writing essay-zhikang

/in /by

Please read this essay very carefully, follow the writing instruction.

My writing topic would be : food security and GMOs foods in India.

Need at least 7 paragraphs!!!!!!! word count: 1000

Task:

This first draft assignment asks you to think about the function and content of each paragraph of your essay (the final paper will roughly equate to 7-8 paragraphs altogether, though this will vary). Hopefully, this assignment should give you a better idea of the entire argument, and the work you need to do between this draft and the next.

Please, use the format below (so, copy and paste it into a blank Word document and fill out the blanks). Your first draft must have at least 7 paragraphs filled out to be considered complete, including the intro and conclusion. You may, of course, include more. See below for the rest of the minimum requirements.

(Please just copy and paste what’s in bold below. Do not include the above instructions or what’s in parentheses below.)

(Title) Essay 2.1 Outline

Introduction paragraph

Question at Issue (Q@I):

Reasoned Thesis (also called an enthymeme):

How will you intrigue the reader and make them want to read more? (2-3 sentences):

What groups or types of people are likely to agree with your Reasoned Thesis? (1-2 sentences):

What groups or types of people a likely to disagree with your Reasoned Thesis? (1-2 sentences):

Major Ideas or Terms That Need to be Defined For an Audience (2-4 terms/ideas, you don’t have to define, but you can)

Body Paragraph

What 1 Main Idea should the reader take away from this paragraph? (2-3 sentences):

How will Main Idea help achieve your essay’s argumentative purpose? (1-2 Sentences):

Key Evidence or Examples from Research? (to support/ explore paragraph’s major claims, 1-2 sentences):

Why Should This Paragraph Appear Here, and not somewhere else?(Explain your reasoning, 1-2 sentences):

(Repeat for at least 5 more paragraphs)

Conclusion:

Key Points from the Essay to Summarize: (2-3 sentences)

What Questions do you want to leave your reader with? (2-3 questions)

(Optional)What aspects of your essay might lead to or require more research by others in the future?

(Optional) Is there a “call to action” about your subject that you want to make of your reader?

Minimum Requirements for Essay 2.1:

  • It must include a header (which include your name) and a title.
  • The outline must include 7 outline entries for essay paragraphs, including the introduction and conclusion paragraph (so, 5 body paragraphs in addition to the intro and conclusion).
  • Each entry must include all of the information requested in the format above, unless otherwise noted as “optional.”
  • It does not require a Works Cited page, but you may include one if you wish.

It’s a short list of minimum requirements, as befitting a rough draft – even a detailed outline! So, if anything feels confusing or if my expectations for this assignment are unclear, reach out ASAP. After I receive all submissions, I’ll assign peer review pairs. You’ll also receive direct feedback from me on what I think you might prioritize in your revision process.

Reflection on Your Proposed Amendment to the Constitution, political science homework help

/in /by

Reflection on Your Proposed Amendment to the Constitution

In at least 250 words reflect on your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that you presented to your peers in the discussion board.. This assignment is about creating and communicating a fully developed argument.

  • First, describe your proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (this is a thesis statement)
  • Second, present and describe three (3) arguments in support of your Amendment. Think especially about the ideas, themes, and nature of our nation’s founding and political institutions. For example, do our founders ideas of what liberty means support you proposed amendment?
  • Third, address at least two 2 counter arguments that could be made by those that might oppose your proposed amendment. Describe those counter arguments fully and discuss why those counter arguments do not sufficiently counter your proposed amendment to the Constitution.
  • Finally, write a conclusion paragraph that restates your proposed change to the Constitution and reviews what you believe to be the most compelling argument in support of your proposed amendment.

Be sure to include a reference list for any outside sources you use in completing your paper.

Please note: APA formatting and citations rules apply to this and all essays in this course.

English M4 Assignment 3 help

/in /by

Assignment 3: Paragraph Writing—Greatest Success: Final Submission

In this assignment you will add adverbs, adjectives, and pronouns and identify them in your final draft. In addition, using the information from Modules 1–4 and suggestions you have received from your instructor( Attached below), you will revise your paragraph for your final submission.

For your final submission, include the following in your paragraph:

  • At least two different pronouns that correctly agree with their respective antecedents in gender and number. Identify the pronouns in the paragraph by putting them in italics.
  • Four adjectives or adverbs that enhance the descriptions in your paragraph. You should have already incorporated these words into your paragraph for the M3: Assignment 3 discussion posting. Identify the descriptive words by placing them in bold.

Example: My piano teacher’s words were harsh. However, as I climbed the stairs with shaking legs, I thought about what she really meant.

Your final draft should also follow these standards:

  • All sentences should conform to conventions of Standard English grammar.
  • Sentences are well formed and are complete without any run-ons or fragments.
  • Verb forms are appropriately used.
  • The paragraph contains 150–200 words.

Need an essay

/in /by

Need an essay about the
following;

Over
the long-term, has state power increased or decreased in relation to that of
the federal government? Use a couple or a few examples to help make your points
and be sure to provide your lessons learnt and takeaway in the conclusion.

