Block Business Letter

/in /by

Savannah
is the lead on a project with a team of six other people. The project involves using an outside
vendor’s software. Without consulting Savannah,
Amber (a senior team member) sends a professional email to the vendor asking
for a change to the existing software.
The vendor responds to the entire team expressing concern over making
the requested change.

Use the professional scenarios provided above. Write a Block Business Letter (in the form of the posted example from Week 4) from the perspective of the company management. It should provide bad news and follow the guidelines outlined in Chapter 7: Delivering Bad-News Messages in BCOM7 (pages 110-128).

The message should take the block business letter form from the posted example; however, you will submit your assignment to the online course shell.

The block business letter must adhere to the following requirements:

  1. Content:
    1. Address the communication issue from the scenario.
    2. Provide bad-news from the company to the recipient.
    3. Concentrate on the facts of the situation and use either the inductive or deductive approach.
    4. Assume your recipient has previously requested a review of the situation via email, letter, or personal meeting with management.
  2. Format:
    1. Include the proper introductory elements (sender’s address, date, recipient’s address).
    2. Provide an appropriate and professional greeting / salutation.
    3. Single space paragraphs and double space between paragraphs.
    4. Limit the letter to one-page in length.

    If you need any other information kindly let me know.

response to below DQ

/in /by

response to the below DQ 150 words with 1 citation/ refrence less than 5 years old apa format

Mcchristy posted


Subscribe

Previous Next

This page automatically marks posts as read as you scroll.

Adjust automatic marking as read setting

A 60-year-old man comes to your office because of a persistent cough that has been bothering him for the past 3 months. His cough is dry and is more frequent during the evenings. He also notes frequent nasal congestion, especially when he is exposed to dust and cold weather. He reports no hemoptysis, weight loss, wheezing, fever, or changes in his appetite.

What additional questions would you ask to learn more about his cough?

Do you cough up any phlegm or sputum? How much? What color is it?

Does the cough come on with activity? Position?

Which treatments have you tried?

Are you taking any prescription or over the counter medication?

Do you have shortness of breath?

Do you have asthma?

Do you have a family history of asthma?

Do you have allergies?

Do you have reflux?

Do you smoke?

Are you exposed to any environmental irritants?

(Jarvis, 2016).

How would you classify his cough based on the duration to help with the diagnosis?

A cough lasting over 3 weeks is considered to be chronic (Dunphy, Winland-Brown, Porter, & Thomas, 2015). Chronic coughs can be linked to a couple of different diagnoses. Some diagnosis that may cause a chronic cough include: postnasal drip linked to allergies, postinfection such as the flu causing a cough for 8 weeks, chronic bronchitis (COPD) is characteristic of a productive cough lasting for 3 months, asthma reactive airway associated with a dry cough, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) cough caused by esophagus being irritated, medications such as ACE inhibitors, and environmental exposures can all produce a chronic cough (Dunphy et al., 2015).

What diagnostic tests do you want to include to help you with your diagnosis?

Some test that could be ordered to help correctly identify COPD would include a pulmonary function test or a more common test called spirometry. Spirometer measures how much air the patient can hold and how quickly it is exhaled (Mayo Clinic, 2018). A chest x-ray can reveal other causes of a chronic cough that include emphysema, infections, tumors and GERD (Mayo Clinic, 2018). Another test you can order to diagnosis GERD is an endoscopy (Hopper, 2015).

Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: Art and science of advanced practice nursing, 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis

Hopper, A. D. (2015). Improving the diagnosis and management of GORD in adults. The Practitioner, 259(1781), 27.

Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Mayo Clinic. (2018). COPD. Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cop…

SEC 10K PAPER and Powerpoint for Northrop Grumman

/in /by

Good afternoon, Please provide assistance with this SEC 10k report and PowerPoint. I have included guidelines in this email and attached required documents. The SEC 10k Report should included the following:

  • 3 pages single spaced, double space between paragraphs. Page count does not include title page, tables and exhibits, table of contents, and works cited list
  • title page
  • bibliography or works cited in APA format
  • in text citations in APA format
  • tables, and appendixes if you wish to copy and paste financial statements or materials you did not write (these will not be part of the ‘page count’)
  • Your paper should use one-inch margins on the left, right, top, and bottom of each page, and font set at 12 point.
  • Using accounting words and explain how these relate to the financial statements of Northrop Grumman

Written Assignment: SEC 10-K Analysis Report:Review Northrop Grumman’s MD&A as well as financial statements and the accompanying footnotes. Use this information to prepare the “analytic” results. The SEC 10-K report and the attached materials are the only resources that should use. Avoid a copy and paste approach except for the presentation of financial statements.

Include accounting issues and words used in accounting, including financial accounting as well as managerial accounting. An example would be a discussion on inventory: how it is valued, whether there is a WIP account, and other details.

Use accounting/related terms and create displays using the SEC 10-K for Northrop Grumman. The use of headings will label the sections in the paper. Present inventory turnover, days sales in inventory, days sales in accounts receivable, and other financial analysis from our course, both for the current year and as they relate to changes in accounts from one year to the next. The goal is to explain the financial statements and the information of the SEC 10-K. While not explaining every item in the SEC 10-K, tell a story and illustrate an understanding of the accounting terms and concepts. No more than one page should be devoted to your company’s history and non-financial information. The Power Point presentation (no more than 10 slides) will also need to be prepared to cover the highlights of the Written SEC 10k Analysis report

Frensh Culture ; Yves. St. Laurent

/in /by

I’m looking for someone who has a knowledge about french Culture. I already have the thesis statement and what I want to need today is

1. Evidence

2. Examples

3. Conclusion

4. introduction paragraph

Thesis statement: Yves. St. Laurent was best known as a powerful European fashion designer who affected fashion from 1960 to the present day. He is viewed as being among the premier fashion designers in the twentieth century.

I. Introduction

1. Statement of the problem

2. Definition of Terms

3. Theoretical Framework

4. Methodology

a. Type of Research

b. Respondents

c. Questionnaire

5. Hypothesis

6. Review of Related Literature

7. Scope and Limitations

8. Significance of the Study

2. Body

I. Background of the Study

i. Early Life

ii. Personal life and career

a. Young designer

b. Conscription , independence and illness

iii. Later life

iiii. Legacy

v. Death

vi. In popular culture

a. Books

b. On film

c. television

3. Conclusion

I. Analytical Summary

II. Thesis Reworded

III. Concluding Statement

Conduct a breif policy analysis

/in /by

Purpose: The purpose is to consolidate your learnings during the semester and develop a HRM policy that can be used in the workplace. You can choose an organisation in which you are currently working, were employed by or one you aspire to work for.For this assignment you need to choose an organisation and develop a policy on one of the following topics for that organisation.

  • Recruitment and selection
  • Performance management

    • You will need to conduct a brief policy analysis which will underpin your policy. Further information on how to do this will be provided during the semesterYou are expected to research widely to identify examples of relevant policies and journal articles. You need to use a minimum of 10 articles to support your policy. If you choose to base your policy on a pre-existing one, you need to identify and reference this policy.

    Please ensure that you include all of the following elements

    1. Policy analysis (500 words)

  • Internal and external issues analysis
  • High priority issues
  • Policy problem
  • 2. Policy (1500 words)
    ▪ Overview
    ▪ Scope
    ▪ Policy Statement
    ▪ Legislation
    ▪ Process (1 page diagram or flowchart)
    ▪ Accountabilities
    ▪ Evaluation Measures
    ▪ References
    ▪ Appendices (optional)
  • Learning outcomes assessed:
    5. Identify the potential contribution of SHRM and HRM to an organisation’s performance and other stakeholder outcomes; (GA 5)
    6. Identify and evaluate a number of human resource management policies, such as recruitment and selection, performance management, remuneration, training and development.

