Sustainability
For this assignment, you will be considering how we can meet sustainability goals while dealing with infrastructure from the past. We have cities which were not built according to the principles of sustainability, dams that provide clean energy while creating other environmental and social problems, then there are pipelines which carry crude oil and natural gas – both fossil fuels which need to be phased out.

Your task is to comment on what you think we should do with this infrastructure over coming decades. What should we continue to use, seeing as it has been built, what should we retrofit to make it more sustainable, and what should we just outright dismantle?

To do this, you need some parameters.

Defining Sustainability

First off, sustainability is not perfectly defined in this course, nor is there consensus of the meaning of the term in scientific and academic circles. We will employ what is called a “working definition.” This one comes from the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) which runs as the

“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

This concise definition encompasses environmental, economic and social sustainability. It recognizes that the world’s poor, who have not benefitted from globalization, deserve to have their own needs met today but that this cannot be done at the expense of generations to come.

Analysis

Create a table like the one below. You can either write or type it out.

For the section on “action” write either “accept,” “retrofit,” or “dismantle.”
Under “supporting evidence, give at least three reasons for your choice.
You might notice that these topics are more complex than this table allows for. You can explain that in your composition. For now, do your best to categorize these topics.

 

Report

You will now explore each of the areas above in a composition using the table above. Include the following sections:

Introduction – introduce the topic then answer the question – How can we meet sustainability goals while dealing with infrastructure from the past?
Cities – Explain how we can make cities sustainable, using evidence to support your position on actions that must be taken.
Dams – Explain your choice about what must be done with the world’s 50,000 large dams based on evidence from the course. You can focus on a specific region as a case study.
Pipelines – Explain what we must do with approximately 2,000,000 kilometres of pipelines in the world. You can focus on a specific region as a case study. Provide evidence.

***Use specific examples to support your observations

***You can focus on a specific region if you wish.

***Include images to help explain the main points. Include a caption and citation information.

 

The Checklist of what needs to be submitted:

 

The table
The Report
Works Cited in MLA8 format.
You should have a minimum of 6 sources for an assignment of this nature.

What to do:   In a short 1 page response. First, discuss the complexities of communicating and developing relationships across cultures.  Then discuss the complexities of communicating and developing online intercultural relationships.  Finally, compare and contrast face-to-face and online intercultural realtionships by discussing the similarities and differences of the two relationship types.

the assignment will provide background information on the historical development of the policy. The paper will also focus on a critical analysis of the selected policy. This paper should address the following issues. 1 identify the policy 2 History of this policy or related policies 3 A description of the policy as it currently exists 4 what are the stated goals and objectives of the policy 5 what are the hidden goals and objectives of the policy 6 identify and discuss the programs implemented as a result of the policy 7 discuss the effectiveness (strengths and weakness)of the program 8 recommend alternative approaches 9 feasibility of the alternative approaches given the current social economic and political environment.

Healthcare organizations accredited by the Joint Commission are required to conduct a root cause analysis

(RCA) in response to any sentinel event, such as the one described in the scenario attached below. Once the

cause is identified and a plan of action established, it is useful to conduct a failure mode and effects analysis

(FMEA) to reduce the likelihood that a process would fail. As a member of the healthcare team in the hospital

described in this scenario, you have been selected as a member of the team investigating the incident.

SCENARIO

It is 3:30 p.m. on a Thursday and Mr. B, a 67-year-old patient, arrives at the six-room emergency department

(ED) of a sixty-bed rural hospital. He has been brought to the hospital by his son and neighbor. At this time,

Mr. B is moaning and complaining of severe pain to his (L) leg and hip area. He states he lost his balance and

fell after tripping over his dog.

