The Price of Doing Good: Consequences of Ethical Decision Making, business and finance homework help

Choose a positive example from the past ten years of a
business organization whose leaders acted ethically when they
encountered an ethical dilemma. Select, analyze, and describe
the ethical decision making and actions in the organization. 

Submit a 4-page (not including cover page or
references) analysis of the ethical situation. Your analysis must
include the following:

• An explanation of the ethical framework applied by the
organization to make its decision, including support for your
analysis from scholarly research

• An examination of both the positive and negative
consequences of the decision, including the tradeoffs that the
leaders of the organization made in making their decision

• A minimum of five peer reviewed scholarly references. Include doi if available or url

Please use APA format and cite accordingly

describe your goals for your internship experience, assignment help

After our face-to-face meeting, you need to describe your goals for your internship experience. While you have only spent a small amount of time at your site, I would like you tothink of at least 3 goals you want to accomplish by the end of the semester. These goals could involve learning new skills, being more assertive, developing self-confidence, practicing a skill you learned in a course, or applying a skill that you have to a new setting, but you need to list at least 3 and include concrete steps you can take to achieve them (i.e., “I will practice
assertiveness by engaging in staff meetings at least twice a week…). You will evaluate how wellyou have accomplished each of these goals at the mid-point of the semester.

my internship is with psychology major and i want u to write three different things on both

you need to list 3 new goals for the 2nd half of your internship. As before, include concrete steps you can take to achieve them (i.e., “I will solidify timely and accurate clinical documentation skills by completing all paperwork by the time I leave each shift and having my supervisor review it.”).


write three different things for both and again my internship is on psychology

Challenger Accident

1.Given the Challenger accident

a)What were the communication problems?

b)Who was responsible?

c)How could they have been resolved?

d)What is the disposition of the system currently?

2.Systems thinking is a way of understanding reality that emphasizes the relationships among a system’s parts, rather than the parts themselves.

a)What does this mean?

b)Why is Systems Thinking needed?

c)What works against the adoption of Systems Thinking?

3.Systems thinking focuses more on the system rather than on the actions of individual engineers or others involved with the system. This allows us to learnhow to redesign a failed system from design to operation. How can we apply systems thinking to learn from failures such as the Challenger accident to reduce incidents and accidents?

A Tale of Two Routes

Instructions: In class we discussed one of the major theories of persuasion, the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM). For this activity, you will apply your knowledge of the two routes of processing proposed by the ELM (i.e., the central and peripheral routes) to identifying the extent to which components of a sales pitch on the popular show Shark Tank encourage each of these routes. Refer to class notes from Unit 13 (Persuasion and Public Communication) as well as the Booth-Butterfield (n.d.) and O’Keefe (2012) readings from Unit 13 to help you complete this activity.

Choose any sales pitch from Shark Tank during which entrepreneurs ask the Sharks to invest in their product. You may choose any sales pitch that is available to you on Youtube. Then, respond to the following:

  1. Identify 3 message factors from this clip that encouraged central route processing about investing in the product and describe why they are relevant to the message argument of investing in the product.
  2. Identify 3 message factors from this clip that encouraged peripheral route processing about investing in the product and describe why each is a heuristic cue rather than a message that supports the message argument of investing in the product.
  3. Are the Sharks more likely to process centrally or peripherally? Why? Make sure to discuss this in terms of your motivation and your ability to process the message.
  4. When YOU watched this video, did you use central or peripheral route thinking? Why? Make sure to discuss this in terms of your motivation and your ability to process the message.

This activity must be submitted to eCampus as either a text submission or an attached file no later than 11:59pm.

15 hours ago

Complete 1000 word Essay Allegra

Instructions

For this assignment, you will provide an in-depth sociological analysis of your gender socialization. Apply what C. Wright Mills called the sociological imagination to an analysis of your own experiences with gender socialization. Consider how they were shaped by social institutions and historical forces.

Some of the questions you might consider are:

  • What are some of the ways in which you are/were socialized into an “appropriate” gender role?
  • How did various social institutions (e.g. your family, mass media, religious institutions, educational institutions, sports etc.) shape your gender identity?
  • Why do we place such great importance on “proper” gender role behavior?
  • How does society deal with people who violate gender norms?
  • How does gender socialization shape who we become as individuals?

