Leader ship study case (HBR case study)

PART A: Having read the HBR Case Study, Big Shoes to Fill answer the following questions about the case.

  1. What type of leader, discussed within the current course module, best characterizes former CEO Jack Donally. Be sure to provide rationale for your selection.
  2. What situational variables contributed to the success and maintenance of this type of leader in this specific case?

PART B: Now imagine you are Stephanie Fortas, the new CEO of Innostat.

  1. What leadership style/approach/theory would you embrace and implement, and why? Be sure to reference reasons for your decision (e.g., company history, current personnel, market trends, etc.).
  2. How would you communicate your new strategy for the company to maximize buy-in and organizational success and why would you use this style and medium of communication? Draft detailed messages to each and every group of stakeholders you identify as necessary (e.g., board, senior management, all employees, etc.) to communicate your position(s) and rationale. These messages may take various forms depending upon the content and the audience so make sure and identify the specific medium you would use to communicate with each group (e.g., memo, presentation, etc.).

Reminders for Part B:

  • Answer each of the questions above first on one page. Then draft the necessary message(s) to your organization on subsequent pages.
  • If you choose to write memos, or emails please make sure your formatting is consistent throughout and the message length is appropriate for this type of message.
  • If you choose to include a white paper or other report please follow APA guidelines for formatting (e.g., font, margins, page numbers, headings, etc.)
  • If you choose to include a presentation make sure and write out the presentation content fully so that I can see exactly how the presentation would be delivered. Don’t assume I will fill in the blanks.
  • The entire assignment for Part B should NOT exceed 5 typed pages.

need 3 page paper on Female Genital Mutilation written in apa with in text citations and cite page

Below is segments from my syllabus that provide instruction on assignment

” For each assignment, please write an essay of at least three pages in length (APA, 6th ed., format, Times New Roman, 12 pt. font, for example).Each essay should have a considerable research component using at least three sources, and should not contain only your opinion – if there is not a considerable research-component, your paper is incomplete, and your grade will reflect this.Please provide a works-cited page at the end of your essay (which is not part of the three page minimum).Please use articles (papers) and/or scholarly books in addition to trustworthy online sources “

:The Female Body

“CHOOSE ONE of the topics below to research and write an essay on your findings.If there is no gender analysis, your paper is incomplete, and your grade will reflect this.Within your essay, please mention if male bodies have been treated in similar ways.If so, in which countries and centuries? If not, why not?For each choice, please also consider the following: Do you think things should change for society to evolve in a positive way?How do you think things could possibly change in the future?Be sure to incorporate at least three scholarly sources into your essay.

  • FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION – What is female genital mutilation?Where is it practiced and by whom?How prevalent is this practice, and what is its function?What is its impact on women’s health?”

communication tools

This assignment has two parts.

Part I:

Compare traditional communication tools with social media communication tools in no more than 175 words. What are the pros and cons of each?

Part II:

Review the following scenario:

Your coworker’s office is situated next to yours. One day she comes into your office and informs you of a huge project that is in the process of being assigned from upper management to your department’s manager. Within forty eight hours, your department manager contacts you through a text message informing you of your inclusion in this project. Unfortunately, your manager included very minimal information about project specifics, so you do not know enough to get a solid start.

Your manager is highly political and does not pay much attention to detail. Also, he does not like his personnel reaching out to individuals outside of the department, especially his counterparts.

On the other hand, you do have good relationships with other departmental managers.

Discuss in 525 to 700 words the following:

  • Explain how you would go about gathering the information needed to start your project, while navigating the tough political map.
  • Select one of the communication tools from Part I to deliver your message, and explain the rationale behind your selection.
  • Describe how you would use the selected communication tool in the given scenario to deliver your message.

Threat Analysis Essay

For this assignment, you are to assess a threat of your choice and elaborate on items 1-6 below:

  1. Identify a potential threat.
  2. Identify the threat’s motivation, capabilities, and history.
  3. Choose an organization.
  4. Identify the organization’s assets.
  5. What tactics might the chosen threat use against the organization?
  6. Will such tactics be effective? Why or why not?

Your essay should be 3-4 pages long, cite at least three different sources in APA format.

Here are some ways to enhance your analysis.

One can effectively assess threats in four steps:

  1. Identify potential threat actors.
  2. Identify their motivation, capabilities, and history (thus their
    level of intent, skills, weapons, and tactics and what types of targets
    they have chosen in the past).
  3. Develop a list of the organization’s assets, and determine which of
    the weapons and tactics are most likely to be of use in attacking the
    organization.
  4. Compare that data to information about the organization’s assets to
    be protected, and determine which potential threat actors are likely to
    be most effective against the organization. (Norman, 2009, p. 140)

discussion supplements provide the nutrients, writing homework help

·Critical Thinking question: “Believing that supplements provide the nutrients that her body needs, Alice regularly takes numerous supplements while paying relatively little attention to her daily food choices”.

