|
Learning Outcomes
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Provide an introduction and background to company chosen. (10% of grade)
|
Student provides a well-reasoned explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides a succinct yet complete summary of the company’s background.
|
Student provides a well-reasoned explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides an incomplete summary of the company’s background.
|
Student provides an adequate
explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides a succinct yet complete summary of the company’s background.
|
Student provides an adequate
explanation as to why the company was chosen and provides an incomplete summary of the company’s background.
|
Student does not provides an
explanation as to why the company was chosen and does not provide summary of the company’s background.
|
|
Analyze the company in the context of the critical success factors (15% of grade)
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors and relates them well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the critical success factors but only relates them adequately to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the critical success factors and relates them well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the critical success factors and relates them adequately to the company.
|
Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the critical success factors and does not relates them to the company.
|
|
Analyze the company in the context of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard. (15% of grade)
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard but only relates them adequately to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and relates them adequately to the company.
|
Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the four perspectives of balanced scorecard and does not relates them to the company.
|
|
Analyze the company in the context of the value chain.
(10% of grade)
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the value chain and relates it well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the value chain but only relates it adequately to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the value chain and relates it well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the
value chain and relates it adequately to the company.
|
Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the value chain and does not relates it to the company.
|
|
Analyze the company in the context of customer delivered value. (5% of grade)
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the customer delivered value and relates it well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of the customer delivered value but only relates it adequately to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the customer delivered value and relates it well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the customer delivered value and relates it adequately to the company.
|
Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the customer delivered value and does not relates it to the company.
|
|
Analyze the company in the context of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality. (10% of grade)
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth knowledge of cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality but only relates them adequately to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the
cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and relates them adequately to the company.
|
Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the cost of controlling quality and the costs of failing to control quality and does not relates them to the company.
|
|
Analyze the company in the context of the Theory of
Constraints.
(10% of grade)
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth
knowledge of the Theory of
Constraints and relates it well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an in-depth
knowledge of the Theory of Constraints but only relates it adequately to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate
knowledge of the Theory of
Constraints and relates it well to the company.
|
Student demonstrates an adequate knowledge the Theory of
Constraints and relates it adequately to the company.
|
Student does not demonstrate knowledge of the Theory of Constraints and does not relates it to the company.
|
|
Conclusion, including degree to which organization incorporates concepts. (10% of grade)
|
Conclusion drawn is excellent.
|
Conclusion drawn is above average.
|
Conclusion drawn is average.
|
Conclusion drawn is below average.
|
No conclusion is drawn.
|
|
Quality of writing, including citing sources; and organization of project. (15% of grade)
|
Writing skills are at high level with almost no errors; organization is excellent.
|
Writing skills are good with a few errors; organization is above average.
|
Writing skills are adequate with many errors; organization is average.
|
Writing skills overall are below average; organization is below average.
|
Writing skills are poor with remediation required and project is not organized.
|