Mid-term assignment

I have attached the mid term instructions as well as some background information for this assignment which is also attached in the midterm assignment. Please use APA style, citations and watch your spelling and grammar.

Please follow the directions and elaborate on what is already given to you in the midterm assignment that is attached. That is the base for the assignment and then you can go on from there.

This paper is in the eyes of an addictions counselor

This is a 10 page paper which does not including the 1 page with the name and the last page with the reference

Discussion: Program Evaluation Overview

To prepare

Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on:

  • The steps that make up the program evaluation process
  • The objectives-based approach to program evaluation
  • The Program Evaluation Standards related to ethical issues

Post the following for Dr. Jones: This is the assignment that needs to be completed

  • Compare the objective-based, decision-based, and participatory approaches to program evaluation, including the benefits and challenges of each approach.
  • Explain how you will apply objective-based program evaluation components and procedures to your identified program.
  • Identify and discuss ethical dilemmas related to your role as a program evaluator and how your personal beliefs and/or biases may influence accomplishing objectives.
  • Support your post with two or more references to this week’s Learning Resources and/or scholarly sources within the last 5 years beyond the course material.

References:

Chen, H. T. (2015). Practical program evaluation: Theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chapter 2, “Understand Approaches to Evaluation and Select Ones That Work” (pp. 35–57)

Spaulding, D. T. (2014). Program evaluation in practice: Core concepts and examples for discussion and analysis (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Chapter 3, “In-Depth Look at the Objectives-Based Approach to Evaluation” (pp. 59–67)

Videos:

http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=103

http://www.janetwall.net/attachments/File/9_Step_E…

https://prezi.com/qvgzbrkwqfhk/objectives-oriented…


The logic model flowchart is my topic choice.


Article (a)

Please read the following article: https://nypost.com/2017/04/25/did-oreos-change-the…

Note: Please click on the links embedded in the article to see social media, etc.

FB: https://www.facebook.com/oreo/posts/10154459983024…

Discuss the following:

1. How are third-party sources (‘earned media’) affecting Oreo’s image and consumer’s attitudes (including trust) in a negative way?

2. Discuss the importance of managing the brand’s (company’s) communication (‘owned media’ and ‘paid media’) and the communication from other sources (‘earned media’ – publicity via traditional and online media platforms). Based on your example, how should Oreo managers deal with negative reviews, messages, and/or news to minimize damage and promote favorable attitudes?

two pages; double-spaced is sufficient. Include a link to the article.

Cumberland last part

The final part of your project is your reflection on the administrative process of proposing a new program for a Human Services organization. In a 1-2 page paper, reflect on the process of putting your program proposal together. Detail your analysis of each section of the project, including consideration of how the section pertained to administrative leadership in Human Services. Discuss challenges you may have dealt with throughout the process and what this implies for future leadership roles.

Your submitted assignment should include your complete program proposal along with your reflection piece. Connect each section of the project into one unified submission with the following structure and in APA format:

  • Cover page
  • Introductory paragraph that explains the program proposal
  • Needs Assessment
  • Program Design we already work on these three categories i can attach them for you
  • Implementation Plan with Funding Goals
  • Reflection
  • Reference Page

Before submitting your completed project, make sure you have incorporated any feedback received from your instructor and made changes accordingly.

Narrative and Descriptive writing, English homework help

This week, we begin a new chapter in our course; namely, we move away from expository writing (like Narrative and Descriptive writing), and into academic argument. Most academic writing takes the form of argument. Persuasive writing, also known as argumentative writing, utilizes logic and reason (and sometimes emotion) to show that one idea is more legitimate than another idea. It attempts to persuade a reader to adopt a certain point of view or to take a particular action. Ideally, the argument should always use sound reasoning and solid evidence by stating facts, giving logical reasons, using examples, and quoting experts.

As we prepare to write our persuasive essays, think of a time when you were engaged in an argument, either written or verbal. Tell us about the argument and what it entailed. Were you able to use logic and sound reasoning? Did it help with the outcome? Were you successful in being persuasive?

i need some one to edit the work

its only one and half a page, please try to finish it in one hour.

The product:

Uber Motorcycle in italy, the paper is talking about a team project and my part is this:

The product should be mostly focused on our service we are providing and only a small portion is the motorcycle used… and the drivers would most likely use the motorcycles they own already similar to how Uber drivers use their own cars

II. The product

A. Evaluate the product as an innovation as it is perceived by the intended market

1. Relative advantage

2. Compatibility

3. Complexity

4. Trialability

5. Observability

B. Major problems and resistances to product acceptance based on the preceding evaluation

Mohamed Chehaima, health and medicine homework help

I need a well written essay contain Five Paragraphs about my experience with working with my group for the presentation and Who was the leader? How often did we meet? What would i do differently? How did you all perform in the presentation?

and here is some information about my group

my group was four members 1-Mohamed Chehaima 2-LaShaunta Lusk 3-Khalid Zalbani 4-me. our leader was Mohamed Chehaima. and our topic is about Stress Management . and our group was number one. and we only share our info on text massage and we did not meet, and we did our PowerPoint online, each one of us added something on the slides that he is going to talk about in the presentation.

