Anglo-Saxon Epic Project Assignment Sheet

Directions: After understanding the various types of Anglo-Saxon literature, students will complete an epic project that identifies the various characteristics of an epic appearing in Beowulf. Use the following directions to successfully complete the project:

1. The project will have 10 slides—one for each epic characteristic
2. Students can use any kind of presentation software desired (Prezi, PowerPoint, Emaze, etc.)
3. The information on each slide should be a well-developed paragraph
4. Each epic characteristic will serve as the topic sentence for each paragraph
5. Each topic sentence (epic characteristic) must then be supported by cited evidence from the text
6. Each paragraph must include an analysis that shows how the evidence fully supports the topic sentence
7. Each slide must have an image that corresponds to the epic characteristic and include other creative elements
8. MLA format must be present

Proofreading Checklist: Look for the following errors when proofreading

• Spelling errors
• Comma, Semi-Colon, and Colon errors
• MLA format errors
• Fragment and Run-On errors
• Apostrophe errors

Remember the following requirements while polishing the final project:

• Introduction
• Paragraph form
• Proper thesis statement
• Topic sentences that relate to the thesis statement
• On topic development and transitions
• Evidence that supports claims
• Integrated evidence
• Correct in-text citations
• Analysis of evidence that does not summarize
• Conclusion sentences for each body paragraph
• Conclusion paragraph that does not summarize
• Proper Works Cited page

Submit the completed assignment wh

HOBART CORPORATION

While Hobart Corporation, a manufacturer of equipment for the food service (restaurants and institutions) and retail (grocery and convenience stores) sectors for more than a century, had developed a solid reputation for high quality and extremely reliable products, it wasn’t necessarily seen as an industry leader. It had credentials, however. In addition to being the largest firm in terms of sales, it also had broad coverage of the industry and its product categories and a respected service network, with some 200 locations and over 1,700 service vans. The better competitors excelled in a particular product category (refrigeration, for instance) or were well known in one of the industry sectors but lacked Hobart’s breadth of offerings.

Hobart was concerned with less expensive competing products that were made overseas. Most customers were continuing to buy Hobart products, but the threat was growing. Further, it was hard to create advertising and trade show material that would break out of the clutter. Breakthrough products that would attract attention were not easily generated.

In response to these concerns, Hobart sought to establish a different customer‐facing brand that would be the “thought leader” in the industry, not just the product leader. It wanted to be known for the best quality, “plus more.” The driving idea was to offer solutions to everyday issues its customers faced in their businesses—things like finding, training, and retaining good workers; keeping food safe; providing enticing dining experiences; eliminating costs; reducing shrinkage; and, for some, enhancing same‐sales growth. The firm systematically marshaled a knowledge base in order to address these problems.

This driving idea of solving everyday concerns led to a powerful brand‐building program around the tagline, “Sound Equipment, Sound Advice.” One element was a customer magazine called Sage: Seasoned Advice for the Food Industry Professional (later made available via the Internet at Sage Online). Sage’s in‐depth, objective treatment of customer problems and issues made it feel more like a newsstand publication than a corporate promotional tool. At industry trade shows, the Hobart company booth had an “Idea Center” where people could approach industry experts for sound advice about the problems they faced in their businesses. Hobart conducted seminars using leading experts; “The State of Collegiate Dining” was one topic. Internally, the leadership message was reinforced at department and company‐wide meetings and through internal newsletters.

Hobart also offered useful content about key issues on its Web site, hobartcorp.com. Visitors could find papers, question‐and‐answer sessions with industry experts, briefing documents, and other material updated on a weekly basis. This program grew to over 100 papers on technology, saving labor, reducing shrinkage, productivity, improving food safety, growing sales, and cost management. The brand lived on the Web and in other places as well, thanks to the strategic placement of Hobart content on many other sites frequented by people in the industry. Select elements of this Web content were converted to printed pieces and disseminated broadly.

Hobart shared more sound advice through speeches at key industry shows, events like the Home Meal Replacement Summit, and articles for trade magazines (for example, “Cold War: Smart Refrigeration Arms Restaurateurs Against Food‐Borne Illnesses” in Hotel Magazine). The goal of public relations became idea placement rather than product placement. Hobart also changed its approach to new product releases to emphasize how each product helps the customer deal with key business issues. For instance, rather than emphasize specific features like the recessed nozzles on the Hobart TurboWash, the firm communicated how easy it made the task of scrubbing pots and pans, thereby creating happier restaurant and food service employees.