    • leadership styles , law homework help

    /in /by

    Use this Leadership Style Evaluation Test ( http://www.yourleadershiplegacy.com/assessment/ass… )

    from Your Leadership Legacy by Robert M. Galford and Regina Fazio Maruca to determine what leadership style you lean towards and how that might affect the way you function in a criminal justice field. As you are deciding how it might affect the way you function in a criminal justice field, consider the leader you believe you want to be and what you need to improve upon to be a highly successful leader. Share and evaluate your results. Discuss whether they reflect what you would have expected or if they are different from the type of leader you would like to be.

    Next, look back to the readings this week on leadership styles and any of your own research. Find what you believe are the two leadership styles that are more likely to lead from an ethical high ground. Discuss the following:

    • Why do these leadership styles produce agencies that have reduced liability and citizen complaints?
    • How do the different leadership styles facilitate or motive their employees?
    • What communication strategies do different leadership styles employ within their organization and to the public?

    Please have in text citations and a reference page please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Psyc Questions

    /in /by

    TASK 1: Need for Cognition (NfC) (8 points)

    Okay everyone, let’s discuss a variable called “The Need for Cognition.” There has been a lot of research on this concept and as you can tell, it is a personality variable (another word is “individual difference” variable) that identifies how much people have a “need to know or think.” Basically, it is a continuum where some of us could have a lower NC and some of us medium and some high.

    Regardless, it is an interesting variable for social psychologists too in that it could have some strong relationships with other factors such as how we vote, how we are influenced by advertisements, how we might form impressions of people, how easily we might form stereotypes and prejudice etc.

    Here is what you have to do for this task:

    1. Go to the following site and find a discussion as well as the 18 items short “Need for Cognition” survey: http://www.liberalarts.wabash.edu/ncs/

    Use the following FIVE point scale to answer each item:

    1 = extremely uncharacteristic

    2 = somewhat uncharacteristic

    3 = uncertain

    4 = somewhat characteristic

    5 = extremely characteristic

    Before you read over the discussion, fill out your responses for each item from the survey on a separate piece of paper for yourself. Then read the discussion they provide and figure out how to get your overall score. You will need to consider both the following;

    (a) items are scored on a 1- 5 scale

    (b) some of the items will need to be reverse-scored.

    2. Now that you have your own score, you need to figure out what your score basically means — determine if you fall in a high, medium, or low category. Give good thought to this and explain!

    Based on #1 and #2, come back here and discuss this process. Tell us your score and HOW you figured it out. Discuss the score – is your score “high”, “medium”, or “low” and importantly, HOW did you determine that? Does your score seem accurate to you and why? What positive or negative consequences do you find regarding high or low scores for yourself or for others? Where does this concept fit into our readings for the week etc. Remember, consider questions or issues that are your own as well.

    3. Lastly, go the UMUC library database (if you didn’t know, you can access via the classroom by clicking the “Resources” tab on the top bar and selecting “library”). Go to PSYCINFO and do a search with “need for cognition” and find one research article that peaked your interest (please don’t just select the first one that comes up :).

    You do not need to understand everything in the article or for that matter spend too much time reading the study (although I hope you’ll read it out of pure interest;). I mainly want you to see how many different relationships have been studied and to pick one. Include a paragraph and tell us what you found and why this was a topic that interested you. Summarize the study so we know what was done and what they found. Also, make sure to provide a proper APA formatted citation for the source.

    As you can probably tell, I’m also trying to make sure you practice how to access the library and to make you write out your citation in proper style in preparation for your paper.!

    Anyway, that’s it for this one! 😉 Keep in mind that the larger portion of this write-up is on #1 and #2 and it is adequate for a 7-10 line paragraph on #3.

    Serial Podcast Assignment

    /in /by

    The Case: Adnan Syed was convicted of first degree murder and is serving a life sentence plus 30 years for the 1999 murder of his 18 year old ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee.In 2014 a 12-part podcast investigated the circumstances of the crime and attempted to evaluate all the evidence.

    You are only required to listen to four episodes (4 hours).In order to enjoy this experience the most, I advise you to wait to Google this case.The podcast was a huge success when it first aired in 2014 and there has been a tremendous interest in the case.Just wait to read all about it until you have listened to the podcast.

    Read the questions below before starting to listen to each episode (the links are in Canvas).

    Please answer the questions below.Do not erase the question itself as it makes it difficult to grade.

    Episode 1

    • What was the date six weeks prior to the day you are answering these questions?
    • What did you do on this day? Be as detailed as you can without assistance from social media. Write at least 5 sentences trying to answer the question.
    • Now add any information you learned from social media.
    • Was anything you wrote initially not supported by what was documented on social media? If so, what?
    • What is the importance behind Asia McClain’s letter?
    • Why would it be important for a defense attorney to look into Asia McClain’s letter?

    Episode 2

    • What argument did the State make to use the relationship between Hae and Adan against Adnan?
    • What evidence did they use? What was their argument?
    • In what ways did the state try to use Adnan’s religion against him?
    • At this point, how are you feeling about the case?

    Episode 3

    1. Explain whether or not you believe the story of Mr. S. Use evidence from the episode. Write at least 5 sentences.

    Episode 4

    • Briefly explain what key piece of evidence provided by Jay lead to Adnan’s arrest.
    • What are some of the inconsistencies in Jay’s story (major and minor)?
    • Which of Jay’s “inconsistencies” gives you the most concern as to the credibility of his story? Explain.
    • What are YOUR thoughts on Jay so far? Do you think he is a credible witness? Explain.

    —————-

    For the files, If you would provide me your email address so I can send them for you because the website did not accept them for some reason.

    Research a local health care organization of your choice, and complete the following tasks:

    /in /by

    3-5 pages excluding cover, abstract, and reference pages

    Research a local health care organization of your choice, and complete the following tasks:

    • Perform a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, listing at least 2 points in each area.
      • Information can be gathered from the Web site or articles about
        similar organizations from the readings. For example, extended hours of
        operation could be a strength (internal).
    • Choose 1
      strength or opportunity, and create a marketing strategy that would
      promote a competitive advantage for this organization within the
      community being targeted.
    • Determine whether your approach will be market penetration, development, diversification, consolidation, or strategic alliances.
    • Are you the market leader, a challenger, a follower, or are you creating a market niche?

    NOTE: You need to support your work with at least 4
    academic or professional peer-reviewed sources that were published
    within the past 5 years.

    Collectivism and Individualism

    /in /by

    The concepts of individualism and collectivism, introduced in Week 1, are important terms to keep in mind when studying human development and socialization. As a reminder, individualist cultures prioritize concern for self or immediate family. Collectivist cultures are more oriented to the larger community group and emphasize traditions. Both types of cultures have many more characteristics, and any given culture does not necessarily belong exclusively in one category.

    As you might expect, parenting styles and expectations for family members in individualist cultures are often different from those in collectivist cultures. For this Assignment, you will analyze collectivism and individualism as it applies to parenting styles.

    To prepare:

    • Review Chapter 8 in your course text. Pay particular attention to the sections on norms, customs, and child care; parental values and expectations; and late adulthood.
    • Review the concepts of individualism and collectivism from Chapter 1 of the course text. Also, review the Week 4 media piece in the Learning Resources.
    • Consider this scenario: Imagine you are watching a reality television show in which two sets of parents trade places and take their same roles in the other family. Keep these details in mind:
    • One family is characterized as coming from a collectivist culture,
    • The other family is characterized as coming from an individualist culture.
    • Each family has one 1-year-old, one 8-year-old, one 14-year-old, and two grandparents living in the household.
    • In trading places, each set of parents must interact with the grandparents in the new household and parent the children in the new household.
    • Consider what the outcomes would be in each household based on the differences between collectivist cultures and individualist cultures.