Your paper will be evaluated on its structure as well as its content. It should have an introductory paragraph with a thesis statement. The thesis statement makes clear what the main issue of your paper is. The body should be organized around the key points that support your thesis and provide examples to illustrate how your experience was shaped by social institutions. Use this as a rule of thumb: One idea per sentence, one topic per paragraph. The final paragraph is where you draw conclusions from the material presented in the body of your paper (not a summary). Drive home the main idea presented in your thesis.

Be sure to cite the textbook and one peer-reviewed sociological article in the paper. This APA style paper is worth 100 points. The body of your paper should be no less than 1,000 words in length

Rewrite essay for me

Can some rewrite this essay for me I want EVERY SINGlE WORD MUST BE DIFFERENT!! NO SENTENCES CAN BE THIS SAME!!

THERE MUST BE NO PLAGIARISM!1

Here is the essay!!

1.Socrates claims that “knowledge and belief are not the same”, and that, however, “both
those who have learned and those who believe have been persuaded” (454 d-e). The
difference in belief and knowledge is that there can be false beliefs. There is not a
possibility that there is such a thing as false knowledge. Knowledge is something that has
been proven and involves true meaning. Beliefs can simply be a perception of an
individual’s reality. Gorgias does agree with Socrates that the kind of conviction about
the right and wrong in a courtroom can be persuasive but that does not include whether
the information given is right or wrong. Although he is in agreement with Socrates, he
still maintains the belief that oration can convince a crowd on any subject, even if the
person speaking is not an expert in the subject, as long as they are able to persuade well.
Socrates is trying to get Gorgias to admit that an individual who is not skilled in the
subject that they are speaking about is more likely to persuade a crowd because they are
able to create the impression of good and make it seem desirable.

2. Gorgias states that “… I suppose that if he does not possess this knowledge, he can learn
these things from me” (460a). In this statement, he is contradicting himself because he is
saying that the person who has taught their students a specific subject is not responsible
for the unjust uses by the students. This is contradicting because he had previously stated
that anyone who is becoming an orator should know the difference between just and
unjust beforehand.

3. Polus believes that orators are the individuals who have the ultimate power in the city
that they live in and that the power in which they have is good for for them. Socrates
disagrees with that statement, saying that orators are not capable of have such power. He
compares orators and tyrants, stating that they both only do what is best for themselves
because of the good results that they think will happen. Socrates then says that an
individual only become powerful if the results that they receive are good. Most of the
time, they are unsuccessful with good results and this becomes a sign of weakness. Polus
then states that an individual who does what they want has to try to avoid the bad results,
which can include punishments. By doing so, they can achieve an advantage from their
actions and have good results for themselves. Socrates disagrees because he feels that if
an individual has done an unjust actions, by receiving a punishment, this will help them
improve themselves. When it comes to happiness, Polus believes that it is completely
based on the individual’s attitude toward concepts. Socrates agrees with him but then
Vigil 2
disagrees because in order to be happy, a person’s soul must be just because that is, in the
end, what seems to be the most beneficial to that person

4. Callicles believes that once an individual enters adulthood, they should not continue to
search for the truth through philosophy. He considers it to be childish because it provides
and encourages the lessening need to be interested in the political world. It also weakens
an individual’s power and makes them lesser of a man. An individual needs power in
order to achieve one’s desires and pleasures from which they will be satisfied. Rhetoric is
something that will allow that person to achieve all those things in order to be the best
they can be.

Defining a Good Sales Experience

BUYING A SNOWBOARD FROM REI SPORTING GOODS.

***THIS WILL BE BASED ON GREAT EXPERIENCE I HAD BUYING A NEW SNOWBOARD FROM A VERY KNOWLEDGABLE SALES PERSON THAT TOOK TIME TO FIT ME WITH A NEW BOARD AND BOOTS. THIS IS THE BOARD I BOUGHT

http://arborcollective.com/snowboards/products/swo…

I BOUGHT IT AT REI CO-OP

Recall a recent positive sales exchange you have had as a customer. This could be as a customer in B2C sales or in business in a B2B interaction.

Complete both parts of this assignment.

PART I

Answer the following questions in a 350-word paper:

  • What is the difference between B2C and B2B sales? Which is your experience?
  • What were you purchasing, and where?
  • How did the interaction between you and the sales person begin?
  • Was there ever a point where you wanted to discontinue your interaction with the salesperson? If not, why? If so, what made you continue?
  • What did the salesperson do well? Explain how.
  • What could the salesperson have improved on to make it a more positive experience for you? Explain why.
  • How did the transaction end?
  • What did you learn from this interaction that could help make you a more effective salesperson?

Format your assignment according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines.

