Unit 5 discussion

Unit 5 Discussion: Professional Practice

Whistleblowing

Please read the following case: Whistle blowing in healthcare: An organizational failure in ethics and leadership by P. Rolland (2009) from the The Internet Journal of Law and Ethics: http://www.ispub.com/journal/the-internet-journal-of-law-healthcare-and-ethics/volume-6-number-1/whistle-blowing-in-healthcare-an-organizational-failure-in-ethics-and-leadership.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

After reading the case study consider and respond to the following questions:

  1. Were Phillip’s actions and reactions appropriate or were they an attempt on his part to avoid professional practice in his field?
  2. If Phillip reported the incidences of “alleged” improprieties and was told to move on with the plan, is he now relieved of any liability that ensues due to his actions?
  3. Should Phillip take his concerns to a level higher than his administration (CEO) if he feels there are still violations taking place? If so, who should he go to?
  4. Is Phillip being disloyal to his company or acting on behalf of the professional community?
  5. What is whistle blowing and can Phillip be considered a whistle blower? Please explain.

Provide justification for each of your explanations.

Research Abstract

Please I sent you the power points with is an example can give you more explanation for the paper, also I sent you the paper description which can help you to understand the paper elements and format and the research paper that I already did which is about Pokémon and how it was adapted from a video game to a Tv series, you should explain everything that the professor asking about and describe the three adaptations which are Tv show, Pokémon go and Pokémon game boy

Please avoid every information about financial or marketing just focus on the adaptation the similarities and differences between the tree resources

6-7 CONTENT PAGES This must be done APA Style with Abstract, intext citations,

6-7 CONTENT PAGES

This must be done APA Style with Abstract, intext citations, references and conclusions

  1. select an industry of interest (K–12, higher education, military, corporate training, etc.). MCDONALDS is the company of choice.

 I CHOSE  corporate training,

2. You must select a specific organization to critique from the selected industry. Use the Library or Internet, or share a personal experience of a training or educational organization to choose incidents, reports, or a case study revelation of the hiring, termination, compensation, or professional development practices of the organization. 

3. Critique the organization’s policies and/or practice based on the information presented in your readings, experience, and personal research. Focus on summarizing the current regulations (such as, Equal Employment Opportunity [EEO] laws and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC] regulations, Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA], Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA], minimum wage, Family and Medical and Leave Act [FMLA], etc.), how they affect decisions in the area, and what ultimate mandates they require a training department/organization to address. Your research paper must include the the following as follows:

o An introduction of the chosen organization and the industry represented

o A summary of the incidents, reports, or case study used in your project

o An explanation of how the current regulations affect the staffing issues being addressed (which could include but are not limited to recruitment processes, selection methods, how data are managed, termination, compensation, professional development, job levels, variable pay, performance evaluation methods, or employee benefits)

o A critique of the organization’s compliance with regulations

o Your recommendations

o Support for your critique and recommendations as appropriate 

4. Submit the created plan in a Word document following APA format guidelines.

HC250 Week2 Herzing University Conflicts

The nature and manifestation of conflicts have changed over time. This week, you will cover the causes and manifestations of conflicts in contemporary environment with a focus on the healthcare industry. You will discuss the role of pertinent issues such as advancement in technology and increased cultural diversity of employees on workplace conflicts.

Think of a conflict you or someone you know was involved in that has affected you deeply. It can be a personal one such as a fight at work or in the family, or a more public one that you care about deeply (i.e., equal pay for men and women).

  • In 2-3 pages, examine how emotions played a role in that conflict and what was done (or might have been done) to harness these emotions in a more positive way.
  • Your Assignment must be written in standard edited English per the APA guidelines.
  • Be sure to support your work with at least two high-quality references, including at least one from peer-reviewed journals accessed through the Herzing University Library or other sources.
  • Your assignment should show effective application of triangulation of content and resources in your conclusion and recommendations.

