American Art Before and After World War II

/in /by

Imagine it is 1954 and you have just read a critic’s scathing review of an Abstract Expressionist art exhibition.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word letter to the editor
responding to the attack. At the beginning of your letter, discuss how
the work of American artwork created in the 1930s embodied Democratic
values. Then, discuss Abstract Expressionism as an extension of those
values and a demonstration of the freedom of expression available to
artists in American society.

Include discussion of the following in your letter:

  • Two examples of art from the 1930s with explanation of how these
    artworks embody democratic values; were the works tools of social
    reform? If so, what were the goals of the artists? Were the works
    depicting uniquely American scenes? If so, for what purpose?
  • One example of a work of Abstract Expressionism
  • How the Abstract Expressionist artist expressed themselves using
    this abstract style; what were they “saying?” or what was the message of
    their artwork? What influenced their work?

Format your letter according to appropriate course level APA guidelines.

Controversy In Art: Richard Serra’s “Tilted Arc” sculpture. (ART 1010 Visual Art)

/in /by

tilted Arc.jpg

Tilted Arc#2.jpeg

Controversy In Art: Richard Serra’s “Tilted Arc” sculpture.

For this writing assignment, you will need to carefully look that at the two above photographs of Richard Serra’s controversial sculpture entitled “Tilted Arc.” This topic will also be covered on the first day of class during the first lecture.

Richard Serra was commissioned by the Art-in-Architecture division of General Services Administration in 1981 to create a 12 feet high, 120 foot long sculpture made out of Cor-Ten steel in a Federal Plaza in downtown New York City. The public who had to interact with the sculpture everyday immediately cried: “This is not art!” They even went so far to say that the sculpture was “ugly, rusty, and a target for graffiti.” They also argued that the sculpture interrupted normal pedestrian foot traffic across the plaza. More than 7,000 workers in the surrounding area signed a petition to have “Tilted Arc” removed.

Artists, dealers, and critics rushed to the sculpture’s defense. Serra himself argued against any attempt to remove “Tilted Arc” because he argued it was commissioned specifically for that location, and any attempt to remove it or place it in a more convenient location would compromise its artistic integrity.

The public’s voice ultimately won, and the sculpture was taken down and dismantled in March of 1989.

In a page and a half or longer of writing, I would like you to carefully think through this issue and formulate an opinion on it.

Some questions you should answer in your paper are: 1). Was “Tilted Arc” a “work of art” or not? Why? Give reasons and specific examples. 2). Was the public justified in having“Tilted Arc” removed? Why or why not? Give specific reasons and examples. 3). Is a creation by an artist not considered “art” just because the public does not agree with it? Why or why not? 4). Does the definition of art lie at the feet of the creator (artist) or does the public have the right to decide what is art? Why or why not? 5). Does this sculpture fit in to your personal definition of art? 6). Does art have to be beautiful, skillful or convenient in order to be “art?” These are all questions I would like you to address in your writing for assignment #1.

Please be mindful of spelling, grammar and complete sentence and paragraph format. Respond in one and a half pages or longer of writing. No double-spacing or larger than 12 point type please.

1626692513 Eleanor – 5250 words French

/in /by

The
title of the essay is “Les messages de la pièce de Thomas Beckett “En
attendant Godot” sont-ils toujours pertinents dans la société française
d’aujourd’hui ?”

The essay needs to present and analyse conflicting sides of an argument.

Specific quotations from the play Waiting for Godot are needed throughout the essay.

The
essay should be divided into 4 key themes from Waiting for Godot, each
of these should be compared to a key theme in French Society today. For
example, les banlieues or les gilets jaunes.

The
essay needs to have a heavy focus on existentialism and the key
characteristics of the theatre of the absurd should also be used to help
form an analysis.

The
structure should be – 500 words introduction, 1000 words per key theme,
overall x4, (500 words arguing that waiting for Godot is relevant in
society today, 500 words arguing against that), 500 words conclusion.

