What are your most important takeaways from the project you completed and your studies in this course?, homework help

Assignment 2: Discussion—Reflection and Summary

Respond to the following:

  • What are your most important takeaways from the project you completed and your studies in this course?
  • How was your thinking changed as a result of your research and participation in discussions?
  • How will you apply what you have learned in future career opportunities?

By Sunday, July 9, 2017, post your response to the appropriate Discussion Area. Through Wednesday, July 12, 2017, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses.

Write your initial response in 300–500 words. Your response should be thorough and address all components of the discussion question in detail, include citations of all sources, where needed, according to the APA Style, and demonstrate accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation

Do the following when responding to your peers:

  • Read your peers’ answers.
  • Provide substantive comments by
    • contributing new, relevant information from course readings, Web sites, or other sources;
    • building on the remarks or questions of others; or
    • sharing practical examples of key concepts from your professional or personal experiences
  • Respond to feedback on your posting and provide feedback to other students on their ideas.
  • Make sure your writing
    • is clear, concise, and organized;
    • demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and
    • displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Grading Criteria

Assignment Components

Max Points

Initial response was:

  • Insightful, original, accurate, and timely.
  • Substantive and demonstrated advanced understanding of concepts.
  • Compiled/synthesized theories and concepts drawn from a variety of sources to support statements and conclusions.

16

Discussion Response and Participation:

  • Responded to a minimum of two peers in a timely manner.
  • Offered points of view supported by research.
  • Asked challenging questions that promoted discussion.
  • Drew relationships between one or more points in the discussion.

16

Writing:

  • Wrote in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner.
  • Responses were error free.
  • Information from sources, where applicable, was paraphrased appropriately and accurately cited.

8

Total:

40

Marketing Mix, business and finance homework help

Marketing Mix

Please complete ONE of the following assignments, incorporating ideas and concepts from the week’s lecture and/or articles. Please feel free to incorporate outside resources as well. When submitting your assignment, please indicate which of the three options you have chosen. For Options 2 and 3, please make sure to double space your papers.

Option 1: Get Creative

Design and format a 10 – 15 slide Microsoft PowerPoint presentation on one of the learning objectives found in the Getting Started – This Week’s Activities folder for this week. The requirements below must be met for your presentation to be accepted and graded:

  • Design and format each slide for a presentation, see example below.
  • The notes sections must total a minimum of 250 words for the entire presentation. Use these sections to explain and support information provided on your slides.
  • Include a cover slide and reference slide (these slides do not count toward the 10 – 15 slide requirement).
  • At least 60% of your paper must be original content/writing.
  • No more than 40% of your content/information may come from references.
  • Use at least two references from outside the course material, preferably from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the two reference requirement.
  • Identify sources on slides that contain reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) and list them on a reference slide.

Reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) must be from sources like scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, online newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, etc. are not acceptable.

Weekly Related Readings

The Marketing Mix and 4 Ps: Understanding How to Position Your Market Offering
Putting the right product in the right place, at the right price, at the right time.
http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newSTR_94.h…

Marketing to Gen Y: What you can’t afford not to know
How do you reach these 71 million “Millennials” that spend over 200 billion dollars annually and will soon replace the baby boomer generation as the largest percentage of the workforce?
http://precisionprofiling.com.au/marketing-to-gen-…

13 Reasons Why Using Social Media for Business is Non-Negotiable!
Is there ever a time when having a social mediapresence is an option?
http://web.archive.org/web/20130518034250/http://s…

it management22 What do you think about the CHAOS study’s definition of a successful project, writing homework help

Discussion Question: What do you think about the CHAOS study’s definition of a successful project? Do you think there are better definitions of success besides meeting scope, time, and cost goals?

Discussion Forum Instructions:

WHAT: You will be writing three or more discussion posts per week. Your main post must be two to three substantive paragraphs 250+ words and include at least 2 APA-formatted citation/reference. Please follow up with two subsequent replies to colleagues. Each reply should consist of a relevant paragraph containing 50 words or more.

WHY:Discussion questions are designed for you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the weekly material. This forum provides an opportunity to develop ideas and concepts with your instructor and peers. This discussion format assists with development of communication skills and critical thinking necessary for success in the modern workplace.

HOW: Your posts should be substantive, demonstrate independent thought relevant to the topic, and encourage continued discussion. Please avoid simply repeating previous posts and agreeing. Provide supporting evidence for your ideas and opinions through the use of personal or work examples, relevant articles or websites, or concepts covered in the week’s readings. Best practice: compose and save your discussion post in a word processing document, then copy and paste it in the Discussion Forum.

See SHARC for sample APA-formatted discussion post (Links to an external site.)

Discussion Question: What do you think about the CHAOS study’s definition of a successful project? Do you think there are better definitions of success besides meeting scope, time, and cost goals?

analysis of the risks and benefits of integrating a positive social change mission into organizational strategic planning

Post an analysis of the risks and benefits of integrating a positive social change mission into organizational strategic planning. Your analysis should include the following:

  • What are the benefits for organizations considering integrating positive social change into their business strategy?
  • What are the potential risks for organizations considering integrating business strategies with an emphasis on positive social change?
  • Provide a real-world example of an organization that experienced an unsuccessful implementation of a positive social change initiative. As an independent scholar and global change agent, explain what the organization might have done differently, including planning or executing strategies to improve marketplace or cultural impacts.