Mr. B was admitted to the triage room where his vital signs were B/P 120/80, HR-88 (regular), T-98.6, and R-

32, and his weight was recorded at 175 pounds. Mr. B. states that he has no known allergies and no previous

falls. He states, “My hip area and leg hurt really bad. I have never had anything like this before.” Patient rates

pain at 10 out of 10 on the numerical verbal pain scale. He appears to be in moderate distress. His (L) leg

appears shortened with swelling (edema in the calf), ecchymosis, and limited range of motion (ROM). Mr. B’s

leg is stabilized and then is further evaluated and discharged from triage to the emergency department (ED)

patient room. He is admitted by Nurse J. Nurse J finds that Mr. B has a history of impaired glucose tolerance

and prostate cancer. At Mr. B’s last visit with his primary care physician, laboratory data revealed elevated

cholesterol and lipids. Mr. B’s current medications are atorvastatin and oxycodone for chronic back pain.

After Mr. B’s assessment is completed, Nurse J informs Dr. T, the ED physician, of admission findings, and Dr.

T proceeds to examine Mr. B.

Staffing on this day consists of two nurses (one RN and one LPN), one secretary, and one emergency

department physician. Respiratory therapy is in-house and available as needed. At the time of Mr. B’s arrival,

6Ø23Ø2019†WGU†Performance†Assessment

https∫ØØtasksÆwguÆeduØstudentØ000903425ØcourseØ10460005ØtaskØ1235Øoverview†2Ø7

the ED staff is caring for two other patients. One patient is a 43-year-old female complaining of a throbbing

headache. The patient rates current pain at 4 out of 10 on numerical verbal pain scale. The patient states that

she has a history of migraines. She received treatment, remains stable, and discharge is pending. The second

patient is an eight-year-old boy being evaluated for possible appendicitis. Laboratory results are pending for

this patient. Both of these patients were examined, evaluated, and cared for by Dr. T and are awaiting further

treatment or orders.

After evaluation of Mr. B, Dr. T writes the order for Nurse J to administer diazepam 5 mg IVP to Mr. B. The

medication diazepam is administered IVP at 4:05 p.m. After five minutes, the diazepam appears to have had

no effect on Mr. B, and Dr. T instructs Nurse J to administer hydromorphone 2 mg IVP. The medication

hydromorphone is administered IVP at 4:15 p.m. After five minutes, Dr. T is still not satisfied with the level of

sedation Mr. B has achieved and instructs Nurse J to administer another 2 mg of hydromorphone IVP and an

additional 5 mg of diazepam IVP. The physician’s goal is for the patient to achieve skeletal muscle relaxation

from the diazepam, which will aid in the manual manipulation, relocation, and alignment of Mr. B’s hip. The

hydromorphone IVP was administered to achieve pain control and sedation. After reviewing the patient’s

medical history, Dr. T notes that the patient’s weight and current regular use of oxycodone appear to be

making it more difficult to sedate Mr. B.

Finally, at 4:25 p.m., the patient appears to be sedated, and the successful reduction of his (L) hip takes place.

The patient appears to have tolerated the procedure and remains sedated. He is not currently on any

supplemental oxygen. The procedure concludes at 4:30 p.m.,and Mr. B is resting without indications of

discomfort and distress. At this time, the ED receives an emergency dispatch call alerting the emergency

department that the emergency rescue unit paramedics are enroute with a 75-year-old patient in acute

respiratory distress. Nurse J places Mr. B on an automatic blood pressure machine programmed to monitor

his B/P every five minutes and a pulse oximeter. At this time, Nurse J leaves Mr. B’s room. The nurse allows

Mr. B’s son to sit with him as he is being monitored via the blood pressure monitor. At 4:35 p.m., Mr. B’s B/P is

110/62 and his O2 saturation is 92%. He remains without supplemental oxygen and his ECG and respirations

are not monitored.

**** PLEASE SEE ATTACHED*** INCLUDES REQUIRED PAPERS AND QUESTION ****

“We can reasonably ask whether the emerging Christian traditions of the Two-Thirds World have recaptured themes and trends in Christianity that the older churches have forgotten, and if so, what we can learn from their insights.…The critical question must be to determine what is the authentic religious content, and what is cultural baggage” (Jenkins, 2006, p. 178).<br /> <br /> Develop a reasoned analysis to respond to the passage from The New Faces of Christianity: Believing the Bible in the Global South, drawing on your reading and thought, and utilizing the Christian Scriptures to illustrate your points.