    By Day 7

    Submit a 2- to 3-page paper in which you do the following:

    • Explain the differences in parenting style of “collectivist” and “individualist” parents.
    • Describe how each couple would differ in their expectations of each of the children in their “new” household.
    • In light of the differing styles and expectations, analyze points of conflict that would arise with the children when the parents swapped households and why (i.e., how the collectivist parents would respond to each of the individualist children, and how the individualist parents would react to each of the collectivist children).
    • Compare the grandparents’ role in the collectivist family to the grandparents’ role in the individualist family.
    • Analyze conflicts that the grandparents’ roles could cause when the parents swapped households and how the “new” mother and father might wish to change the existing roles.
    • Describe how you think the show would end. Will anyone (i.e., parents, children, grandparents, or people watching the show) learn something from the experience?
    • Is it possible to change cultural values? Explain your ideas and your reasoning.
    • A B C D F
      Explain the differences in parenting style of “collectivist” and “individualist” parents
      5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not well-supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      3 (4%) – 3 (4%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      Describe how each couple would differ in their expectations of each of the children
      9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      is not well-supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      6 (8%) – 6 (8%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      0 (0%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      Analyze points of conflict that would arise with the children when the parents swapped households and why
      9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not well-supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      6 (8%) – 6 (8%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      0 (0%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      Compare the grandparents’ role in the collectivist family to the grandparents’ role in the individualist family
      5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      is not well-supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      3 (4%) – 3 (4%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      AND/OR
      is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      Analyze conflicts that the grandparents’ roles could cause when the parents swapped households and how the “new” mother and father might wish to change the existing roles
      9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not well-supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      6 (8%) – 6 (8%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      0 (0%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      Describe how you think the show would end. Will anyone learn something from the experience?
      5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      AND
      Is supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      is not well-supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      3 (4%) – 3 (4%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      AND/OR
      Is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      AND/OR
      is not supported by evidence from the assigned Learning Resources
      Is it possible to change cultural values? Explain your ideas and your reasoning
      9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%)
      Excellent application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%)
      Good application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues
      7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%)
      Average application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (lacking some information or details; and/or has some inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      6 (8%) – 6 (8%)
      Weak application/analysis of concepts, skills, or issues (substantially lacking information or details; and/or has several inaccuracies; and/or demonstrates a lack of understanding)
      0 (0%) – 5 (6.67%)
      Substantially lacking in information or details; and/or has many inaccuracies; and/or does not address the prompt
      Quality of Writing. Writing is original, free of mechanics, usage, grammar, or spelling (MUGS) errors, and follows academic writing expectations (AWE) guidelines for citing and referencing
      18 (24%) – 20 (26.67%)
      No or very few MUGS errors
      AND
      Writing is always clear, well organized
      AND
      All work is properly citied and referenced as per AWE
      AND
      Writing is original and properly paraphrased; contains no direct quotes unless necessary.
      16 (21.33%) – 17 (22.67%)
      Few MUGS errors
      AND/OR
      Writing is mostly clear and organized
      AND/OR
      Work is mostly properly citied and referenced as per AWE
      AND/OR
      Majority of writing is original and properly paraphrased; contains no direct quotes unless necessary.
      14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%)
      Several MUGS errors
      AND/OR
      Writing is somewhat clear and organized AND/OR Some issues with proper citing and referencing as per AWE
      AND/OR
      Some under-use of original writing; overuse of directly quoted content; material not all properly paraphrased.
      12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%)
      Many MUGS errors
      AND/OR
      Writing is unclear and disorganized
      AND/OR
      Many issues with proper citing and referencing as per AWE
      AND/OR
      Mostly under-use of original writing; overuse of directly quoted content; material is not properly paraphrased.
      0 (0%) – 11 (14.67%)
      Excessive MUGS errors
      AND/OR
      Writing is extremely unclear and disorganized
      AND/OR
      No proper citations and referencing as per AWE
      AND/OR
      No original writing; all directly quoted content; no proper paraphrasing
      Total Points: 75