Criminal Justice Assignment, law homework help

/in /by

Assignment 3: The Big Stage!

Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

In the United States, both the federal government and the states have authority to indict for criminal wrongdoing. The federal government and each state have their own criminal statutes, court system, prosecutors, and police agencies. Use your textbook, the Internet, and / or Strayer Library to research articles on crime trial, prosecutor, and criminal investigator.

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Further, analyze the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
  2. Review Figure 21.1 “The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process” in Chapter 21 of the text and specify the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  3. Define a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Analyze the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
  4. Differentiate not guilty and acquitted. Give your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Support your position.
  5. Predict one to two (1-2) changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty (20) years. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  6. Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Describe the major components of and responsiblities involved in the investigative process.
  • Recommend improvements to the criminal investigation process in selected areas.
  • Predict changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next 20 years.
  • Evaluate the role of the criminal investigator in preparing evidence for presentation and courtroom testimony.
  • Use technology and information resources to conduct research in the criminal investigation process.
  • Write clearly and concisely about the criminal investigation process using proper writing mechanics.

How Nurse Executive can use data from HIT systems to promote EBP

/in /by

Provide a literature review of how the nurse executive can utilize data from HIT systems to promote evidence-based practice and clinical decision making to improve organizational outcomes.

This Assignment should include:
A title and reference page (at least 10 references)

An introduction

The literature review

Any strengths, weaknesses, and gaps in the literature 

A synthesis of the literature

Recommendations for practice

A conclusion

See the grading rubric under Course Resources for details on how this Assignment will be evaluated.

Assignment Requirements:
The finished Assignment should be approximately 6 pages, excluding the title and reference pages. The viewpoint and purpose of this Assignment should be clearly established and sustained.

You will locate, evaluate and summarize 5 articles

/in /by

You will locate, evaluate and summarize 5 articles. These will be displayed in a 3 ring binder notebook with an SLR format cover page. You will also print a copy of the original article (up to 10 pages per article). You will also use the exact format of this page provided at the end of this document.

Themes:

– Sports Material advances

The completed set of research articles (5 per month) should reflect your individual interests.

These materials may take different forms: articles from magazines or journals, downloaded materials, newspaper articles.

For each item, you should provide the following information:

a. the exact source of the materials (give complete bibliographical citations for print and visual materials, complete URLs for Internet downloads);

b. a brief statement (a sentence is plenty) explaining why you consider the selected item important enough – or interesting enough – for inclusion;

c. An executive summary must be written in your own words, at least 250 words per article.

10 points (total)

3 ring binder, 5 articles, formatting

5 points (total)

Referenced correctly

5 points per article

Brief statement of why chosen

10 points per article

Use own words, 250 word summary

project management knowledge

/in /by

Since this is your first project with the company, your manager would like to test your project management knowledge before you can begin to work on your own. Your manager has asked you to describe the characteristics of the project lifecycle and describe the characteristics of a successful project.

To make sure you impress her, make sure your memo includes the following points:

  • What a project is, and how it differs from a process
  • Brief discussion on all phases of a project.
  • Describe two criteria that may be used to select a project.

If you need a reference, look to your text (Gido, Clements & Baker , 2018, pg 10-14)

All assignments should be completed in a Word document using correct APA formatting (Headers, one inch margins and double spacing, title page and References page, etc.). Please complete the essay in a Microsoft Word document. Essays that are pasted into the Assignments area will not be accepted. The length of your essay response should be around 600 words. Points will be deducted for incorrect grammar, punctuation and spelling errors.

amswer question below

/in /by

Use the Ashford Library to research a prominent leader, living or deceased, who you admire. Explain whether the leader’s style is transactional or transformational. What type of leadership characteristics does the leader demonstrate? What aspects of servant leadership does the leader exhibit? Provide relevant examples to support your claims.

The paper should be three to four pages in length (excluding title and reference pages). At least two scholarly references (a minimum of one being from the Ashford Library) plus the course textbook must be utilized in the research. The paper should also reflect proper APA format and style and integrate resources with in-text citations to support the writing. Vocabulary and course content should be integrated throughout the paper.

MUST USE SCHOLARLY SOURCES

Discipline of Religious Studies and Philosophy.

/in /by

These terms are important to both the discipline of Religious Studies and Philosophy.

For this discussion, consider the following central terms. Briefly state whether or not you knew any of these terms prior to the class, then look up several definitions for each term and, in your own words, offer a brief definition for each. You can quote brief (3 words top) phrases from online definitions but the idea is to figure a way to understand it/say it in your own words. Finally, after defining each term, comment briefly on some of your preconceived ideas about these concepts and what thoughts they provoke.

These terms will come up over and over in our discussions, so take the time to know them well.