Rubric

HC250 – Unit 2 Assignment

HC250 – Unit 2 Assignment

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

15.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

14.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

12.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

11.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

9.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

20.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

10.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

9.0 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

8.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

7.0 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

6.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

4.0 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

White collar crime paper

the thesis statement about a white collar crime is done it was approved, you wrote the 1st page (intro) of the paper which needs to be fixed. Now you have to complete the FINAL paper, a 12 font double spaced, 5 page minimum paper not including the front page or the thesis statement page.

Also make a fun and informative for a 7 min long presentation PowerPoint to be presented in class. If a video is included no more than 30 secs long no personal opinions ..write the case overview, security recommendation, short history of the beginning and downfall/end, redemption,give credit to what-ever you’re adding in your paper make sure to have a well written paper

Discussion Applications of ABA across settings

Resources

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Education.

Miltenberger, R. G. (2012). Behavior Modification: Principles & Procedures (5th ed.). Belmont, CA, USA: Cenage Learning.

post should be at least 200–250 words in length and should extend the discussion of the group supported by your course materials and/or other appropriate resources.

Applications of ABA across settings

Part 1: Describe how ABA techniques can be used within a business or organization. Using contingency contracting, a token economy, self-management, or a group contingency, describe how one of these might be used within a business or organization.

Part 2: Provide an example of an on-the-job training you received. Did it include the components of Behavioral Skills Training (BST)?

  • If not, explain how the training could have been improved by including the components of BST. If your training did include the components of BST, explain the training by describing how it fit the components of BST.
  • Why are rehearsal and feedback important components of the BST procedure?

Presentation Topic

Each student will select a topic of her/his choice. Your selection should be about How & Why Consumers Behave the way they do. You must use at least three (3) or more outside sources other than the textbook (please no newspaper articles or wikis) OR present the findings of an article from the Journal of Consumer Behavior. Both require a maximum two-page summary write-up with a list of sources (references) used uploaded to the Presentation link. Please attach a copy of your power point slides to the end of your write-up. Grading will be based on the following Consumer Behavior Presentation Evaluation Criteria.

50 Point Consumer Behavior Presentation Evaluation Criteria:

(Score: 1=poor, 5=excellent)

1. Appropriate Consumer Behavior Topic

5

2. Comprehensive and covered all situations

5

3. Quality of the material contents

5

4. Depth of the material presented

5

5. Presentation Structure Flow

5

6. Presentation Structure Logic

5

7. Presentation is well organized

5

8. Exclusion of irrelevant material

5

9. Supporting material and reference sources

5

10. Overall quality of the presentation

5

11. Total

50

Candidate Selection

Read the following case scenario:

Biotech Health and Life Products (Biotech) is attempting to develop new business in Saudi Arabia and Angola. Each country has an open position for a Sales Division Director that needs to be filled.

You are fairly new to the job and your boss, Walter Pidgeon, has asked you to review the candidates and perform an analysis on the information to determine who you believe will be the best candidates for each country. You know Mr. Pidgeon is a stickler for exactness, and is testing you because there is one best candidate that he has already identified but has not shared his choice. He wants to see how you are progressing in the job and wants to see if you are ready to work independently and capable of make critical hiring decisions. Mr. Pidgeon is also insistent that all workers support his or her reasoning and conclusions using data and research as doing so brings validity to the analysis. Mr. Pidgeon likes to say he is from Missouri (the Show-Me State), so he want you to show him the support so he can assess your ability to think critically. Your job is important to you and you want to show Mr. Pidgeon that you have the potential to do well in the job.

Completing the Report

You will write a report addressed to Mr. Walter Pidgeon, Vice-President of International Sales that provides your selection of the two best candidates for the Sales Director positions.

Read the country information, the Biotech Company Profile, and the descriptions of the four candidates for the Sales Division Director’s position, found below.

Country Information

Job Descriptions

Sales Director in Angola: Candidate must have traveled extensively. Has held a successful sales career in either pharmaceuticals or nutraceuticals. Must have previous experience leading a staff of at least 20 people. Foreign language fluency preferred in Portuguese or French.

