Assignment 1: Course Project Task VI/Final Literature Review

In this module, revise the Literature Review for final submission based on feedback from the instructor and the Turnitin report. Submit the final submission of your literature by the due date assigned.

Your facilitator used the very detailed Module 6 Assignment and Grading criteria to provide feedback and suggest corrections to your literature review draft. Return to those materials to review and correct your draft, turning it into a final version. Ask yourself if you have accomplished the following:

• Written an effectively organized paper, with an introduction [including the 4 essential elements], a body with sub headings that matched your introductory map, and a conclusion/summary that returned to your introductory purpose, map, and key themes.
• Explained the significance of your research topic and clearly stated a relational research question–as a question [?]; supported the importance of and/or benefits of studying your topic and question, with demographics and statistics..
• Used themes or another clearly organized way to analyze and synthesize the relationships and differences among and across the studies.
• Identified a theory base or conceptual framework.
• Had a minimum length of 10 pages and a minimum of 10 references; at least 1/2 were clearly marked as qualitative or quantitative studies.
• Cross-listed the well formatted in-text citations with the Reference page, and utilized appropriate APA guidelines and format.
• Submitted a nearly error-free paper, denoting the use of spell check and proofreading.
• Wrote clearly and succinctly throughout the paper, utilizing active voice when appropriate.

Read your instructor’s comments and feedback on your first draft of the literature review as soon as you receive it. After you have completed your reading, take time to analyze the feedback and note the primary areas where you will need to make changes. As you go through your facilitator’s comments, look for the following common areas for improvement, often cited in first drafts:

• Were there consistent comments related to the same areas, for example, APA citation or grammar errors? Were themes clearly stated in the map and then used as sub headings in the body of the paper? Were themes supported by examples from different literature sources?
• Was there a specific element missing from your first draft, for example, lack of a discussion of a theoretical base?
• Were biased or opinionated statements made, with no data or examples provided for support?

Also, review and interpret the Turnitin report carefully and correct citations and parahrases as needed.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA style in formatting and attributing sources.

Complete the finalization of your literature review, incorporating the feedback received from your facilitator. Submit the document to the Submissions Area and name the file W7000_M7_A2_lastname_firstinitial.doc.

Note: Use the Highlight feature of Microsoft Word to identify areas where you have made corrections or developed additional content in response to feedback received.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Please make sure you review the elements of the grading criteria and associated points carefully and make sure your assignment has addressed all the elements and in enough detail to merit full points.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria	Maximum Points
Provided a clear introduction with all essential parts; described the significance of the topic and question and ended with a summary that returned to the essentials of the introduction	12
Clearly stated the research question-as a question; situated the research focus in broader scholarly literature and/or in a historical context, discussing its significance, using demographics and/or statistics.	8
Identified a theory base or conceptual framework; highlighted its relevance to the research question and literature sources.	8
Analyzed and synthesized the literature around the basic themes used as sub headings to organize it, using details, examples, appropriate quotes and paraphrases to support the clear topic sentences of each heading/paragraph.	12
Identified and explained the gaps found in the literature, tying these to potential places your future work might fit into the scholarly conversation; Identified and explained what scholars had suggested is needed for future research	12
Chose and identified references for the literature review that were scholarly and clearly related to the research question.	8
Displayed accurate APA Style and format, presenting information in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship with accurate in-text citations and references; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation, showing strong evidence of very careful proofreading.	12
To Rubric Name: W7000_M6A1_Grading Rubric Criteria Maximum Points Score and Feedback GR1 Introductory paragraph[s]: Clearly stated the research topic and question [question format]; explained the significance of the topic, in the broader scholarly literature and/or in historical context; provided a clear purpose of the literature review, a 10 points 10 points GR2 Sub headings clearly matched the themes stated in the map. Each paragraph had clear topic sentences that followed the sub heading, stating the themes/patterns and in a statement of what you intended to analyze/synthesize within that theme area, clearly 10 points 10 points GR3 Identified a theory base or conceptual framework; highlighted its relevance to your research question. 4 points 4 points GR4 Evaluated the literature and analyzed the relationships and differences among related studies. 6 points 6 points GR5 Identified and explained the gaps you found in the literature, as well as some areas for additional study, as suggested by researchers. 6 points 6 points GR6 Chose a minimum of 10 references for the literature review that were clearly related to the research question. 4 points 4 points GR7 Summarized the literature review and included all significant points in your own summary paragraph at the end, also returning to your purpose and map, to bring closure to your literature review draft. 4 points 4 points GR8 Displayed accurate APA style and format by presenting information in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship with accurate in-text citations and references; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation–especia 8 points 4 points You must cite your references throughout the document to avoid taking the credit for what other researchers’ work. Please refer to your APA Manual in levels of titles. Focus on making shorter sentences for clarity. Remember, people from all parts of the world will review your research. Dr. Austin Overall Score Total Score 0 or more Score and Feedback Overall Score 48 points Feedback Score 48 / 52 – 92.31 % Feedback Date Jun 16, 2018 2:06 PM Submission Feedback GR8 Displayed accurate APA style and format by presenting information in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship with accurate in-text citations and references; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation–especia: You must cite your references throughout the document to avoid taking the credit for what other researchers’ work. Please refer to your APA Manual in levels of titles. Focus on making shorter sentences for clarity. Remember, people from all parts of the world will review your research. Dr. Austin tal:	72

https://www.thebraudisgroup.com/wp-content/uploads…

After reading the article, post a three-paragraph response to the discussion questions. (no word limit as long as the questions are answered fully & properly). Please read the questions carefully:

