For this Assignment, which you began in Week 7, you are going to create an implementation plan for your public health program. In order to create your plan, you need to determine which setting is most appropriate for your public health program. You also need to consider your target population and the steps you would take to implement your program. For this Assignment, it will be helpful to review the “Implement” section of the MAP-IT Model in the Learning Resources (Wukitsch, 2012) to create your plan.

Submit a 4-page paper in which you do the following:

• Explain how you might implement your SPP in each of four settings (health care, community, school, and workplace).
• Identify which participants (stakeholders, target populations) you might involve in each setting and explain why.
• Explain which of the four settings is most appropriate for your SPP and why.
• Describe the steps that you might use to implement your program in your selected setting.
• Explain why your implementation plan will achieve the intended outcomes for your target population.

Resources

https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/overview/m…

Step 3:

Answer the following questions about the reading. These answers can be submitted as a text submission or added to the end of your annotation worksheet.

1. What does it mean to “anglicize” a word, a name?
2. Why, according to the writer, do many people in California’s Central Valley, “regardless of the speaker’s background,” Anglicize the pronunciation of Mexican names? Consider his explanations regarding the demographics of the small towns in the region and the prevailing perceptions of Spanish.
3. Munoz claims that the Anglicization of his stepfather’s name “ties into something bigger than learning English” (par. 14). Explain what he means by “something bigger.” How does this relate to the idea of cultural borders within the same physical space/border?
4. In paragraph 8, Munoz mentions the stigma associated with speaking Spanish, saying that “Spanish was and still is viewed with suspicion.” Do you agree that there is stigma with speaking Spanish in the United States? Why or why not? How is that a reflection of Spanish culture within the physical borders of the U.S?
5. In paragraph 9, what does Munoz realize about what it means to be “white: and “American.” What is his realization? Why is it significant?

Assignment Questions:

• Read the attached article titled as “Are You Solving the Right Problems” by Thomas Wedell-Wedellsborg, published in Harvard Business Review, and answer the following Questions: [5 Marks]

1. Summarize the article and explain the main issues discussed in the article. (In 600-700 words)
2. Discuss the seven practices for effective reframing of the problems. (In 100-300 words)

• What do you think about the article in relations to what you have learnt in the course about identification of problems for decision making?Use additional reference to support you argument. (In 200-400 words)

Instructions

• Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation.
• Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
• Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
• All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).

Applying an Ethical
Theory

Please read these assignment instructions before writing your paper, and
re-read them often during and after the writing process to make sure that you
are fulfilling all of the instructions.

Overview
The following short essay assignment is designed to help prepare you for an
important part of the Final Paper. In this essay, you will do the following:

• Choose either the same ethical
  problem or question you discussed in the Week One Assignment, or a
  different one from the list of acceptable topics.
• Choose either utilitarian or
  deontological ethical theory to apply to the ethical question.
• Explain the core principles of
  that theory.
• Demonstrate how the principles
  of the theory support a certain position on that question.
• Articulate a relevant objection
  to the theory on the basis of that argument.

Instructions
Write a five paragraph essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper
must be 600 to 900 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. The
paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

1. Introduction
   The introduction should be one paragraph, no more than 120 words. This
   should clearly delimit the ethical problem or question under
   consideration, and define the essential issues. You may build upon the
   problem you raised in the Week One Assignment, or you may choose a
   different topic, but it must be from the list of acceptable topics. 
   The last sentence of the introduction should briefly summarize the
   conclusion or position on this issue that you think is best supported by
   this theory, and succinctly state what the objection will be. Remember
   that your essay will not be concerned with your own position on this issue,
   but what someone defending the chosen theory would conclude.
    
2. Body Paragraphs
   Each paragraph in the body should start with a topic sentence that clearly
   identifies the main idea of the paragraph. Each paragraph should have at
   least four sentences.
1. Theory explanation:
   This should be approximately 150 to 200 words explaining the core
   principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory and the
   general account of moral behavior it provides.

• You must quote from at least
  one required resource that defends or represents that theory. Please
  view this list of acceptable resources.

Application:
This should be approximately 150 to 200 words, and should address how the
principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory apply
to the problem or question under consideration and identify the specific
moral conclusion that results from that application.

