Source Essay

/in /by

NO plagiarism , No hard grammar .use only 3 outside sources new ones.

the topics will be about gun control and mental issue related to guns . and government legalization for guns.

Instructions

For this assignment, you will be tasked with locating, reading, and evaluating sources. You will also meditate on and draft a reflection of your research process.

1) First you will locate 3 decent sources on your topic. The sources you locate should be examples of public writing, similar to the kinds of articles we have been reading in class. Try to choose a variety of sources for how they help you learn about your topic and the problems associated with it. These sources might include newspaper articles, magazine articles, government sponsored studies, or even an individual chapter in a book. You may choose a website or blog post from a credible source. Locate each source by using the internet or a library database. You will spend enough time with these sources to write a 1-3 sentence overview of them (This source is about …). You will be evaluated on whether these articles are substantial, credible, and on the same narrowed topic..

2) Then you will choose the 2 sources on which to focus in your Source Evaluation Essay. As you decide which sources to focus on, ask yourself the following questions:
Are they “meaty” or substantial

  • in length and perspectives (such as a feature article in a newspaper or magazine) or
  • in breadth or depth of research (such as a government report)
  • In depth of research (such as a newspaper expose)

3) Read each of your 2 best sources at least one time. Knowing these sources well will prepare you for Project IV. Revise the 1-3 sentence overview you wrote for this source. Make sure it captures the thesis and purpose of the whole article or source.

Then for each source, you will write one good-sized paragraph that describes what kind of source it is and considers its rhetorical situation—audience, publication venue, author. To write this paragraph, you will need to know what kind of publication the source came from (a news magazine for general readers; a trade journal for practicing nurses; a website aimed at cancer patients). Be sure you answer the following questions: who is the author (and what qualifications does the author have); who published the source; what is the purpose of this publishing venue; what biases or slants might be connected to this purpose; and, most importantly, who is the audience of this publication venue (and hence the audience of the article). This paragraph on rhetorical context may also consider the conversations in which the source is engaged; the main types of evidence the source employs (research studies, first-hand accounts, etc.); the stylistic and genre conventions of the source; the ways the author accommodates or appeals to his/her audience.

4) Write the Source Essay (see checklist below for what to include).

Checklist for Source Essay:
In general, the format for this assignment is up to you. For example, you may use section or subject headings to help your reader navigate between the overview, your research process, and your source analyses. The following components are required.

• The first two paragraphs should contain an overview of the topic—cite and quote from your sources when necessary—and your interests in the topic.

• A third paragraph will describe your research process. What search terms did you use? What worked and how did you change your plan based upon your initial searches? Did you need to narrow or broaden your topic?

• Much of the essay will be the write-up and analysis of your sources (#3 above).

• Include a conclusion paragraph that draws connections among the sources telling me how they work together to give you a better sense of your final paper topic. What kinds of sources might you still need to locate? What gaps in knowledge about your topic exist that future research could fill?

• Your paper must have a bibliography page for the three sources, which will constitute both the works you have referred to in your essay and a brief bibliography on your topic. The bibliography page will appear at the end of the assignment. It is here that you will include the sentences for all 3-5 sources (see #1 above).

Note: The length of the assignment is flexible, but the total number of pages should be no less than 3.

Criminal Law Paper

/in /by

Attached is the interview questions and answers

The purpose of the paper is to afford students the opportunity to apply the scholarly perspective to a criminal justice topic of making a law. The paper is to be computer generated. The paper must be presented in APA (American Psychological Association) style. The paper should be between 5 to 7 pages of text and should be double-spaced – this page count includes the title page and reference pages. The paper shall also include an 8-10 slide PowerPoint presentation. All important information or factual statements must be referenced in text.


Written Assignment: In the written assignment the student will be accomplishing two things. First, the student will define what is a law and how is a law made at either the local, state, or federal level. This part of the paper should be at least two pages length and should clearly lay out the process that is required for a law to be proposed, voted on, and enacted. The politician that you interview should be a key source of information for you as you are working on this section of your project. The second part of the assignment is to prepare a written summary at least two pages in length of your interview with the politician of your choice. Each student will interview either a local, state or federal politician and what they personally do when they are trying to pass a law. The politician needs to give you an example of a law they sponsored that was passed into law. All statements or information presented about the topic should be referenced. The works cited should support the interests identified in the paper’s introduction. All key terms should be clearly defined, all major points should be illustrated with examples.

