This week you will write the Proposed Study and Budget sections of
your Grant Proposal. The Proposed Study section will resemble a typical
methods section like the one you would write in an empirical paper
(except that the data have not yet been collected). In this section you
will describe the study that you are proposing to conduct to test your
hypothesis.

You will also write the Budget Justification section and the Budget
for your grant proposal. The Budget Justification section will contain a
description of your proposed budget including how grant funds will be
used and justifying costs. Proposed costs must be reasonable, necessary
and allocable to carry out the project’s goals and objectives.

The Budget, which will be Appendix A of your grant proposal, will follow the format of the budget in the Sample Grant Proposal Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Appendix A . There is also a Budget Calculation spreadsheet (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. that you can use to determine the direct and indirect costs for your proposed study.

After writing the Proposed Study, Budget Justification and Budget
sections, combine them with the completed sections you have done in
Weeks Two and Three (with feedback incorporated), and create the first
draft of your grant proposal. Submit your draft grant proposal this week
for the Week Five Grant Proposal – Peer Review assignment.

See the Grant Proposal Guidelines (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for detailed instructions on writing your grant proposal. See the Sample Grant Proposal Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. as an example of an actual proposal and use it as a template for your grant proposal.

ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION

1. Click here for instructions on how to submit a clickable rubric assignment
2. .Landlord-Tenant Law
3. Larry Landlord has recently renovated an apartment and has put it on the market to be rented for $800.00 a month. Larry Landlord has been in business for approximately five (5) years and has had both positive and negative experiences with tenants. Larry Landlord is hoping to find a good, long-term tenant for his apartment. Roger Renter saw Larry’s sign for the apartment for rent and thought the location and the apartment would be perfect. Roger met Larry to look at the apartment and Roger fell in love with it.All of the interior fixtures had been replaced and the unit had a nice large closet. Roger noticed that although newly painted, the exterior of the apartment did show a little bit of wear. Because of the condition of the exterior of the building, Roger asked Larry about any roof leaks. Larry stated that he had never had a leak and was not aware of any leaks.Roger and Larry entered into a valid contract for the rental of the apartment. (Note: The issue of whether or not a contract exists is NOT part of this question. For purposes of this question assume the contract is valid and there are no issues with the contract.) Roger Renter was very happy in his new location; the apartment was quiet and the neighbors were friendly. Larry Landlord was also very happy because Roger Renter was a model tenant. Roger Renter paid on time and was quiet and respectful to other tenants.The part of the country where Roger rented was rainy in the summertime. Roger rented and moved into the apartment in October. In June, a tremendous rainstorm occurred and Roger’s roof began to leak. The leak was minor at first and Roger merely put a trash can under the leak and had no other issues that month. When handing over his monthly rent check, Roger told Larry about the small leak. Larry thanked Roger for letting him know about the leak and told Roger he would have it fixed. The next month the rains came again and the leak grew larger in Roger’s apartment. Roger was not home at the time of the rain and therefore the leak damaged some of Roger’s furniture. Roger called Larry to let him know that there was a leak and asked when it might be fixed. Roger also stated that he thought Larry had fixed the roof. Larry curtly stated, “When it rains, sometimes it pours. When it pours, sometimes it leaks.” Roger did not like Larry’s tone or response and called back to ask when the roof might be fixed. Larry stated, “When I get to it.” The following day, Roger sent Larry a note about the roof leak and asked Larry to please address the issue.The week before the rent was due, another rainstorm occurred and the leak was even larger. This time the leak damaged Roger’s clothing, furniture, and some precious items he had inherited from family members. Roger called Larry and asked Larry to fix roof immediately. Larry responded in a similar and condescending manner. Roger hung up the phone and threw his baseball bat against the wall, damaging the drywall and knocking out an electrical socket. Since it was the rainy season, Roger knew it would rain again and therefore simply moved his items away from the leak and did nothing to help mitigate the damage from the leaking roof.Larry came into the apartment to investigate the leak and found damage from not only the leak but also from the thrown baseball bat. Roger states that the baseball bat damage was a direct result of Larry’s inability to fix the leak based on his anger from Larry’s curt response. Suppose you are a mediator. In five to seven (5-7) pages discuss the rights and responsibilities of the landlord and the tenant in which you:
   1. Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.
   2. Decide whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.
   3. Determine whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Explain why or why not.
   4. Describe whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and determine whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.
   5. Support each response with facts presented in the scenario.
   6. Use proper legal terminology throughout your responses.
   7. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.
   8. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
      • Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
      • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
      • Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.

   Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.Click here for the grading rubric.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Determining whether to try a child in the juvenile or the criminal justice system will have an impact on every step of his or her experience. Although the exact laws and practices of the systems vary from state to state, broad underlying beliefs differentiate the two systems. While the juvenile system is often thought to be more lenient in its punishments, there are often stricter regulations throughout the process. In the juvenile system a child may not have a right to a jury trial or bail. Juvenile records are not open to public access like adult criminal records and parole is very different between the two systems. When the child in question is treated by the justice system as a child, the courts act as more of a parent attempting to punish but also protect.

Differences between juvenile and adult criminal justice systems exist at every step of the way. In the website Four Kids, Four Crimes (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., follows four cases and examines how and why two defendants were tried as juveniles and two were tried as adults. After reading all four case stories, choose one of the cases and answer the following questions:

• Which case did you choose? Was he tried as an adult or a juvenile?
• Discuss whether you agree with the decision made to try the juvenile as an adult or as a juvenile. What factors did you rely on to arrive at this decision?
• What scholarly evidence did you use in making your decision? Why is this resource credible and compelling?
• Compare your chosen case to that of Christian Fernandez (covered in your text at the beginning of Chapter 5). What similarities and differences are there? Would you have tried Christian as an adult if you were the prosecutor? Why or why not?
• Are girls (women) treated the same as boys (men) in the criminal justice system? Be sure to discuss both juvenile and adult offenders of each gender.

Your initial post should be at least 350 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and at least one other scholarly resource. Please properly cite in the body of your work and at the end of your work your required references. Be sure to support any opinions you have with credible, scientific evidence. APA Style please

The book for the class is Crime & Society by Kimberly Collica and Jennifer Furs

1. Tonya’s Case: Ethics and Professional Codes

   Resources

   • Tonya’s Case: Ethics and Professional Codes Scoring Guide.
   • APA Style and Format.
   • Capella University Library.

   By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:

   • Competency 2: Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.
     • Demonstrate sound ethical thinking in applying ethical principles and moral theories to a specific case.
   • Competency 3: Analyze ethical issues associated with patient care from the perspectives of various health care professionals.
     • Explain professional codes of ethics and apply them in to a specific case.
   • Competency 4: Explain the conceptual framework that health care leaders use to make ethical decisions.
     • Explain organizational documents like mission and value statements and use them to analyze a case study.
     • Explain the role of accrediting bodies and applies this understanding in analyzing a case study.
   • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others and is consistent with health care professionals.
     • Provides validation and support within written communications by including relevant examples and supporting evidence using APA citations.
     • Produce writing with minimal errors in grammar, usage, spelling, and mechanics.

   For this assignment you will apply some skills concepts we’ve learned in the course, particularly those relating to the basic principles of health care ethics, professional codes of ethics and values of health care institutions.Consider the following case study scenario:

   Case

   Tonya Archer is a fifteen year-old patient admitted to the hospital early last week to have some fairly routine surgery performed. Post-surgical complications resulted in cardiac arrest, and then loss of blood circulation caused whole brain death. However, a ventilator and intubation are sustaining her body’s life functions, including all other vital organs. The doctors have determined that the damage is permanent and that Tonya has no chance of regaining consciousness. Therefore, they want to take her off life support. However, Tonya’s parents are adamant she remain on life support. They point out that her heart is beating, and they insist that their daughter is still very much alive.

   Write a paper that answers the following questions:

   • What are the most relevant end-of-life issues in health care ethics as they relate to this case?
   • What should the hospital do? Should doctors simply keep Tonya on life support, as the parents want? Or, since all medical evidence indicates that Tonya’s brain is permanent, should life support be removed?

   Support your answer with the following considerations in mind:

   • Explain which principles of health care ethics and which moral theory are the best philosophical foundations for your view.
   • Is your view supported by your professional code of ethics? If so, explain how. If not, explain what your code gets wrong about a case like this.
   • Is your view consistent with the mission statement and values of the hospital you discussed in Unit 1? Why or why not?
   • Would an accrediting body, like the Joint Commission, support your choice? Why or why not?

   Submission Requirements

   Your paper should meet the following requirements:

   • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
   • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
   • Length: 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
   • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.