Paper assignments

/in /by

In this assignment, you will conduct a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat) analysis for the type of beverage you have selected, and for your company overall. As you work on the assignment, consider why you have chosen one type of non-alcoholic beverage over another and the reasons for that choice. As you complete your SWOT analysis, be sure to include external factors such as industry / market trends and competition, and internal factors such as your capabilities or abilities to reach certain market segments.

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper, in which you:

Create your revised NAB company name and explain its significance.

Develop your revised company’s Mission Statement and provide a rationale for its components.

Hints: Use the Statement of Mission template on pp. 72-73 on the course textbook: Successful Business Plan to aid your development. Click here for help accessing a specific page number in your eBook.

Extracting appropriate information from the NAB company portfolio, where applicable. You should fill in other required items in the template using your personal preferences.

Describe the trends in the non-alcoholic beverage industry, especially the specific type of beverage category you have chosen. Justify at least three (3) reasons why you have chosen this type of non-alcoholic beverage.

Hints: Research and outline beverage industry trends. Consider the size and growth rate of the industry overall and the specific beverage type you have chosen. Use the worksheet in the course text (p. 88 | Past and Future Growth of Your Industry) to help you project the future growth rate. Consider the use of industry associations and search engines to find reliable, recent data.

The Effects of Business on Consumers and the Environment: Case Study: Perdue Farms

/in /by

The “Initial” post is attached. I am looking for the “Revision” of the “Initial” post (Requirements included below), and the repossess to 2 others repossess per requirements. The two I need responses to will be added at the bottom after all the rules and requirements for the assignment. Let me know if you have any questions. The bold and underlined is meant too help you know where I am telling/ or asking you to do something.

This
discussion assignment requires you to submit at least four posts: an
initial post, two reply posts to fellow students in threads other than
your own, and a revised post.
Prepare Icon

Prepare: In preparation for your
first post in this discussion, you will become familiar with the case
of Perdue Farms by means of the material listed under Required Resources
(Generally). You will also find more material under Required Resources
(Per Subject Heading) because the specific task for this discussion is
to examine this case with an eye for any one of the following four
subject headings in business ethics: (1) the environment, (2)
advertising, (3) consumer safety and (4) moral responsibility. You must
select one of these subject headings and your selection will be the
specific focus of your work for your discussion. Accordingly, you will
be responsible to complete the readings and videos listed under your
chosen subject heading.
Reflect Icon

Reflect: If you choose the
environment subject heading, reflect on the sheer density of chickens
raised at any given time in the Perdue facilities. The disposal of their
discarded remains and their processing for distribution, either
individually and most definitely together, pose a number of
environmental concerns.

If you choose the advertising subject heading,
reflect on how the two videos on Perdue farms present the sharp
contrast between the way the company presents its product and the way in
which it has been discovered to run its chicken farms. Consider whether
this is an example of failure to provide truth in advertising and how
you would support such a stance.

If you choose the consumer safety subject
heading, reflect on the way in which chickens raised in factory farms
risks consumer safety. These might include (a) bacterial contamination,
(b) the effects of antibiotics on the meat that is consumed, or (c) the
release of adrenaline, cortisone, and other chemicals resulting from the
acute stress endured by factory farm animals, which then becomes part
of the meat that is later consumed by humans.

If you choose the moral responsibility heading,
reflect on the stewardship role that may fall upon humans toward
non-human animals. Can we utilize them as mere means to an end (for
entertainment, companionship, or food)? Or do we have special
obligations toward them (e.g., not to mistreat or torture them and to
slaughter them quickly and without stress) because they are sentient
beings?

Once you have completed the indicated readings
and videos, reflect on the ethical theories that we have covered in the
discussions thus far and identify one that you want to apply for your
analysis in your discussion post.

Also, reflect on the regulations (or lack
thereof) in the factory farming industry in order to be able to examine
how our nation’s laws affect the operations of the business. You will need to research the applicable laws on the factory farming industry.