·Yourtwo evidences should document how Alice’s practice could lead to health problems.

·INITIAL POST must include:

Position Statement (At least 200 words are required.)

·Include TWO evidences (data or quotes from your references) that support the position that Alice’s practice could lead to health problems. This must be documented evidence, NOT personal opinion.

·Cite the source for the data or quotes you used at the end of each evidence statement. Eg. (Jones 2007) or (2) the number corresponding to the reference list.

Reference List (At least TWO references are required.)

·References must be from notable, professional health or nutrition resources other than your text. Do not use Wikipedia.

·Citation must include Author, Title, Website. 

Gov 2305 Chapter 12

Chapter 12 Assignment

PBS Frontline: Obama’s Deal

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamasdeal…

1)What were the democratic objections to President Obama attempting healthcare reform?

2)Who pushed President Obama to pursue healthcare reform?

3)What is the ‘political price’ of a failed healthcare reform legislation?

4)Why did ‘Hillarycare’ under the Clinton Administration fail?

5)How did the Obama Administration approach healthcare reform differently than the Clinton Administration?

6)What ‘special interests’ were involved in the healthcare reform process?(hint: In this situation, we largely see certain industries being represented AND the video will talk about several throughout the video)

7)Why was Max Baucus a less desirable negotiator for the Democrats over healthcare reform?

8)How much money did Max Baucus receive from industries related to healthcare?

a.What do these contributions mean for the person making them?

9)Why were liberals outraged at how Senator Baucus/Democratic leaders were handling negotiations over healthcare reform?

10)Why did bipartisan negotiations over healthcare fail?

11) How did the Obama Administration end up getting the votes they needed to pass health care reform?

12) UPDATE: What is the current status of the Affordable Care Act under the new administration? How has President Trump tried to influence policy? Has he been successful- why or why not?
HINT: You’ll need to do a little research on your own for this one – provide me with your source(s)

nature versus nurture controversy

For your assignment this week, you will detail key aspects of development and discuss the role of nature and nurture in development. 

  1. Detail the nature versus nurture controversy from the scientific evidence.  Address the following:
  • Define nature and nurture.
  • Describe which (either nature or nurture) you feel had a greater impact on your development.  
  • How did nature and nurture work together to influence who you are today in terms of personality, sexuality, and gender?

Your paper must be two to three pages in length (excluding title and reference pages).  Support your thoughts using a minimum of three references from scholarly sources.  Examples of scholarly sources include: peer reviewed journal articles, research studies, professional websites with authored material, and government websites.  Popular internet sites (Wikipedia, Newsweek, New York Times, etc.) are not considered scholarly sources.  Your paper and sources must be formatted according to APA style

Advanced Cost Accounting, Assignment Homework Help

Please do not accept if you cannot meet deadline or understand what needs to be done. I need a paper that addresses the following in approximately 600 words.  I have attached the case study that it refers to.

Per the attached case study (p. 89), you are asked to provide an analysis of whether the university is in compliance with Title IX. This analysis should be provided in a presentation format and should include the following:

1. Identify the three criteria KSU can use in determining whether the University is in compliance with Title IX.s requirement of equal accommodation of athletic interests, abilities, and opportunities of male and female student athletes.

2. A critique of Kingston State’s current allocation of indirect costs (as prepared by the internal audit department).

3. Identify possible methods for ensuring compliance with Title IX, at least two of which involve reallocation of indirect costs. Sam has directed you to determine a reallocation of indirect cost that indicates more money is being spent on women’s sports than under the existing method of overhead allocation. Include schedules of supporting calculations, details of any assumptions you made in performing your calculations, and comments on your choice of alternative methods of indirect cost allocation.

4. Identify which method of documenting compliance with Title IX you would prefer to see implemented. Use the ethical decision model, discussed in the Appendix, as a basis for your recommendation.

