Use the same company/project idea you use in the Learning Team assignment this week.

Prepare a visual presentation for the project sponsor and other executives of the company that describes the team structure for the project.

Submit a 10- to 15-slide presentation with speaker notes for each slide and include the following (the speaker notes should address how these items apply to your specific project):

• The fundamentals of team structure
• The ‘5 stage model’ of team development that will be used
• The stages in the life cycle of the project
• The team leadership needed at each stage of the project lifecycle
• The roles of the project leader in team management – internal and external

attached is a detailed guide for this research paper. Please go through it and adhere to the guidelines. during the research and writing process, I will need you to supply me with your notes, information about the sources intended to be used, and the specific subject of the paper for us to discuss them, and also, as I need to turn them in as part of the assignment delivery.

I suggest the topic be a specific case study of a specific African american community after abolishing slavery.

I’ll need a rough draft completed by the evening of of the 29th of October comprising of general idea and outline, sample of possible sources, and some notes. I’ll provide you with feedback within 24 hours to proceed.

I’ll need a semi final draft completed by the evening of the 2nd of November after, and I’ll get back to you by the 4th if any last minute adjustments may be needed. also, provide me with any additional notes by that point (typed notes will be preferred)

I’ll need the final paper by the evening of the 6th of November.

don’t worry about the cover page

please avoid excessive redundancy in ideas and vocabulary

Hypothesis testing can be important when developing performance standards for

your subordinates. Each of you will be a manager, and each of you will

therefore need to develop performance standards which will clearly allow you

(and your subordinate) to agree as to whether or not the subordinate met your

requirement. You do not want to end a rating period with disagreement on the

subordinate’s performance, and you do not want to lose a grievance to upper

management should the subordinate appeal your performance rating. (A

subordinate certainly has every right to appeal, but you should never lose an

appeal!)

Suppose that you are manager of a restaurant, and need to develop a series of

performance standards for each member of your staff. The restaurant is a

full-service restaurant, with seated customers, menus, a hostess to meet

customers and seat customers, etc. Examples might include Joe Theismann’s,

an IHOP, an Outback Steakhouse, etc.

For this case study, develop one measurable, numeric performance standard for

a member of the wait staff. Then show how you could take a random sample of

30 readings of the performance and develop a hypothesis test using the t

statistical method to determine, at 95% confidence, if the performance

standard was met. List 30 notional (hypothetical) “readings” and calculate

a corresponding notional t-test to show how your subordinate hypothetically

performed. You will need to calculate the sample mean, sample standard

deviation, use the t table in the back of the book, etc., to complete the

analytics. You must use Excel to log your data and perform many or all of

your analytics, and you will submit your Excel file (and any other files you

may find convenient to submit such as photos of your calculations if done

long-hand). This may be a one-tail test.

At the 95% confidence level, using the notional data, can you conclude that

the subordinate is meeting your standard

Bureaucratic Justice (part 1 on own page)

Introduction
For this discussion, assume you are a district attorney prosecuting a burglary case. The defendant is willing to plead guilty in return for a sentence of probation, and you feel that this is a fair punishment. However, the victims are upset and want to see the offender receive prison time. They insist that you try the case. What should you do?
Instructions
Consider your responses from a legal, moral, and ethical perspective, and address the following in your main post:
Analyze the steps you would take when faced with this dilemma, from an ethical standpoint.
Explain your individual philosophy of ethics, as a criminal justice professional in this scenario, based on the ethical system that applies.
Differentiate the legal, moral, and ethical issues you see in the scenario provided.

Internal Affairs Investigations (part 2 on own page)
Introduction
Imagine that you work for the inspector general’s office as an internal affairs investigator for the U.S. Department of Justice. Your current investigation involves an agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) with 18 years on the job. The agent has numerous commendations and awards for successfully arresting some of the most violent drug traffickers in the world. He is 41 years old, and his wife is 39 years old.
A paid DEA informant has alleged that the agent is corrupt, and has been selling illegal drugs on the street.
In opening the case, you conduct some preliminary inquiries, and learn through informal sources that the agent’s wife has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of cancer. Rumor has it that her only option is a stem-cell transplant, which is not covered by the DEA health insurance plan. The medical procedure is estimated to cost about 300,000 dollars. You can relate to this agent’s situation since you lost your own spouse a couple of years ago to cancer as well.
There are many things running through your mind. Do you call the agent under investigation (he does not know about the internal affairs case) and inquire about his wife’s health? Or do you not concern yourself with the potential reason for his alleged actions? Do you seek help from other investigators, or keep this information to yourself? Should you turn this investigation over to another staff member?
Instructions
Thoughtfully consider your responses from a legal, moral, and ethical perspective, and address the following in your main post:
Analyze the steps you would take as an internal affairs investigator faced with the ethical dilemma in the scenario.
Explain your rationale for the decisions you would make as an internal affairs investigator in this case.
Describe the impact your personal bias may have on the outcome of this internal affairs investigation.