Finally, since Perdue Farms is an American
corporation, reflect on the mixed economic system in the United States
in order to articulate the setting for the operations of factory
farming, and then, be able to analyze the ethical actions of Perdue
given this setting.
Write Icon

Write: In the first part of your
initial post, you will need to introduce the Perdue case within the
particular subject heading that you have chosen. In this introduction,
you will also need to (1) articulate the relevant characteristics of our
mixed economic system and (2) present the regulations for the factory
farming industry. These will provide the setting for you to be able to
examine how the nation’s laws affect its operations.

In the second part of your initial post, present
your analysis of the problem in a way that identifies which entities
(Perdue as a corporation, the economic system in the USA, the regulatory
control of the state, or all of these) have a role in the problem that
you have presented. In your analysis, you must assess the negative
effects of the interplay between business activity and one of the
following: the environment, advertising, consumer safety, or corporate
social responsibility. Your focus must be an ethical analysis of this
interplay, and it must be well supported by reliable and/or scholarly
sources by clearly identifying the ethical theory that you are applying
in your analysis.

Revise: Read the feedback
provided by your professor to your initial post, either directly to you
or to your fellow students. Use this as an opportunity to learn from
your professor, especially with regard to the best ways to apply the
course material and your research to your analysis. On the basis of what
you have learned in this process, post an improved revision of your
initial post that applies the additional knowledge that you have gained.

Remember that your grade depends on the quality
of your initial and revised responses, not just on the submission of an
attempt at improvement. It is thus to your advantage to post the best
initial post you can and then to also improve that best effort as much
as you can through revision. Taking this process seriously will help you
develop the skills you need to do well on the Final Project.

Requirements for Your Initial Post:

  • Your initial post should be at least 400 words in length and have citations and references in APA notation.
    It should address the prompt in its entirety. This means that you
    should not split your response to the prompt in multiple posts. Your
    examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination
    that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft
    and revise.
  • Please be advised that until you post, you
    will not see what your fellow students are posting. Once you submit your
    post, you will be able to view the posts from your other classmates.
    You can then proceed to reply to at least two different threads based on
    the required material for this discussion.
  • Your list of references for your initial
    post should include the videos and the other required reading material
    for this discussion, the Instructor Guidance, and any other
    announcements presented to you by your professor. List all the course
    material that informed your work in the list of references and cite
    these too where appropriate. In addition, your references should include
    any other sources that you consult to inform yourself (but not
    Wikipedia or similar sources).
  • Your initial post for this discussion should be submitted no later than the end of Thursday (11:59 pm, U.S. Mountain time).

Requirements for Replies to Other Threads:

  • At least two of the four posts required should be in the form of replies to fellow classmates in threads other than your own.
  • Each of your replies should be at least 200 words
    and informed by the course material. As such, the replies must have
    citations and references in APA notation. Your list of references for
    each reply should include all of the course material that has informed
    your reply, in addition to any research that you have obtained on your
    own.
  • Your replies should focus on the specific
    examination presented by your fellow student, and these should include
    an examination of whether or not the characteristics of the ethical
    theory and/or economic system were identified well, and whether or not
    their application and analysis was also carried out successfully.
    Providing such an examination is not an attack on your fellow student
    but an attempt to work together with your fellow student toward the
    better understanding of the ethical theories employed, as well as their
    application.

Requirements for Revising Your Initial Post:

