through the end of the module, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. Do you agree with the rationale provided by them in identifying the two most important and the one least important practice for avoiding interview contamination? Why or why not? Provide a rationale for your answer. Be honest, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress.
Discussion Grading Table Maximum Points
Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instruction

16

Quality of responses to classmates

12

Frequency of responses to classmates

4

Reference to supporting readings and other materials

4

Language and grammar

4

Total:

40

Rubrics

Unit 2: Individual Behavior, Diversity, Attitudes, and Job Satisfaction, management homework help

In Discussion you addressed the effect of workforce diversity on job satisfaction. Now you will continue this topic of job satisfaction in this Assignment.

Assignment: Job Satisfaction

Marla Santigo is an accountant for at Lemnah Company. Marla loves her job and spends countless hours working at the office. She enjoys working on taxes and reviewing financial records. Being an accountant was her dream and she reached hers goal after going to school evenings and weekends. Every morning she cannot wait to get to the office.

Darell Washington is a Quality Control Agent for an insurance company. He investigates potential fraud cases. He travels all over the United States investigating cases. He spends more time traveling then home. He has been doing this job for 10 years and feels the need for change. He no longer likes to be away from his family. He feels the company is full of politics and does not respect employees.

Mike Walker is a retail store manager for Outdoor Inc. He believes in the quality products his store sells. He comments that retail is a tough business but enjoys a challenge. He enjoys seeing the new products come into the store every season. His employees remark that Mike is a great manager and passionate about his job. He makes himself available to employees on days off and can often be found in the store during his vacation. Lately though, he is feeling stressed due to the demands from corporate about daily sales. He wants to succeed and get promoted but feels helpless because last quarter’s sales were down.

Working more than 40 hours, constant travelling, and being available 24 hours a day seven days a week can be a challenge to most people. This can leave them feeling stressed and burned out. However, some people find this exhilarating and thrive on the demands of the job and cannot wait for the next challenge.

Checklist:

Address the following questions in your 2—3 page essayadding an additional title and references page:

The three employees and their jobs at three different companies considered are:

Maria- Accountant; Darell- Quality Control Manager for an insurance company; and Mike, Retail Store Manager for an outdoor products company.

  1. What characteristics of these jobs might contribute to increased levels of job satisfaction?
  2. What characteristics of these jobs might contribute to decreased levels of job satisfaction?
  3. The three individuals we just read about have different levels of satisfaction with their jobs, how might their levels of satisfaction relate to:
    1. their job performance
    2. citizenship behavior
    3. turnover
    4. company profit

Please submit your minimum APA formatted and citation styled 2–3 pages of body text, and include an additional title and references page.

Directions for submitting your Assignment:

Before you submit your Assignment, you should save your work using the correct naming convention: Last_first Name_Homework_Unit #.

Make sure your Assignment is in Microsoft Word, doubled spaced and 12 pt. font in Times New Roman.

Please site your references