• Your application should
  clearly show how the conclusion follows from the main tenets of the
  theory as addressed in the previous paragraph. Please see the associated
  guidance for help in fulfilling this requirement.

Objection:
This should be approximately 150 to 200 words raising a relevant
objection to the argument expressed in part “b.” A relevant
objection is one that exposes a weakness in the theory as it applies to
your problem, and so you should explain how it brings out this weakness.

• Note that this does not
  necessarily mean that the objection succeeds, or that the conclusion the
  theory supports is wrong. It may be an obstacle that any adequate
  defense of the conclusion would have to overcome, and it may be the case
  that the theory has the resources to overcome that obstacle. Your task
  here is simply to raise the objection or present the “obstacle”.
   

Conclusion
The conclusion should be one paragraph, no more than 150 words. The
conclusion should very briefly summarize the main points of your essay and
must contain a paraphrased restatement of your thesis.

Resources Requirements:

• You must use at least two
  resources to support your claims.
• At least one of the resources
  should be one of the Required or Recommended resources that directly represent
  the theory you have chosen, and must be drawn from the list of acceptable resources.
• The other source should pertain
  to the particular issue you are writing about, and should be drawn from
  the Required or Recommended readings in the course, or found in the
  Ashford Library.
• You are encouraged to use
  additional resources, so long as at least two conform to the requirements
  above.
• The textbook does not count
  toward satisfying the resources requirement.
• To count toward satisfying the
  requirement, resources must be cited within the body of your paper and on
  the reference page and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
  Writing Center.

List of Acceptable
Primary Resources for the Week 3 and Week 5 Assignments

These are the primary
resources that you can cite when explaining a moral theory in order to fulfill
the relevant portion of the resources requirement. Readings included in the
“Required Readings” list are indicated with a *.

Utilitarianism:

*Mill, J. S.
Utilitarianism, in the original version in the textbook, or in the version by
Jonathan

Bennett retrieved from www.earlymoderntexts.com.

Haines, W. (n.d.).
Consequentialism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from

http://www.iep.utm.edu/conseque/

Singer, P. (2003).
Voluntary euthanasia: A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics, 17(5/6), 526-541.

Retrieved from the
EBSCOhost database.

Deontology:

* Kant, I. (2008). Groundwork for the metaphysic of morals. In J.
Bennett (Ed. & Trans.), Early modern Philosophy. Retrieved from
http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfs/kant1785.pdf

(Original work published in 1785).

Virtue Ethics:* Aristotle. (350 B.C.E.). Nicomachean ethics (W. D.
Ross, Trans.). Retrieved from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html

Annas, J. (2006).
Virtue ethics. In D. Copp (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory (pp.515–36).Oxford:
Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.sesync.org/sites/default/files/resources/case_studies/10-kenyaecotourismhandbook.pdf

Hursthouse, R. (2012).
Virtue ethics. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved
from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/

MacIntyre, A. (1984).
After virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Chapters 14-15 are
included in the Chapter 6 readings of the textbook.

Feminist/Care Ethics:

*Held, V. Feminist
transformations of moral theory. Included in the Chapter 6 readings of the

textbook.

*Gilligan, C. (1982).
In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development.

Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://lms.manhattan.edu/pluginfile.php/26517/mod_resource/content/1/Gilligan%20In%20

a%20Different%20Voice.pdf

* Noddings, N. (2010). Maternal factor: Two paths to morality.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Retrieved from the ebrary
database.

How Have you Addressed Separation Anxiety?

1515 unread replies.1515 replies.

If you are a teacher or a parent of a child who has attended school or daycare, you have probably experienced separation anxiety of a child.

One thing to note is that separation anxiety is normal and a positive sigh of a healthy attachment. It is often more difficult for the parent to cope with than the teacher!

There are situations when a child has severe anxiety and in some cases the child may need more time to mature before attending a group care setting.

1. What does it mean when a parent seems to be supporting the child’s difficulty in separating rather than trying to encourage his/her successful separation?

1. What can teachers do to help support parents when their child is having a difficult time adjusting to be separated from the parent?

1. WHat is your understanding or a collectivist family? What are the primary differences between a collectivist family and one who the text describes as an individualistic family?

1. What has your personal experience been with helping your own child or children in your classroom separate successfully? If you have no experience with separation anxiety, ask someone you know what experiences they might have to share.