  • Submit a revision of your initial post by
    either replying to your own post, or to the feedback provided to you by
    your professor.
  • There is no minimum word requirement for
    your revised initial post. But you should always explain the reasons for
    revising your post so that it is clear what you are doing. If you are
    revising only a few words, or an ethical theory, you should not just
    submit a post with vague language such as: “duty ethics works better
    here” or “I did not consider the economic system.” It is important to
    recognize that no one can read your mind so you need to provide the
    setting for your revision (Why? What prompted it? What course material
    informed you?) , and it is important to write in clear language and
    complete sentences.
  • Your revised initial post is your chance to
    correct any oversights or errors in your initial post, or show your
    improved understanding of the material and its applications to the case
    at hand. You may, for example, come to the realization that another
    ethical theory is better than the one that you initially chose.
    Accordingly, your revision should indicate that you chose another
    ethical theory and an explanation why you find the replacement more
    suitable. You may also find the need to revise any relevant portions of
    your analysis. Or, you might have realized that your conclusion did not
    take into account important factors necessary for your evaluation of the
    situation.
  • You should maximize the improvement of your initial post by employing your professor’s feedback as a guide.
    Keep in mind that you may not always receive direct feedback from your
    professor. But your professor will have submitted feedback in the
    discussion to other posts. So read your professor’s feedback whether it
    is addressed to you directlyor to other fellow students. This will give
    you much to think about and apply to your own post.
  • If your professor or a fellow classmate
    responds to your revised initial post, and on this basis, you find good
    reason to submit yet another revision, then by all means do so. The more
    you improve your initial post, the more you will benefit both in terms
    of your learning and most likely your grade. The first response to a classmate is below, followed by the second one. For this discussion, I chose to analyze the Perdue case regarding
    moral responsibility. After watching the supplied videos, I can
    understand why so much attention is needed in the factory farming
    industry. When we think of consuming meat, we don’t take into
    consideration the process our meat goes through before it gets to the
    stores. Unfair animal treatment and the over use of antibiotics is
    brought into question as farmers feed, confine, and breed their company
    supplied chickens as agreed to in Perdue’s contract with the farmer
    (Compassion, 2014). The fact that factory farming is
    conducted with animals in confined spaces without exposure to their
    natural habitat, should be a concern to those who know. As a solution to
    supply food to our fast-growing world population, CAFO’s or
    Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations aided in higher productions on
    farms and is regulated by the FDA, USDA, and EPA. It is surprising to
    know that our government agencies don’t hold the same stringent
    regulations and laws for livestock raising as the requirements for
    steel, coal, or auto industry’s’ environmental discharge (Kirby, n.d.).
    Under-regulation among the combination of three government agencies
    draws concern as our government exercises capitalist characteristics.
    CAFO’s are strictly for-profit companies that have a large demand in
    product which results in a billion-dollar industry that is supported by
    politicians or government officials. Our government at times does have
    pressure from multilateral trade institutions and trade partners to
    eliminate protectionism in agriculture trade to protect US factory
    farmers from imported food competition (Messerlin, 2005, Long et.al.,
    2013). There is about 2% of livestock farms that produce 40% of all meat
    and other products consumed around the world, creating inadequate
    farming practices (Kirby, n.d.). The socialist characteristic our
    government shows is in 6 companies that have been allowed to dominate
    the agribusiness industry. Perdue, Tyson, Smithfield, Cargill, ADM, and
    Land O’Lakes control processing, packing and distribution which allows
    them to control much of the poultry and livestock production in the
    United States (Kirby, n.d.). In 1994 the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS
    Agreement) was adopted by the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade
    Negotiations (that the U.S. is a part of) where members report
    sanitary/phytosanitary measures along with necessary changes to other
    members (Long). As seen when trading internationally with Europe,
    questionable farming practices including hormone and antibiotic usage
    caused ethical and safety concerns abroad leading to a ban; the U.S.
    increased tariffs on all of Europe’s agriculture products in return,
    showing financial intentions only (Donovan, 2015). In 2014, The Food Safety Modernization Act
    was created expanding the FDA’s authority with attempts to require
    farmers to have better plans for disease prevention (Donovan, 2015). The
    effectiveness of this act will take some time to see, yet many think
    the FDA needed to do more instead of have more control in an area that
    is under regulated already.
    The utilitarianism theory is seen when animals are raised to benefit a
    large majority of the world. It is for the greater good that more
    people have food to eat. Animals raised in farm settings are viewed as
    product for consumption instead of a pet or companion. Animal rights
    don’t apply the same for animals in factory farming; however, proper
    treatment is needed for the animals to ensure their best health so when
    consumed, contaminates or diseases are not spread. Perdu is working with
    a hand full of local farmers using them as a means to an end instead of
    branching out to incorporate cleaner farming practices. There is
    clearly government interest regarding food but laws are vague and few to
    enforce serious change. This presents the moral dilemma within Perdu
    because their treatment plans for animals appear to follow regulations
    yet food born illnesses and disease continue to rise along with global
    population. Perdue should exercise corporate social responsibility and
    lead the way for factory farm improvements. The second response to a classmate is below. According
    to the video produced by CompassionUSA (2014), over the course of six
    weeks, in a house of 30,000 Perdue chickens laying side by side, it is
    considered normal for more than 1,000 of those birds to die in each
    flock. The birds are not allowed to go outside to get fresh air or see
    sunlight. They are crammed into a warehouse where they are overfed and
    are prone to illness, genetic problems, and injury from being so tightly
    packed together. These concentrated animal feeding operations
    (“CAFOs”) emit large quantities of air pollutants that are harmful to
    public health, sickening people and damaging the environment. Some of
    the pollutants include ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, nitrous oxide,
    methane, particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
    (Hoover, 2013). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is in charge
    of regulating air pollution in these industries and are failing
    miserably when it comes to factory farms and pollutants. Factory
    farming most definitely falls under the capitalistic nature of free
    market economics. Fieser (2015), defines this by saying “businesses
    should be governed by the laws of supply and demand, not restrained by
    government interference. The idea of competition in a free market is
    sometimes compared with the evolutionary notion of survival of the
    fittest.” In other words Perdue justifies its mistreating of animals
    and the process to discarding the chicken’s remains, by using the shear
    realistic need for large quantities of food to be mass produced. These
    actions degrade and conflict with the use of utilitarianism ethics in
    Perdue’s business model. In order for Perdue to succeed in running
    their organization, they need to focus on maximizing pleasure for all,
    and to reduce suffering (Zúñiga & Postigo, 2015). By allowing the
    chickens the freedom to roam outside in the sunlight and get fresh air,
    it maximizes the pleasure and life of the chicken, while simultaneously
    reducing the suffering of the chickens being stuck inside a warehouse
    with 30,000 other chickens side by side. This creates a better overall
    product to the end consumer. Additionally if Perdue and the EPA were
    more environmentally conscious about the pollutants they were putting
    into the air, then they could maximize the pleasure and reduce the
    suffering of the chickens and the farmers living in that environment.