Sales Director in Saudi Arabia: Candidate must have traveled extensively. Has held a successful sales career or has intimate knowledge of either pharmaceuticals r nutraceuticals. Has previous experience leading a staff of at least 20 people. Foreign language fluency preferred in Hejazi Arabic.

Candidate Descriptions

Candidate 1- Alberta Raynard

Alberta Raynard is 28 years old with three years of college. She currently is finishing her degree online at UMUC. Raynard is a business administration major. She works full- time for NIH in its hospital pharmacy. She has been purchasing drugs for the hospital for the last three years. Raynard is very familiar with Biotech’s product line as well as its competitors. Raynard is friendly but has a quiet demeanor. Her upbringing was that of an “Army Brat.” Raynard traveled with her parents and is familiar with several countries including Angola. She speaks French at an advanced level but is not yet fluent in the language. Despite the exposure to various cultures, Raynard still finds it stressful to interact with people who do not have a European or American background. She feels uncomfortable, not because of ethnocentrism, but because she does not want to offend them from lack of cultural knowledge.

Raynard’s Myers Briggs personality test show her to be an ISTJ. She does not tolerate much nonsense from people, hates surprises, and wants people to be brief in talking with her. She likes the idea of the collaborative environment of Biotech and responded well to the idea that her opinions and suggestions were always welcome. However, she expressed some concern that older employees might find her too young in her approach to leading. She has found that structure, procedures and rules have worked better than asking for input but she attributes this to her Army background. She would like to be more open with others but her age and sex have made her feel that she must be more formal with others if she is to earn and keep their trust. When asked how her staff perceived her, she laughed and said they called her a “Type A.” When asked what characteristics she thought a leader needed to possess to succeed in the 21st century she replied, “…objective, practical, controlled and fair.” Raynard said her leadership style was transactional but the interviewer is not sure if it was not more authoritarian. When asked what leadership theory she thought was most likely to work in the 21st century her reply was “Great Man, because it emphasizes the characteristics of a person who likes honesty and trust.” Raynard’s knowledge of the business was sound but when asked if anyone could be a leader she said no. It was up to the position that a person holds. When asked if she were up to the job and should she be placed in Saudi Arabia, Raynard replied, “If you mean, do I think I can l lead in an all-male environment, sure? I am used to that experience.” When asked, “What about selling?” Raynard replied “I will admit that is a harder challenge but with time and constant contact, I believe that I can make money for the company.”

When asked about her exposure to Angola, Raynard said that she had less knowledge of the Portuguese language than French but felt she could do business there in either language, and stated, “Anyway, most business people speak English in the country.”

Raynard was sure she could improve her skills quickly. Her only real worry was the fact that doing business in Africa was very much about who you knew and at times bribery was expected. This was not something she would do. She was assured that Biotech would not do so either.

Candidate 2 – Jose Ortega

Ortega currently is the team leader of the New Mexico sales division at Biotech. He is Biotech’s top salesman. Ortega is 32 years old. A recent divorce from his wife has made him eager to explore the world. Ortega’s wife was Brazilian. Ortega is fluent in Portuguese so “it would be a good change to go to someplace different and have an adventure. When asked, Ortega replied why he wanted to leave the country. He had not traveled excessively but had gone to Brazil regularly with his wife when they were together. He was familiar with the problems of a developing country.

Ortega enjoys working with customers and spends a lot of time with them making sure they are satisfied. His Myers- Briggs test characterized him as ESTP. Hernandez enjoys Biotech’s collaborative culture. When asked what characteristics he thought a leader needed to succeed in the 21st century, he replied, “…flexible, compassionate, insightful and honest.” He felt a good leader should change rapidly in a crisis and should be direct and assertive when dealing with people. When asked about the idea of competitive edge he said “A leader has to worry about making money every day. It is important to have immediate results for all to see especially in sales. Even customers prefer to deal with successful sales people than those that plod along.” Ortega believes he could do well in another country if the company ensured he received language and cultural training. He knew that understanding how people thought about business and their products was important but more likely the sale would be clinched if he knew what was and wasn’t good in the country in which he was selling. He stated, “Knowing your clients is everything in sales.” When asked how he created followers among his employees, Ortega replied that he liked to have rules but room for deviation, and likes to provide flexibility in the job while staying results- driven. Ortega said he was a situational leader because it encouraged freedom. He said his favorite leadership theory was contingency theory because it allowed him to approach things by the situation.

Candidate 3 – Jonathan Washington

Washington currently works for the sales division of Burt’s Bees. He is 48 years old. He obtained his current job right out serving in the military. While familiar with natural products, some of which are related to those produced by Biotech, he is not familiar with the medical aspects of most of the products. Washington entered the interview room all smiles and with a firm handshake. He was very personable and struck an immediate feeling of warmth and connection. This impressed the interviewer. He held constant eye contact throughout the interview. Washington was able to discuss the culture of both countries having spent time in both during his military service. He does not; however, speak a language other than English. His attitude about learning a new language was somewhat inflexible on this point.

Washington was described as an ENFJ in his Myers-Briggs results. When asked about his preferred work environment, Washington responded, “I believe individuals should focus on changing things for the betterment of others. I think this is what the people of Angola could really use and Biotech’s products would help change things for the better.”

Washington also had read about Biotech online and spoke with current employees prior to the interview. He indicated that he was the team leader in his current job and was content with the organization. However, his current job does not lead to a career position in management, which he desires. Washington stated, “He leads with personal enthusiasm and praise, put the people in the organization at ease but will attend to the needs of his people.” He is interactive and cooperative. The interviewer was a little concerned that Washington may be too naïve about people and their limitations. The interviewer wondered if this concern may prove a problem when dealing with a culture for which he is unfamiliar and with sales of a product that is new. Washington said he saw himself as a transformational leader. He feels that good leadership is built on good relationships with followers. Relationship theory seems to make the most sense to him for the 21st century because people may change work places and leading change is the future.

Candidate 4 – Adrianna White

Adrianna White is 36 years old. She is a single mother of two. She was a nurse for 8 years before coming to work at Biotech in the marketing area of the sales division in Chicago. She has been working for the company for four years. Her immediate manager reported that Adrianna is highly motivated and competent at her job. Her manager said that Adrianna’s biggest asset is that she “looked at challenges as opportunities and often found creative solutions to problems that others had not considered.”

White’s nursing years were spent at the University of Chicago in Orland Park. Surrounded by a large Muslim community the hospital gave classes in Arabic and White found it very useful in her work to attend Arabic classes. She learned not only how to carry on a conversation with non-English speaking patients but the names of many drugs and over-the-counter treatments. White enjoyed her time in Orlando Park and found the culture of the families very compatible with her own ideas of family.

White’s Myers Briggs results indicated that she is an ENTJ. When asked if she felt the Myers-Briggs description fit her she replied, “Absolutely! Especially the part that I reward risk taking in the work environment. I do not think poorly planned risk is wise, but you have to take a chance in sales. It is not for the faint-hearted.”

Having read about the opportunity through the Biotech’s HR division website, White was excited about the possibility of moving her career forward. When asked if she were to get the job in Saudi Arabia, if it would present problems for her. She only said. “Initially, but if she planned things out well, surrounded herself with good people and learned about her clients she was sure she could overcome the cultural drawbacks to being a woman.”

On the other hand, White freely admits that she knows little about Angola. She has read some information and thinks she could learn another language if she is given help and the time needed to learn.

White has many innovative ideas about increasing sales. White’s evaluations are superior and she works well with her team. Her colleagues suggest that she is flexible and a people-first person. Her eye contact is good and she comes off as being very authentic. She describes her leadership style as a blend of situational and relational. The interviewer noted that at times she seemed to be more future oriented in her comments and may need to worry more about the here and now when getting things done.

Completing the Report

You will use the country information, candidate information and the course material to draw conclusions as to the best candidates that are likely to succeed in selling Biotech’s product line in Saudi Arabia and Angola. In identifying the best candidates, you will select one best candidate for Saudi Arabia and one best candidate for Angola.

