Write 3 short papers 1-2 pages each APA format. Sources should be cited according to a discipline-appropriate citation method. Page-length requirements: 1–2 pages. ORIGINAL CONTENT!!

1. Short Paper Organizational Change

What does the term managing organizational change mean to you? Is it possible to not have change in an organization? Is change best driven by the leadership or is change more effective in a grass roots movement. Should change be resisted at all costs? Is change a good or a bad thing? Discuss, substantiating your position with the research that you have collected.

2. Short Paper New Take on Old Adage

“If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” is an adage that has been around for many years. Take a position for or against this saying and provide a substantive argument in support of your case.

3. Short Paper Implementing Change

Think of a specific change you would like to bring to your organization. Describe the change, the value that you believe the change would bring to the organization, and the methodology that you would use (top-down or bottom-up) in order to implement the change.

Where
do our thoughts come from? Are they byproducts of brain activities,
somehow electrically and chemically manufactured in the gray matter and
then exported to the mind? Or are they distinct from and unconstrained
by the biological workings of the brain? These questions intrigued
seventeenth-century philosopher Rene Descartes and continue to occupy
present-day scholars.

One of the most interesting and emotional
debates argued by Descartes’s intellectual heirs involves the origin of
thought. This version of the nature-versus-nurture question is well
understood: Are we the products of our genes, or are we what we have
experienced? Today, we do have some scientific answers. For example,
Roger Sperry, Nobel laureate in medicine, found that the circuits of the
brain are, for the most part, hard-wired during embryonic development,
suggesting that each cell possesses its own chemical individuality,
rendering it unmodifiable (Horowitz, 1997).

For this 5–8-page
assessment, you will evaluate the connection (if any) that you see
between neuroscience and altruism. In addition, you will assess how the
history of cognitive and affective psychology supports your position and
how understanding the interplay between these two topics can impact
your professional practice.

Based on what you know and have read
on the ethical brain, evaluate the connection (if any) that you see
between neuroscience and altruism. In a 5–8-page paper, address the
following:

• How does cognitive psychology help us understand altruism, if at all?
  • Examine how cultural differences could impact this debate.
• Include an assessment of how the history of cognitive and affective psychology supports your position.
• Finally, assess how understanding the interplay of these two topics can impact your professional practice.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will do the following:

• Explain how the field of cognitive and affect psychology evolved into a recognized psychological discipline.
  • Assess how the history of cognitive and affective psychology supports a position.
• Evaluate the theories and principles that pertain to the cognitive components of cognitive and affective psychology.
  • Evaluate the connection between neuroscience and altruism.
• Explain how the theories and principles of cognitive and affective psychology can be incorporated into professional practice.
  • Assess how understanding neuroscience and altruism can impact professional practice.
• Explain how the theories and principles of cognitive and affective psychology apply to diverse populations.
  • Explain the impact of cultural differences on neuroscience and altruism.
• Communicate
  in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with
  expectations for members of the psychological professions.
  • Communicate
    in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with
    expectations for members of the psychological professions.

Prior to engaging in this discussion please read Chapter 7: Evolving Frameworks, in your e-book, watch the Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video, read the article “Multiple Intelligences” (2011), and review the Instructor Guidance.

Traditionally, someone who is intelligent is defined as an individual who can solve problems, use logic to answer questions, and think critically. However, psychologist Howard Gardner has created a much broader definition of intelligence called multiple intelligences, which is more focused on our areas of learning preferences. For this discussion, please complete the following:

• Demonstrate an understanding of intelligence (IQ) and multiple intelligences (MIs) by comparing and contrasting the differing variables associated with each.
• Thinking critically about these foundational differences, comment on how Gardner’s ideas about learning preferences might change the way we assess a person’s strengths and weaknesses.
• Click the following link and take the MI assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Review your results.
  • Do you agree with the assessment? How can what you have learned about yourself help support your learning performance? List at least two behaviors you could change or traits you could develop in your own behaviors, and explain how they support your assessment results.

Submit a topic selection short paper. Key to your success is providing the background to thoroughly address each of the critical elements. Ideally, the business selected will be the same one that you created in your MBA 560: Marketing and Strategy course. (My selected company is Kellog.Inc) If that company has not faced some significant government impact, you may still choose it, but you will need to identify one or more government impacts that the business would be likely to face.

For additional details, please refer to the Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document and the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course.

2-3 pages is enough. APA style

Replies (Modules/Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8)

You are required to reply to the Case Study responses of two classmates. The classmates you choose to respond to should not have researched the same question as you. Each reply will include at least 2 original references and should be at least 250 words. The response should not be an agreement or disagreement with the initial post, but an evaluation of the author’s analysis. All assertions must be supported by research and should not be based upon one’s “feeling” or “opinion.”

For each reply, the following headings should include:

Response to:

Classmate’s Name, Case Study Name, Question Number

Response:

An evaluation written in current APA format, using third person. Make sure to evaluate and critique each post you are replying too.

References:

Refer to the APA Manual for proper formatting.

Biblical integration:

Just as you did for the thread, provide integration of a biblical concept that supports your reply. Include 1 bibilical quote in proper APA formatting.

*****Must follow the above formatting and use the same headings!

***** Also provided a thorough evaluation of your classmate’s posting, including a review of their references.Be critical of their post.

Must be written at graduate level.