HrM SLP 1 W whistle blowing

/in /by

Module 1 – SLP

WHISTLE BLOWING, NEGOTIATING, AND HR LAW

Negotiating

The art of negotiating is important for all employees and especially for HR managers and professionals. HR personnel are involved in many negotiations such as allocating salaries and bonuses, implementing policies, and determining procedures. There are two main methods of negotiating: (1) Distributive and (2) Integrative. Distributive bargaining is the approach to bargaining or negotiation that is used when the parties are trying to divide something up—distribute something. It contrasts with integrative bargaining in which the parties are trying to make more of something. A practical example of distributing bargaining is when purchasing a vehicle from a dealership that is trying to profit as much as possible. In distributive bargaining, it’s best to keep information to yourself while trying to get information out of the other party. An integrative bargaining situation occurs when it’s possible to produce a greater outcome together than either party could reach on his or her own. During integrative bargaining, it is important to determine the priorities of all parties involved. As a practical example, when dealing with Labor Unions, it is recommended for managers to use an integrative bargaining approach, but unfortunately many managers use a distributive bargaining approach, which results in impasse, employee strikes, and wasting an organization’s time and resources.

Negotiating Approaches

Negotiating Approaches

Discuss a negotiation that you have been involved with. Discuss the details of the negotiation and whether you used a distributive or integrative approach. Depending on the approach you used for the negotiation, what if you used the other approach? Do you think that would have helped the situation? As an HR manager, should you use a distributive or integrative approach when dealing with employees?

SLP Assignment Expectations

Your paper should be short (2–3 pages, not including the cover sheet, references, and assessment sheet) and to the point. You are expected to deal with these issues in an integrated fashion rather than treating them as a series of individual questions to be answered one by one and left at that

Caretaker Interview (BSHS/445)

/in /by

Burnout is something that those working in the human service field must be aware of and look out for both in themselves and coworkers.

This interview gives you the opportunity to discuss the topic of burnout and compassion fatigue with an individual already in the human services field.

Conduct an interview with someone who works in human services, answering the questions from the University of Phoenix Material: Caretaker Interview.

