This is interactive virtual family situation that class has to read through, after I reach each section I copied and pasted each section to Word document which I will attach. I am sorry, it is a very detailed document I included info which I might have needed to. I didn’t want to miss one tidbit of information.

Answer these questions for Asia for each age group: 2 mon old, 6 mon old and and 9 month old.

Apply information from the Aquifer Case Study to answer the following questions:

• Discuss the history that you would take on this child in preparation for the well-child visit. Include questions regarding her growth and development that are appropriate for her age.
• Describe the developmental tool to be used for Asia, its reliability and validity and how Asia scored developmentally on this tool. Is she developmentally appropriate for her age?
• What immunizations will Asia be given at this visit; what is the patient education and follow-up?

NO COVERAGE PAGE OR NUMBERS. PLEASE USE APA FORMAT AND REFERENCES. I DO NOT KNOW IF IT WILL LET ME CHOOSE HOW MANY PAGES OPTION.

The Literature Review

This week, we will be expanding on the work we started in week two of this course. Rather than just analyzing resources, this week we will be blending our resources into a larger frame, drawing connections between each of the resources and to our project thesis. For a refresher on the final project criteria, see our preview.

A literature review has two specific goals:

• To demonstrate that you, the researcher, have done your due diligence in exploring the work other researchers have done in the area; and
• To ground the theory in the current research available.

You should think of your literature review as a way to tell a story about your research using sources as guideposts along the way. Think about your role in this as a moderator in a discussion between your sources, and your job is to keep them focused on your thesis (this is usually the first section of a research article, so you should use the literature reviews of your sources as a model for what we are doing here).

You will need a minimum of five (5) sources in your literature review (you will need a total of ten in your Final Project). Consider the following to help you gather these sources:

• Do a library search using Grantham’s EBSCOhost library database or from Google Scholar
• Use key words to search (try different variations)
• Only use scholarly books or peer-reviewed journal articles
• Choose sources from within the past 5 years (you can set your EBSCO search to only show articles within this range)
• Read titles to see what looks relevant (don’t waste your time reading things that don’t look like they will work for your project)
• Read the abstracts and only choose the most pertinent articles (once again, don’t waste your time—if the abstract doesn’t seem promising, move on to the nerxt article).

Please note: information from the Internet may not be used for this project unless the source is from an e-journal (a peer-reviewed journal that is published on the web). The organization’s website is an exception to this rule, but it can only count as one of your ten sources.
Assignment

Create a literature review, incorporating each of your references (minimum of five), tying them to each other and to the thesis of your project in a single narrative. You should cite each source in the body of your literature review and in a references page at the end of your paper.

Your literature review should be arranged in the following way:

• Introduction: A concise definition of the topic and organization with which you are working. A clearly stated thesis of your project. A brief description about how this project might be interesting and/or important to your readers/adudience.

• Main Body: A discussion of each of your sources, including what they are claiming, how they relate to other sources you are using, and how they support your thesis (make sure you identify and cite each source as you use them). Each work should be summarized and evaluated for its premise, scope, and conclusion. In addition, address any inconsistencies, omissions, or errors, as well as accuracy, depth, and relevance you find compelling or think might be useful to your readers/audience. Use logical connections and transitions to connect sources.

• Conclusion: The conclusion summarizes the key findings of the review in general terms. You may want to revisit commonalities and differences between your sources, whether favorable or not. Make sure you tie your work throughout this review back to your thesis.

References: As well as accurate in-text citations, your literature review must contain complete and correct APA citations for every source in a references page at the end of your review.

Background Information

The Job Accommodation Network (JAN) is a free service of the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Disability Employment Policy. JAN consultants have been providing job accommodation information to employers since 1983 after JAN was founded. In addition, JAN consultants have been providing information to employers about the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) since 1992 when the ADA went into effect. Over the years, JAN consultants have developed practical ideas to help employers provide job accommodations and comply with the ADA. The Employer’s Practical Guide to Reasonable Accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act is a summary of some of the most frequent issues that employers have regarding accommodations and ADA compliance and JAN’s practical ideas for resolving them. As new information is available or new issues develop, the Guide [is] updated to reflect the changes. (JAN, n.d., p. 3)

Job Accommodation Network. (n.d.). Employer’s practical guide to reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Retrieved from http://askjan.org/Erguide/ErGuide.pdf