# I only need two pages or one and half

# please make the essay simple and easy to understand.

ENG315 Week 1 Assignment

Due at the end of Week 1 (not eligible for late policy unless an approved, documented exception is provided)

*In the workplace, incomplete work is not accepted. The professional experience assignments are designed to help prepare you for that environment. To earn credit, make sure you complete all elements and follow the directions exactly as written. This is a pass/fail assignment, so no partial credit is possible. Assignments that follow directions as written will be scored at a 22. Assignments that are incomplete or do not follow directions will be scored at a zero.

Steps to Complete Professional Experience One:

Step One: Find an article about effective professional communication that was published in the last 18 months.

Step Two: Read the article and develop a 25 to 50-word summary. Summaries shorter than 25 words and longer than 50 will not receive credit.

Step Three: On the top of the page, there is a Link to One Drive – that link will take you to a document entitled “Professional Communication Table.” Locate and click on this link

Step four: The table requests that you provide a hyperlink to the article, your 25-50 word summary, and your name (in the employee section). Fill in the table with the requested information.

In order to receive your points for completing this task you must do the following:

  • Provide a viable link (not a URL) to the article
  • Ensure your summary is no less than 25 and no more than 50 words
  • Fill in the “Employee” section with your first and last name
  • Copy the webpage link to the article you summarized and submit it to the Professional Experience 1 link in Blackboard

This is a pass/fail assignment. All elements must be completed (simulating the workplace where incomplete work is unacceptable) for credit. You cannot receive partial credit.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Plan, create, and evaluate professional documents.
  • Write clearly, coherently, and persuasively using proper grammar, mechanics, and formatting appropriate to the situation.
  • Deliver professional information to various audiences using appropriate tone, style, and format.
  • Learn communication fundamentals and execute various professional tasks in a collaborative manner.
  • Analyze professional communication examples to assist in revision.

History-american violence-Discussion post

What mix of motivations led young American soldiers to Civil War battlefields? Did the emancipation of slaves matter? In “The War Will Never End Until We End Slavery,” James McPherson assesses the place of emancipation in the motivations of soldiers who enlisted in the Union cause. To what extent, he asks, did soldiers wager their lives to free slaves, to a cause they knew meant likely death?

Use these Related Documents as well: ATTACHED BELOW

  1. Isaiah H. Welch, A Black Soldier Explains His Motives for Fighting (1863)
  2. John A. Potter, Antiblack Prejudice in the Union Ranks (1897)
  3. Chauncey Welton, A Union Soldier’s Changing Views on Emancipation (1863-65)

Simple Discussion post, use the sources provided.

Research Project on Grotte de Chauvet

 Find six academic, first hand archaeological sources related to your topic using the KPU Library webste

 Summarize all six sources by answering the summary questions in a maximum of
two double spaced pages. Cite all six of your sources (APA format).

1. Where is the site, and what is its local environment like?
Easy question! Answer this in one or two sentences, and cite your source(s) in APA
format.

2. Why is this site significant to archaeology?
Answer in one paragraph of 3 to 4 sentences. Make an argument, using specific
information from your sources, that study of this site is important. Cite your sources in
your text in APA format.

3. What are the dates of occupation or use of the site, and what method(s) were used
to determine this?
Provide a date for your site. Answer this question in two paragraphs of 3 to 5 sentences
each paragraph. Use your sources to find specific information about how old the site is,
and how this was determined. Was the site dated by radiocarbon, by tree rings, or by
documentary evidence? Often more than one method is used to date a site, and
sometimes the methods conflict with each other. Include specific detail about this from
your sources, and cite that detail in APA format. Do not quote, paraphrase the sources
and use your own words. Prove that you read and understood the sources.

4. What are the conservation challenges and threats to this site, and what is being
done to address these?
Every site has threats to its ongoing integrity. Some are threatened by looting, some by
development, some by neglect and lack of funding. Use your sources to determine what
threats are significant for your site, and how these threats are being dealt with. Use
specific information from your sources, and cite this information in APA format in the
text of your answer.
Answer this question in two paragraphs of 3 to 5 sentences each paragraph. Do not
quote, paraphrase the sources and use your own words.

 For each source, answer the three source questions in the order they are given. At
the top of each source question page, list the source in APA format.

1. How do you know this source is credible? Provide specific detail from the source.
Do not simply google the author(s) and paste that information, make your own argument
as to why the source is credible. You need to prove you read and understood the source.

2. Which SPECIFIC concepts relating to the course (ANTH 1300) are used in the
source? Do not just list them, explain how they are used. Provide specific detail from
the source. You need to prove you read and understood the source.

3. What makes this an original archaeology study? That means a first-hand academic
/ archaeological study. Prove this source is an original archaeology study and not just a
literature review or repeat of older material. Provide specific detail from the source
related to the methods of the study. If its not archaeology, say so and document how you
know this. You need to prove you read and understood the source.