Please
use more than 10 academic sources and around 5 non academic
(newspapers, websites, etc). Referencing style should be Harvard.

The quality and complexity of the analysis and the language will be judged.

Thank you in advance,

Order ID: 1626692513

Order Details: 357

Country : United Kingdom

Service Required : Essay

Subject : French

Level of Study : Undergraduate

Target Grade : Undergraduate 2:1

Length: 5250 Words (~21 pages)

Delivery Time : 30 Days

Time for requesting changes : Standard 7 days

Paper
instructions : The title of the essay is “Les messages de la pièce de
Thomas Beckett “En attendant Godot” sont-ils toujours pertinents dans la
société française d’aujourd’hui ?”

The essay needs to present and analyse conflicting sides of an argument.

Specific quotations from the play Waiting for Godot are needed throughout the essay.

The
essay should be divided into 4 key themes from Waiting for Godot, each
of these should be compared to a key theme in French Society today. For
example, les banlieues or les gilets jaunes.

The
essay needs to have a heavy focus on existentialism and the key
characteristics of the theatre of the absurd should also be used to help
form an analysis.

The
structure should be – 500 words introduction, 1000 words per key theme,
overall x4, (500 words arguing that waiting for Godot is relevant in
society today, 500 words arguing against that), 500 words conclusion.

Please
use more than 10 academic sources and around 5 non academic
(newspapers, websites, etc). Referencing style should be Harvard.

The quality and complexity of the analysis and the language will be judged.

Healthcare

/in /by

Each question should be 200 words and contain two references.

1.Describe interoperability and the challenges of achieving interoperability. Why is interoperability so important to HIE?

2.Would you use a virtual care service like https://www.tgh.org/services/virtual-care? What are the implications of virtual care use for health care providers, insurance companies, and health care organizations?

3.Telematic devices have been used by insurance companies to collect billions of miles worth of driving data from its policy holders. Should health insurance companies be able to do the same to their policy holders through wearable tech? Defend your answer?

4.Identify a key legal or ethical issue regarding the use of wearable health technology. Why is this issue important? What can a health organization do to address the issue?

What type of damages should be allowable in a products liability case and who should be held responsible?

/in /by

What type of damages should be allowable in a products liability case and who should be held responsible?

Granted Byslma vs Burger King is a bit of a bizarre case, but do you think the court got it right? Please address the following issues:

  1. What degree of injury should a person have to experience from consumption of a contaminated food before that injured party can hold another person responsible?
  2. Do you think the current policy of holding food companies responsible for injury that their products cause regardless of whether they followed best practices or not is a good policy – why or why not?
  3. Do you think emotional distress should be part of a food products liability action, and if so under what circumstances?
  4. At what point should a company be held responsible for the intentional acts of its employees?

Please write at a 2 – 3 page single spaced paper addressing these four issues. Provide a justification based upon the RCW and it interpretation to support your position.

Finance Discussion

/in /by

Initial post is 150 words 2 follow up posts 50 words each answer

There are two primary means to earn income as a stockholder. The first method is dividend income and the second method is earnings from capital gains. With respect to the investor seeking dividend income, when the investor buys a stock from a corporation with a primary focus to earn dividend income they will typically expect a higher dividend on common stock versus preferred stock. Discuss the dividend payment requirements of a common stock versus preferred stock, in terms of which type of stock has a primary claim on dividend distributions. Explain why the common stock investor demands a higher dividend rate.