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly source.

complete this sheet that it is presentation and my topic this is Electrical Engineering

Title

Persuasive Speech Outline

Name

Topic:

General Purpose: To persuade.

Specific Purpose: To persuade the class to/that….

Thesis:Electrical Engineering statement of your topic and angle…

————————————————————————————————————

I. Introduction

A. (Attention)

B. Thesis –

C. Connect Audience & Self to Topic

Personal Concern..

Concerns audience because …

Transition:

II. Body

(Need) Current problem… (source)

Transition:

B. (Satisfy Need) –

Transition:

C. (Visualize– describe what the future will be like if things are changed or not

changed) – add sub-points as needed.

If it is not changed…

If it is changed…

Transition:

III. Conclusion

Summary- brief summary of the ideas in the body

(Source #)

Changing our behavior can …

B. Concluding Statement (Action-encourage your audience to implement your

solution, adopt your attitude, change a behavior, etc.)

Works Cited:

1.

2.

3.

communication

In a seven to ten-paragraph essay, please discuss your views on the following questions in regards to racism in America in particular, and the world in general. You may reference the videos shown in class, or any other materials you choose to include. This paper should have a reference list of Internet sites, peer-reviewed articles, and or videos used to formulate your discussion.

Question:Given what you know about systemic, institutionalized, and internalize racism, what is your opinion as to its existence in America and the world in general? Do you have suggestions as to how racism might be addressed, combatted or eradicated in America ? Projecting ten years into the future, what do you see the state of racism being in America?

Character Analysis

Option 1: Character Analysis

Write an analysis of one character, either major or minor, from any of the
works we’ve looked at. Your thesis statement should make a central claim
about the character, and the body of your paper should introduce and
support the points that support that thesis. All claims you make should be
supported with evidence pulled from the text.

In deciding what your central claim will be, consider one or more apparent
personality traits of the character you choose. Try to relate those traits to the
behaviors we see in the story (character motivation).

Of the character you choose to analyze, ask yourself what kind of person
she/he is. Is s/he weak? strong? determined? optimistic? arrogant? afraid?
timid? shy? and so forth. You will need to find specific evidence from the
story to support your argument, and incorporate that evidence into your
paper. Refer to your class notes on techniques for doing so. Also, you’ll want
to review the literary terms that specifically refer to character (such things as
dynamic, static, protagonist, antagonist, and epiphany).

After choosing the character to analyze comes the hard part: explaining why
the author developed such a character. Which is to say, you’ll need to move
from the “what” to the “why”.

For your thesis statement, you should refer to the major characteristics
you will discuss and relate them to either the outcome of the story or
to one or more of its themes. For example, a student writing about Connie
from “Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” might have a tentative
thesis statement like this:

Emphasizing Oates’ belief in the lack of solid values in modern society,
Connie’s conceit, secrecy, and rebelliousness contribute to her
destruction.

The dependent clause of this thesis states the theme (i.e., that modern
society lacks solid values), while the main clause focuses on the three
character traits that the student will explore in her paper by offering many
specific examples from the story and showing how those traits all lead in
some way to Connie’s kidnapping (and presumed rape and death) at the end
of the story. Notice, too, that there is a mention of the author’s name
and purpose.

You might also approach this paper in terms of the ways an author reveals a
character to us. Remember, we learn about a character through appearance,
actions and reactions, speech, gestures, and even name. You could organize
your paper according to these items rather than characteristics, if you choose.
In any case, each body paragraph needs to begin with a strong, clear topic
sentence to guide the reader.

  1. General Requirements

Audience: The paper should be written for an academic audience. You may
assume that your readers have already read the work you are analyzing, so
excessive summary will not be necessary; however, you might include very
brief bits of summary, as needed, to help lead into or accentuate the points
you are making.

Length and format: The paper should be a minimum of 1000 words
and should be formatted according to MLA standards. Visit Purdue’s OWL for
discussion of MLA formatting. You do not need a title page or an outline for
this assignment.

Research: You must use at least TWO secondary sources to support (or
refute) your claims.

A successful paper will do the following:

1. Make a central claim that moves beyond the obvious. Try
to stretch a little; surprise me—but make sure you can support
your claim with evidence from the text.
2. In supporting your central claim, discuss the most
important elements and why they are important.

3. Have a stylistically effective introduction that engages the
reader and sets up the topic to be discussed, as well as a
stylistically effective conclusion that moves beyond mere
summary of what has preceded it.

4. Make use of evidence from the work to support your
claims.
5. Be organized logically so your reader is able to easily
follow your argument.

6. Cite the text properly according to MLA format. Direct
quotations and indirect summary do need to be cited in your
paper using MLA-style parenthetical citations. You may use any
of the biographical/historical information from our textbook.