Instructions

1. Review Chapter 9—“Workers with Disabilities” in The Employer’s Legal Handbook.
2. Download and review the Employer’s Practical Guide to Reasonable Accommodation.
3. Download and read the article “ADA Compliance and Reasonable Accommodation in Crisis Management: A Suggested Action Plan for Employers”
4. Open and read the web page article titled Essential Job Functions Under the ADA.
5. For this Dropbox, you will complete a three-part assignment, to include: (1) a response paper, (2) workplace accommodation policy and procedures (Appendix in the paper), and (3) two workplace accommodation plans using selected cases studies and a workplace accommodations template provided in the Doc Sharing folder.
   1. Response Paper. Download the WS3_3.4 Dropbox Response Paper Template. Save the document by adding your name to the file. Be sure to respond to each of the essay questions using single spacing and keeping within the word count range.
   2. Response Paper Appendix—Work Accommodation Policy and Procedures. Complete the appendix of the response paper. Use the headings provided and single spacing for the paragraphs, with double spacing between each of the paragraphs. The completed policy and procedures should be approximately two pages in length.
   3. Workplace Accommodation Plans. Complete a workplace accommodation plan template for each of two selected case studies.
      1. Download and save the WS3_3.4 Dropbox Case Studies.
         1. Select 2 cases from the list of 8 cases for completion of workplace accommodation plans.
         2. Click on the hyperlink for the selected case studies to review the job description (tasks, technology skills, knowledge, abilities, and so forth). If the case job title hyperlink does not work well for you, simply go to the O*Net site and look up the job number and job title. By reviewing the job duties, you will have a better understanding of what accommodations will be needed based on the situation. (In the workplace, the HR manager would typically use the job description on file.)
      2. Download the WS3_3.4 Dropbox Case Study Workplace Accommodation Plan Template. Save two copies of the case study template with the case study number and job, and your name as part of the file name, according to the following example: 3.4_Workplace Accommodation Plan_Case 2 Tellers_Student Name
         1. Complete the workplace accommodation plan based upon the reading resources provided in this workshop and additional research for specific workplace needs related to the situation, as applicable.
         2. Be sure to use critical thinking and creativity for how best to reasonably accommodate each individual with a disability.
6. Answers must be substantive with use of the language of business and employment law. See the Assignment Criteria grading rubric for assignment expectations.
7. Before submitting this assignment, thoroughly edit the written paper:
   1. Run a Word spelling and grammar check and make corrections as needed.
   2. Run a Grammarly report and make appropriate changes. Click on Grammarly to learn more about the software. Click on the following link for Grammarly sign-up to set up an account.
   3. Check for proper APA 6e Guide formatting, citations, and references.
   4. Checkmark the instructions for this assignment and checkmark the rubric to be sure your paper has fulfilled all requirements.
8. When you have completed and edited your assignment, save a copy of all documents.
9. Submit in a SINGLE SUBMISSION all three (3) documents: the response paper and the two case study workplace accommodation plans.

Click here to access the Dropbox.

Assessment Criteria

Criteria	18 Points	14-17 Points	9-13 Points	0-8 Points
Response Paper Essays	You demonstrated clear, insightful critical thinking when: Developing answers to the response paper essay questions.	You demonstrated competent critical thinking when: Developing answers to the response paper essay questions.	You demonstrated limited critical thinking when: Developing answers to the response paper essay questions.	You demonstrated little to no critical thinking when: Developing answers to the response paper essay questions.
Criteria	18 Points	14-17 Points	9-13 Points	0-8 Points
Response Paper Appendix—Workplace Accommodation Policy and Procedures	You demonstrated clear, insightful critical thinking when: Formulating a workplace accommodation policy and procedures.	You demonstrated competent critical thinking when: Formulating a workplace accommodation policy and procedures.	You demonstrated limited critical thinking when: Formulating a workplace accommodation policy and procedures.	You demonstrated little to no critical thinking when: Formulating a workplace accommodation policy and procedures.
Criteria	36 Points	28-35 Points	18-27 Points	0-17 Points
Two Workplace Accommodation Plans	You demonstrated clear, insightful critical thinking when: Creating two workplace accommodation plans using the case studies and template provided.	You demonstrated competent critical thinking when: Creating two workplace accommodation plans using the case studies and template provided.	You demonstrated limited critical thinking when: Creating two workplace accommodation plans using the case studies and template provided.	You demonstrated little to no critical thinking when: Creating two workplace accommodation plans using the case studies and template provided.
Criteria	18 Points	14-17 Points	9-13 Points	0-8 Points
Introduction, Conclusion, Length, APA, and Mechanics	There were no errors or limitations — In accordance with English standards of: Sentence structure Spelling Punctuation Capitalization Diction (tone) Word choice In assignment length. In accordance with APA 6e Guide standards for formatting, citations, and references.	There were minor errors or limitations — In accordance with English standards of: Sentence structure Spelling Punctuation Capitalization Diction (tone) Word choice In assignment length. In accordance with APA 6e Guide standards for formatting, citations, and references.	There were several errors or limitations — In accordance with English standards of: Sentence structure Spelling Punctuation Capitalization Diction (tone) Word choice In assignment length. In accordance with APA 6e Guide standards for formatting, citations, and references.	There were serious and persistent errors or limitations — In accordance with English standards of: Sentence structure Spelling Punctuation Capitalization Diction (tone) Word choice In assignment length. In accordance with APA 6e Guide standards for formatting, citations, and references.
Total Points	90