Conclusion: In this section of the paper the student will present conclusions about the topic of making a law based on the research presented and what you learned from your interview with the politician. The conclusion should be at least 1 page in length. The primary purpose of this section is to allow the students to summarize the

information about the topic found during his or her research. In addition, students are encouraged to present their personal opinion in this section, which usually

consists of a review of what aspects of the information and application supported and/or contradicted their original understandings of the topic conversation.

References: The reference section of this paper is the last page and will have the title centered and at the top of the page. All sites in the paper will be referenced

References will be constructed using APA (American Psychological Association) format. Students must cite all scholarly references to include non-scholarly

The Athlete-Coach Relationship Discussion Board

/in /by

Locate the text: Schinke, R. J. (2012). Sport Psychology Insights. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. and read Chapter 13: The Impact of a Coaching Intervention on the Coach-Athlete Dyad and Athlete Sport Experience (p. 193 – 208).

Respond to the following questions:

  1. How does this study support the importance of the athlete-coach relationship?
  2. What role, if any, does psychology play in the athlete-coach relationship?
  3. How is this article useful in your professional practice?

Support your discussion with a substantive content post of at least 150 words, supported by two appropriate, relevant references. Respond to or evaluate three peer postings, with a response of at least 125 words, which will allow you and your peers to generate creative ideas and concepts for your Case Assignment and SLP. In this forum, you need to post a minimum of four postings to receive the full credit. Each forum requires an initial input and three peer replies/critiques. (A minimum of four forum posts are required.)

case study analysis

/in /by

Attached Files:

Instructions:
  • Please proof read your document before you upload as only 1 submission is allowed.
  • Please only submit docx. (Word) documents as other formats cannot be checked in Safe Assign. If they cannot be checked they will not be graded and will earn Zero points.
  • To submit your work –First answer in a word document. When completed, proof read, and save your document. To upload scroll to where it asks you to attach file – browse your computer and upload your document. Don’t forget to click submit. You’ll do this for each of the 5 written assignments required.
  • Assignment 4 is Due 11/19
  • Each assignment is worth 25 points. No more than 4 pages in length.
  • Follow basic APA formatting i.e. 12pt font (Times or Arial), double spaced, 1 inch margins. You do not need a cover page but you must cite references in APA style.
  • Be clear, and concise, but thorough in order to expect full points.
  • Use three (3) peer reviewed journal articles to support your arguments/claims. The book can be used as an extra resource (the book also provides several resources to look up).

Please check your grammar, sentence structure, and thought process – as this assignment is language focused 😉

Please watch the video attached above – it deals with a classic case study known as Genie the Wild Child

It’s 55 minutes long and really interesting.

ALSO:- Read the attached Article: TheEarlyCatastrophe(1).pdf

Now:

  1. Discuss the case study (video) with reference to the key arguments on language development that are covered in your book, and the video, namely the critical period vs the sensitive period, and the behavioral approach vs the LAD approach (Noam Chomsky). How do these ideas clash and combine with this case.
  2. Use the article to assist in discussing how language acquisition affects other aspects of development.
  3. What are your take away thoughts about language development – does this case answer the questions? If not, why? What else do we need etc. make sure to use peer reviewed journal research to support your arguments. Do not use direct quotes from the article, only paraphrase and cite accordingly.

the authenticity of leadership

/in /by

Read Case Study 9.1, “Am I Really a Leader?” in your textbook.

Answer the three questions at the end of the case study.

Directions:

  • Write a three-part essay (i.e., an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph) that addresses the assignment’s guide questions. Do not address the questions using a question and answer format.

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Be five pages in length, which does not include the title page, abstract or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
  • Use academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.
  • Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least 5 scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more.
  • avoid long paragraphs.

Social Movements, Fundamentalists, and Cosmic Warriors Essay

/in /by

Unit 2 Analysis Paper: “Social Movements, Fundamentalists, and Cosmic Warriors:

Three Theories of Religious Activism and Violence”

Instructions and Requirements

Instructions:

You are to complete an analysis of the essay, https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/467… by Dr. Heather S. Gregg, Assistant Professor, at the Naval Postgraduate School. You are expected to analyze the reasoning of the author by evaluating at least two areas/specific points that you agree and/or disagree with.Be sure to demonstrate your rationale for your conclusions.Of importance is that you clearly illustrate your critical thinking and analytical skills, while incorporating scholarly or professional sources in your arguments. Essential to your preparation for this assignment is the review of the following video: Religious and Theologically Motivated Terrorism: Part 1 and 2 – from the Naval Post Graduate School Center for Homeland Defense & Security located in the Unit 2 Assigned Readings and Preparation Activities. In addition, the OWL at Purdue provides a good framework for the expected analysis: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/725/03…

Requirements:

Your paper must:

Be a minimum of 1,200 words, excluding the title page and references

Include a minimum of three scholarly or professional journal articles written within the last five years.