  1. Use a style appropriate to the given audience.
  2. Be free of mechanical errors, such as incorrect grammar,

spelling, and punctuation.

* A note about sources: Although this paper is a research paper, it is not
intended to be a synthesis of other people’s analyses or literary criticism.
Nearly all claims and observations made in the paper should be yours
(roughly 80% for your voice and primary text, 20% for the critics).

Unintended Consequences of Decisions, management homework help

Managers who make decisions must also think about the results of their actions. Based on systems theory a system is made up of a closed loop — when one action is taken it affects each part of the whole with a ripple effect. When a decision is made, each part of the loop is impacted. Discuss the impact of a specific decision that can be made within a closed loop — whether it is in your home or at work. Discuss how each part of the whole could be affected.

* write at least 160 words in APA style with at least 3 academic journals references

* write 2 different answers to this question

PAD 515: Leadership and Conflict Resolution Bringing Change to Public Leadership

“Bringing Change to Public Leadership” Please respond to the following:

You have been newly promoted to Superintendent of a Youth Service Center with 150 employees. Several supervisory staff have also been promoted to management roles in addition to hiring of new staff. At least 50% of the employees have 10-25 years of experience. The previous Administration was in place for approximately 7 years and operated an Authoritarian style of leadership causing many employees to be fearful and intimidated. The new Administration has been in place for about 2 years and operates a Transformational style of leadership with the idea of staff empowerment and growth. There are some senior employees who remain fearful and are unwavering in their attempts to develop them under a Transformational style of leadership. While newly promoted and newly hired staff need guidance in their new roles. Your task is to build a new “leadership team” for the facility.

  • How would you, as the new Superintendent, need to proceed with resistance from existing and new employees? Provide a rationale for your response.
  • What style of leadership and three (3) characteristics of leadership would be most effective? Provide a rationale and appropriate academic support for your position.

Approach for balancing issues paper

Assignment 3: Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues

Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

Before writing your position statement on Philosophical and Practical Approach for Balancing Issues, you should read Chapters 1 through11 in your textbook. Then, research at least three (3) peer-reviewed articles about individual rights, morality, ethics, individual rights, duty, or codes of conduct for criminal justice professionals.

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:

1. Create a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will balance the two issues in your own career in law enforcement.

2. Determine a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Provide one to two (1-2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

3. Select a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Provide one to two (1-2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

4. Explain what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

5. Support your position statement with three (3) relevant and credible references, documented according to latest edition of APA. (Note: Do not use open source sites such as Ask.com, eHow.com, Answers.com, and Wikipedia.)

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format (latest edition). Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page developed in accordance with the latest edition of APA, including a running head, page number, the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page, revision of the previous assignment, and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
  • The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
    • Analyze the issues pertinent to codes of conduct and / or the ethics of duty.
    • Recommend ways to use ethics to improve decision making in the criminal justice system.
    • Analyze various philosophical approaches for ethical decision making, and the effectiveness and limits of each approach for making ethical choices.
    • Analyze the ethical issues involved with balancing means and ends in the criminal justice field.
    • Examine the key elements of virtue and character.
    • Examine reasons for and effective ways to apply critical ethical thinking to criminal justice issues.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in ethics and leadership in criminal justice.
    • Write clearly and concisely about ethics and leadership in criminal justice using proper writing mechanics.
    Criteria

    Unacceptable

    Below 60% F

    Meets Minimum Expectations

    60-69% D

    Fair

    70-79% C

    Proficient

    80-89% B

    Exemplary

    90-100% A

    1. Create a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Weight: 25%

    Did not submit or incompletely created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Did not submit or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Insufficiently created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Partially created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Satisfactorily created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Thoroughly created a philosophy and approach for balancing the issues of individual rights and the public’s protection. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    2. Determine a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.
    Weight: 20%

    Did not submit or incompletely determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Did not complete or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Insufficiently determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Partially determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Satisfactorily determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Thoroughly determined a philosophy and approach for balancing the use of reward and punishment in criminal justice. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    3. Select a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Provide one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Weight: 20%

    Did not submit or incompletely selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Did not submit or incompletely provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Insufficiently selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Insufficiently provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Partially selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Partially provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Satisfactorily selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Satisfactorily provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    Thoroughly selected a philosophy and approach that addresses the use of immoral means (e.g., torture or lying in interrogation) to accomplish desirable ends. Thoroughly provided one to two (1 to 2) examples illustrating how you will use this philosophy in your own career.

    4. Explain what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

    Weight: 20%

    Did not submit or incompletely explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

    Insufficiently explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

    Partially explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

    Satisfactorily explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

    Thoroughly explained what you believe the Ethics of Care and Peacemaking Criminology presented in your textbook should mean for law enforcement professionals.

    5. 3 references

    Weight: 5%

    No references provided

    Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

    Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

    Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

    Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

    6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

    Weight: 10%

    More than 8 errors present

    7-8 errors present

    5-6 errors present

    3-4 errors present

    0-2 errors present