6 Opinion based questions!

/in /by

  1. Is gender itself a social problem, or is it only gender inequality that is a social problem? What evidence can you use to support your answer?
  2. What is “hegemonic masculinity?” What forms did hegemonic masculinity take in your high school? Think about your current college life. What similarities and differences do you see with hegemonic masculinity in college, as opposed to your experiences in high school? Do you think there should be a concept called “hegemonic femininity?” What might it look like, and what forms did it take in high school and now in college?
  3. Do you think most people today consider pornography a social problem? How might the Internet have changed peoples’ views on the acceptability of pornography? Is there a sexual double standard related to pornography? What benefits are there to pornography?
  4. What is sexual script theory? How does gender relate to hook up culture, especially in terms of sexual scripts? How could we analyze the phenomenon of hooking up from a functionalist perspective? What are the potential functions and dysfunctions of hooking up?
  5. Sociologist David Popenoe, co-director of the National Marriage Project at Rutgers University, has argued that the modern family is failing in its primary social functions: sexual regulation, procreation, and socialization of children in a stable, economically productive and emotionally supportive unit formed by the lifelong union of a man and a woman. He calls this the “decline of the family.” Other scholars, however, suggest that the modern family is in a state of adaptation (rather than decline). Which of these arguments do you feel best characterizes the modern family (adaptation or decline)? Which of these arguments do you think most Americans would use to characterize the modern family? Explain your position.
  6. Try to imagine 100 years in the future. What do you think the “typical” family will look like in 100 years? What might the functions of the family be in 100 years? What types of social problems might families be experiencing in the future that are also common today, and what problems might they face that are not yet common for families now?

Comparative Method and Theory Essay

/in /by

Write thoughtful 500-word response papers on the attached readings

The papers should include the following:

• What is the author’s main argument?

• What are the key assumptions?

• Is the argument logically consistent?

Write most of your paper on the following points

• How are the selected readings connected? Find common elements in all the readings.

• What important elements of comparative politics are discussed in the readings?

• How do the readings fit into the course as a whole? (This is critical part of the paper, make sure you write enough to show as many connections and also emphasize the differences between the articles.)

“course name is Seminar in Comparative Politics“

Provide a brief history for this organization

/in /by

Primary Task Response: Your first task is to post your own Key Assignment Outline to the discussion area so that other students are able to review your plan. Attach your document to the main discussion post, and include any notes you feel are appropriate. The purpose of this assignment is to help improve the quality of the Key Assignment Draft that you will complete next week.

  • Research the IASB, and discuss its structure.
  • Provide a brief history for this organization.
  • Compare and contrast the differences between principles- and rules-based approaches when setting accounting standards.
  • Share what you feel are 2 barriers and 2 benefits that could be encountered with the move toward a single set of accounting standards

  • Discuss how the changes that you have chosen will impact the financial reporting of U.S. corporations
  • Research this topic, and give your argument for or against the use of fair value for the nonfinancial assets of a company

    • Part 2 400 – 600 words

    write at least 3 paragraphs about the outline.




    My major is in PhD in Business Administration with a concentration in Industrial/Organizational Psychology,psychology homework help

    /in /by

    My major is in PhD in Business Administration with a concentration in Industrial/Organizational Psychology

    1. Statement of problem. Provide a clear justification with evidence on why this study is relevant to your field and worthy of doctoral-level study. Support your efforts using scholarly information published within the past 5 years to ensure relevancy. Remember the problem statement should reflect your degree type (applied or research).
    2. Purpose statement (how your study will address the problem using qualitative methodology). This statement should flow from the problem statement.
    3. Research questions (make sure there is alignment with the problem and purpose).
    4. Find 2 to 3 articles related to your topic of interest and provide an overview of the research methodology and design where you specifically discuss the elements below from each article and discuss how each applies (or does not apply to your current study):
    5. A specific qualitative design,
    • The population and sample,
    • Steps for data collection and protection of human subjects,
    • Steps for the analysis of the data, and
    • Issues of trustworthiness within a qualitative framework.
    1. Based on your analysis above, what seems most applicable to your hypothetical study and why? Be sure to discuss the qualitative design, population and sample, data collection, analysis, and trustworthiness.
    2. Discussion of the inherent strengths and challenges of your hypothetical study to include any ethical considerations that might need to be addressed in the study.
    3. Make sure to support all assertions and research choices, using the course resources as well as additional scholarly literature you have found.

    Make sure to justify your steps and choices, using the course resources to help support your points.

    Length: 5-7 pages

    Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards