Chapter three discusses models for understanding mental disorders and their causes. Compare and contrast the diathesis stress model with the biopsychosocial perspective. Share examples of disorders that you believe might be best understood in one model versus the other. Feel free to discuss other models presented in the chapter.
Topic- Any topic from the power point
The paper should be set up as follows: Clearly write your name, date, class Descriptive Title introduction Body Conclusion/Agreement or disagreement with research you have read on your paper topic. You must be convincing either way or bring up good sound points. APA Format
You should use 3-5 sources of information. Only 1 of those sources can be on-line, No Kendra Cherry.
DOUBLE SPACED
Include a bibliography in alphabetical order
Introduction
Position and exceptions, if any, are clearly stated. Organization of the argument is completely and clearly outlined and implemented.
Research
Research selected is highly relevant to the argument, is presented accurately and completely – the method, results, and implications are all presented accurately; Theory is relevant, accurately described and all relevant components are included; relationship between research and theory is clearly articulated and accurate.
Conclusions
Conclusion is clearly stated and connections to the research and position are clear and relevant. The underlying logic is explicit.
Writing
Paper is coherently organized, and the logic is easy to follow. There are no spelling or grammatical errors and terminology is clearly defined. Writing is clear and concise and persuasive.
Using the knowledge you gained from the readings, evaluate how a typical drug, when orally administered, may be handled differently by these two patients: Ms. Jones is a 30-year-old female personal trainer that is 5’ 4” tall weighing 110lbs. She regularly drinks socially and sometimes more than a bit when she meets with her bi-weekly book club. Mr. Smith is a 65-year-old software tester who is 6’ tall and weighs 235lbs. He drinks only occasionally.
Assume no other significant medical history or issues with either patient. In your analysis, compare how the two patients will metabolize the drug considering weight, gender, distribution of body water and body fat, age, metabolic state, and alcohol use. Explain how these factors impact the pharmacokinetics of the drug (half-life, dosage, route of administration, and elimination of the drug). Evaluate the impact on the risk-benefits analysis of the use of this drug.
In a 500 word paper critically analyze (Suicide prevention and treatment). Analysis must be in your own words. Do not copy or paraphrase information.
What are theoretical approaches in clinical psychology and how are they used? What are the advantages and disadvantages of integrating theoretical approaches
Read “Topic 5: Vargas Family Case Study.” Write a 750-1,000-word paper in which you demonstrate how therapists apply Strategic Family Therapy theories to analyze the presenting problems and choose appropriate interventions.
Be sure to answer the following questions in your paper: How would Jay Haley or Chloe Madanes approach the current presenting problem? Identify and describe two interventions that he/she may use and why. How would an MRI-style therapist approach the current presenting problem? Identify and describe two interventions that would be used and why. How would a Milan-style therapist approach the current presenting problem? Identify and describe two interventions that would be used and why.
Cite at least three academic sources (peer-reviewed journal articles, books, etc.).
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Vargas Case Study
The Vargas family arrives to their 5th session together and on time. As a follow-up to the last session’s focus on the family structure, you decide to consider a strategic approach this week. To check in, you invite them to share any feedback from last week’s session. Bob reports that he apologized to Elizabeth for “mishandling the suspension thing” then complains that Elizabeth is still “holding a grudge.” He admits that he often does not understand why she gets so upset and that he wants her to be happy. Elizabeth acknowledges that the apology “is a start” and suggests that the reason Bob doesn’t understand is that he “doesn’t ever listen” to her. Bob tells Elizabeth that he listens, but gets frustrated because he doesn’t know how to “fix it.”
You notice Frank and Heidi sitting together, quietly looking at a book while their parents talk. You inquire about any noticeable changes made during the week. Both parents claim to have made an effort to avoid raising his/her voice and report being pleased with their conduct. When asked about the children, Elizabeth reports noticing improvement. Bob, however, expresses frustration with Frank’s constant need of redirection and numerous reminders to complete his chores. Bob also noted an increase in Heidi’s demands for attention.
© 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Graphic Design Tools to use:
• Padlet
• Canva
• Piktochart
• Picture2Life
Hi so the assignment is done, I just need it to be put into different words.
In the Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Daneshfar and Moharami (2018) explain that Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory is a significant contribution in the field of language teaching, and consequently, in language learning assessment. Their study presents a review of a new form of assessment derived from Vygotsky’s theory, known as dynamic assessment (DA). Children interact in their environment that provides them with all the social, cultural and interpersonal experiences which represent a key element of their development. As children are still developing, they interact with different experiences according to their level of cognition development, which encourages them to exceed their current level and develop further skills (Daneshfar & Moharami, 2018).
The most highlighted notion of the mentioned theory is the concept of the zone of proximal development, which has been supported by research and put into use for the last three decades. According to sociocultural theory, children’s development is not linear as it develops on different levels which correspond with the child’s stage of cognitive development. Furthermore, children can achieve the tasks that are appropriately challenging to their level but can reach a higher level of development by the help of a more skilled peer a teacher or. The zone of proximal development is the distance between the two levels.
This theory applies more to western cultures where the focus of the parents is mainly on literacy and scaffolding different tasks to sharpen their children’s ability to read and write and occupy jobs in the future. However, in other cultures, parents raise their children to sharpen other skills related to their life, such as hunting or weaving (Galotti, 2017). To adapt the concept of ZPD, another term known as guided participation was suggested to refer to skills shared between experienced and less experienced individuals to allow more variation in different contexts and cultures (Berk, 2016).
References:
Galotti, K. M. (2017). Major theories of cognitive development. In Cognitive development: Infancy through adolescence (2nd ed.) (pp. 18–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Berk, L. (2016). Development Through the Lifespan, 6th Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions,
Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic Assessment in Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory: Origins and Main Concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607.
Choose a single topic or iss ue in psychology that is of interest to you. The11 find a recent psychological, empirica l journal article on this topic using the library ‘s
database. Each student w ill present one empirical article from (late) 2004 – 20 16
at some point during the semester. Each presentatio n should include a detailed
description of (a) the reason for conducting the research (how the authors see their research as contributing to the literature), (b) theories and hy potheses described In the article, (c) methods, (d) results, and (e) the broader· relevance of the research.
Artic le presentations should not exceed 15 n1inutes . Article presenters are to
prepare a handout or PowerPoint presentation, and distribute a pirinted version of it
(3 slides per page) to each person in attendance that w ill be used to l1elp direct our group discussion. Specific dates for article presentations w ill be detet n1ined dur·ing
our first meeting . .
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.
Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542