AT LEAST ONE SINGLE SPACE FOR EACH QUESTION. STRAIGHT TO THE POINT AND WRITE DETAILED.

1. Compare and Contrast the role of language in the various theoretical perspectives as described by Habermas, Goffman, Bourdieu, and Giddens. What similarities do you see in their perspectives on languages in their theories?

2. Define and distinguish between economic, social, cultural, andy symbolic capital. Provide examples from life of who would posses these four forms and how.

3. According to Habermas, what role does the mass media play in shaping the public sphere? How might be corporate consolidation of media outlets and growing use of the internet affect public debate?

4. Use an example from your own life that demonstrates Goffman’s vocabulary of the front, backstage, character, and performer.

as attached the 2 articles

http://www.thinkingautismguide.com/2010/07/living-…

and this is the original question for the assignment

after reading the required articles Living the Least Dangerous Assumption, and Inclusive Language as a Form of Disability Advocacy in Schools, consider your prior personal experiences, and professional experiences/aspirations. Have you been exposed to this notion previously, or is this your first time really thinking deeply about inclusive language and disability? Contemplate if the way educators discuss disability really matters. How have the readings impacted your understanding of communicating for and about all students in neutral and inclusive ways, and how do you see yourself as trying to implement the principles of inclusive language in the future? Note: If you believe or do not believe that using these principles are necessary or important, explain your rationale. Make connections to course readings: at a minimum, include one quote from the textbook and one quote from this module’s required course readings (APA format for quotes requires name, year and page number of quote).

This is my work and I need editing and correction:

I was very impressed by the Inclusive language article that I read, it made me think about choosing my words and thinking about them carefully. Before reading this article, I did not think as deeply as I am thinking now. This article will support me and help me a lot in the future of my dealings with PWD.

Inclusive language article explains misconceptions and makes us formulate and replace them to fairly concept. “It is a vehicle for addressing unwanted narrow definitions of people with disabilities.” (Dinaro, 2017). Furthermore, choosing an appropriate language in schools where there is no judgment or diminishing the value of others. This article taught me that such words have a very powerful effect that can limit one’s ability or grieve others. Therefore, we have to be very careful and watch our language to avoid these bad results

Although we as human beings are not infallible from mistake and forgetfulness, we must correct our mistakes immediately. After reading this article, I should try to convey what I learned to everyone in my society to benefit from. in addition, stop hurting others feelings by judging them and let them know everyone is capable to do something.

I read also the Living the Least Dangerous Assumption article that talks about the benefits of living the least dangerous assumption and the steps that help us to achieve this concept. “We must come to understand that refusing to presume competence is, in the long run, more costly than making that least dangerous assumption.” (Ahern, 2010)

We must believe that everyone has special potential and capabilities and any goal needs time to be an achievement. We have to be patient because the patient always brings the desired results. ”Patience makes things possible (allow processing time)” (Ahern, 2010)

Please respond to the Forum questions listed below. You are expected to give complete answers referring to what you have read in the “Lessons”(reading & resources). Reference to, or the use of critical thinking, analysis, what you have learned in previous courses, the media, and in your professional lives is also expected. Define the subject; make references to what you have read, what you have learned elsewhere, and then form a response.

Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 350 words. Please respond to a least 2 other students. Response should be a minimum of 150 words and include direct questions. When addressing the topic questions, you are to state the question followed by your response. Do this for each question posed.

1) Describe the following and discuss how they enhance port maritime operations?

a) The SMART Port Security Legislation.
b) The SAFE Port Act.
c) The Small Vessel Security Strategy.

d) The Maritime Transportation Security Act.