For this paper, you will write a dialogue between you and an imaginary Socrates. You will debate the question of free will versus determinism. Remember that the Socratic Method involves asking a series of questions to clarify key words and ideas. In your dialogue, the imaginary Socrates should be asking clarifying questions, and you will be answering them. Please refer to the excerpt from Plato’s Meno as an example (below). This paper should be 2–3 pages.

Your dialogue should address the following questions:

What is the definition of determinism?What is the definition of free will?Do you agree that every event has an explanatory cause?How do you define event?How do you define explanatory cause?Do you agree that every human choice or event has an explanatory cause?How do you define human choice? How do you definite human event? Are they different?Do you agree that to have an explanatory cause is to not be free?How do you define free?Do you think that free will and determinism can coexist in any way?Is it possible to have external determinism and internal free will?

To have cohesion and reach solid conclusions, your imaginary Socrates will probably ask you more questions than the ones listed above. Be sure to include all of the above ideas in your dialogue.

Your dialogue should also include all of the following:

Use of the Socratic Method to form all conclusions (this will be achieved by the question and answer dialogue between you and the imaginary Socrates)Clear and concise language, using proper spelling, grammar, and punctuationCorrect definitions of free will and determinismLogical explanations and valid reasoning for each conclusionClear answers to each question with a definite stance or positionYou must reach a conclusive answer to each question2–3 pages in length

The following is an excerpt from Plato’s Meno (Soccio, 1995):

Socrates: …Do not all men…desire the good?
Meno: I think not.
Socrates: There are some who desire evil?
Meno: Yes.
Socrates: Do you mean that they think the evils which they desire, to be good; or do they know that they are evil and yet desire them?
Meno: Both, I think.
Socrates: And do you really imagine, Meno, that a man knows evils to be evils and desires them notwithstanding?
Meno: Certainly I do.
Socrates: And desire is [for] possession?
Meno: Yes, [for] possession…
Socrates: Well, and do those who, as they say, desire evils, and think that evils are hurtful to the possessor of them, know that they will be hurt by them?
Meno: They must know it.
Socrates: And must they not suppose that those who are hurt are miserable in proportion to the hurt which is inflicted upon them?
Meno: How can it be otherwise?
Socrates: But are not the miserable ill-fated?
Meno: Yes, indeed.
Socrates: And does any one desire to be miserable and ill-fated?
Meno: I should say not, Socrates.
Socrates: But if there is no one who desires to be miserable, there is no one, Meno, who desires evil; for what is misery but the desire and possession of evil?
Meno: That appears to be the truth, Socrates, and I admit that nobody desires evil.

For
your final paper you will be developing an international business plan.
The scenario is that you have a small business in a country of your own
choice and would like to expand on a global level. This business will
be used in all of your assignments. Select a country of your choice that
you might want to explore doing business in. Review the following
website- http://geert-hofstede.com/argentina.html. Based on your
findings prepare a 4-5 page report that addresses the following:

• • Company background (inclusive of the product or service description)
  • Rationale for expanding on a global level.
  • Country selection for expansion. This needs to include:
  • Economic background of the country.
  • Customs both verbal and nonverbal.
  • Education level.
  • Income level.
  • Hofstede’s factors that might impact doing business in your selected country.
  • Justification of the selected country
  • Use at least three (3) quality references. Wikipedia does not quality as academic resources. Credible websites are acceptable.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• • Be
    typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman or Ariel font (size 12),
    following APA formatting inclusive of: title page, headers, page
    numbers, citations and references. The title and reference page are not
    included in the page count.

Course Outcomes:

Examine the international business environment

Analyze feasibility of entering an international market

Course Objectives:

Examine international economies

Understand cultural influences on international business