Utilize resources from the Deets Library (or other accessible library) and/or the Naval Post Graduate School Center for Homeland Defense and Security – Homeland Security Digital Library:https://www.hsdl.org/?collection/stratpol.

Properly cite all sources used (following APA guidelines)

Your essay paper should include the following components:

1.Title Page (per the APA – running head, etc.)

2.Introduction (clearly stated thesis)

3.Body – use section headers for each relevant component of the paper.

4.Conclusion

5.References (formatted per the APA and on a separate page)

APA Notes:You must follow APA guidelines (one inch margins, double spacing, etc.) and use an “APA title page,” proper page headers, introduction, page numbers (top right), body, in-text citations, conclusion, and properly formatted references. Remember, you must use a proper APA in-text citation for each reference (and vice versa). For more information on credible sources and other information regarding the APA format, please visit https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/02….In addition, be sure to review and follow the grading rubric provided in the course shell.

​Synthesize and evaluate the research articles summarized in the assignments in Units 2 and 3. ​

/in /by

Synthesize and evaluate the research articles summarized in the assignments in Units 2 and 3. Make sure to identify the strengths and weaknesses of related research studies, with emphasis on the validity and reliability of conclusions and applications of the research. Tie this to your topic of interest and base recommendations for improvement, future research needs, and applications on the stakeholder groups involved (patients, providers, third-party payers, legislators, etc.).

Additionally, create 4 PowerPoint slides that summarize your conclusions and future direction based on the synthesis and evaluation of the research literature related to your topic of interest and area of application or function related to healthcare.

Deliverable Length: 3–5 pages excluding cover page, abstract page, and reference page. Students need to support their work with at least 4 academic or professional peer-reviewed sources published within the past 5 years.

On Justice – Doing Well by Being Good. book review, business and finance homework help

/in /by

Sandel, Michael J. Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux 2010
(paperback). ISBN: 978-0-374-53250-5

read this book and write a book review. 2000 words minimum

To work on this job, you must have the access to this book.

  •  Central theme – identify author’s main lesson/argument – what is the author
    teaching us
  •  Critical analysis – evaluate the lesson/argument – strengths/weaknesses –
    considering pointing to a frame of reference in your own life or your training in the
    subject
  •  Main takeaways – so what and now what? How do we best apply the knowledge
    from this book? Essentially, why does this study matter?

What Is Intelligence, English homework help

/in /by

What Is Intelligence?

This week’s lecture focused on the
role of human intelligence. In your own words, what do you think intelligence
is? Do you think intelligence is something you are born with or something that
you can grow and develop? Why do you feel the way you do about that? How can
engaging in good critical thinking impact your intelligence (or can it?)

Your work should be at least 500 words, but mostly draw from
your own personal experience. This should be written in first person and give examples
from your life. Be sure if you are using information from the readings that you
properly cite your readings in this, and in all assignments

How to compare Ideology to NFL Games

/in /by

Assignment 3: Ideology

1. Watch the assigned television show. 2. Read one of the following essays. 3. Read my notes. 4. Write a paper following the directions provided on this page.

Due Date:
Sept. 11
Assignment 3

This week’s TV show

This week’s TV show is NFL football (regular season)
pick a game of your choice from week 1

ESSAYS

Wikipedia

Ideology
Maurice Cranston

MY NOTES

Ideology is confusing. I explain ideology as a the collection of values or preferences shared by a group of people. An ideological group shares a dominant ideology. Let’s take another look at these binary oppositions:

good evil
young old
attractive unattractive
justice injustice
smart dumb
rich poor
thin fat
athletic couch potato
white black
men women
sexy unsexy
masculine feminine

The people who believe in the dominant ideology of a group will generally agree that these binary oppositions should be resolved. They agree on what “masculinity” means within the group; they agree on what “femininity” means to the group. The members of the dominant ideology share values and preferences on how binary oppositions should be resolved.

Accordingly, the mass media teaches the members of the culture the dominant ideology by teaching them how to resolve the binary oppositions and what rewards and punishments are associated with how the binary oppositions are resolved.

Now I am borrowing from John Fiske and Stuart Hall and many other scholars. People within the dominant ideology agree with how a program resolves the binary oppositions within the story line. Other people may disagree with the resolution and disagree with the ideology–be in opposition to the dominant ideology. Some people may negotiate a position within the ideology. Others, may find a position on the margins of the ideology.