Q1. After reading “What Makes a Leader” conduct a self-audit of your strengths and weaknesses for each of Goleman’s five components of Emotional Intelligence (See article page four). Write a one-paragraph explanation of your self-audit results.

Q2. Based on your self-audit, pick one strength that you can leverage to further improve your leadership performance. Describe how you can further leverage your strength in your present situation, and how it supports your working relationships as a leader.

Q3. Based on your self-audit, pick one weakness that you can focus on improving to further develop your leadership performance. Describe how you can develop your skills and EI (Emotional Intelligence) to turn the weakness into a strength. How can take your leadership skills to a higher level using the principles of EI.

Find additional sources to expand the conversation around Emotional Intelligence as relates to leadership and cite all source(s) please.

Please do a paragraph about this post with this instruction . post most have  4 or more  sentences .you also have to have a high quality post from a content perspective. This means it also needs to do more than agree with or praise a class mate. If you agree with a classmate, explain why, give an example, share what you learned in the readings

Quantitative research is a formal, objective rigorous, systemic process for generating numerical information about the world.  It is conducted to describe new situations, events, or concepts; examine relationships among variables; and determine the effectiveness of treatments or interventions on selected health outcomes in the world. The Quantitative methods (approaches) commonly used are; Descriptive, Correlational, Quasi-experimental and Experimental.  Its research is a scientific investigation conducted to generate knowledge that will directly influence through evidence-base practice to improve clinical practice.  

Qualitative research is a systematic approach through oral and written description used to describe experiences and situations from the perspective of the person in the situation.  Qualitative methods seek to provide a holistic picture of the human experience. Qualitative research is also rigorous because it is detailed build with careful data collection and thoroughness of analysis.  For this reason, it is valued and deemed more credible and of greater worth (Bellali, 2011).  The findings from a qualitative study, leads to an understanding of a phenomenon in a particular situation and are not generalized in the same way as a quantitative study. Qualitative method increases the nurses’ understanding of the best way to intervene and be supported.

Mixed methods research is valuable, appreciating the different blends of knowledge claims, enquiry strategies, and methods combining quantitative and qualitative research techniques, methods, approaches, concepts or language into a single study. Investigator collects and analyzes data, integrates the findings, and draws inferences using both qualitative and quantitative approaches (Maudsley, 2011).  Another advantage is that qualitative method will gives insight to the statistical quantitative method for better understanding.  The disadvantage is that including both methods can be rigorous, as the write-ups should report the ‘mixing’, as appropriate, rather than reporting qualitative–quantitative components separately.  Write-ups should also explicitly highlight what has been mixed and implicitly acknowledging the required rigour, expertise, time, and effort (Maudsley, 2011).

Identify and discuss
the role of supervisors in holding law enforcement officers accountable. Why is
this important?

At
the end of your answer, identify one of the Saint Leo University Core Values,
and explain how it relates to your answer.

Excellence
Saint Leo University is an educational enterprise. All of us, individually and
collectively, work hard to ensure that our students develop the character,
learn the skills, and assimilate the knowledge essential to become morally
responsible leaders. The success of our University depends upon a conscientious
commitment to our mission, vision, and goals.

Community
Saint Leo University develops hospitable Christian learning communities
everywhere we serve. We foster a spirit of belonging, unity, and interdependence
based on mutual trust and respect to create socially responsible environments
that challenge all of us to listen, to learn, to change, and to serve.

Respect
Animated in the spirit of Jesus Christ, we value all individuals’ unique
talents, respect their dignity, and strive to foster their commitment to
excellence in our work. Our community’s strength depends on the unity and
diversity of our people, on the free exchange of ideas, and on learning,
living, and working harmoniously.

Personal Development
Saint Leo University stresses the development of every person’s mind, spirit,
and body for a balanced life. All members of the Saint Leo University community
must demonstrate their commitment to personal development to help strengthen
the character of our community.

Responsible Stewardship
Our Creator blesses us with an abundance of resources. We foster a spirit of
service to employ our resources for University and community development. We
must be resourceful. We must optimize and apply all of the resources of our
community to fulfill Saint Leo University’s mission and goals.

Integrity
The commitment of Saint Leo University to excellence demands that its members
live its mission and deliver on its promise. The faculty, staff, and students
pledge to be honest, just, and consistent in word and deed.

Listen. Learn. Share. Serve.
We’ll give you all the tools you need to make a positive impact on the world.
Your time here won’t just prepare you for a great career — it will help you
become a better person.