12 Angry Men movie Reflection

APA Reflective Paper 1 Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men is a powerful look back at the use of archetypes for the audience to label people.

Choose one of the two(2) academic articles in the COURSE FILES (attached) related to the movie and seek a level of deep thinking. How does your own subjective approach to others create preconceived stereotypes?

Dare to ask a few deep thinking questions, reflect and discuss. Add at least 2 in-text citations from the one chosen article.

The length of this paper should be between 450 – 550 words.

DO NOT RETELL THE STORY

Note- the APA Reference format is the name of the file.

Evirgen, B. (2009). 12 Angry Men as a Teaching Tool in Organizational Behavior. Journal Of Academic Studies, 11(41), 175.

Rubric

Grading Rubric APA Essays

Grading Rubric APA Essays

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

25.0 pts

Full Marks

Oragnization

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDeep Thought & Use of ReadingsDeep Thought & Use of Reading Assignments per specific reflection and application of theories presented in readings and in-class lectures, class discussions and personal reflections.

25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammarGrammar and Writing Skills ETS Rater will also be used to review and provide suggested revisions for future assignments.

25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA FormatBasic APA Essay Format Title Page with name, assignment, course, FIU, date No Abstract is needed In-text citations must be used to support the written paper. Minimum of 3 in-text citations and one (1) properly cited APA Reference per essay.

25.0 pts

Full Marks

0.0 pts

No Marks

25.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Law for Accountants. 3 questions (Each answer 350-450 words)

Law for Accountants. 3 questions (Each answer 350-450 words)

100% original and no plagiarism (Each answer 350-450 words)  APA format with references (Book attached)

11–4. Shipment and Destination Contracts – In 2003, Karen Pearson and Steve and Tara Carlson agreed
to buy a 2004 Dynasty recreational vehicle (RV) from DeMartini’s RV Sales in
Grass Valley, California. On September 29, Pearson, the Carlson’s, and
DeMartini’s signed a contract providing that “seller agrees to deliver the
vehicle to you on the date this contract is signed.” The buyers made a payment
of $145,000 on the total price of $356,416 the next day, when they also signed
a form acknowledging that the RV had been inspected and accepted. They agreed
to return later to have the RV transported out of state for delivery (to avoid
paying state sales tax on the purchase). On October 7, Steve Carlson returned
to DeMartini’s to ride with the seller’s driver to Nevada to consummate the
out-of-state delivery. When the RV developed problems, Pearson and the Carlson’s
fi led a suit in a federal district court against the RV’s manufacturer, Monaco
Coach Corp., alleging, in part, breach of warranty under state law. The applicable
statute is expressly limited to goods sold in California. Monaco argued that
this RV had been sold in Nevada. How does the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
define a sale? What does the UCC provide with respect to the passage of title?
How do these provisions apply here? Discuss. [Carlson v. Monaco Coach Corp.,
486 F.Supp.2d 1127 (E.D.Cal. 2007)]

11–5. Additional Terms – Continental Insurance Co. issued a policy to cover
shipments by Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. Oakley agreed to ship three thousand tons
of fertilizer by barge from New Orleans, Louisiana, to Ameropa North America in
Caruthersville, Missouri. Oakley sent Ameropa a contract form that set out
these terms and stated that title and risk would pass to the buyer after the
seller was paid for the goods. Ameropa e-mailed a different form that set out
the same essential terms but stated that title and risk of loss would pass to
the buyer when the goods were loaded onto the barges in New Orleans. The cargo
was loaded onto barges but had not yet been delivered when it was damaged in
Hurricane Katrina. Oakley fi led a claim for the loss with Continental but was
denied coverage. Oakley fi led a suit in a Missouri state court against the insurer.
Continental argued that title and risk passed to Ameropa before the damage as
specified in the buyer’s form under Section 2–207(3) of the Uniform Commercial
Code because the parties did not have a valid contract under UCC 2–207(1).
Apply UCC 2–207 on additional terms in an acceptance to these facts. Is
Continental correct? Explain. [Oakley Fertilizer, Inc. v. Continental
Insurance Co.,
276 S.W.3d 342 (Mo. App.E.D. 2009)]