Social Responsibility and Intercultural Competence
Social responsibility includes intercultural competence, knowledge of civic responsibility, and the ability to
engage effectively in regional, national, and global communities.
Intercultural competence includes:
1. Knowledge of your own culture and how it has shaped your world view.
2. Knowledge of significant characteristics of other cultures.
3. Awareness of differences and similarities in cultures.
4. Ability to adjust your actions to successfully interact with someone of another culture.
How do we continuously improve our intercultural competence? First, by understanding that intercultural
competence is complex and it requires growing and maturing in three areas: mind set, heart set, and skill set.
Mind set is the domain where as we learn and engage with others, we recognize similarities and differences. A
growth mind set requires self-awareness and cultural awareness.
Heart set is the domain where we learn to acknowledge, appreciate, and accept cultural differences. There are
six dimensions to your heart set:
1. Self esteem
2. Self-monitoring
3. Empathy
4. Open mindedness
5. Reserved judgment
6. Social relaxation
Skill set involves our intercultural agility; the ability to adjust your actions to successfully interact with
someone of another culture. Specific skills include message skills, appropriate self-disclosure, behavioral
flexibility, and interaction management.
Knowledge of civic responsibility includes:
1. Recognizing your civic responsibility to a specific community.
2. Identifying actions you will take as a citizen to address the pertinent issues within your community.
Engagement in a community includes:
1. Describing effective participation in civic engagement activities.
2. Understanding the purpose and benefits of your engagement in the community.
As you can see, intercultural competence requires:
Knowledge
Skills
Reflection
Social Responsibility Assessment MVC Psychology Professor Deb Yoder
Social Responsibility Assessment
Due February 26, 2020
Assignment Overview: You will watch three short video’s, discuss them with a person/persons of a different
culture than you, then answer eight writing prompts to write a reflection essay. The assignment will then be
uploaded to eCampus no later than April 20, 2020.
Watch the video “Engagement is the Answer! Cross-Cultural Lessons in Life and Psychology”
Laura Johnson | TEDxUM
Watch the video “Defining Intercultural Competence” youtube.com/watch?v=SJqBhLgSNQY
Watch the video If I Could Change the World
Discuss the videos with someone from a different culture than yours. Observe, Think, Listen, Reflect, Question,
Respond. What is your mindset, heart set, skill set? Can you see another’s perspective? What can you do?
What can we do together?
Assignment detailed instructions: Write a three-page (minimum of 750 words) essay addressing the following
eight questions. The paper should be in APA format, double spaced, 12 font, and include
references/bibliography on the fourth page. The title page should include only your name, course and section
number, and your instructor’s name. Upload your essay on the eCampus course page under “Assessment” no
later than Feb. 26, 2020. You will turn in a total of five pages: title page, three-page narrative, bibliography
page.
Write eight paragraphs addressing these eight prompts:
Part 1 Intercultural Competence
1. Identify and describe a specific issue of concern to a specific community for the focus of your essay.
Choose from DACA and immigration laws, racism, prochoice/prolife, millennials, rape culture, gender
equality, same-sex marriage, marijuana laws, religion in schools, human trafficking, white privilege,
police brutality, gun control, or another social justice issue.
2. Define culture and cultural competence and discuss how your own culture has shaped your identity
and world view related to the issue you chose.
3. Discuss significant characteristics about another culture and how and why they see this issue perhaps
differently than you. (put yourself in their shoes, see it from their perspective)
4. Discuss how you have or how you might adjust your actions and communication style to successfully
interact with someone from another culture/viewpoint.
Part 2 Engagement with Communities: Social Responsibility
5. Discuss your civic responsibility related to the issue you chose to write about in this essay.
6. Discuss effective participation in civic engagement activities related to this issue.
7. Describe your understanding of the purpose and benefits of civic engagement.
8. If you have engaged in civic activities related to this issue or another issue of importance to you,
describe that experience. What was the purpose? What were the benefits? What did you learn?
Social Responsibility Assessment MVC Psychology Professor Deb Yoder
Helpful assignment tips:
Study the attached grading rubric before you begin writing to be clear on the assignment expectations.
You may also choose to visit the Writing Center on campus in W114 to get help writing an exemplary paper.
Due Date: Final paper must be uploaded on eCampus by February 26
th, under the Assessment Tab in your
psychology course main menu. This assignment will be graded using elements of the MVC Quality
Enhancement Program (QEP) Writing Rubric and Standards of Critical Thinking. If you are in a face-to-face class
on the Mountain View Campus, every classroom has a poster that lists these elements:
Standards of Critical Thinking
o Clarity: understandable, nothing is confusing
o Accuracy: the information is true, correct, and can be verified. Project demonstrates accurate and
knowledgeable understanding of one’s ingroup and the outgroup and the relevant issue.
o Precision: includes the specific information needed to address and explain the problem, issues.
o Relevance: Incorporates meaningful information and observations. Information provided relates
directly to the project.
o Depth: includes enough complex information to address the psychological concepts related to ingroup
and outgroup dynamics.
o Breadth: involves more than one point of view; considers alternative perspectives
Logic: answers/paper makes sense; nothing is confusing, no contradictions
o Significance: focuses on the important aspects of the ingroup’s and outgroup’s identities, positions,
beliefs, norms, (culture). respondent’s life, not the trivial
o Fairness: considers the thoughts and views of others

Your supervisor has placed you in charge of hiring a new, full-time administrative assistant for your department.

• Prepare an advertisement for that position that complies with federal law. This advertisement must be detailed. The minimum length of your job description must be 300 words (approximately three-fourths of a page). You can make up the job details but must include the following:
• A job description
• A description of the job duties
• A description of the minimum qualifications
• Prepare 10 illegal questions that must not be asked. For each question, be sure to justify your reasoning.
• Prepare 10 legal questions that may be asked during the interview. For each question, be sure to justify each question.

Submit your three- to five-page paper (not including the title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide and must cite at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.