This is an essay question that should be developed
primarily from your head. But I do encourage the use, and expect some, direct
quotes, or data/examples from outside sources to support, not to write, your
ideas. It must be a solid introduction which lays out what the essay is about
and accomplishes, and includes a good introductory paragraph; a body with one
paragraph for each idea you need to develop to reach your conclusion; and, a
well-developed and detailed conclusion that is based on what is presented in
the body. Must be at least 700 to 1000 words.

Analysis Exercise Due

/in /by

it’s time now to put it all together and write a clear, complex, well-supported practice analysis with appropriate tone and style.

Choose a single word and analyze its meaning, producing an extended definition that presents a claim about the word, illustrations of its use (evidence), analysis of its use and therefore its meaning, and use all of these to reveal something complex and interesting about it.

This basically means you’re using everything but the dictionary definition of the word. You’re really describing, using detail, the actual way the word works out in the world of the reader, what the word does.

This is a common use of analysis in a lot of fields. If you’re looking for a model to follow, every week the Sunday edition of The New York Times Magazine runs an extended definition of a word or term that’s been making the news. The column is called “First Words,” and you can find them online. But a particularly good example just ran for the use of the word “humbled.”Since Adele recently used it (incorrectly) in her acceptance speech (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for her grammy when she (incorrectly) beat out Beyonce, I thought it was appropriate. Find it here (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/magazine/callin…

essay for sociology class

/in /by

As I mentioned in class on Friday, January 11th, you will have a choice of two essay possibilities for this next week. Please choose one of the following two essay options:

****FIRST POSSIBILITY: ESSAY 1A****

In class this week, Professor Avery mentioned that the heart and soul of thinking sociologically is to “make the familiar strange” and “question what seems obvious.” What do you think he meant by that? What does it mean to make the familiar strange? What does it mean to question what seems obvious? Why is that important to do?

On the document header, please clearly indicate that you are responding to “Essay 1A” and make sure the file you submit is .doc, .docx, or .pdf.

****SECOND POSSIBILITY: ESSAY 1B****

Nowadays, more people than ever before are attending institutions of higher learning (i.e. college). Today, many high school students think that attending college is mandatory; there is no other option but to attend college after graduating high school. This sentiment was strongly expressed in one of this week’s course readings. “I think you need to go to college. It’s just like high school and elementary school and middle school. I don’t know why, but I have that idea in my head.”

Should everyone go to college? Yes or no? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support whatever position you take on this matter.

In writing up your response, please reference at least one of the course readings that was assigned this week (“Degree by Default” and “Anti Social Debts”) as well as material presented during lecture. Don’t forget to do that! Points will be taken off for failing to reference reading/lecture material.

You can write the essay in the first person, and feel free to use either APA or MLA style for referencing materials.

On the document header, please clearly indicate that you are responding to “Essay 1B” and make sure the file you submit is .doc, .docx, or .pdf.

Your response must be between 600-700 words.

Read a book and complete the following requirements and assessments

/in /by

Here is a PDF link for the book: https://www.pdfdrive.com/consider-the-lobster-othe…

what I’d like is fairly simple: just a few paragraphs summarizing what you read, what you learned about writing, science, engineering, or business from what you read, how you can use this knowledge in your own work/studies, and what you think of the book so far. And I suggest you to read the entire book, or at least as much as you can(more than just one chapter). I simply expect you to have read further in the book.

Requirements & Assessment

1) 2-3 paragraphs (NO MORE) stating which pages you read, and summarizing the events in those pages

2) 2-3 paragraphs stating what you learned about science/engineering/business, and writing from the week’s reading

3) 2-3 paragraphs stating how you can use this knowledge in your own work and/or studies

4) 1-2 paragraphs stating what you think of the book so far

Essay poem of two books

/in /by

notice:THIS ESSAY HAVE TO BE(perfect) FULLY GOOD!!!

4 pages essay poem about the memory in these two books ( Another Brooklyn, Brown Girl Dreaming )

and this is the thesis:

Thesis: Woodson uses memory in both books to show how Jackie becomes a writer and how August uses the past to understand what humans need to interpret and survive loss. Both characters see the value of their own personal pasts and the history of African Americans as they develop their own identities.

I. The ten haiku show how Jackie learns the value of listening in order to tell her life story, but also the story of her people.

A.

II. August learns to accept the death of her mother by remembering; by remembering the past, she learns to appreciate the beauty as well as the trauma she experienced, as well as how to connect these experiences and her family’s experiences to the broader history of African Americans.

A.

Executive summary

/in /by

In this assignment, you will select a program, quality improvement initiative, or other project from your place of employment. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (850-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which they will make their decision to fund your program or project. The summary should include:

  1. The purpose of the program or project.
  2. The target population or audience.
  3. The benefits of the program or project
  4. The cost or budget justification.
  5. The basis upon which the program or project will be evaluated.

Share your written proposal with your manager, supervisor or other colleague in a formal leadership position within a health care organization. Request their feedback using the following questions as prompts:

  1. Do you believe the proposal would be approved if formally proposed?
  2. What are some strengths and weaknesses of the proposal?

Submit the written proposal along with the “Executive Summary Feedback Form.”