12–7. Libel and Invasion of Privacy – The Northwest Herald, a newspaper in Illinois,
regularly received e-mail reports from area police departments about criminal
arrests. The paper published the information, which is proper because the
reports are public records. One day, the Herald received an e-mail
stating that Carolene Eubanks had been charged with theft and obstruction of
justice. The paper put that information into an issue that was to be published
four days later. Several hours after the original e-mail had been received, the
police issued another e-mail, explaining that Eubanks had not been charged with
anything; the correct name was Barbara Bradshaw. Due to a long weekend, no one
at the Herald noticed the e-mail until after the paper had been published.
The following day, five days after the e-mails had been received, the paper
published a correction. Eubanks sued the Herald for libel and for
invasion of privacy. Does Eubanks have a good case for either tort? Why or why
not? [Eubanks v. Northwest Herald Newspapers, 922 N.E.2d 1196
(App.Ct.Ill. 2010)]

Book:

Cross, F.
B., & Miller, R. L. (2010). The Legal Environment of Business: Text and
Cases – Ethical, Regulatory, Global, and Corporate Issues, 8th Edition.

Cengage Publishing.

Chapter 11  

Chapter 12

Poetry Explication and Analysis Essay

I will submit a poem to be analyzed. Please be sure to follow instructions exactly as they say.

  • Length Requirement: 750-1000 words
  • All sources must be cited

Your Process:

Choose one of the poems included in the list of “Poetry Selections” in “Unit 3 Readings and Resources” document.

You will closely read your chosen poem, considering its logic, organization, patterns of figurative language, and other literary elements. Read and reread the poem; by paying attention to the varied features of a poem, you will build an interpretation of the poem’s meaning.

Instructions:

Your essay is not a traditional 5 paragraph essay, but rather will be divided into two parts. These parts do not have to be of equal length.

Part 1: Scansion and Analysis

In the first part, which should be labeled with the heading “Part I: Scansion and Analysis,” you should make a brief, relevant introduction and then begin discussing the structural elements of the poem—its meter, its rhyme scheme, the punctuation, capitalization, and whatever else adds to the structural aspect of the poem.

In this section, you might consider what is significant among the following:

  • Stanzas (how many, what shapes, appearances, what breaks, rhyme scheme, are they all the same?)
  • Lines (lengths, line breaks, enjambment or end-stopped?)
  • Syntax/Diction (Is the poem grammatical? Does it follow English conventions? Why?)
  • Meter/Rhyme (free verse or metrical? How many feet? Is it consistent?)
  • Punctuation (anything unusual? Is it excessive, conventional, or omitted?)
  • Organization (how does the poem progress in time and space? What does it look like on the page?)
  • Form/Mode (is it a special type of poem: ode, dramatic, narrative, sonnet, elegy, or a mixture?)

Part 2: Explication

In the second part, titled “Part II: Explication,” begin explicating the poem. Move through the poem slowly in a logical manner, pointing out any literary devices or elements of interest. In this second part of the essay, you are helping your reader gain an understanding of the poem in terms of its narrative—what’s going on in the poem—and in terms of the poet’s use of poetic devices to convey meaning.

NOTE: Do not fall into the paraphrase trap; that is, do not take your reader line by line just to fill your essay with words. The point of explication is not to retell the poem; instead, you are explicating to point out in the poem those elements that need interpreting or those places within the poem where you find something interesting. Although the goal of explicating is to explain as much about a poem as is necessary, you should explicate reservedly and intelligently.

Here are some questions to consider in this section:

  • What is the poem’s main idea?
  • What larger themes or issues are addressed– religious, philosophical, political, etc.?
  • What patterns can you find (recurring imagery, repetition, formal and stylistic features)?
  • Are there allusions present to other poetic works, myths, historical/religious figures, etc.?
  • What is the lyric situation? (Why was it written? Who is the speaker/addressee? What is the occasion?)
  • What poetic devices and figurative language does it use? (metaphor, simile, metonymy, synecdoche, symbol, personification, etc.)
  • Why does it use the specific words it does? (consider etymologies, denotations, connotations, and homonyms. Use a dictionary/thesaurus to reinterpret or rethink even common words.)
  • What is its tone? What type of language does it use? (formal informal? Slang? Euphony/cacophony?)