supervision and operation on Ems

  1. It has been discussed in class that “leaders are made, not born.” However, it can also be said that some leaders are indeed “born leaders.” Therefore, it can be argued: “leaders are born and/or made.” Do you agree or disagree with this premise? Defend your answer by citing specific examples of leaders who support your position (Do not have to be EMS). [10 points]
  2. Compare and contrast industrial period leadership versus post-industrial leadership. Cite specific examples of leaders from both periods to support your response. [10 points]
  3. What is the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire? Who developed it? What group(s) was it administered to? Why is it significant? What leadership theory was based on it? [5 points]
  4. For each of the following vignettes of a leader, identify the leadership theory that they most likely are displaying. Defend your answer by linking leader characteristics with theory components.
    1. Dr. Dillon, the local EMS medical director, is frustrated with the lack of proper documentation by paramedics. He issues a memo stating that any paramedic who fails to provide proper call documentation will have to attend a special class on documentation. [5 points]
    2. Newly promoted ED nurse manager Pearlstein has identified significant deficiencies in the routine operation of the ED. To address these concerns, he has put in place a quality-of-care committee made up of ED staff at all levels. He also makes it a point to meet individually with all his nursing and tech staff with the hope of instilling in them a deeper appreciation for needed change as the right thing to do in the best interest of the patient and the department. [5 points]
    3. The director of Acme Ambulance Service has noticed that one of its field offices has been continually underperforming, especially in terms of personnel management. Employees come in late, are not in proper uniforms, provide poor customer service, and frequently do not provide sufficient documentation to support billing. To address this situation, he reassigns a high performing manager to this site. The new manager, Ms. Bast, makes it a point to always be on time, even coming in early and staying late, presenting a professional appearance, and positive customer interaction. After a few weeks, it is noticed that the employees are now coming in on time and have a much more professional and positive attitude towards their work. [5 points]
    4. In the Town of Hopelessville, a recent car crash in town took the life of a prominent member of the community. It is apparent that her death was exacerbated by the fact that the closest ambulance took 27 minutes to arrive. This is not the first time town residents have had to wait for an ambulance. A group of town’s people approaches the president of the Lions Club, who is a well-respected local businessman, about leading an effort to form a town rescue squad. They have raised a few hundred dollars and offer to compensate him for his time. He readily agrees, but refused any compensation, instead saying it should go to the cost of starting the squad. As a friend of the recently deceased town resident, he considers it his duty to lead this effort. [5 points]
    5. Lt. Swain is known in the fire department as a “good leader.” He is well respected by those he supervises and is seen as fair and effective. What stands out the most is his ability to adjust his leadership style to the situation at hand. For instance, he allows his senior medics to manage most of their daily duties and responsibilities. However, on scene he assesses the situation and if necessary, assumes command. [5 points]

Opponents and Proponents, English homework help

I have already created the topic and question so you just follow the next steps after step2

Opponents and Proponents

1.Create a neutrally worded question that reasonable people debate about your topic.

1.Should Students That Sexually Assault Other Students Be Expelled from College?

Sample: Should Governor Jerry Brown ban fracking in California? Note that the question and words to the effect of: For the next four posts I want to explore the question… will be your main point in your post.

2. Based on this question, figure out a neutral title for post 5 that is easy to read.

Example: Should California ban fracking?

3. Explain why it is an issue now.

Examples: other states/cities/countries have a different policy so maybe we should as well; we are voting on it at the next election; the problem has gotten worse or has gotten more attention, so we should look at this solution; new research has come out; people in power are proposing it; etc.

4. When you write your introduction to post 5, include the answers to questions one and three.

5. To help your reader (and yourself) understand the issue, figure out what the two sides want/believe/think and use opposing verbs or verb phrases to indicate this. Try to make this a verb other than “is/are.”

Examples: ban vs. keep; vote for vs. vote against; continue vs. stop; succeed vs. fail; should pursue A vs. should pursue B; threatens vs. does not threaten

6. Figure out who the players are on each side (add more to the list as you research the issue)

For example: On the ban side of mine are: Opponents, People who oppose fracking, Environmentalists, Community groups and activists against fracking, People who are concerned with the environment, People who are concerned about the power of oil companies

On the keep side are: Supporters, People who support fracking, Jerry Brown, Oil companies, Big business interests

7. Figure out the global reason why each side wants what they want and use opposing words to indicate this:

Examples: Help vs. harm, works vs. will not work, effective vs. ineffective, helpful vs. useless etc.

8. Put 5,6 and 7 together and write it as a sentence or two:

Supporters, like Governor Jerry Brown, want to keep fracking because they feel it helps California financially while opponents, especially environmentalists, want to ban fracking because they believe it harms California.

Use the sentence you craft for #8 in your post to help us see the issue clearly. The following questions are brainstorming ones for the rest of your post.

9. Assuming best intentions on both sides, why do the sides disagree? What do they see differently?

Example: Proponents think the money generated from fracking as well as the economic independence it affords are more important than the small potential for environmental damage which they think the other side exaggerates.

Opponents of fracking think the short-term money gained is insufficient to cover the long-term damage to the environment and that fracking just continues our reliance on oil instead of alternative energy.

*Find some quotes you can use from proponents and opponents on each side that show that they see the issue differently. Then analyze this difference in how they look at the problem.

10. How long has the issue been going on for?

For example: Fracking started in the U.S. in the early 2000s when advances in new technology made it possible. New York state under Gov. Cuomo banned fracking a couple of years ago. Environmentalists never liked fracking, but have increased pressure on Gov. Brown to ban it after New York did. (I would need to research to find more specifics, but the above I knew from hearing about it on the news.)

11. What is at stake? Why do people care?

Examples: money, power, environment, safety, etc. (explain these in more detail)

12. What questions would the readers like answers to about your issue to have an informed opinion?

Research those questions and find as many answers as you can give in your post.