You will recommend the best candidate for the two positions;

Use the following elements to support the recommendation. Be sure to explain the reasoning and conclusions of your decision using the course material, the country information, Biotech’s Company Profile, and candidate information. (Note: There is a best candidate for each position)

  • Identify and discuss the cultural factors and demographic characteristics relied upon to select the best candidates for the two positions;
  • Explain the role of high-low culture in the selection of the candidates;
  • Identify the personality traits that would work well for the Sales Division Director position;
  • Identify the personality traits that would work well for a sales person in each country;
  • What indicators (facts) did you find in the candidates interview summary that suggests the selected candidates have emotional IQ sufficient for the job and the culture?
  • What indicators (facts) did you find in the candidates interview summary that would suggest their moral compass might fit the culture of the country?
  • How will personality, emotional IQ, cultural IQ, and ethics help the candidate be successful in the new job?

In a paragraph for each candidate, explain why the other two candidates were not selected.

The Report

You will write the report using Times New Roman, 12” font, single-spaced with double-spaces between paragraphs and headings. The paper should be approximately 3 pages excluding the title page and reference page. It is important to write clearly and concisely.

Use the following format:

  • Introduction
  • Recommendation for Candidate for Saudi Arabia
  • Recommendation for Candidate for Angola
  • Candidates Not Selected
  • References

HIST week 3 Assignment 1 Dealing with Diversity in America

Assignment 1: Dealing with Diversity in America from Reconstruction through the 1920s
Due Week 3 and worth 120 points

After the Civil War, the United States had to recover from war, handle western expansion, and grapple with very new economic forms. However, its greatest issues would revolve around the legacies of slavery and increasing diversity in the decades after the Civil War. In the South, former slaves now had freedom and new opportunities but, despite the Reconstruction period, faced old prejudices and rapidly forming new barriers. Immigrants from Europe and Asia came in large numbers but then faced political and social restrictions. Women continued to seek rights. Yet, on the whole, America became increasingly diverse by the 1920s. Consider developments, policies, and laws in that period from 1865 to the 1920s. Examine the statement below and drawing from provided sources, present a paper with specific examples and arguments to demonstrate the validity of your position.

Statement—in which you can take a pro or con position:

  • Political policies and movements in the period from 1865 to the 1920s generally promoted diversity and “the melting pot” despite the strong prejudices of a few. (or you can take the position that they did not). Use specific examples of policies or movements from different decades to support your position.

After giving general consideration to your readings so far and any general research, select one of the positions above as your position—your thesis. (Sometimes after doing more thorough research, you might choose the reverse position. This happens with critical thinking and inquiry. Your final paper might end up taking a different position than you originally envisioned.) Organize your paper as follows, handling these issues:

    1. The position you choose —or something close to it—will be the thesis statement in your opening paragraph.
    2. To support your position, use three (3) specific examples from different decades between 1865 and 1930. You may narrowly focus on race or gender or immigrant status, or you may use examples relevant to all categories.
    3. Explain why the opposing view is weak in comparison to yours.
    4. Consider your life today: In what way does the history you have shown shape or impact issues in your workplace or desired profession?

    Length: The paper should be 500-to-750 words in length.

    Research and References: You must use a MINIMUM of three sources; the Schultz textbook must be one of them. Your other two sources should be drawn from the list provided below. This is guided research, not open-ended Googling.

    Source list for Assignment 1: Some sources are “primary” sources from the time period being studied. Some sources below can be accessed via direct link or through the primary sources links on Blackboard. Each week has a different list of primary sources. For others, they are accessible through the permalink to the source in our online library: Sources below having libdatab.strayer.edu as part of the URL have a permalink to that source in our university’s online library.

    SWS Form for the textbook: Kevin M. Schultz. 2018. HIST: Volume 2: U.S. History since 1865. 5th ed.