Print advertising, once the prime brand‐building tool, played a lesser but still important role, focusing on key customer issues. For instance, one ad showed a sign at a bathroom sink reading, “Employees Must Wash Hands Before Returning to Work.” The text underneath the picture asked, “Need a more comprehensive approach to food safety?” and then described the solutions recommended by Hobart.

The Hobart program was impacted perceptions of the brand and propelled Hobart into a leadership role that lasted well over a decade until they were bought and integrated into a larger firm.

Reference:

(Aaker 282-283)

Aaker, David A. Strategic Market Management, 10th Edition. Wiley, 2013-10-11. VitalBook file.

Task(s):

• Read “Hobart Corporation” on pages 282-283 in the course text.

• 1. Prepare a Strategic plan for Hobart Corporation as discussed on page 282. Consider both internal and external analysis in preparing your plan. Identify Hobart’s SCA and its branding equity

• 2. Discuss the strategic goals and methods for this firm applying information that you identified in your library research. Consider the discussion questions on page 283 in preparing your response.

• 3. Cite the source and the edition of the periodicals that you have referred to for this assignment.

Deliverables and format:

Submit your answer in a Microsoft Word document.

Length: 5 pages

Font: Courier or New Times Roman: 12

Line Spacing: Double

The Trickster Archetype and The Epic of Gilgamesh:

The assigned Vogler reading instructs on how to identify this specific archetype in a story and it provides many examples of it in other works, particularly cinematic narrative. Now that you’ve read The Epic of Gilgamesh in its entirety, which character (or, characters), best fits this archetype? Does only one trickster character exist, or, are there more? If more than one exists, who is the primary? Cite passages (use quotations and MLA parenthetical citations with page numbers) from both Vogler and The Epic of Gilgamesh to fully support your answer.

No more than 250 words

For this discussion topic, I would like you to address the following questions in a paragraph (6 to 8 sentences or more): 1). What specific roles & functions does architecture fulfill in our everyday lives? 2). What is it specifically about architecture that makes it so important in our lives? 3). What is it specifically about architecture that makes it fit into the category of “art?” 4). Is the role of architecture today any different than it was during Ancient times of the Ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans and other cultures of the past?

Please respond in six to eight sentences, being mindful of spelling, grammar and complete sentence structure.

Examples from other replies:

1- Architecture in the least of its elements is a necessity of society. Values, lifestyles, style and taste are reflected by our architecture- the very way cities are developed, designed and used reflect the way we live. From ranch homes in the west sprawling out like the land itself to the carefully balanced skyscrapers of large cities, architecture is integral to our habitats. It’s little wonder why architecture is an art that blends science and design for people to work, live, eat, recreate, attend culture events or any other social activity. Architects played active roles in developing and influencing societies for thousands of years. The role of the architect appears important and fixed, yet technology, materials and styles will continue to evolve.

Cities, buildings, structures and dwellings are used for long periods of time. Some of the European structures are 100s of years old. In designing new projects it is the architects role to be a prophet of sorts. They must be able to look into the future and imagine how their projects will be used or could be used 10, 20, 50 or more years.

Many architects understand that their creations are much more than utilitarian buildings and strive to create designs that inspire and provoke awe to the user and community. General examples of such work include cathedrals, temples, churches, and synagogues where the building is intended to add to the worshipful experience of the parishioner. In some cases the goal of the architect is to obscure the building into the surrounds or blend it so well that the art is in absence of intrusion.

2- Architecture

In our daily lives, we use architecture. Without it there would be no homes, no stores, no movie theaters or even churches. Architecture is more than just a roof over our heads. While the roof protects us from the weather. The walls are what support the weight of the roof. In any structural system, there must be weight and tensile strength to support the roof or the levels of floors.

5,000 years ago, the Ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and other cultures used ceramic products like clay or mud, stone, and even bone to build their buildings. Today we use tensile and cement and marble and stone to make our buildings sturdier. In ancient times, I feel like architecture was a form of art since they had to use their creativity to survive. Today I feel like architecture is not really an art. It is more of a science and technology; it does not really have any emotions behind it nor creativity; it is not original. Function seems more important than artistic qualities in today’s architecture.

please the question is all about summary

You will see the white paper i wrote something with pen use it to answer the question

Thanks