Obtain faculty approval before conducting your interview.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper discussing the interview. Include the following:

  • Provide a summary of the interview. (Do not include a question/answer of the entire interview)
  • Explain how burnout is different from compassion fatigue.
  • Identify the signs that are key indicators of burnout.
  • Explain the levels or stages of burnout that the interviewee experienced.
  • Describe prevention strategies that the interviewee finds helpful in the field.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Is delinquency prevalent to low income communities

/in /by

A 10 page research paper on a topic of your choice. You should incorporate a minimum of 8 sources. APA FORMAT. You might think of this as a long literature review/research paper, but you might also be arguing/advocating for a particular policy/practice (you might discuss prevalence rates, current prevention efforts, and relevant court cases)

Research question: Is delinquency prevalent to low income communities

I. Introduction

II. What Is Social Class, and Why Is It Important?

III. Exploring the Social Class–Crime Link

IV. Explaining the Relationship Between Social Class and Criminality

V. Perceptions of Crime as a Lower-Class Phenomenon

VI. Social Class and Criminal Victimization

VII. Social Class, Crime, and Policy, Cases

VIII. Whose Crimes Are More Harmful?

IX. Conclusion “Is delinquency prevalent to low income communities “

Any other information you find reliable to the research is more than welcomed.

I will be selecting you for another research paper once finish with this. Please take my 45 dollar offer.

Please choose one of the following topics and use the links to answer

/in /by

instructions: Review the following guidelines in full and engage in a discussion activity based on the question below.

Visit the National Institute of Nursing Research website: NINR Strategic Plan. Locate the pdf file titled, “The NINR Strategic Plan Advancing Science” and read pgs.1-10 to learn about the mission, goal, and six research focus areas of NINR. Read pgs.10-32 to gain a detailed understanding of the six priority areas of research listed.

OR

Visit Healthy People 2020 and review the 42 topic areas listed from A-Z.

As you read, contemplate the following question:
To advance the science of health, what investment priority area(s) would you choose from NINR priority areas OR from Healthy People 2020 to conduct research? Choose ONE topic area and discuss why you would like to choose the topic.

  1. Initial post: Your answer for the above question must be minimum 300 words in length. Edit your work for grammar, spelling and run-on sentences. Include one or two resources to support your ideas in APA style.

I will send the rubric in a bit

Investigating, Researching, and Gathering Evidence, law homework help

/in /by

Case Study:

You are the law enforcement official gathering evidence against a suspected online pedophile. The individual in question is suspected of enticing children through online chats, email, and text messaging. Additionally, this individual is thought to be using information obtained through credit card fraud to pay for his online activity and camouflage his identity.

For this project, you are to explain how you would gather evidence on the suspected individual. Thoroughly explain your course of investigation and methods of research, including (but not limited to):

  • Description of the use of computer operating system data you would use in investigating the case.
  • Your specific investigation relative to how the individual obtained credit card data.
  • Specifics in terms of use of identity theft and high-tech crime investigative protocols.
  • Method(s) you would employ in email tracking.
  • Specifics in terms of chat investigation protocols you would employ.
  • Specific techniques for online intelligence gathering you would employ.
  • Method or methods you would employ for exceptions to the search warrant requirement to obtain information.
  • Procedures you would follow for obtaining a search warrant if necessary.
  • Methods you would use to:
    • extract, transport, and store digital evidence from the suspects PC;
    • research and recover computer files deleted by the suspect and;
    • access data files encrypted by the suspect.

As part of your research for this project, investigate prior real-life cases with fact patterns similar to this case study. Include in your paper commentary on how the real-life cases may have impacted the current methods for handling digital evidence.

Note: This Assignment requires outside research. Use at least two credible sources beyond the text material and discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used. You may consult the Kaplan Online Library, the Internet, the textbook, other course materials, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style.

The paper:

  • Length should be 5 – 6 pages, excluding cover page and references page
  • Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained
  • Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).
  • Writing should be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful
  • Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics
  • Appropriate citation style should be followed

How to be true to your word

/in /by

In a 2 to 3 page, double-spaced essay (12pt font), write a personal and reflective essay and write it as an example of your best writing. Grammar, spelling, format, will all count. You must use at least one short quote from the reading “How to be True to Your Word” but no more than three short quotes and all quotes must be placed in quotation marks and followed immediately by proper APA citation information in parentheses. No other written sources for this essay should be quoted, copied, or summarized. No more than 40 words are allowed in any one quote. The full source information of the quote must also be listed at the end of the essay under work cited.