    Choose sources relevant to the topic and position you are taking:

    Y. Abu-Laban & V. Lamont. 1997. Crossing borders: Interdisciplinary, Immigration and the Melting Pot in the American Cultural Imaginary. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    Black Testimony on the Aftermath of Enslavement. 1866. Report of the Joint Committee on Reconstruction. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811…

    Chinese Exclusion Act. 1882. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811…

    Civil War Journeys. n.d. The Lost Cause. http://civil-war-journeys.org/the_lost_cause.htm

    J. C. Bancroft Davis. 1896. Plessy vs. Ferguson. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811…

    Fitzgerald, M. W. January, 2018. Terrorism and Racial Coexistence in Alabama’s Reconstruction. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    G. M. Foster. Feb. 24, 2002. The Lost Cause. http://www.civilwarhome.com/lostcause.html

    S. S. Harjo. 1996. Now and Then: Native Peoples in the United States. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    J. Meacham. 2017. Our Historical Ambivalence about Immigrants is a Great American Paradox. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    Mississippi Black Code. n.d. http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/122/recon/code.html

    W. G. Moody. 1883. Bonanza Farming and Its Impact. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811…

    Katy Morris. March, 2017. “More reputation than she deserves”. Remembering Suffrage in Wyoming. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    E. F. Parsons. Feb., 2011. Klan Skepticism and Denial in Reconstruction-Era Public Discourse. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    Populist Party Platform. 1896. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811…

    Kevin M. Schultz. 2018. HIST: Volume 2: U.S. History since 1865. 5th ed.

    Upton Sinclair. 1906. Attack on the Meatpackers. http://college.cengage.com/history/wadsworth_97811…

    J. D. Zahniser. Dec., 2015. “How long must we wait?” Alice Paul Wanted Action on Votes for Women. http://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=https://sear…

    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
    • Be typed, double spaced between lines, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the Sources page are not included in the required assignment page length.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Identify and discuss the different ways that the heritage of slavery, the Civil War, Reconstruction, and segregation have shaped America’s history.
    • Specify ways that women and minorities have responded to challenges and made contributions to American culture.
    • Summarize and discuss the ways that formal policies of government have influenced the direction of historical and social development in the United States.
    • Recognize the major turning points in American history since the Civil War.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in contemporary U.S. history.
    • Write clearly and concisely about contemporary U.S. history using proper writing mechanics.

    Click here to view the grading rubric.

    Toulmin argumentative essay

    The Toulmin assignment directions are as follows: This essay, not the quiz, should be between 900 and 1000 words. This essay will help you practice what you have learned so far in this course. First, you will choose a topic of interest. Make sure that you choose a topic with two opposing sides. Then, you need to research that topic in order to specify the topic’s scope, so it can be easily discussed in a shorter, 1000 word essay. For example, you may be interested in learning more about traffic issues in the United States. However, that topic is too large to cover in a 1000 word essay. After researching peer reviewed articles that discuss US traffic issues in general, you may discover that the metro system in the District of Columbia is underfunded and underutilized. Through your research, you found that you could make a claim that more funds should be made available in order to upgrade the metro system, which would improve traffic issues in the District of Columbia. This would make for a stronger, specific argument.

    The following overused topics may not be used in your essay: gun control, abortion, capital punishment, gay marriage, gays in the military, mandatory drug testing, euthanasia, childhood obesity, women in the military, diets (including the Paleo diet), workout regimens (including CrossFit), underage drinking, and the legalization of marijuana.

    This essay must include a minimum of five sources. Three should peer-reviewed sources preferably from the APUS databases. You may use eBooks; however, as discussed earlier this semester, books generally are not as current as peer-reviewed articles. You may also use primary sources (interviews, statistics, etc); however, these primary sources should be obtained from experts within that field. If you cannot find strong sources for your chosen topic, then change your topic. If you have a question about the validity of a source, please email me, or post your question to the open forum.

    Make sure to include the following sections in your essay: introduction and claim, background, body, and conclusion. Within the body of your Toulmin essay, make sure to include the following in any order: support for your claim, opposing or alternate views, scholarly research, and rebuttals.

    After you have written your essay, please make sure to revise the content of your essay. Lastly, be sure to edit your essay by checking grammar, format, and smaller technical details. Please make sure your essay is written in third person. Also, please include an outline for your essay on a separate page.