PART II

Reverse your role for this part of the assignment.

Describe a hypothetical situation where you are the salesperson. You may choose either a B2C or B2B scenario:

  • Choose the item to be sold.
  • Choose the venue (brick-and-mortar, online, and so forth).
  • Describe how you would approach your customer. What communication style would you choose and why?
  • Explain how you would keep your customer interested.
  • Acknowledge where you might lose your customer and how to counteract this.
  • Describe how you would close the sale.

Create a 6- to 8-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation that describes your hypothetical situation.

  • For Online and Directed Study students, these are Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentations with notes.

Understanding Criminality, psychology homework help

Understanding Criminality:

Sociopathy and Psychopathy vs. Mental Illness and
Mental Disorders

Edmund Kemper, at age 15, shot and killed his grandparents in
North Fork, California. After 9 years of institutionalization and treatment at
Atascadero State Hospital, Kemper was released with a requirement that he
continue his therapy. During one of his outpatient therapy sessions, the
therapist commented to Kemper that he had come a long way in his treatment and
that the therapist was very pleased with his progress.Kemper appeared happy to
hear this and noted that he could now live a normal life, get married, attend school
and have a career. During this particular interview, sitting outside the
therapist’s office in the trunk of Ed Kemper’s car, was the head of a college
student. Kemper had been killing female college students and having sex with
their corpses. He killed several college students, slept with the corpses, and
cannibalized them. Kemper eventually went on to kill his mother and her best
friend and had them for dinner. A few days later on his way to Reno, Nevada,
Kemper called police from a phone booth and told them what he had done. He
waited at the phone booth until police arrived and arrested him. He was found
to be competent and subsequently convicted and sent to prison (Hickey, 2015).

Andrea Yates called her husband at work to inform him that she
had just killed all five of their young children.She had drowned each one,
individually, in a bathtub. She was found guilty of capital murder and
sentenced to 40 years in prison. The verdict was overturned on appeal and in a
retrial, Yates was found not guilty by reason of insanity and sent to a Texas
state hospital for treatment (Hickey, 2015). This week you will be exploring
mental illness and mental disorders and how they differ from sociopathy and psychopathy.
What do you think influenced Ed Kemper to kill? Andrea Yates? As you read the
materials for this week consider the dangers of dichotomies: either a person is
mentally ill or is not mentally ill or a person is a psychopath or is not a
psychopath.

Required :

Determine where a
subject lies on the spectrum of psychopathy

Differentiate between mental
illness and mental disorders

Need 3 Pages responce

Calculate Financial Ratios (AMAZON)

  • For the company you chose in the previous unit’s assignment ( AMAZON) , evaluate
    its health based on its financial statements (which you may download
    from the company’s 10-K Annual Report in EDGAR or the company’s
    website).
  • Compute the company’s current ratio, its debt
    ratio, its net profit margin, and two other ratios you deem relevant to
    the understanding of the company as a whole. Calculations should be for a minimum of two consecutive fiscal years.
  • Compare these ratios to industry standard
    calculations. Also, try to identify major changes in the ratios and the
    company’s balance sheet and income statement from one year to the next
    to identify trends in the company’s health. Is it improving or
    deteriorating over time? Briefly comment (in approximately 250 words) on
    your assessment of the health of the company given its ratios and the
    changes in its financial statements over time.
  • Include a minimum of two sources, which may consist
    of readings from the University Library, your text, and other
    selections, and which should include the company’s 10-K Annual Report.

Application: Paper on Sexual Differentiation

Hormones play a crucial role in shaping the fetal body into either a
male- or female-typical body. The brain determines the type and amount
of hormones the fetus produces. Furthermore, hormones do not act alone,
but rather in concert with brain regions that regulate sexual
behavior. The brain, therefore, not only regulates sexual behavior, but
it is also shaped by the same hormones that prepare the body for
reproduction. These facts raise intriguing questions about gender,
sexual behavior and orientation, and the extent to which these are, or
are not, under conscious human control.

For this Assignment, you research and evaluate the current literature
on prenatal influences on sexual behavior, gender orientation, or
gender typical behavior.

The Assignment:

Select an article related to the process of sexual differentiation,
prenatal influences on sexual orientation, gender orientation, or
gender typical behavior and write a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses
the following:

  • Write a brief summary of the article you selected. Describe two
    implications of the article’s findings. Explain whether the findings
    concur or conflict with the body of literature in this area.
  • List one question that remains unanswered and is in need of further research.