At the end of Part II you should mention the theme(s) of the work as well as what you believe the overall meaning or central message of the poem is.

Source Requirements

You do not need to use any outside sources for this essay, although you might consider using a dictionary, etymologies online, or a thesaurus.

You should plan to include direct quotes from the text and properly cite them in-text using MLA format (for poetry, this will mean line numbers). Here is one example of how to cite a line of poetry in MLA format:
By concluding the poem with the lines “Of all the things that happened there / That’s all that I remember,” Cullen reinforces the tragic and transformative nature of the incident (11-12).
Note that there are spaces before and after the slash that indicates a line break, and the parenthetical citation appears at the end of the full sentence. Punctuation goes inside the quotation marks, and the period goes after the end parenthesis. If you are quoting four or more lines of poetry at once, you will have to reproduce them as a block quote, indented one inch from the left.

Creative Statement

I need someone to write for me AFFIRMATIONS
I will give you some example and how to do it
1.5 pages to 2 pages

GUIDELINES FOR WRITING AFFIRMATIONS

  • PERSONAL: YOU CAN ONLY AFFIRM FOR YOURSELF.IN WRITING YOUR AFFIRMATION, YOU ARE CHANGING YOUR REGULATOR, YOUR SELF IMAGE, THROUGH YOUR PERSONAL AFFIRMATION STATEMENTS.THEREFORE, IN MOST CASES YOUR AFFIRMATION WILL BE AN “I” STATEMENT.AN EXCEPTION TO THIS IS A TEAM GOAL THAT IS JOINTLY CREATED, “WE” IS THEN USED.
  • POSITIVE:WRITE YOUR AFFIRMATION IN A POSITIVE SENTENCE STRUCTURE.DESCRIBE WHAT YOU WANT TO BECOME, NOT WHAT YOU WANT TO STOP DOING.
  • PRESENT TENSE: WRITE IN PRESENT TENSE AS IF ALREADY EXISTING.
  • INDICATE ACHIEVEMENT:ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENT
  • NO COMPARISONS:YOU ARE UNIQUE.
  • ACTION WORDS:CREATE MOVING PICTURES.
  • EMOTION WORDS:USE IMPACTUAL WORDS.
  • ACCURACY: BE ACCURATE
  • BALANCE:BALANCE IS A KEY
  • REALISTIC: YOUR INVESTMENT IS IN EXCELLENCE NOT PERFECTION.
  • CONFIDENTIAL:REVEAL GOALS ONLY TO THOSE WHO CAN ASSIST YOU.

PCI DSS Research Paper and Presentation.

Hello there are total two tasks you need to do.

Task 1: Research Paper must be 5 to 10 pages in APA style.

Task 2 : PowerPoint Presentation must be 10 to 15 slides.

Task 3: Need references for the Document

Group 7

In further analyzing PCI DSS, and without necessarily
homing in on Kentucky stakeholders, what other American laws or
regulations might relate to, implicate, or otherwise find a nexus with
PCI DSS? Here, the audience needs to understand, as you will, that PCI
DSS does not operate in a vacuum. Rather, like most of what we’ll learn
in ISOL 633, there are numerous laws, regulations, and other governing
principles that interact with PCI DSS to form an overall governance
model.

Help . Please submit Original work As word Doc.

PT.1

a. Why banning the use of cell phones while driving should be mandatory nationwide

b. What I see as the biggest challenges young adults face today

  • State the general purpose, specific purpose, and central idea clearly and in the appropriate form.
  • Limit your main points and supporting materials to no more than three.
  • State your main points and supporting materials in complete sentences.
  • Summarize key points of introduction.
  • Summarize the conclusion in one statement.

OUTLINE TEMPLATE

Use this outline as your template.

TITLE:

A. General Purpose

B. Specific Purpose

C. Central idea

I. Introduction

A. Key point #1

B. Key point #2

C. Key point #3

II. Body of the Presentation

A. Main Point #1

1. Supporting material

2. Supporting material

B. Main Point #2

1. Supporting material

2. Supporting material

C. Main Point #3

1. Supporting material

2. Supporting material

I. Conclusion 

PT.2

Written Speech

Develop your speech based on the preparation outline you submitted. Write your speech using tips, techniques, and guidelines studied in the lesson. Create a reference list that includes any and all sources you use to locate information. Limit your speech to no more than four pages, double-spaced. Submit your speech with a title page, your name, and date submitted.