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS451V. ExecutiveSummaryFeedbackForm_2-24-24.doc

Kohlberg’s Three Levels of Morality

/in /by

This week’s lecture focused on moral development and ethical reasoning. As part of your readings for the week, Kohlberg’s three levels of morality were discussed. How would you have answered Heinz’s dilemma? (See readings for the week for the full dilemma). Which of Kohlberg’s three levels of morality do you feel you are in? Do you feel you are in a different level of morality in different settings (i.e. work vs. personal life?) How has your morality (if it has) progressed from your adolescence?

Your work should be at least 500 words, but mostly draw from your own personal experience. This should be written in first person and give examples from your life. Be sure if you are using information from the readings that you properly cite your readings in this, and in all assignments

Readings

Moral Reasoning

Have you ever considered what has set the foundation for you as to what is right and wrong? What drives your ethical decision making? Although not without some controversy and detractors, a man named Lawrence Kohlberg set out to define and describe moral learning in people in the world. He tested hundreds of men with a dilemma called Heinz’s dilemma.

The dilemma went something like this:

Imagine living 1000 years ago – and there was a guy named Heinz and his wife. Heinz’s wife had a very rare form of cancer. A doctor in a town down the road has come up with a new medication that could treat Heinz’s wife’s cancer and give her a shot at life. He charges 2,000 dollars for this – 10 times what it cost him to make. Heinz did everything he could to come up with the money and he could only come up with 1000 dollars. He begged and pleaded for the pharmacist to take $1000 dollars as a down payment and let him pay the rest back in payments. The pharmacist declined. Desperate, Heinz broke into the pharmacy and stole the medication. Should Heinz have done this – and why?

Kohlberg was not interested in whether or not you said yes or no to this dilemma. He was more curious as to WHY you agreed or disagreed. Through his research, he gave people thorny moral dilemmas, and broke up their answers into three different types of moral reasoning.

  • Preconventional thought
  • Conventional thought
  • Postconventional thought

It is easy to keep up with the three stages – since the first one is “pre”, the last one is “post” and the middle one is normal. If you take a future psychology course here at Grantham, you’ll learn more about Kohlberg and how each level is broken up into two stages – but for the purposes of this course, we want you to understand that Kohlberg had three levels of thought – which are stated above.

Preconventional thought occurs primarily in children, but it can occur in adults. This is when you participate in a behavior because you get a reward or to avoid a punishment. Why did you donate to that charity? Well, I got entered into a million dollar raffle to do it – and I wanted to get a chance! Why did you volunteer at the homeless shelter? My coach said I would have to run 20 laps if I didn’t volunteer. These are examples of preconventional thought. The method and reasoning why you do something is to get a reward or avoid a punishment. In Heinz’s dilemma, the example answers might be – well, of course you steal it – you get a free 2000 dollar drug! Or – no, if you steal, you go to jail – and you don’t want to get in trouble, do you? If those were your thoughts about the dilemma, you are in preconventional thought. Most adults are not in preconventional thought, but some still are.

Conventional thought is more advanced than preconventional thought, and it is a progression children make as they get older and get more thoughtful. They start to consider – what would a good person do? They haven’t internalized themselves that they are a good person – but they really focus on trying to be good – and that is their justification for a behavior. Also – their justifications come into understanding that laws are there to protect society – and one should honor laws. So the type of answers someone might give to the previous dilemma in conventional thought would be – a good husband would protect his wife at all costs; subsequently, stealing the drug is an appropriate behavior. Or someone might also say that the law is the law – and it is wrong to steal – not because you are going to be punished – but what type of society would we have if we do not obey the rules?

Finally, we advance to postconventional thought. Postconventional thought comes in when you consider laws and rules, and you have your own belief system – and your belief system may actually go outside the laws and rules – and you understand and respect them – but you are willing to fight for your belief system at all costs. It is the highest level of thinking. The belief system may be the same as the law – or it may be different. So examples of post-conventional thought to Heinz’s dilemma might be things like Life is more important than property – and when deciding whether or not to do something – you have to consider the value of each – and valuing life is a way more lofty endeavor. Or something like – laws are grounded in justice, and there is no justice in allowing someone to die to make a 100% profit with no consideration for a payment plan – so it is absolutely justified.

Part of critical thinking and understanding critical thinking is to learn how to become a stronger ethical and moral thinker. Understanding the levels of thought help you to consider how you’re thinking. It’s unlikely that we will always answer questions with post conventional thought. For instance, there may not be some universal principal as to why you change your oil and rotate your tires – it may sometimes be just to avoid having to pay costly car repairs down the road – but in life and death situations – or thorny situations dealing with complex levels of thought – always keeping your own values and principles in mind can help you become a more critical thinker. As part of your assignments and work this week – consider these levels of thought – and if you’re not quite there yet – that’s absolutely okay. Even thinking about higher levels of thought can assist you in achieving your critical thinking goals. One final thought about critical thinking. As soldiers, you are taught to obey orders. But as thorny situations in movies like Born on the Fourth of July teach us – “just obeying orders” does not stand up in court as an affirmative defense to a criminal action – so understanding critical thinking always pays dividends.