Choose one of three topic, write a paper. It should be at least 2 pages.
No plagiarize. Have some example.
Defend or refute oneof the following statements: 1. Slavery of Africans had a greater impact in North America than it did in Central America, South America, or the Caribbean. 2. Without question, the most important commodity during the era of European expansion was silver. 3. The European Expansion was motivated purely by religious rivalries among the European powers.
Principalism, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative?
Please discuss Japan’s rise back to power as a first-world country after the Second World War. How did they do it? How far have they progressed after that time in history? This essay needs to be at least 500 words.
For the attached (previously done) Research proposal, please complete Interim report.
Interim Report: The interim report contains all the information needed to complete the analysis of the decision problem except that it does not have to include the final numerical calculations and conclusions. This report provides the student with a chance to update their project. Please label each section of your report.
Use the following outline for the interim report:
Background: Briefly describe the history of the problem including its cause(s) and the result of any previous attempts to solve this or similar problems. If the problem affects more than one stakeholder, describe each of them and the basis for their concerns.
Problem Statement: This should be redefined from your proposal. Overview of the decision problem and the major considerations in analyzing it.
Objective(s): What is the objective of the decision concerning the problem? List all of the objectives and place them in categories. These categories are values (save money, improve sales, increase productivity, etc.).
Decision Alternatives: Describe the process used to determine alternatives (Nominal Group Think, brainstorming, meetings, research, etc.); including a discussion of other alternatives that seem relevant and the reasons these were not analyzed. Describe the final set of alternative (What are your choices?) used in the decision analysis.
Evaluation Considerations and Evaluation Measures: Describe the process used to determine evaluation considerations and evaluation measures, including a discussion of other evaluation considerations that seem relevant and the reasons that they were not included. What is important to the decision maker, (the person who will ultimately implement your recommendations)? Weigh the various items (for example – “office supplies†– what is more important to the decision maker – cost, time or quality? Relocating a company may include: distance to the customers, cost of various locations, impact on sales etc.
Steve Trautman is one of America’s leading knowledge experts. View the following four videos to understand the depth of the knowledge-transfer process and follow Mr. Trautman’s widely used knowledge transfer solution.
Pay close attention to the process. Developing your own Knowledge Silo Matrix and discussing what you found will be the basis of your Case 1 assignment.
For this Case Assignment you will be completing and analyzing a matrix following the Knowledge Silo Matrix instructions in the third video above. (The team you choose could be a current or past work group, a group of committee members, a group of family members, members of a rock band, or any group where you know the expertise needed and the skill levels of the employees/members.)
You may (a) complete the matrix by hand, (b) use the Knowledge Silo Matrix Word form, or (c) download the Excel form from stevetrautman.com. Remember these key points:
The Knowledge Silo Matrix (KSM) is a high-level tool of knowledge silos. Think bigger picture. For example, if you were filling out a KSM for building a house, some example silos would be Plumbing, Electrical, Flooring, Insulation, etc. Not “Weld a pipe†or “Test for adequate water pressure.†The blog article, Tip for Better, Faster Knowledge Transfer—It’s Not What People KNOW, It’s What They Know How to DO, provided by The Steve Trautman Co., addresses the important distinction between Knowing vs. Doing. This will help you create a more actionable KSM.
Once you have your matrix completed, then respond to the following questions using the section headings in your paper that are marked in bold below. Utilize at least two sources of outside information from other authors; be sure to cite them and provide a reference list at the end.
Introduction—This section is often written after you have completed the rest of your paper.
Work Team Overview—Provide an overview of the work team you have assessed in the Knowledge Silo Matrix. Who are they, how long have they been in the group, and what are their jobs?
Skill Level in Silo—Discuss each group member’s job in terms of his/her silo status—discussing why you have evaluated them as purple, green, yellow, or white.
Matrix Analysis—Analyze what the matrix tells you.
Look at each silo and analyze what you see and what needs to be done to minimize the knowledge risk.
Look at the colors assigned to each employee (horizontal colors). What should be done next to minimize the risk related to each employee as well as to enhance the performance of the work team? Be sure to discuss the training needed (or not) for each member and what the format of the training should be given what you learn from the matrix.
Application of the Matrix–Discuss what you have learned from this exercise and the strengths of the Knowledge Silo Matrix approach and the challenges you see managers could face in an organization using the Matrix.
Conclusion
Submit BOTH your Knowledge Silo Matrix and your discussion covering the points above by the module due date.
Compare and contrast healthcare errors and seminal events. How are they similar and how are they different?
Identify and state how you would evaluate one kind of healthcare error or seminal event found in one of the following types of healthcare settings: (a) hospitals, (b) clinics, (c) mental/behavioral health facilities, (d) long-term care, or (e) pharmacies/medication-dispensing facilities.
Please follow all requirements and answer each question.
Include introduction and conclusion.
Please use Peer Reviewed Articles
APA format is required and each reference must be cited in the paper.
Use headings to organize the content in your work.
Please no plagiarism and sources should be no more than 5 years old