Save your assignment as a Word (.doc) document. 

​Week 3: Discussion: Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders.

Week 3: Discussion: Pharmacotherapy for Cardiovascular Disorders

As the leading cause of death in the United States for both men and women, cardiovascular disorders account for 7 million hospitalizations per year (NCSL, 2012). This is the result of the extensive treatment and care that is often required for patients with these disorders. While the incidences of hospitalizations and death are still high, the mortality rate of cardiovascular disorders has been declining since the 1960s (CDC, 2011). Improved treatment options have contributed to this decline, as well as more knowledge on patient risk factors. As an advanced practice nurse, it is your responsibility to recommend appropriate treatment options for patients with cardiovascular disorders. To ensure the safety and effectiveness of drug therapy, advanced practice nurses must consider aspects that might influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes such as medical history, other drugs currently prescribed, and individual patient factors.

Consider the following case studies:

Case Study 1:

Patient AO has a history of obesity and has recently gained 9 pounds. The patient has been diagnosed with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:

  • Atenolol 12.5 mg daily
  • Doxazosin 8 mg daily
  • Hydralazine 10 mg qid
  • Sertraline 25 mg daily
  • Simvastatin 80 mg daily

Case Study 2:

Patient HM has a history of atrial fibrillation and a transient ischemic attack (TIA). The patient has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and ischemic heart disease. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:

  • Warfarin 5 mg daily MWF and 2.5 mg daily T, TH, Sat, Sun
  • Aspirin 81 mg daily
  • Metformin 1000 mg po bid
  • Glyburide 10 mg bid
  • Atenolol 100 mg po daily
  • Motrin 200 mg 1–3 tablets every 6 hours as needed for pain

Case Study 3:

Patient CB has a history of strokes. The patient has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:

  • Glipizide 10 mg po daily
  • HCTZ 25 mg daily
  • Atenolol 25 mg po daily
  • Hydralazine 25 mg qid
  • Simvastatin 80 mg daily
  • Verapamil 180 mg CD daily

To prepare:

  • Review this week’s media presentation on hypertension and hyperlipidemia, as well as Chapters 19 and 20 of the Arcangelo and Peterson text.
  • Select one of the three case studies, as well as one the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior factors.
  • Reflect on how the factor you selected might influence the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
  • Consider how changes in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
  • Think about how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Reflect on whether you would modify the current drug treatment or provide an alternative treatment option for the patient.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post an explanation of how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you selected. Then, describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Finally, explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.

Checkpoint Submission #2

Hello, Just like a few weeks ago where we submitted the 1st part of the final project, this is another checkpoint in the final project. AS mentioned before it is all working up to the big final project presentation later in the class, so please save the work you have done thus far on this so that its a breeze.

Just like in the first checkpoint, except different things obviously since it is a different part of the project. Please remember the couple of small tweaks my professor mentioned with the text overlapping etc.

Thank you so much. Let me know if you need the rubric and guides again!

Use the work completed in Modules Four and Five discussions and transfer into your existing Presentation Template from Checkpoint Submission One in Module Three. This will cover the following critical elements of the final project:

Trade Regulations and Legal Considerations, Political-Legal Environment Observation Deck, Economic Measures, Transportation, and Telecommunication.

Submit the presentation for participation credit and instructor guidance to assist you in completing your final project, which is due in Module Seven. Use the Final Project Guide to assist you in the development of this presentation.

To complete this assignment, review the following documents:

Leadership Analysis In Organizations, business and finance homework help

Create a 7–9-page leadership analysis using the narrative and summary of the leadership interviews you conducted.

This assessment gives you the opportunity to synthesize and demonstrate your understanding and experience interviewing leaders and how the leadership characteristics you analyzed relate to leadership theories, the New Business Realities, and the Thinking Habits.

Competency 1: Analyze the art and science of leadership.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Analyze how the data from leadership interviews supports leadership theories.
  • Competency 2: Reflect on personal leadership skills.
    • Analyze the relevance of the concepts from New Business Realities and Thinking Habits to an interview experience.
    • Self-assess the experience as an interviewer.
  • Competency 3: Create and effective theory of leadership.
    • Recommend leadership development initiatives for leaders at a specific level.