After reading the article “How to be True to Your Word”, write about the following: Based on your experience with someone in your life who was not true to their word, tell the story of what happened and how it affected the relationship (you may use a false name for the person). Explain what one thing makes untruthfulness so very wrong in your view. Is your explanation of what’s wrong with a broken promise a consequentialist or a non-consequentialist type of reasoning? Explain. At what point does Cat Thompson use consequentialist or non-consequentialist reasoning about what’s wrong with untruthfulness in the article on “How to be True to Your Word” (LINK (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)? Identify and explain the use as one or the other type of reasoning. Support your answers from the article.

website evaluation and origin story assignment, history homework help

/in /by

Find an American Indian origin/creation story on the internet. Evaluate the website and then provide summary information about the story by answering the questions below. For ANY of the questions, it is not sufficient to simply answer “Yes” or “No.” You must support your answers (e.g., If “yes,” then why? If “no,” then why not?)

Pertaining to the website you found:

  1. What is the URL for the website you found?
  1. Is there a title for the website? If so, what is it?
  1. Is the site kept up-to-date, with current links, new material added from time to time, and a creation or revision date?
  1. Is the purpose of the site clear? Does the stated purpose match the actual content?
  1. What links are included to other sites? How well do these links meet criteria for quality Web sites?
  1. Who is the WebBuilder for the site? Is an email address included?
  1. Does the site’s URL give you any information as to the authority and validity of the site?
  1. If the site claims to represent a tribe or a tribal view, is there information supporting the claim that it is an “official” or authorized Web site for the tribe? If so, provide that information here.
  1. If the site builder self-identifies as Indian, is tribal affiliation identified? Is the word used to identify the tribe accurate? If so, provide that information.
  1. Is the site marketing something, persuading or informing you of something, providing information, or introducing something personal about the WebBuilder? Give an example.
  1. Is the content for the site presented from the Native or the non-Native point of view? What makes you think so?
  1. Are the images and icons used on the site accurate and respectful or neutral, or are they inaccurate and caricatures or disrespectful in other ways? If photographs are used, has permission to use them been given? Provide examples.
  1. If stories or poetic words are provided, does the site tell you where they come from? Are they appropriate for the general viewing public on the Web?
  1. Is the content accurate (e.g., Indian people, no matter what tribal group, incorrectly depicted as living in tipis)? Give an example.
  1. If the site is trying to sell something, does the seller tell you about how the item was acquired or created? Does the seller try to make you feel that you are buying into the “mysterious powers” of American Indians if you buy the product? If so, what product and why.
  1. Are sacred objects, ways, knowledge, or other forms of Native spirituality being offered for sale? Such as?
  1. Is there anything about the content or presentation that makes you feel uncomfortable?

Regarding the origin/creation story you found:

  1. Is there a title to the story? If so, what is it?
  1. What tribe is the story about?
  1. What type of story is it? (e.g., origin of tribe/people; creation of the world; explanation of how something came to be, etc.)
  1. Who are the main characters in the story?
  1. What is the story about? (brief summary)
  1. How does this story explain cultural origins/development of the group as a distinct people? If so, how?
  1. Does the story make connections to a particular landscape? If so, what?

PreviousNext

Content in Context Quiz

/in /by

Based on uploaded context and own accounting working experience, answer following questions:

1. What Is The Link Between Perception And Decision Making? Why Are Perception And Decision Making Important In The Context Of Organizational Behavior?

2. What Are The Major Ways That Jobs Can Be Redesigned? Why Does Job Redesign Matter In The Context Of Organizational Behavior?

3. What Are Some Early Theories Of Motivation? Why Is Motivation Important In The Context Of Organizational Behavior?

4. How Do Role Requirements Change In Different Situations? Why Are Role Requirements Important In The Context Of Organizational Behavior?

5. Why Do Organizations Focus More On Creating Teams Instead Of Groups? Why Are Creating Teams Important In The Context Of Organizational Behavior?

6. Recalling the HBR Article Why Teams Don’t Work, Is The Article Reflective Of Your Co-Op Experience? If Yes, How So? What Are The Major Takeaways From The Article? How Would You Apply The Learning From The Article To Your Most Recent Co-Op?