1) selfhood

2) soteriology

3) apotheosis

4) eschatology

5) cosmic dualism

Then, pose a question for further discussion or a comment about what you’d like to learn from this class or your first impressions of the material.

Discussion Board Post #6

/in /by

A 28-year-old woman is seen at her gynecologist’s office to confirm an early pregnancy.  Discuss what dietary requirements for pregnancy are essential regarding the hematological system (iron, folate).  What role does nutrition have on the developing baby?  What interventions may be suggested to promote the health and prevention of pathologies for the woman and her unborn child?  Where does hematopoiesis occur after birth (erythrocytes, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets).  Within the first year of life what is normal for a child regarding lymphocyte count, platelet count, lymphocyte count, and eosinophil count?

Communicating Nursing-Specific and Interdisciplinary Knowledge

/in /by

Purpose:

To remain current in the field of nursing, the professional nurse must be able to communicate nursing-specific and interdisciplinary knowledge within a complex, highly technical, and rapidly changing health care environment. Pursuing higher levels of education such as your baccalaureate degree is just one step in accomplishing this purpose.

Tasks:

In a minimum of 200 words, post your response to the following:

  • In what ways can the professional nurse use the capstone project to communicate nursing-specific and interdisciplinary knowledge within a complex, highly technical, and rapidly changing health care environment?
  • Justify your response from the readings or articles from the Argosy University online library resources.

Week 3 Short Paper – Data Backup/Disaster Recovery

/in /by

Define, describe and identify the elements of (a) good Data Backup Planning, (b) good Disaster Recovery Planning, and (c) good Business Continuity Planning. Be sure to identify and describe any interdependencies in the planning.

The paper must following the formatting guidelines in The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2010), (6th ed., 7th printing), and contain a title page, four references, three to five pages of content, and a reference page. In addition, the paper will be submitted through the SafeAssign originality-checking tool. More APA assistance can be found at the Purdue University Online Writing Lab.

The rubric for this assignment can be viewed when clicking on the above assignment link, which you will use to submit your assignment.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

/in /by

Reading Research Literature Guidelines

Updated 8/11/2017

Purpose

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)

Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.

Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

  1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

  1. Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  2. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  3. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
  4. Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.
  5. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
  6. Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.
10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

 9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

 8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

 4.0 pts

Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any purpose for the research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.
10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

 9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

 8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

 4.0 pts

Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any research question.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes the research design of the study.

 9.0 pts

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

 8.0 pts

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

 4.0 pts

Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any research design.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.
10.0 pts

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

 9.0 pts

Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

 8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

 4.0 pts

Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any population.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?
10.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

 9.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

 8.0 pts

Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

 4.0 pts

Misidentifies the sampling approach.

 0.0 pts

Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure
10.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

 8.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

 4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe any data collection procedures.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed
10.0 pts

Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

 8.0 pts

Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

 4.0 pts

Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe how data were analyzed.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

 8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

 4.0 pts

Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe any limitations for the study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

 8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

 4.0 pts

Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe any author conclusions.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.
10.0 pts

Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

 9.0 pts

Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

 8.0 pts

Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

 4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.
10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

 9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article

 8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

 4.0 pts

Offers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any purpose for the research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.
10.0 pts

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

 9.0 pts

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

 8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

 4.0 pts

Offers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any research question.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes the research design of the study.

 9.0 pts

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

 8.0 pts

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

 4.0 pts

Offers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any research design.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.
10.0 pts

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

 9.0 pts

Mostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article.

 8.0 pts

Somewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article.

 4.0 pts

Offers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article.

 0.0 pts

Does not identify any population.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?
10.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate.

 9.0 pts

Correctly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate.

 8.0 pts

Correctly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate.

 4.0 pts

Misidentifies the sampling approach.

 0.0 pts

Doesn’t explain any sampling approach.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in detail.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes the data collection procedure in general.

 8.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it.

 4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe any data collection procedures.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed?
10.0 pts

Correctly describes how the all of the data were analyzed.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes how most of the data were analyzed.

 8.0 pts

Describes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation.

 4.0 pts

Describes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe how data were analyzed.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the limitations in the study.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the limitations in the study.

 8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two.

 4.0 pts

Minimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe any limitations for the study.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.
10.0 pts

Correctly describes all of the authors’ conclusions.

 9.0 pts

Correctly describes most of the authors’ conclusions.

 8.0 pts

Correctly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two.

 4.0 pts

Minimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe any author conclusions.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.
10.0 pts

Describes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field.

 9.0 pts

Generally, describes how this research advances knowledge.

 8.0 pts

Briefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

 4.0 pts

Incorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

 0.0 pts

Does not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and WritingNames file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
25.0 pts

Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

 22.0 pts

One to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

 20.0 pts

Five to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

 10.0 pts

Nine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax

 0.0 pts

Thirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

25.0 pts

Total Points: 225.0