    Assessment Instructions

    This is the last assessment that is related to your leadership interviews. For this assessment, use the narrative and summary of your interviews to complete the following analysis:

    1. Leadership theory: Summarize the leadership theory that you used to develop your interview questions. Analyze how the questions you asked and the data you collected during the interview support your chosen leadership theory. You might have used servant leadership, Kevin Cashman, Margaret Wheatley, articles from the Center for Creative Leadership, leadership stage theory, or other sources. Demonstrate your understanding of your chosen mastery (personal, purpose, change, interpersonal/being, balance, or action). Use examples from your interviews to demonstrate your mastery topic.
    2. Common Learning Themes: Reread the New Business Realities and the Thinking Habits of Mind, Heart, and Imagination, linked in the Resources. Select one topic from each and discuss its relevance to your experience interviewing leaders. The following are two examples:
      • New Business Realities: Did the interview reflect the dynamics of transformational change in complex systems in the change mastery questions?
      • Thinking Habits: Did the interview encourage professional self-development through conversational reflection in the questions on personal mastery?
    3. Self-Reflection: Self-assess your experience as an interviewer. What seemed to work? What did not work? What would you do differently next time? How would you change your explanation of your leadership topic, the medium you chose, or your behavior during the interview, to enhance the quality of your data? What did you learn about interviewing? What did you learn about your topic and its potential for helping leaders examine their leadership skills and characteristics?
    4. Summary Statement: Think about your experience interviewing leaders at this level. Describe the primary lessons you gained from this experience, the value of interviewing leaders, and the impact this approach has on leadership development. Include your recommendations to your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar about the development of leaders at this level and on your mastery topic and the use of interviews to propel personal development.

    Additional Requirements

    • Length: Your assessment should be 7–9 pages, double-spaced.
    • Font and size: Use a standard font—either Times New Roman or Arial. The font size must be 12 point.
    • Margins: The paper margins should be 1 inch on each side.
    • Components: Include a title page, table of contents, and reference page. These do not count toward the paper length.
    • Formatting: APA format is required for all aspects of your analysis, including citations and references. Your writing should be well organized and clear. Writing structure, spelling, and grammar should be correct as well.

Internal Public Relations

Resource: The Practice of Public Relations, Ch. 11

Read the “Sony Shoots the Messenger” Case Study on page 242 in The Practice of Public Relations, Ch. 11, below.

CASE STUDY SONY SHOOTS THE MESSENGER

In the old days of employee relations—before there was an Internet or a computer or a typewriter or even an America—there were Greek and Roman rulers who never like to receive bad news. Whenever they did, they lashed out at the (blameless) poor souls who delivered the unfriendly tidings. In some cases—if the messenger delivered news of a lost battle or fallen city—the envoy would be dealt with in the harshest manner; merely for delivering bad news.

Today, of course, the bearers of bad news are often public relations professionals, whose essential mandate, as we have learned, is to tell management the truth. Modern managers, by and large, appreciate this candor from their public relations associates.

But occasionally, as in the case of Sony Pictures Entertainment in the winter of 2014, a disgruntled manager harkens back to 46 a.d. and shoots the poor public relations messenger.

BOY KING STRIKES BACK

Sony’s problems began in November 2014, after the company released the trailer for an infantile satirical comedy about North Korea, The Interview, starring Seth Rogen and James Franco (Figure 11-7). Among other bits of hilarity, the movie included the killing of North Korea’s boy ruler Kim Jong-un.

From all reports, North Korea’s supreme leader evidently didn’t see the humor in the Sony movie. And shortly thereafter, cybercriminals hacked into Sony’s computer system and leaked a treasure trove of 32,000 internal e-mails, revealing all sorts of confidential and embarrassing correspondence. The anonymous criminals promised to stop leaking documents if Sony canceled release of the offensive, anti-Kim Jong-un movie.

Within weeks, the U.S. government concluded that North Korea was behind the Sony cyber attack, which it labeled, “a serious national security matter.” For its part, Sony got cold feet and canceled The Interview’s theatrical release, compelling Rogen and fellow Hollywood actors to condemn Sony for its cowardice.