I will use marriage as an example.

In American culture, the dominant ideological position is for a man and woman to be in love, to have sex and child, and raise a family in a state of marriage. This is the dominant or the preferred position. People who agree with this statement accept the dominant ideology and are rewarded by society, the law, and their friends.
However, we accept many other relationships as being acceptable within our culture, but not dominant. These negotiated positions will be punished. Among the negotiated positions within our dominant ideology are:

Dating, particularly if the couple is in love, but not financially ready for marriage.
Choosing a celibate life.
The couple being of the same gender.
A male and female living together outside marriage.
A man or a woman who is not in a relationship, but seeks out sexual partners.
People who chose to live alone.

People in total oppositional positions will be more socially isolated or even arrested.

People who prefer polygamy.
People who chose relationships with children.
People who chose partners through violence, like rape.

As you can see, our culture has one dominant ideological position, many less acceptable cultural positions, and some positions that will land you in jail. However, there are attempts within our culture to establish other dominant ideologies. In isolated parts of the western U.S., groups have formed their own communities based on polygamy. I am sure there are still a few communes around where people in the community share sexual partners. The biggest ideological conflict is over the role of homosexual marriage within our culture and law.

Among competing groups, the binary oppositions change little. Definitions change.

As I said in the previous reading, television teaches the audience how to resolve binary oppositions, according to the producers of the television show, by rewarding the people who demonstrate the proper behavior and by punishing the improper behavior. Television is the dominant means for teaching ideology in American society.

Another tool for cultural assimilation is the school system, which helps teach students what is preferred and what is not. I require you to write your papers according to the preferred standards of the English language. If you violate those standards, I will dock your grade. If you cannot meet those standards, I can give you a zero. I am teaching and enforcing dominant ideology.

Football is an ideological conflict between two teams. The winner will be preferred; the heroes will be preferred. The loser will be punished throughout the week by the media and fans. The players whose mistakes lead to victory for the other team will be punished for their errors by being denied respect by the people who follow football. They were less masculine and more feminine by extension than the heroes and the winners.

The TV commenators will be a veteran sportscaster (like Jim Nantz) and a former NFL player and football expert (like Phil Simms). They will present the players in binary oppositions. The binary oppositions will be the coaches, the opposing quarterbacks, the offenses and defensives, the stars from the two teams, and finally the fans of the opposing teams.. The sportscaster does the play by play and then feeds the question to the ex-football player. The expert is a former player or coach who has been a hero, victor, and winner. Based on the game, the expert identifies the heroes and explains how they were heroes; the expert identifies the losers and how they failed.

Networks will have these camera positions so that it can present the binary oppositions. The teams line up and the camera will be a wide shot from a high angle so that we can see the whole play. There will be a camera trained on the quarterback, others on the running backs, and others on the wide receivers. There will be a camera on the key defensive player. There will be cameras on the sidelines. There will be cameras viewing the game from each end zone. When the play is over, the network will show us the play again in slow motion during the 45 seconds that the team huddles. We will see the hero–offense or defense–being heroic by being more masculine than the opposition players. The former NFL player will explain to us what this happens, informing us who was the hero and who was the loser.

Questions asked from the perspective of binary oppositions:

What is the primary binary opposition set up during the football? Usually these are the coaches and the quarterbacks. What are the secondary binary oppositions? Wide receivers and running backs versus the best defensive players. Or, coach vs. coach.

You don’t need to count, but how many times were these binary oppositions presented during the course of the game?

Did the announcers identify the heroes or the losers? How did they present the position of the dominant ideology?

Pay attention to how the commentators use superlatives? Words like great, fantastic, all-time, totally fooled, totally outmatched, etc.

What role did the camera shots play? Did the shots show the heroes and the losers?

Paper 3:
Applying ideology to NFL football

Section 1: Summarize the game in one paragraph, i.e., no more than half of a page. We all watched a game. 10 points

Section 2: Explain the theory. Tell me which parts of ideology theory (the reading and my notes) you are going to use and how you are going to apply the theory to this show. 10 points

Section 3: Critique the announcers and the game presentation from the perspective of ideology. 20 points

Section 4: Your conclusion should be a logical result of what you have said in the first three sections of the paper. This is not a football paper about who won and why. This is a paper on how the television presentation fit with the theory of binary oppositions. Your conclusion should be based on your critique.

Your conclusion should not be a personal opinion, but a logically developed conclusion based on ideology theory. This is not a football paper. Do not tell me why the winning team won the game or do any game analysis unless it is directly connected to your analysis of the ideology.