Eventually, after the release of a tidal wave of damaging documents, Sony changed its mind and initiated a low-scale release of the movie, which landed with a thud and was quickly resigned to the Hollywood scrap heap; at an estimated cost to Sony of $75 million.

THE DAMAGE IS DONE

In the face of a steady flow of leaked revelations—including top employees’ salaries, nasty Hollywood e-mails, and illicit movie downloads—Sony hired hardball attorney David Boies to warn publishers that they would be held responsible if they dared release any of the purloined material.

Good luck.

Boies’ entreaties were laughed at, as the nation’s gossip network, fueled by Wikileaks, Gawker, TMZ.com, and a host of other willing enablers, proceeded to fill the airwaves with a month’s worth of stinging and embarrassing stories, including:

Facebook founder Marc Zuckerberg wrote desperately to Sony executives to try to get them to stop the movie, “The Social Network,” which he found “hurtful.”

Sony Co-Chairman Amy Pascal ran up a tab of $66,500 for car services, air travel, meals, etc. on a two-day movie premiere in Washington, D.C.

In an e-mail to Pascal, another Sony executive called comedian Kevin Hart “a whore,” for demanding money to write a tweet promoting his new Sony movie, for which he received a $3 million paycheck.

Before a fund-raising dinner for Barack Obama, Pascal e-mailed producer Scott Rudin, with both playfully pondering if she should ask the President how he liked the movies Django Unchained, 12 Years a Slave,and other black-themed films.

A movie poster for “The Interview” features James Franco and Seth Rogan

Figure 11-7 The provocateurs.

James Franco and Seth Rogen, stars of The Interview.

Photo: SPNNewscom

Co-Chairman Pascal was criticized for the Hart and Obama e-mails, interpreted by many as “racist,” and she was also taken to task for a set of e-mails, surrounding her decision to fire Sony’s director of communications.

“OFF WITH HIS HEAD, DARLING”

Among the leaked e-mails were several between the Sony co-chair and her husband, former New York Times reporter Bernard Weinraub (Figure 11-8).

Photo of Amy Pascal, her husband, and her young son posing for cameras on the red carpet

Figure 11-8 The e-mail executioners.

Amy Pascal and husband, former New York Times reporter Bernard Weinraub.

Photo: FRED PROUSER/REUTERS/Newscom

Subject of this marital correspondence was the publication by the Hollywood Reporter newspaper of a roundtable interview with the heads of the major film studios. For some reason, the only studio chief who wasn’t invited was Pascal.

That didn’t sit well with concerned hubby Weinraub, who tersely e-mailed his wife, “I would fire your P.R. guy immediately . . . or at least tell him you’re not going to deal with him anymore.”

Pascal forwarded her spouse’s note to Sony’s head of human resources, George Rose. “He’s right,” the independent-minded human resource chief wrote back. Six days later, Sony Pictures’ head of corporate communications, Charles Sipkins, was out of a job. He made a base salary of $600,000-a-year, according to leaked documents.

According to other leaked e-mails from Sipkins to Pascal, Hollywood Reporterapologized to Sony for not inviting its chief, explaining that the roundtable lineup shifted after some people initially passed and then reconsidered.

The explanation wasn’t enough to save the public relations man’s job.

After the “shoot the messenger” e-mails were made public, co-chair Pascal scrambled to explain that the missed roundtable wasn’t the cause of the dismissal of her communications chief. “That’s ridiculous,” Pascal said. “That has nothing to do with it. Charlie’s very talented at what he did.”

But in public relations, as in life, “what goes around comes around.” And shortly after she lowered the boom on her public relations director, Amy Pascal, herself, was fired as Sony’s co-chairman, basically for what she revealed in her e-mails.

Another messenger had bitten the dust.*

QUESTIONS

How would you assess Sony’s handling of the hacking scandal?

Had you been Amy Pascal’s public relations advisor, how would you have suggested she handle the fallout from the e-mails, adjudged as “racist?”

Had Pascal asked you to counsel her on what to do in light of her husband’s e-mail about the roundtable, what would you have suggested?

Answer the three questions above.

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you describe how the case was handled and provide recommended improvements for your client (Sony).

Include three outside references as well as citations with your paper.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.